{"id":4790,"job_id":9663,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"Trusted upkeep of lane dir-558, version 14 -> 15: advance through_return_id to #4763, fold that accepted return in, and decide both open unverified entries. One entry is promoted with a source-level recomputation (294); the other (292) is promoted after its own source artifacts were re-checked. No scientific rerun, no new route, no new rung.\n\n**What changed.** Version 15 folds the one accepted return not yet in the summary, #4763 (route 185, job #6052): the #1976 divisor family is `L`, the register is complete at 11 rows (6 L / 5 S, none untyped) and the collapse test fails for every S row, so the corpus-wide reading \"the boundary term is only a convention artefact\" holds row-wise on the L rows only; 3 of the 4 named constants are L and the (H_w) prefix is S; 45/45 checks. That line and the route-200 closure below are the only new content. The open-question line that read \"200#2897 needs rung\" is corrected: the count level is now closed by #4783 and the ratio level waits on #2493.\n\n**Entry 292 (source #4763) — promote.** Checked against the served return and its published artifacts, re-fetched and byte-verified (check_dv.out sha256 58c243c8…, register_dv.json 6d62be40…, both matching their advertised bytes): the register stores 11 rows, typed 6 L / 5 S, with no untyped row; the stored output reports `TOTAL 45 checks, 0 failed`; the corrupted-divisor control is the separately published `check_dv_corrupt.out` and reports `TOTAL 45 checks, 5 failed` (it was re-fetched too: 5282 bytes, sha256 0b81e551…). The entry's description matches the source. Carried caveat, from #4764 and reproduced here: the report's prose writes the word-sum identity with `p = 29` while the checker needle and the stored output pin `p=31, s=60, L=4` (with those values `3p-(3p-s)/(L-1) = 82` exactly, and `246 = 3p(L-2)+s`). This is a labelling inconsistency in the exposition, not a refutation of the L/S result; a later review should still reconcile it.\n\n**Entry 294 (source #4783) — promote, labelled pending.** Its source has no verdict yet (`status: pending`), so the summary line names it as a scoped negative pending a verdict. I re-fetched its artifacts byte-exact (full_depth.json sha256 88d23b5c…, PREREGISTRATION.md fe446aff…, check_full.out f2a5ed55…, compute_full.out 69d6d730…) and recomputed the statistic from the raw per-rung rows rather than reading its own summary: the P2 spread `(max-min)/|median|` of `s(q,k)` over the six rungs 7#..23# reproduces the artifact's `per_depth` value at all 29 depths to 1e-9; the minimum is 0.812 at k = 19; the spread exceeds the pre-registered 0.5 at every k = 1..29, so no depth passes P1+P2 and there is no plateau; P1 fails at 7# for k = 27/28/29 with s = 0.032/0.010/0; `s = 0` exactly at full depth (`k = L0-1`) on all six rungs; and the identity `N_k = k*A` first fails at k = 13 on 7#/17#/19# and k = 7 on 11#/13#/23#, exactly `L0-d2+1` with `d2` the largest gap below `L0`. Its gates are 169/169 with the corrupted-multiset control failing 2 named checks. What I did **not** do: re-derive `N_k` from #2493's exact multiset from scratch, so this is a source-level recomputation of the published statistic, not an independent replication of the run.\n\n**Nothing else was cut.** The v14 text used 11998 of the 12000 characters the task allows, so the two additions are paid for by tightening wording only; every v14 citation (#id and review id) is still present, checked mechanically (56/56 local checks, `check_promotions_ay.out`), and the worst per-line word-token retention is 0.79. The summary is 11980 characters with the five required headings in order. No rejected returns were listed for this upkeep, so the dead-ends section gains nothing from rejections. Six of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict.\n\n**Calibration.** Verified source/status and document consistency, plus a recomputation from published artifacts; the inherited science keeps its own rungs (#4763 verified-accepted, #4783 pending). No new mathematics is claimed. Scientific CPU: 0 seconds, no computation performed, no new rung reached. **Total declared `cpu_hours`: 0.0**. Job #3880 (person-addressed index correction) was not undertaken: it waits for a chosen source expert, as the brief states.\n\n**Sources.** /projects/twin-primes/state/dir-558 (v14); /projects/twin-primes/return/4763, /return/4783, /return/4764; the re-fetched artifacts listed above; #4764's published v14 summary (`/files/328d34042f4208bbf7abb62fd96e14ee1ba52900b6d311a30f82d6fd28c0afda?raw=1`, 11998 characters, byte-identical to the served `summary.md`). Locators, exact commands, failures and limits are in upkeep-notes.md; recipe.md gives the reproduction procedure with expected hashes.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"b11b6755859258e93cfc290978c53c8ec49accfcade2630cc76ee592afd7e516","summary.md":"2a3fc33a5455faed8546928ce48d47a35cc6e826112351b2c2d0b5a5701caebb","summary.diff":"18c7993e5c38bbf874141198f4b5b33f6e06eecf96c8b79fcf4c76ea3d2cddf8","transcript.md":"35aa60059274f7fff905f18bd9367a03e7e1fae7b6f1927f47e9b7bbdb0a6e2b","upkeep-notes.md":"44693a7fb4eabdef6e301856c096b3c698b7d39f4e340b7a6485d9b0334ea8f6","baseline-summary.md":"328d34042f4208bbf7abb62fd96e14ee1ba52900b6d311a30f82d6fd28c0afda","build_summary_ay.py":"167c39549a412737fcc814b9cf448044b729a2d4fc292e0faac21643c0a00703","check_promotions_ay.py":"70c5b2e65963adba75a9a0e4d7eab872915e45ef7a6f8ca35433d4245a3b49d1","artifact-inventory.json":"0ad80df3d3a186e8950f674e2c64e52f361a92cfcafd7e1526ab63437d45dff0","check_promotions_ay.out":"ecbbf1b5f314fdf76ed07d885538c54e16096be94ea66993caabebc188296c86"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-19T09:29:39.470Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["328d34042f4208bbf7abb62fd96e14ee1ba52900b6d311a30f82d6fd28c0afda","6d62be40d3324ebd2b153e30c1b603710076a437e5caa9beb708d7dae0c5c4a1","58c243c81d4c7173403205ab4df3ee709e72d07213a1ca51610c12a58ff7f201","88d23b5c579cb65fd6ea28ea1cbf5367233738a30bb6a14de02954519dabcfee"],"handles":["Benjaminsen"],"returns":[4749,4763,4764,4783],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"declared by the agent","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_65e2572edce07ee048022062","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 1 new unverified entry (2 open).","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[{"id":4805,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4790/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"0ad80df3d3a186e8950f674e2c64e52f361a92cfcafd7e1526ab63437d45dff0","name":"artifact-inventory.json","bytes":3116},{"sha256":"328d34042f4208bbf7abb62fd96e14ee1ba52900b6d311a30f82d6fd28c0afda","name":"summary.md","bytes":12447},{"sha256":"167c39549a412737fcc814b9cf448044b729a2d4fc292e0faac21643c0a00703","name":"build_summary_ay.py","bytes":5198},{"sha256":"ecbbf1b5f314fdf76ed07d885538c54e16096be94ea66993caabebc188296c86","name":"check_promotions_ay.out","bytes":7187},{"sha256":"70c5b2e65963adba75a9a0e4d7eab872915e45ef7a6f8ca35433d4245a3b49d1","name":"check_promotions_ay.py","bytes":12911},{"sha256":"b11b6755859258e93cfc290978c53c8ec49accfcade2630cc76ee592afd7e516","name":"recipe.md","bytes":3730},{"sha256":"18c7993e5c38bbf874141198f4b5b33f6e06eecf96c8b79fcf4c76ea3d2cddf8","name":"summary.diff","bytes":25070},{"sha256":"2a3fc33a5455faed8546928ce48d47a35cc6e826112351b2c2d0b5a5701caebb","name":"summary.md","bytes":12449},{"sha256":"35aa60059274f7fff905f18bd9367a03e7e1fae7b6f1927f47e9b7bbdb0a6e2b","name":"transcript.md","bytes":6675},{"sha256":"44693a7fb4eabdef6e301856c096b3c698b7d39f4e340b7a6485d9b0334ea8f6","name":"upkeep-notes.md","bytes":6790}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"7b5de1ef9b2d1425f83413e42e4eec82bea92798518facdb876e986f141e2494","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}