{"id":4831,"job_id":9732,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 128 step check (job #9732): the registry regeneration is still unapplied, and the patch is still byte-current\n\n**Outcome: `promising`** — the held step is still open; no return on record has applied the regeneration or re-audited a post-regeneration registry. Read-only comparison: no generator run, no patch applied, `cpu_hours 0`, no mathematics.\n\n## What was asked\n\nRoute 128's step, set by **#3295** (job #6894, 2026-10-12): apply the produced `registry_v11_to_regen.patch` to the served `research/QUESTIONS.md` under the maintainer's normal regeneration/record path, confirm that after it each of the 7 accepted W revisions has its own ledger cell served (#2329, #2256, #2237, #2275, #2313, #2327, #2318), then re-read `/history` and `/docs` and re-run the mirror-cut cell audit against the next registry version, reporting 0 unexplained cells or naming the new one.\n\n## Step custody\n\n- Route 128 is `active`, **revision 21**, `last_return_id` **3295**, `updated_at` 2026-10-12T23:47:36.870Z. Its 21 events are newest-first and the newest is #3295; no event follows the setter.\n- `route128.next_step` is **object-equal** to #3295's submitted `research.next_step`; its canonical sha256 (`json.dumps(sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'))`) is `379489ad7beca28198e9cbb0429f7625900cba4cc7fd208d795ea8830ef697fa`, identical to #3295's server-recorded `next_step_sha256`, and its `question` equals this job's `unresolved_obligation_md`.\n\n## The decisive served state\n\n- **The served registry is still v11.** `GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md` returns 627,860 bytes with sha256 `de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f` — the same bytes #3295 audited.\n- `GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md` has **11 versions** and **5 publications**; the latest publication is **#2521**, recorded 2026-10-03T11:49:35.435Z, sha `de3354dd…`. There is **no v12 publication**. The maintainer has not regenerated since 2026-10-03, so the patch has not been applied on the served edition.\n- **The patch's premise is still current.** #3295's recorded freshness probe pinned each of the 7 owning notes' served bytes on 2026-10-08. All seven notes fetched today hash **exactly** to those pinned values: `exponent-control` `8f735b41…`, `global-factor-signs` `792a363e…`, `mobius-bv-derivation` `1dd5320f…`, `oeis-seam-submission` `66067e1b…`, `signed-moment` `fe3e6694…`, `xchannel-at23` `945bc2aa…`, `xchan-at29` `f50039ea…`. The corpus has not moved, so #3295's patch (`81d4804d…`, fresh generation `67e8f4a9…`) still names the right 7 cells.\n\n## What the comparison returns settle\n\nEight returns were compared (the brief's set; route 128 itself has no post-setter return).\n\n- **#4531** (route 246, accepted result, 2026-10-18) is the only return that touches this object. It adjudicates `research/QUESTIONS.md` as a **STALE projection** inside a later repository edition: \"current physical lines 64 and 481 still say PARTIAL with the old verdict, while current accepted owner #2318 (792a363e) says ANSWERED at its bounded scope.\" It identifies accepted **#1962** (`97678f53…`, integration `conflict`) as the obsolete whole-file candidate for the two Q-global-factor-signs rows, and states: \"Restoration/regeneration work already has project obligations; this audit does not edit documents or close their findings.\" It **corroborates cell 7's staleness and the #2318 target**; it does not apply the patch or verify the other six cells.\n- **#4493** (route 246, recorded progress, 2026-10-17) records that the served copy is \"still the reviewed text as of 2026-10-16; stale-candidate signal persists\". It confirms the state #3295 audited; no application.\n- **#3467** (route 251 step check, 2026-10-13) screens #3295 as \"classifies the 7 registry-stale cells … and emits a byte-exact regeneration patch\" and calls it a **non-carrier** for its own route. It is a clean independent characterisation of #3295, not an answer.\n- **#4554, #4102, #4042, #3953, #3570** contain none of the step's identifiers (no `QUESTIONS.md`, no registry, no patch hash) and do not bear on it.\n\n**Absence screen:** none of the eight comparison returns names `registry_v11_to_regen.patch` or the fresh generation `67e8f4a9…`; none reports a post-regeneration registry version. The only registry sha any of them names is the still-served v11 `de3354dd…`.\n\n## Why `promising`, not `known` or `progress`\n\n`known` fails: nothing on record applies the patch, and the served registry still carries the earlier cells, so the step's own success clause is unmet. `progress` would require a narrowed replacement step; none is needed — #4531's new facts (the #1962 conflict and #2318 owner) are already the target #3295's patch restores, and review #573 forbids installing #1962's obsolete whole-file candidate. The step's method already says \"under the maintainer's normal regeneration/record path\", so the residual is exactly the maintainer application plus the post-application audit. Copying the step unchanged as `promising` hands that to the held pursuit with this corroboration and freshness check attached.\n\n## Scope and limits\n\n- Documentary/registry integrity only. No twin-prime, `G2`, `beta_2` or exponent claim; no mathematical object is changed.\n- The audit is read-only and bounded by the served record: there is no project-wide return index (`GET /returns` is 404), so the screen is the brief's comparison set plus route 128's own 21 events. The served registry sha and history publication list are the live state at 2026-10-19T14:53Z.\n- `cpu_hours 0`; no generator, no patch application, no note re-generation.\n\n5 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"35eb8924d75765a94951b958f62b21ff0fee7b8d2b5303668b509550a439f529","report.md":"fa32f1ab78b495d4f3d72cf8674bacd9f7b6c58341f27093a3d1dc3610bbc2c4","build_bg.py":"fc1a7ecc1df74c902136b709a5295c69b7453fe5b2dd45455d39e7f9ae072fb8","check_bg.py":"9ecd10444951e1ef04cbb85f9e771bba4d30dfdc2fb0c87cfd886f076a14f485","evidence.md":"1d639d6553d0432e9dbed8df3d1ef31437a040e7e60f5956efe6070802af4f12","fetch_bg.py":"23e9c9b0a929ee34154b176df861ddbbfa438397f9c78ae90527bd8a9a2f1b24","check_bg.out":"a5c0b452f9bbbe7561aa8d8a4295259c10019b55d4f37cf730fdf5f8c786ca56","fetch_raw.py":"4d5b385325c999cf1408325fe4e5277a0e1e78efc35e058db2c09e2c3c6d9bae","prior_art.md":"ec2dd8cb7fb3bf506ac999f2ca79194939af57149e8d4d8f9d73879c920d4bfc","transcript.md":"d3ffbe73499f51ad407c668ca73c11b9fdfd7b81bdd71d261b886721f416017e","next_step.json":"62890bc8087875da7533e1f196d0f5126b84f0aa6704a95c35e0459699d32d68","comparison_bg.json":"1ae2aaab03a32ccb74348b2cd7ba83eec6ca4a45bca7f6e2f51816dbffbaa8c1","check_bg_control.out":"2c009b33ba044ecd834e3593d17cd4d227a5fca99db9be291d65f7af011d1f52"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-19T15:08:48.565Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[3295]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"Freebuff CLI/Codebuff harness exposes no per-turn token counts (no usage file, status output or session-log field); values are never estimated.","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-19T15:09:36.502Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":128,"next_step":{"method":"Take the byte-exact patch registry_v11_to_regen.patch and apply it to the served research/QUESTIONS.md under the maintainer's normal regeneration/record path (the same served generator over the same corpus); then re-read GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md and GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md and re-run the cell comparison of this return (v11 vs the regenerated bytes must reduce to the patch exactly). Finally recompute the stale-cell set for the new registry version against a fresh generation and classify any new cell with the same two tests used here: the #1567 signature (a content sha occurring twice in a note's version list with an accepted revision between the occurrences, and a version created at the 2026-09-16T10:42:20Z cut) and the served-v11-equals-pre-cut-value test. Report 0 unexplained cells or name the new one.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Any of the 7 cells still serving an earlier revision's cell, the Q-global-factor-signs cell reverting to the pre-cut value, or a newly changed cell that matches neither a later accepted revision nor the pre-cut value.","success":"The served registry carries each of the 7 accepted revisions' own ledger cells (#2329, #2256, #2237, #2275, #2313, #2327, #2318), the Q-global-factor-signs cell is the post-cut v4 = #2318 value and no longer the pre-2026-09-16 value, and a fresh generation against the new registry version yields 0 unexplained changed cells.","question":"Apply the produced registry regeneration patch to the served edition (record, not re-apply), confirm that after it every accepted W revision of the 7 mirror-drift cells has its own ledger cell served, and re-run the mirror-cut audit against the next registry version so no new stale or cut-reverted cell appears.","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":["node","git"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[3295,4531,4493,3467],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #9732, route 128 step check (comparison only)\n\n`cpu_hours 0`; no generator run, no patch applied, no cell re-derived. Every fact is read from this\nrun's own snapshots in `served/` (written by `fetch_bg.py`/`fetch_raw.py` through `sah.api`) and\nre-derived by `check_bg.py` (65 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0).\n\n## 1. Step custody\n\nRoute 128: `active`, revision **21**, `last_return_id` **3295**, updated 2026-10-12T23:47:36.870Z,\n21 events newest-first, newest **#3295** — no post-setter event. `route128.next_step` is object-equal\nto #3295's `research.next_step`; canonical sha256\n`379489ad7beca28198e9cbb0429f7625900cba4cc7fd208d795ea8830ef697fa` equals #3295's recorded\n`next_step_sha256`; the step's `question` equals the job's `unresolved_obligation_md`.\n\n## 2. Served registry (the obligation's target)\n\n- `GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md` → 627,860 bytes, sha256\n  `de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f` (v11, exactly #3295's audited bytes).\n- `GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md` → 11 versions, 5 publications; latest **#2521**,\n  recorded 2026-10-03T11:49:35.435Z, sha `de3354dd…`. No v12 publication: the regeneration is unapplied.\n- #3295's own report says \"The served registry is still v11 (`de3354dd`), i.e. the maintainer has not\n  regenerated since 2026-10-03.\"\n\n## 3. Patch premise remains current (freshness probe)\n\n#3295 pinned the 7 owning notes' served bytes on 2026-10-08. Re-fetched today, all 7 match exactly:\n\n| cell | ledger note | sha256 (pinned = today) |\n|---|---|---|\n| Q-exponent-control | research/exponent-control.md | `8f735b41…` |\n| Q-global-factor-signs | research/global-factor-signs.md | `792a363e…` |\n| Q-mobius-bv-derivation | research/mobius-bv-derivation.md | `1dd5320f…` |\n| Q-oeis-seam-submission | research/oeis-seam-submission.md | `66067e1b…` |\n| Q-signed-moment | research/signed-moment.md | `fe3e6694…` |\n| Q-xchannel-at23 | research/history/staging/xchannel-at23.md | `945bc2aa…` |\n| Q-xchannel-closedform | research/history/staging/xchan-at29.md | `f50039ea…` |\n\nSo the 7-cell patch (`81d4804d…`, fresh generation `67e8f4a9…`) is still byte-current.\n\n## 4. Comparison returns (brief's set; route 128 has no post-setter return)\n\n| return | route | status/outcome | identifiers found | what it settles |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| #4531 | 246 | accepted/result | QUESTIONS.md ×2, de3354dd ×2, #2318 `792a363e` ×2, #1962 `97678f53` ×2, Q-global-factor-signs ×1 | QUESTIONS is a **STALE projection**; lines 64/481 still PARTIAL while accepted owner #2318 says ANSWERED; #1962 is `conflict`; \"this audit does not edit documents or close their findings\" |\n| #4493 | 246 | recorded/progress | QUESTIONS.md ×3, de3354dd ×2 | served copy still the reviewed text as of 2026-10-16 |\n| #3467 | 251 | recorded/progress | QUESTIONS.md ×1 | #3295 = 7-cell classification + patch; **non-carrier** there |\n| #4554 | 36 | accepted/result | none | unrelated weighted-sieve step |\n| #4102 | 139 | recorded/progress | none | unrelated patch-row audit |\n| #4042 | 141 | accepted/result | none | unrelated integrated-bytes audit |\n| #3953 | 169 | recorded/progress | none | unrelated step check |\n| #3570 | 111 | recorded/progress | none | unrelated source-custody check |\n\n**Absence screen:** none of the eight names `registry_v11_to_regen.patch` or `67e8f4a9…`; none reports a\npost-regeneration registry version. Only #4531 and #4493 name a registry sha, and it is the still-served\nv11 `de3354dd…`.\n\n## 5. Reproduction and control\n\n`check_bg.py` re-reads the snapshots, recomputes the canonical step sha, the served-registry sha, the\nhistory latest publication, the 7 note hashes, the 8 status/outcome rows and the identifier screen;\n**65 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0** (`check_bg.out`). `--corrupt` plants route-revision, registry-sha,\nnote-drift and false-carrier mutations: **4 FAIL, exit 1** (`check_bg.control.out`).","prior_art_md":"# Prior art / record note — job #9732 (route 128 step check)\n\n**External prior art: none added; none needed.** This step is documentary registry bookkeeping — a\ngenerated index (`research/QUESTIONS.md`) versus the ledger cells of the notes it indexes. It makes no\nmathematical claim and does not re-open any literature search. The route's own `prior_art_md` and the\naccepted returns below are the record it builds on.\n\n**Internal chain (all served, read here).**\n\n- **#2421** (`recorded`, job #4779, 2026-10-06) — the 12-cell classification that first identified\n  `research/QUESTIONS.md` as a served registry whose cells can lag the notes; set the next step for a\n  fresh-baseline regeneration.\n- **#2535** (`recorded`, job #4802) and **#2550** (`recorded`, job #5155) — the fresh-baseline\n  generation and the `analysis_ew.json`/`classification_ew.json` cell tables. #2550 pinned the\n  served-corpus mirror on which the 7-cell set is defined and produced the predecessor evidence for\n  #3295.\n- **#3295** (`recorded`, job #6894, 2026-10-12) — the **setter**. Classifies all 7 mirror-drift cells\n  (6 forward later-edits + 1 reversion-signature cell, `Q-global-factor-signs`), emits the byte-exact\n  `registry_v11_to_regen.patch` (`81d4804d…`, 10 hunks) and verifies it applies to v11 to give the\n  fresh generation `67e8f4a9…`. Its recorded freshness probe pinned the 7 notes on 2026-10-08; the same\n  probe re-read today matches byte-for-byte. Its own scope note: served-record integrity only, no\n  mathematics and no live registry modified.\n- **#4531** (route 246, accepted result, 2026-10-18) — independent documentary audit. Confirms\n  `research/QUESTIONS.md` is a **STALE projection** inside a later repository edition, names accepted\n  **#1962** (`97678f53…`, integration `conflict`) as the obsolete whole-file candidate, and current\n  accepted owner **#2318** (`792a363e…`) as the ANSWERED target. It explicitly does **not** edit\n  documents or close the regeneration obligation.\n- **#4493** (route 246, recorded progress) — served copy still the reviewed text as of 2026-10-16.\n- **#3467** (route 251 step check) — independent characterisation of #3295 as the 7-cell\n  classification plus patch, non-carrier for route 251.\n\n**The 7 accepted W revisions the patch must serve:** #2329 (`Q-exponent-control`, verified), #2256\n(`Q-mobius-bv-derivation`, verified), #2237 (`Q-oeis-seam-submission`, verified), #2275\n(`Q-signed-moment`, verified), #2313 (`Q-xchannel-at23`, heuristic), #2327 (`Q-xchannel-closedform`,\nverified), #2318 (`Q-global-factor-signs`, verified — the post-cut v4).\n\n**What the step still owes (unchanged by this return).** The maintainer application of the patch to the\nserved edition, then a re-read of `/history` and `/docs` showing each of the 7 ledger cells, the\n`Q-global-factor-signs` cell at v4 = #2318 and no longer the pre-2026-09-16 value, and a fresh\nmirror-cut audit against the new registry version with 0 unexplained changed cells. Review #573 of\n#1962 forbids installing #1962's obsolete whole-file candidate; the fresh regeneration restores #2318,\nso the step's target is unaffected."},"research_route_id":128,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_10f1bdb007df7ebeeb87fce6","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #128's next experiment was set by return #3295, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Take the byte-exact patch registry_v11_to_regen.patch and apply it to the served research/QUESTIONS.md under the maintainer's normal regeneration/record path (the same served generator over the same corpus); then re-read GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md and GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md and re-run the cell comparison of this return (v11 vs the regenerated bytes must reduce to the patch exactly). Finally recompute the stale-cell set for the new registry version against a fresh generation and classify any new cell with the same two tests used here: the #1567 signature (a content sha occurring twice in a note's version list with an accepted revision between the occurrences, and a version created at the 2026-09-16T10:42:20Z cut) and the served-v11-equals-pre-cut-value test. Report 0 unexplained cells or name the new one.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"Any of the 7 cells still serving an earlier revision's cell, the Q-global-factor-signs cell reverting to the pre-cut value, or a newly changed cell that matches neither a later accepted revision nor the pre-cut value.\",\"success\":\"The served registry carries each of the 7 accepted revisions' own ledger cells (#2329, #2256, #2237, #2275, #2313, #2327, #2318), the Q-global-factor-signs cell is the post-cut v4 = #2318 value and no longer the pre-2026-09-16 value, and a fresh generation against the new registry version yields 0 unexplained changed cells.\",\"question\":\"Apply the produced registry regeneration patch to the served edition (record, not re-apply), confirm that after it every accepted W revision of the 7 mirror-drift cells has its own ledger cell served, and re-run the mirror-cut audit against the next registry version so no new stale or cut-reverted cell appears.\",\"budget_hours\":1,\"required_tools\":[\"node\",\"git\"],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #1400, #1402, #1556, #1567, #1630, #1828, #1987, #2051, #2072, #2169, #2177, #2181, #2293, #2304, #2308, #2391, #2421, #2535, #2550, #3295 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #4554 (route 36, result, accepted, proven): **What the evidence changes.** The held step asked whether `sup_{Q,N} mu(Q,N)/(log Q)^2` is finite with an explicit absolute `C` for `W <= C (log Q)^2 L_full`. The answer is NO, with both sides pinned. (1) Exact ceiling (proof, machine-checked). With `v_q(a) = (q/phi(q)) Sum*_{x mod q}|S(x/q)|^2 >= 0`, `W = Sum_q 3^{nu(q)} v_q` (squarefree q) and `L_full = Sum_q v_q`, so `W/L_full <= max_{q<=Q} 3\n- Return #4531 (route 246, result, accepted, verified): Completed the exact refreshed documentary obligation. All seven unresolved paths adjudicated: QUESTIONS has stale generated factor cells inside newer repository v11; #1962 is a conflict branch and #3777's accepted owner binding did not integrate its six-row companion. Centered-discrepancy v3 equals v1, losing accepted #83. Wall-note is a newer edition; GLOSSARY #2322, RML #2311, L7 #2059 and Mobiu\n- Return #4493 (route 246, progress, recorded, recorded): Custody. Route record research-routes/246 (route246.json): revision 2, active, last_return_id 2675, updated_at 2026-10-10T03:27:06.546Z, events only 1330 (return 2628) and 1349 (return 2675). Served next_step is parsed-equal to #2675's submitted one (return-2675.json); method-string sha256 1ed2db08a2a631ba99c0a913de26cb6a73e371ad03cc958fdafea4ee5ef5fd98; #2675's server-recorded next_step_sha256 0a\n- Return #4102 (route 139, progress, recorded, recorded): Machine-checked, stdlib-only, offline. Population frozen from the served record: 45 patch rows = #1522 slice-certificates.json (069a6d4b…), 12 revision rows = #1518 base-certificates.json (61debd88…). Per-row candidates = current served bytes + every /history version of the row's OLD and NEW names (bare names prefix-probed), plus the row's own served uploads; each /files byte sha-checked (131/131)\n- Return #4042 (route 141, result, accepted, measured): # Evidence — route 141: integrated-bytes outputs for the 5 content-matched queue rows **Claim.** For the 5 rows #1453 skipped that #2176 matched to a served path, applying the patch to the matched path yields a determinate integrated-bytes sha256 at the base each was produced from: - #11 `research/a3-08-adjacent-pairs.js`, base v1 `a1a074f3…` → `1351dbbb312f92f5fabeb8a03799bdc501f16c879d29c601c7\n- Return #3953 (route 169, progress, recorded, recorded): **Verdict: `progress`.** No return on record answers route 169's held step (set by #1928, held pursuit #4316) — and the step is **not shippable as written**, because its success/failure clauses are the 2-se edges of the log-log fit that the trusted review of #1928 (review 562) withdrew. The extension it asks for stays; its decision rule is replaced by the next_step this return carries. Evidence is\n- Return #3570 (route 111, progress, recorded, recorded): Job #4967, route 111, pursue — the case-3 (C.2) verdict at the target is decided by ONE exponent, and the primary source does not carry it as the record has it. All numbers re-derived by `check_br.py` (stdlib, exact `Fraction`, offline): **51/51 PASS, exit 0**; `--corrupt 1..9` each exit 1 with a named FAIL. ## Source custody (measured) Fouvry 1987, Ann. Sci. ENS 20, 617-640, Numdam PDF sha256 `1\n- Return #3467 (route 251, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 251 step check (job #7124) Read-only comparison; no producer run, no number recomputed, `cpu_hours 0`. Facts come from served records fetched by `work/fetch_at.py` (journaled GETs), reduced by `work/scan_at.py` to `work/scan_at.json`, and independently re-derived by `work/check_at.py` (51/51 exit 0; `--corrupt` 15 named FAIL exit 1). ## 1. Target provenance - Step set by **#2\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 128, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"3295","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3467","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4493","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4531","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/128","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4831/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"1ae2aaab03a32ccb74348b2cd7ba83eec6ca4a45bca7f6e2f51816dbffbaa8c1","name":"comparison_bg.json","bytes":5702},{"sha256":"1d639d6553d0432e9dbed8df3d1ef31437a040e7e60f5956efe6070802af4f12","name":"evidence.md","bytes":3918},{"sha256":"23e9c9b0a929ee34154b176df861ddbbfa438397f9c78ae90527bd8a9a2f1b24","name":"fetch_bg.py","bytes":2414},{"sha256":"2c009b33ba044ecd834e3593d17cd4d227a5fca99db9be291d65f7af011d1f52","name":"check_bg_control.out","bytes":143},{"sha256":"35eb8924d75765a94951b958f62b21ff0fee7b8d2b5303668b509550a439f529","name":"recipe.md","bytes":2520},{"sha256":"4d5b385325c999cf1408325fe4e5277a0e1e78efc35e058db2c09e2c3c6d9bae","name":"fetch_raw.py","bytes":1825},{"sha256":"62890bc8087875da7533e1f196d0f5126b84f0aa6704a95c35e0459699d32d68","name":"next_step.json","bytes":1906},{"sha256":"9ecd10444951e1ef04cbb85f9e771bba4d30dfdc2fb0c87cfd886f076a14f485","name":"check_bg.py","bytes":8406},{"sha256":"a5c0b452f9bbbe7561aa8d8a4295259c10019b55d4f37cf730fdf5f8c786ca56","name":"check_bg.out","bytes":32},{"sha256":"d3ffbe73499f51ad407c668ca73c11b9fdfd7b81bdd71d261b886721f416017e","name":"transcript.md","bytes":5101},{"sha256":"ec2dd8cb7fb3bf506ac999f2ca79194939af57149e8d4d8f9d73879c920d4bfc","name":"prior_art.md","bytes":3155},{"sha256":"fa32f1ab78b495d4f3d72cf8674bacd9f7b6c58341f27093a3d1dc3610bbc2c4","name":"report.md","bytes":5680},{"sha256":"fc1a7ecc1df74c902136b709a5295c69b7453fe5b2dd45455d39e7f9ae072fb8","name":"build_bg.py","bytes":5812}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"fa32f1ab78b495d4f3d72cf8674bacd9f7b6c58341f27093a3d1dc3610bbc2c4","next_step_sha256":"379489ad7beca28198e9cbb0429f7625900cba4cc7fd208d795ea8830ef697fa","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}