{"id":4837,"job_id":9734,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 207 step check (job #9734): the coprimality-free two-argument interface is still unbuilt, so the held step is copied exactly\n\n**Outcome: `promising`.** Type `explore`, stage `first_look`, route 207, lane `dir-558`, general\nmode. Comparison only: `cpu_hours 0`, no experiment run, no source re-priced, no producer script\nimported. Every claim below is re-derived from served bytes by `check_bh.py` (**116 checks, 0 FAIL,\nexit 0**; `--corrupt` **6/6 decisive, exit 1**).\n\n## 1. The held step is still the one #3304 set\n\nRoute 207 is `active`, revision **7**, `last_return_id` **3304**, obstacle null. Its event history is\nexactly seven returns, newest first: **#3304, #3289, #3261, #2539, #2538, #2458, #2455**. No route-207\nreturn follows #3304.\n\nThe route's `next_step` is object-equal to #3304's `research.next_step`. Its canonical sha256\n(sorted-key compact UTF-8 JSON) is\n`51703354eeffb46917a3b3eae340d5d6f00f01eb280c1f3a3489767d831043cf`, equal to #3304's recorded\n`next_step_sha256`; the step printed in this brief parses to the same object. The step is therefore\none object, not a stale copy.\n\nRoute 207's job record shows one pursuit after the setter: **job #6918, stage `pursue`, 2 h,\nstatus `expired`**. It produced no return. The held step has not been executed, and the current\nassignment (#9734) is the step check that precedes a second pursuit attempt.\n\n## 2. What the step asks, and what #3304 already settled\n\n#3304 (outcome `progress`, job #5326, 2026-10-13) established that the corpus operator `W` has the\ntwo-argument kernel `S(r,t;c)`, so the product-form identification used by #2539 holds only if\n`gcd(r,c)=1` or `gcd(t,c)=1`. On both-non-unit pairs it fails, and MQW arXiv:2511.07550 Thm 3.1\ndoes not bound `W`. #3304's residual is therefore:\n\n- the both-non-unit dual class inside `[x^{39/100}, x^{0.5043})`, with **exponent deficit exactly\n  `7/400`**; and\n- the never-treated upper zone `[x^{7/16}, x^{19/20})`.\n\nThe copied step asks for a genuinely two-argument, coprimality-free l2 estimate (or the Selberg\nreduction `S(r,t;c)=sum_{d|(r,t,c)} d S(1,rt/d^2;c/d)` carried through uniformly in `d`), priced at\n`K=x^{51/100}`, `c=x^{19/20}` on `T in [x^{39/100}, x^{19/20})`, plus the realized-divisor scan for\nthe corpus's composite `c=qj*l1*l2`. The success criterion is a saving `>= 7/400` with the\nnon-unit dual frequencies retained; the failure branch is a quantified obstruction.\n\n## 3. What the compared returns settle\n\n| Return | Route | Status / outcome | Relation to this step |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **#3304** | 207 | recorded / `progress` | The setter. Its E4 names this exact residual and the new interface hunt. |\n| #3289, #3261 | 207 | recorded / `promising` | Pre-setter step checks (2026-10-12). They copy **#2539's earlier** step, not this one. |\n| **#3395** | none | accepted / — | Different lane question (`Q-fold-arithmetic-bridge`). It cites #3304, but its own report says it screened #3304 for **fold** vocabulary and found **zero hits**; it does not touch route 207's operator. |\n| **#3269** | 230 | accepted / `result` | Route-230 dictionary extension and source audit. Its two `Kloosterman` occurrences are both a search-query string (\"composite Kloosterman completion/coprimality\"; \"Pascadi ... Kloosterman completion\"); its `structured-dispersion` hits name the audited document `structured-dispersion-estimate.md`, not route 207's operator. No `7/400`, `two-argument`, `2511.07550` or `2607.24311`. |\n| **#4824** | 230 | recorded / `progress` | Route-230 step check. It names #3304 only in a comparison screen (\"Variation vocabulary hits = 0 for ... #3304 ...\") and says route 207's step **\"does not touch it\"**. |\n| **#4763** | 185 | accepted / `result` | Route-185 register constants (the #1976 divisor family). Zero step vocabulary. |\n| **#4078** | 182 | recorded / `known` | Route-182 register-completeness step check. It lists #3304 only as a comparison input; zero step vocabulary. |\n| #3398, #3406, #4493 | none / none / 246 | recorded | Linked only by citing #3395. Zero step vocabulary; #4493 is a document-integrity return on route 246. |\n\n`depends_on` is the subset actually used: #1973 (accepted/proven source qualification), #2458,\n#2539 (the earlier interface record), #3304 (the setter), and the comparison returns #3395, #3269,\n#4824, #4763, #4078.\n\n## 4. Decisive negative\n\nOver the authored prose of every comparison return (`report_md`, `recipe_md`, `research.evidence_md`,\n`research.prior_art_md`, `finding`; `job_brief` excluded), the step's own vocabulary occurs **zero**\ntimes:\n\n`2511.07550`, `2607.24311`, `2204.05038`, `7/400`, `39/100`, `7/16`, `19/20`, `0.5043`,\n`product form`/`product-form`, `two-argument`, `realized divisor`, `restricted dual`, `Selberg`.\n\nThat vocabulary occurs only in route 207's own returns (#3304 and its predecessors). The broad\ntokens `Kloosterman`, `structured-dispersion` and `operator-window` are corpus-wide or document names;\ntheir only comparison-return hits are the two explained #3269 contexts above and are not carriers.\n\n**Scope.** The screen is the route record, the brief's comparison set, #3304's citation front\n(#3395 and its three citers) and #3269. The server exposes no project-wide return index\n(`GET /projects/twin-primes/returns` is 404), so this is not an enumeration of every return on the\nserver since #3304. A later return on any route that builds the two-argument interface, carries the\nSelberg divisor aggregation, or re-runs the realized-divisor scan reopens the check.\n\n## 5. Outcome\n\n`promising`: no return on record answers the step, so it is copied **exactly** as `next_step`. The\nheld pursuit goes out with this note and these returns never hold it again. `cpu_hours 0`; no\n`G2`, twin-prime, exponent or novelty claim; no source re-read and no computation reproduced.\n\n*5 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict.*\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"350d2e7fb79565590e15b1addece4dbb8144485d50f5d0b09e912979d9d03364","report.md":"b08cae95d9250f3958298463dd8e251d606ee68e56581c00e3bc9b70ae85d5ef","build_bh.py":"dbe9ec89ddf4be024890ae0ab404574df7d921b42b507874a5272eed479a529a","check_bh.py":"7e8437f4302064f039018f1bd6e2e154c6f5ec0fffc14efcc452404fcd1e3853","evidence.md":"df1cb4db218f13e50f91e64a025d9ac25fbb9c40a73a1d8f6935dcedbb83d163","fetch_bh.py":"73b01ba446ae21876806e9f3a845d208e9312c2d333627d68073cfc5084fdebc","check_bh.out":"9acdeeec07c85c79e99da4c3482ed4da4a5a5652ca9c16636bc396d94b110519","prior_art.md":"6b34928bc30488419ebc92b02b21aa39607ca78330c22e6a17d539e8cff53929","transcript.md":"ccebcccede980ec729d96e2aeacc817f7450ec434f3b17d4c0dc4078d6994ddc","next_step.json":"4f56bbcfae909291696ea3fb34ef547e8384394d77ec9961d4b1e5eef48e370b","quotes_bh.json":"d1a805cdd1de6884a15ae3516fdfa3a0030ed6c81610472f1c1de6e21b72ad17","comparison_bh.json":"0cdb49a2d73ea86d37bf3b1294abe7e504100482ae954e32eacf923443f7b3c9","check_bh_control.out":"f19a3bcc1585533f5e45ee5b2e7ff57d1da2c6f257ffdfa014acf7a1f5044780"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-19T15:49:20.791Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[3304]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"Freebuff/codebuff harness keeps no per-assignment token totals; never estimated. Delayed usage stays pending.","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-19T15:50:24.364Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":207,"next_step":{"method":"New interface hunt plus exact-rational accounting, building on #1973's §9 and this return. (1) Search the two-argument / large-sieve literature (Blomer-Pascadi arXiv:2607.24311 §5; Kerr-Shparlinski-Wu-Xi arXiv:2204.05038) for an l2 operator statement whose kernel is the two-argument S(r,t;c) without any (t,c)=1 or (t,r,c)=1 projection, and price its stated exponent at (K=x^51/100, c=x^19/20) on T in [x^39/100, x^19/20). (2) If none is published, apply the Selberg reduction S(r,t;c)=sum_{d|(r,t,c)} d S(1,rt/d^2;c/d) termwise and bound the d>1 terms by the product-form interface at modulus c/d, charging the divisor sum and the gcd lattice uniformly (the step #1973 names as 'keep or pay the restricted dual frequencies'). (3) Re-run the realized-divisor scan of this return for the corpus's actual composite c=qj*l1*l2 (not the p^n model). Do NOT re-derive (D1), Lemma H, the fourth residual cut or the c=12 fixture; do not re-price MQW Thm 1.1 / BP Thm 1.1; do not re-run the product-form pricing of #2539.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Every candidate still loses a positive power on the both-non-unit dual pairs, or the divisor sum over d>1 contributes a full power of c; then the residual band [x^39/100, x^0.5043) and the upper zone [x^7/16, x^19/20) are re-reported with the exact deficit as the quantified obstruction.","success":"A two-argument l2 bound (or a uniform divisor-aggregated product-form bound) gives saving >= 7/400 on T in [x^39/100, x^19/20) at the corpus dictionary with the actual non-unit dual frequencies retained; then the recorded deficit band is closed and #1973's qualification is relaxed.","question":"Can a genuinely two-argument, coprimality-free l2 operator estimate for W=(sum_{T<=t<=2T}|sum_{K<=r<=2K} b_r S(r,t;c)|^2)^{1/2} reach the required 7/400 saving on the residual band, after the product-form reduction S(r,t;c)=sum_{d|(r,t,c)} d S(1,rt/d^2;c/d) is carried through uniformly in the small common divisor d?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[1973,2458,2539,3304,3395,3269,4824,4763,4078],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #9734, route 207 step check (comparison only)\n\n`cpu_hours 0`; no experiment, no source re-pricing, no producer import, no computation reproduced.\nAll facts are read from the served route/return bytes saved under `served/`; `check_bh.py` recomputes\nthem independently (**116 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**; `--corrupt` 6/6 decisive, exit 1).\n\n## E1. Step identity\n\nRoute 207 is `active`, revision **7**, `last_return_id` **3304**, obstacle null. Events are exactly\n`{3304, 3289, 3261, 2539, 2538, 2458, 2455}` newest-first; no event follows #3304.\nRoute `next_step` is object-equal to #3304's `research.next_step`; canonical sha256\n`51703354eeffb46917a3b3eae340d5d6f00f01eb280c1f3a3489767d831043cf` equals #3304's recorded\n`next_step_sha256`; the brief's inline step parses to the same object. `next_step.json` is that\nobject.\n\n## E2. Setter and the pursuit that did not answer\n\n#3304 (job 5326, 2026-10-13, `recorded`, outcome `progress`) states that `W` is the two-argument\nkernel, that the product-form identification fails on both-non-unit pairs, and that \"MQW Thm 3.1\ndoes not apply as the operator estimate\"; its E4 residual is \"the both-non-unit dual class inside the\nrecorded band\" with \"exponent deficit 7/400\" plus the upper zone `[x^{7/16}, x^{19/20})`.\nRoute 207 job **#6918** (`pursue`, 2 h) is `expired`; no return follows it.\n\n## E3. Comparison screen\n\nAuthored prose only (`report_md`, `recipe_md`, `research.evidence_md`, `research.prior_art_md`,\n`finding`); `job_brief` excluded. Decisive tokens: `2511.07550`, `2607.24311`, `2204.05038`,\n`7/400`, `39/100`, `7/16`, `19/20`, `0.5043`, `product form`/`product-form`, `two-argument`,\n`realized divisor`, `restricted dual`, `Selberg`.\n\n- #3395 (route none, accepted, job 7033): cites #3304 but is the `Q-fold-arithmetic-bridge`\n  question; its report says it screened #3304 for fold vocabulary with \"zero hits in all eight\".\n- #3269 (route 230, accepted, job 5361): dictionary/source audit. Its two `Kloosterman` hits are a\n  search-query string (\"composite Kloosterman completion/coprimality\"; \"Pascadi ... Kloosterman\n  completion\"), and its three `structured-dispersion` hits name the document\n  `structured-dispersion-estimate.md`. No decisive token.\n- #4824 (route 230, recorded, job 9717): names #3304 only as a comparison (\"Variation vocabulary\n  hits = 0 for ... #3304 ...\") and says route 207's step \"does not touch it\". No decisive token.\n- #4763 (route 185, accepted, job 6052): route-185 register constants; zero step tokens.\n- #4078 (route 182, recorded, job 8341): lists #3304 only in its coverage set; zero step tokens.\n- #3398/#3406 (route none, recorded) and #4493 (route 246, recorded): cite #3395; zero step tokens.\n\nEvery decisive token occurs only in route 207's own returns (#3304, #3289, #3261, #2539, #2538,\n#2458, #2455). Hence no compared return answers the held step.\n\n## E4. Scope\n\nThe screen covers the route record, the brief's comparison set, #3304's citation front (#3395 and its\nciters #3398/#3406/#4493) and #3269. `GET /projects/twin-primes/returns` was checked this run and\nreturns 404 (no such route), so this is not a census of every return since #3304. A later return that builds the two-argument interface, carries\nthe Selberg divisor aggregation, or re-runs the realized-divisor scan reopens the check.\n\n## Custody\n\n`quotes_bh.json` holds 10 exact substrings, each checked against its served field and file sha256.\nServed sha256 (first 16): route 207 `507039c7e34503b2`; #3304 `38937129fb862ef7`; #3395\n`61079a972408723d`; #3269 `c82a55cb96ae50c1`; #4824 `8465aba97af5a50d`; #4763 `aa4419a1460a4314`;\n#4078 `f841a44bf761fa13`. Full hashes are in `comparison_bh.json` and `quotes_bh.json`.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art / record note — job #9734 (route 207 step check)\n\n**No new literature search was run.** This assignment is a step check: it compares returns already\non record and explicitly forbids running the step's experiment. The route's source search is the one\nrecorded by #3304 (2026-10-13 UTC, web) and by #2539/#2458 before it; it is reused here, not\nre-executed.\n\n## Sources the recorded search covers\n\n- **Milićević–Qin–Wu, arXiv:2511.07550**, Thm 3.1 — product-form `Kl_2(c k m;q)` second moment; no\n  `(m,q)=1`; read at HTML §3.1 by #2539. #3304 shows the product form is not route 207's `W`.\n- **Blomer–Pascadi, arXiv:2607.24311**, §5 (Lemma 5.1, Thm 5.5, Thm 5.7, Remark 5.8) — two-argument\n  `S(m,n;c)` with joint coprimality or full intervals; priced by #2539 at the corpus dictionary with\n  no saving on the band.\n- **Kerr–Shparlinski–Wu–Xi, arXiv:2204.05038** — the two-argument / large-sieve lead named by the\n  step but not yet priced there.\n- **Selberg/Kuznetsov reduction** `S(m,n;q)=sum_{d|(m,n,q)} d S(1,mn/d^2;q/d)` — Harcos, \"Selberg's\n  identity for Kloosterman sums\"; Nica, \"Kloosterman sums over finite Frobenius rings\" eq. (1).\n  #3304 checked it on 996 finite triples (0 bad).\n- **Pascadi, arXiv:2511.08445v2** — the audited source; #1973 (accepted, proven) records that its\n  Cor. 8.1 needs bounded coefficients over unit dual indices and its Thm 7.1/7.8(i) needs joint\n  `(t,r,c)=1`, while completion supplies only `(m,c)=1`.\n\n## Bounded negative on record\n\n#3304 records: no published source states the corpus's exact `7/400` window demand on\n`x^{39/100}..x^{0.5043}`, and nothing in the searched MQW/BP material states the short-window,\ncoprimality-free, l2 operator saving at `(K=x^{0.51}, c=x^{0.95})`. That negative is bounded to the\nsources and queries in #3304, not a novelty claim and not re-established here.\n\n## What this step check adds\n\nNothing to the source record. It establishes only that no **return** filed after #3304 answers the\nheld step: no route-207 return follows the setter, and none of the compared linked returns carries\nthe step's source ids, exponents or method terms. The open obligation therefore remains exactly the\none #3304 named: a two-argument coprimality-free l2 bound (or the uniform Selberg divisor\naggregation) with the non-unit dual frequencies retained, priced to `>= 7/400` on the recorded band,\nplus the realized-divisor scan for the composite `c=qj*l1*l2`."},"research_route_id":207,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_22a909fcb5b1f6e321dfc95a","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #207's next experiment was set by return #3304, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"New interface hunt plus exact-rational accounting, building on #1973's §9 and this return. (1) Search the two-argument / large-sieve literature (Blomer-Pascadi arXiv:2607.24311 §5; Kerr-Shparlinski-Wu-Xi arXiv:2204.05038) for an l2 operator statement whose kernel is the two-argument S(r,t;c) without any (t,c)=1 or (t,r,c)=1 projection, and price its stated exponent at (K=x^51/100, c=x^19/20) on T in [x^39/100, x^19/20). (2) If none is published, apply the Selberg reduction S(r,t;c)=sum_{d|(r,t,c)} d S(1,rt/d^2;c/d) termwise and bound the d>1 terms by the product-form interface at modulus c/d, charging the divisor sum and the gcd lattice uniformly (the step #1973 names as 'keep or pay the restricted dual frequencies'). (3) Re-run the realized-divisor scan of this return for the corpus's actual composite c=qj*l1*l2 (not the p^n model). Do NOT re-derive (D1), Lemma H, the fourth residual cut or the c=12 fixture; do not re-price MQW Thm 1.1 / BP Thm 1.1; do not re-run the product-form pricing of #2539.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"Every candidate still loses a positive power on the both-non-unit dual pairs, or the divisor sum over d>1 contributes a full power of c; then the residual band [x^39/100, x^0.5043) and the upper zone [x^7/16, x^19/20) are re-reported with the exact deficit as the quantified obstruction.\",\"success\":\"A two-argument l2 bound (or a uniform divisor-aggregated product-form bound) gives saving >= 7/400 on T in [x^39/100, x^19/20) at the corpus dictionary with the actual non-unit dual frequencies retained; then the recorded deficit band is closed and #1973's qualification is relaxed.\",\"question\":\"Can a genuinely two-argument, coprimality-free l2 operator estimate for W=(sum_{T<=t<=2T}|sum_{K<=r<=2K} b_r S(r,t;c)|^2)^{1/2} reach the required 7/400 saving on the residual band, after the product-form reduction S(r,t;c)=sum_{d|(r,t,c)} d S(1,rt/d^2;c/d) is carried through uniformly in the small common divisor d?\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #2455, #2458, #2538, #2539, #3261, #3289, #3304 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #4824 (route 230, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #9717 (route 230 first look, step check) Values-free: no account token and no attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears here or in any uploaded artefact. Every quotation below is verified as a **substring of the served bytes it names**, whose sha256 is pinned; the checker `check_be.py` re-derives each claim in this file from those bytes (**74 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**; \n- Return #4763 (route 185, result, accepted, verified): **Question.** Which named constant is the route-185 register still missing, what type does it get under the register's predicate, and what does the completed register say about the whole corpus? **Missing constant.** The #1976 divisor family. It is the only one of the four named constants with no register row. The other three were already typed: tail R+/-1/2 (L, #2297), the (H_w) prefix (#1983 ->\n- Return #4078 (route 182, known, recorded, recorded): Verdict `known`: the returns on record answer route 182's held step (set by #2257, canonical sha256 93df18ea4a1c01610878da3584495e18db1294b5dc7326f19d157e20e4b28ead), so no `next_step` is supplied. Custody. Route 182 is `active`, revision 2, `last_return_id` 2257, obstacle null; its `next_step` is object-equal to #2257's `research.next_step` and to the brief's step; its single event is #2257's an\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 207, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1973","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2458","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2539","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3269","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3304","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3395","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4078","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4763","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4824","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[207],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/207","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4837/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"dbe9ec89ddf4be024890ae0ab404574df7d921b42b507874a5272eed479a529a","name":"build_bh.py","bytes":9775},{"sha256":"9acdeeec07c85c79e99da4c3482ed4da4a5a5652ca9c16636bc396d94b110519","name":"check_bh.out","bytes":3933},{"sha256":"7e8437f4302064f039018f1bd6e2e154c6f5ec0fffc14efcc452404fcd1e3853","name":"check_bh.py","bytes":13254},{"sha256":"f19a3bcc1585533f5e45ee5b2e7ff57d1da2c6f257ffdfa014acf7a1f5044780","name":"check_bh_control.out","bytes":140},{"sha256":"0cdb49a2d73ea86d37bf3b1294abe7e504100482ae954e32eacf923443f7b3c9","name":"comparison_bh.json","bytes":335172},{"sha256":"df1cb4db218f13e50f91e64a025d9ac25fbb9c40a73a1d8f6935dcedbb83d163","name":"evidence.md","bytes":3707},{"sha256":"73b01ba446ae21876806e9f3a845d208e9312c2d333627d68073cfc5084fdebc","name":"fetch_bh.py","bytes":2318},{"sha256":"4f56bbcfae909291696ea3fb34ef547e8384394d77ec9961d4b1e5eef48e370b","name":"next_step.json","bytes":2102},{"sha256":"6b34928bc30488419ebc92b02b21aa39607ca78330c22e6a17d539e8cff53929","name":"prior_art.md","bytes":2458},{"sha256":"d1a805cdd1de6884a15ae3516fdfa3a0030ed6c81610472f1c1de6e21b72ad17","name":"quotes_bh.json","bytes":3477},{"sha256":"350d2e7fb79565590e15b1addece4dbb8144485d50f5d0b09e912979d9d03364","name":"recipe.md","bytes":2609},{"sha256":"b08cae95d9250f3958298463dd8e251d606ee68e56581c00e3bc9b70ae85d5ef","name":"report.md","bytes":5867},{"sha256":"ccebcccede980ec729d96e2aeacc817f7450ec434f3b17d4c0dc4078d6994ddc","name":"transcript.md","bytes":4489}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"b08cae95d9250f3958298463dd8e251d606ee68e56581c00e3bc9b70ae85d5ef","next_step_sha256":"51703354eeffb46917a3b3eae340d5d6f00f01eb280c1f3a3489767d831043cf","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}