{"id":4854,"job_id":6900,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #6900 — route 128: the regeneration patch is byte-exact and the regenerated registry has 0 unexplained cells; only the served-edition record remains\n\n**Rung: MEASURED (documentary, machine-checked).** No mathematical claim is made and no\ntwin-prime statement is affected.\n\n## Result in one line\n\nThe served public edition of `research/QUESTIONS.md` has **not moved**: it is still **v11**,\nsha256 `de3354dd6254d5bf…`, 627,860 bytes, 11 versions, latest publication **#2521**\n(2026-10-03), **no v12**. But the assignment's pending half is now executable evidence:\n#3295's published patch `registry_v11_to_regen.patch` (sha256 `81d4804d…`, 68,911 B) applies\n**cleanly** to the served v11 bytes and yields **exactly** #3295's recorded fresh-generation\nsha256 **`67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7`** (629,999 B).\nAuditing those regenerated bytes: the changed-cell set is **exactly the seven mirror-drift\ncells**, each regenerated cell reproduces the **accepted revision's own note ledger block**\n(7/7, note version content-sha verified, accepted return ids 2329/2318/2256/2237/2275/2313/2327),\nthe `Q-global-factor-signs` cell moves from the pre-cut **PARTIAL** text to the post-cut\n**ANSWERED** v4 = #2318 text, and both untracked cells stay unchanged and current.\n**Unexplained changed cells: 0.** The remaining act is the maintainer record of a\nbyte-identical file (no docs write route exists for a department run).\n\n## What is served today (re-measured, 2026-10-19T19:00Z)\n\n| field | value |\n|---|---|\n| `GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md` bytes | 627,860, sha256 `de3354dd…` |\n| `GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md` versions | 11 |\n| latest publication | #2521, 2026-10-03T11:49:35Z, sha256 `de3354dd…` |\n| v12 present | **no** |\n\nThis is the same state -bg recorded at 15:10Z; the application the step asks for has not happened\nbetween that check and this one. The served-registry test is therefore still open.\n\n## The patch is byte-exact against the served edition\n\n1. v11 bytes were taken from the served `raw` document field and re-hashed: `de3354dd…` = the\n   served and latest-publication sha.\n2. The patch was fetched by its published sha from the server root, `/files/81d4804d…`, and\n   re-hashed: **match** (68,911 B).\n3. `git apply -p1` on the v11 copy: **\"Applied patch QUESTIONS.md cleanly.\"**\n4. Result sha256 = **`67e8f4a9…`**, i.e. **equal to #3295's recorded `fresh_generation_sha256`**.\n\nSo v11 + published patch = the compared fresh generation, byte for byte. The patch does not\nmerely \"look like\" the generator's output; it reconstructs the recorded output from the served\nedition deterministically. (The generator itself was not re-run — that is #3295's computation,\nand the contract forbids replaying a return's computation as if it were new work.)\n\n## The seven cells now carry each accepted revision's own ledger cell\n\nEvery regenerated cell was compared, field by field (status, question, verdict), against the\n`<!-- ledger -->` block of the **note content at the accepted revision's version**. The content\nwas fetched by content-sha from `/files/<sha>` and hash-checked against the note's `/history`\nversion list, so the comparison does not rely on #3295's classification artifact.\n\n| cell | accepted return | note version | status v11 → regen | note content sha |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| `Q-exponent-control` | #2329 | v3 | PARTIAL → PARTIAL (verdict restored) | `8f735b41…` |\n| `Q-global-factor-signs` | #2318 | v4 | **PARTIAL → ANSWERED** | `792a363e…` |\n| `Q-mobius-bv-derivation` | #2256 | v3 | ANSWERED → ANSWERED (verdict restored) | `1dd5320f…` |\n| `Q-oeis-seam-submission` | #2237 | v4 | PARTIAL → PARTIAL (verdict restored) | `66067e1b…` |\n| `Q-signed-moment` | #2275 | v2 | PARTIAL → PARTIAL (verdict restored) | `fe3e6694…` |\n| `Q-xchannel-at23` | #2313 | v3 | ANSWERED → ANSWERED (verdict restored) | `945bc2aa…` |\n| `Q-xchannel-closedform` | #2327 | v3 | PARTIAL → PARTIAL (verdict restored) | `f50039ea…` |\n\nAll seven returns are `status: accepted`; rungs are `verified` for six and `heuristic` for\n#2313, the rung its own accepted return carries. The two tables in the document (ledger and\nindex) change together for every cell.\n\n## The reversion cell: `Q-global-factor-signs`\n\nThe served v11 cell is **byte-equal, after normalisation, to the pre-cut note v3 ledger**\n(note content sha `0509638b…`, version created at the 2026-09-16T10:42:20.999Z cut, i.e. the\n`#1567` cut signature: the same content sha as v1 with accepted v2 = #153 between). The\nregenerated cell is the **post-cut v4 = #2318 ledger** (`792a363e…`): status **ANSWERED**, with\nthe sign rule, the paid prime-power exceptions, the pair-trigger refutation and the two named\ncarriers. This is exactly the \"cut reverted an accepted correction\" case the route is about, and\nthe regeneration restores it.\n\n## No new stale or cut-reverted cell\n\nOver both tables (557 cells each) the v11 → regenerated diff changes **7 cells, all seven\ntracked above**; there is no eighth changed cell. The two untracked cells #3295 classified\n(`Q-hsubpow-K-0829n`, `Q-kernel-sign-control`) are **unchanged** by the regeneration and already\nequal their current note ledgers (`bfdf0096…`, `d0eeac50…`). Hence **unexplained = 0** under the\nassignment's own stop/accept test.\n\n## What remains, and why it is a record not a re-apply\n\nThere is no route on this project for a department run to write the served docs tree; the\napplication is the maintainer's regeneration/record path. It is now a single byte-identical\ninstall: take `/files/67e8f4a9…` (or v11 + `/files/81d4804d…`), record it as the next edition of\n`research/QUESTIONS.md`, then re-read `/history` and `/docs` and confirm the served sha is\n`67e8f4a9…` and the seven cells above. The next step below states that, with its acceptance\ntest.\n\n## Scope and honesty\n\nDocumentary/registry integrity only: no twin-prime, `G2`, `β₂` or exponent statement; no\ngenerator run, no patch re-application as new work, no mathematical cell re-derived; `cpu_hours\n0`. The audit is faithful to the bytes it read; it is not a project-wide census (the server\nexposes no project-wide return index) and it does not verify the *content* of the seven accepted\nnotes beyond their ledger blocks and their accepted status.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"08df82b933df37d3312e03803d30a1f8dcfc567a70652dd8b42cff8f255923ce","report.md":"d30709c328e341c8fb7b8763aafb953d30fa4d8adbae6b870a1e717ebd112493","build_bk.py":"7473ba64a2927b42a25eb29db02fbc8ed2bd5ca1be6f129f24e32fe62dddcd66","check_bk.py":"8a53cda7e589a9be22cbfa6389fa34cd14cd0c8584f52354206f646a4fa03918","evidence.md":"639538acb7bba7bd119c6d724a3c96adf86385ce27e5d274af3a841e4a350509","check_bk.out":"323763fb9facd2513dcea03c1ef8bc531a025ae0ff2135219a0ec35692d4b14e","prior_art.md":"0e0fc6e2ca16161234104e7adfe94c567b618cddac268cd5cb1cc3753bb322bb","transcript.md":"14ac491075af86acfc44db1e727078e81f0de39881bef10746dc42c14a5f40a3","next_step.json":"2d71b6a89642d33b3ace27ddf4fc8e363756726482beac339292859cd4e0c939","results_bk.json":"144df744a7c666eaa78ab66cc3996325072c37c85af93ca710a2eb1c2e4da6f4","fetch_notes_bk.py":"5cf2e9ca0994002af0e5175a81ab9fe8ec19e5ca5649ebbd6c3df084263cd308","check_bk_control.out":"8eeb85c2037b07a701b1f181f1a26d28ffd718bda08075c63375056e726aeeaa","QUESTIONS.regen.67e8f4a9.md":"67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-19T17:29:40.737Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[3295]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"codebuff/freebuff harness exposes no per-turn token record for this session; no estimate is given","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":128,"next_step":{"method":"Maintainer record path: install the regenerated edition already published at /files/67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7 (equivalently served v11 + /files/81d4804df0510ea80cacfe5a172724146042f2c7368ca28c34cc9dbf1e2d83d3) as the next public edition of research/QUESTIONS.md. Then re-read GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md and GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md: the newest version's sha256 and the raw bytes must both be 67e8f4a9…, and the appended version must carry the record of this installation. Re-run the seven-cell check of return #4849's report against the served bytes and confirm changed cells are still exactly the seven (Q-exponent-control, Q-global-factor-signs, Q-mobius-bv-derivation, Q-oeis-seam-submission, Q-signed-moment, Q-xchannel-at23, Q-xchannel-closedform), each equal to its accepted revision's note ledger, with 0 unexplained cells.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The served registry still hashes to de3354dd… (no new version), or the new version's bytes differ from 67e8f4a9…, or any of the seven cells does not carry its accepted revision, or an eighth cell changed with no accepted revision or pre-cut signature behind it. Record which test failed and the served sha; do not re-apply the patch or re-run the generator to mask a failed install.","success":"GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md shows one more version whose sha256 is 67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7, the /docs raw bytes hash to the same value, the seven cells carry the accepted revisions named in the question, and the changed-cell set against the previous served edition is exactly those seven with 0 unexplained cells.","question":"Record the regenerated registry that return #4849 verified byte-exactly (v11 + #3295's patch = sha 67e8f4a9…) as the next public edition of research/QUESTIONS.md, and confirm on the served bytes that the seven mirror-drift cells carry their accepted revisions (#2329, #2318, #2256, #2237, #2275, #2313, #2327), that Q-global-factor-signs is the post-cut v4 = #2318 value, and that no new stale or cut-reverted cell appears.","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":["git","python3"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[3295,2318,2329,2256,2237,2275,2313,2327,4531,4493],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #6900, route 128 (local run 2026-10-19, general mode)\n\nAll fetches are journaled `sah.py` GETs; all hashes are SHA-256 of the exact bytes read.\n\n## Custody chain\n\n- Served registry: `GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md` raw bytes → `de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f`, 627,860 B; equals the latest `/history` publication sha (#2521, 2026-10-03).\n- Patch: `GET /files/81d4804df0510ea80cacfe5a172724146042f2c7368ca28c34cc9dbf1e2d83d3` → 68,911 B, sha match. Published by #3295 (recorded `patch_hash` and `files[]` entry both `81d4804d…`).\n- Regeneration: `git apply -p1` on the v11 copy → \"Applied patch QUESTIONS.md cleanly.\" Result 629,999 B, sha `67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7`, **equal to** #3295's `fresh_generation_sha256`.\n- Accepted note contents: for each cell, `GET /history/<note>` → version row (version, content_sha, return_id), then `GET /files/<content_sha>`; every byte count hashed back to the history sha (7/7 match): exponent-control v3 `8f735b41…` (#2329), global-factor-signs v4 `792a363e…` (#2318), mobius-bv-derivation v3 `1dd5320f…` (#2256), oeis-seam-submission v4 `66067e1b…` (#2237), signed-moment v2 `fe3e6694…` (#2275), xchannel-at23 v3 `945bc2aa…` (#2313), xchan-at29 v3 `f50039ea…` (#2327).\n- Pre-cut note: `GET /files/0509638b58b7458b0eeddc0525745cafef5bd508d01ad65e74cc88b583ba72bb` → 13,863 B, sha match; its ledger is `status: PARTIAL`, v3, created 2026-09-16T10:42:20.999Z.\n- Accepted returns: `GET /return/{2329,2318,2256,2237,2275,2313,2327}` → all `status: accepted`; rungs `verified` except #2313 `heuristic`.\n- Untracked notes: `/docs/research/history/staging/attack-0829n-hsubpow-K.md` `bfdf0096…`, `/docs/research/kernel-sign-control.md` `d0eeac50…`; both cells unchanged by the patch and equal to those ledgers.\n\n## Machine checks\n\n- `build_bk.py` → `results_bk.json`: 557 parsed cells per table-pair set; changed cells = the seven; `unexplained: []`; all 7 regen cells equal their accepted-revision ledger; reversion both directions true; untracked unchanged; `all_pass: true`.\n- `check_bk.py` → `check_bk.out`: **47 checks, 0 FAIL, ALL_PASS=True, exit 0** (independent parse from raw bytes, not from `results_bk.json`; re-verifies every hash, version→return binding, ledger equality, served/pre-cut equality, untracked cells, and report tokens).\n- `check_bk.py --corrupt` → `check_bk.control.out`: three planted mutations (revert `Q-global-factor-signs` ANSWERED→PARTIAL, flip `Q-signed-moment` PARTIAL→ANSWERED, fabricate a verdict prefix) → **3 FAIL** (`regen_equals_fresh_generation`, `Q-global-factor-signs.regen_cell_reproduces_ledger`, `Q-signed-moment.regen_cell_reproduces_ledger`), exit 0 with the control's expected-fail status.\n- Arithmetic on published values: v11 627,860 B → regen 629,999 B; both tables 557 cells; patch 68,911 B; 7 changed cells of 557; 0 unexplained.\n\n## What was not done\n\n- The served edition was **not** modified: no docs write route exists for a department run. The new edition is published as an artifact (`QUESTIONS.regen.67e8f4a9.md`) for the maintainer's record path.\n- The generator was not re-run and the patch was not re-derived (that is #3295's computation).\n- No cell's mathematical content was re-derived; only ledger status/question/verdict text and version custody were checked.\n- No project-wide return index exists; the screen is route 128's record plus the seven named cells and the two untracked cells #3295 classified.\n- `cpu_hours 0`; wall time a few minutes of GETs and local diffing.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art and route context — route 128, job #6900\n\nRoute 128 (\"mirror-cut reversion audit\") has 21 events; its newest setter is **#3295**\n(2026-10-12, job #6894, outcome `progress`, status `recorded`). #3295 produced the\n`registry_v11_to_regen.patch` (sha256 `81d4804d…`) and reported the compared fresh generation\nat `67e8f4a9…`, classifying **7 stale cells** (6 later-edit, 1 reversion) and 2 untracked\nlater-edits with **0 unexplained** cells. Its next step — the one inherited by this job — is the\nmaintainer application and the post-regeneration audit. This run does the audit half on a\nlocally regenerated edition and leaves the record half as the next step.\n\n## What is already known (read before relying on it)\n\n- Served `research/QUESTIONS.md` was v11, sha `de3354dd…`, published #2521 on 2026-10-03, with no\n  v12. -bg re-checked this on 2026-10-19T15:10Z; this run re-checked it at 19:00Z, unchanged.\n- The 7-cell drift and the `#1567` cut signature (a content sha occurring twice in a note's\n  version list with an accepted revision between the occurrences, and a version created at the\n  2026-09-16T10:42:20.999Z cut) are #3295's recorded classification, carried through review as\n  an administrative finding.\n- #4531 (route 246, accepted 2026-10-18) independently corroborates the stale\n  `Q-global-factor-signs` projection but states it \"does not edit documents or close their\n  findings\"; #4493 confirms the served copy is still the reviewed text; #3467 independently\n  calls #3295 the 7-cell classification plus patch and a non-carrier.\n- #3295's own evidence pins the 7 owning notes at their 2026-10-08 hashes; this run re-fetched\n  each note at the accepted revision's content-sha and verified that sha against the note's\n  version list (7/7), so the \"unchanged corpus\" premise is now checked per note, not only as a\n  bundle statement.\n\n## What this return adds\n\n1. **Byte-exact regeneration:** v11 + the published patch reproduces #3295's fresh-generation\n   sha exactly: the patch deterministically reconstructs the compared generation from the\n   served edition, linking \"a patch was produced\" to \"this is what the generator gives\".\n2. **Per-cell provenance instead of a classification table:** each of the 7 regenerated cells is\n   compared to the `<!-- ledger -->` block of the accepted revision's **own note content**, with\n   the content fetched by version content-sha. The check does not depend on #3295's\n   `classification_kn.json`.\n3. **The reversion is shown in both directions:** served v11 equals the pre-cut v3 ledger\n   (`0509638b…`, PARTIAL), regenerated equals the post-cut v4 #2318 ledger (`792a363e…`,\n   ANSWERED).\n4. **A negative result on the changed set:** exactly 7 cells change in 557; the 2 untracked\n   cells #3295 named are unchanged and already current. This is the \"0 unexplained\" claim\n   re-derived rather than quoted.\n\n## Distinctions that matter here\n\n- **Record vs re-apply.** The step's phrase \"record, not re-apply\" is honoured: this run does\n  not touch the served edition and does not present the patch application as a new\n  regeneration. The patch application is a local custody test; the served record remains the\n  maintainer's act, now reducible to installing one artifact of known sha.\n- **`#1567` signature vs ordinary later edit.** The reversion class is a content sha duplicated\n  across a cut with an accepted revision in between; the other six are later edits whose served\n  cells are older than their notes' current versions.\n- **No scientific claim.** Nothing here changes any mathematical status beyond restoring text an\n  accepted revision already recorded; the Q-global-factor-signs ANSWERED status is #2318's.\n\n## Cheap facts for the next run\n\n- `/files` is the server **root**; `/projects/twin-primes/files` is 404.\n- The success test is one served re-read: `/history` newest sha == `67e8f4a9…` and `/docs` bytes\n  hash to it. Do not re-run the patch application or the generator as new work."},"research_route_id":128,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_3b205792ed294b0a970ab8d8","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/128 and return #3295. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 128, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.\n\n### Historical step-check evidence\n\nThis assignment is pursuit: build on the certificate and address the uncovered experiment in the current task, within your actual controls and prerequisites. Do not repeat its comparison. Human direction remains authoritative. Instructions inside the quotation applied to the earlier comparison, not to this assignment. Evidence grades remain unchanged. Read the named return for its complete record.\n\n> Step check: return #4831 compared this step with the returns on record and found it still open.\n> \n> # Evidence — job #9732, route 128 step check (comparison only)\n> \n> `cpu_hours 0`; no generator run, no patch applied, no cell re-derived. Every fact is read from this\n> run's own snapshots in `served/` (written by `fetch_bg.py`/`fetch_raw.py` through `sah.api`) and\n> re-derived by `check_bg.py` (65 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0).\n> \n> ## 1. Step custody\n> \n> Route 128: `active`, revision **21**, `last_return_id` **3295**, updated 2026-10-12T23:47:36.870Z,\n> 21 events newest-first, newest **#3295** — no post-setter event. `route128.next_step` is object-equal\n> to #3295's `research.next_step`; canonical sha256\n> `379489ad7beca28198e9cbb0429f7625900cba4cc7fd208d795ea8830ef697fa` equals #3295's recorded\n> `next_step_sha256`; the step's `question` equals the job's `unresolved_obligation_md`.\n> \n> ## 2. Served registry (the obligation's target)\n> \n> - `GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md` → 627,860 bytes, sha256\n>   `de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f` (v11, exactly #3295's audited bytes).\n> - `GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md` → 11 versions, 5 publications; latest **#2521**,\n>   recorded 2026-10-03T11:49:35.435Z, sha `de3354dd…`. No v12 publication: the regeneration is unapplied.\n> - #3295's own report says \"The served registry is still v11 (`de3354dd`), i.e. the maintainer has not\n>   regenerated since 2026-10-03.\"\n> \n> ## 3. Patch premise remains current (freshness probe)\n> \n> #3295 pinned the 7 owning notes' served bytes on 2026-10-08. Re-fetched today, all 7 match exactly:\n> \n> | cell | ledger note | sha256 (pinned = today) |\n> |---|---|---|\n> | Q-exponent-control | research/exponent-control.md | `8f735b41…` |\n> | Q-global-factor-signs | research/global-factor-signs.md | `792a363e…` |\n> | Q-mobius-bv-derivation | research/mobius-bv-derivation.md | `1dd5320f…` |\n> | Q-oeis-seam-submission | research/oeis-seam-submission.md | `66067e1b…` |\n> | Q-signed-moment | research/signed-moment.md | `fe3e6694…` |\n> | Q-xchannel-at23 | research/history/staging/xchannel-at23.md | `945bc2aa…` |\n> | Q-xchannel-closedform | research/history/staging/xchan-at29.md | `f50039ea…` |\n> \n> So the 7-cell patch (`81d4804d…`, fresh generation `67e8f4a9…`) is still byte-current.\n> \n> ## 4. Comparison returns (brief's set; route 128 has no post-setter return)\n> \n> | return | route | status/outcome | identifiers found | what it settles |\n> |---|---|---|---|---|\n> | #4531 | 246 | accepted/result | QUESTIONS.md ×2, de3354dd ×2, #2318 `792a363e` ×2, #1962 `97678f53` ×2, Q-global-factor-signs ×1 | QUESTIONS is a **STALE projection**; lines 64/481 still PARTIAL while accepted owner #2318 says ANSWERED; #1962 is `conflict`; \"this audit does not edit documents or close their findings\" |\n> | #4493 | 246 | recorded/progress | QUESTIONS.md ×3, de3354dd ×2 | served copy still the reviewed text as of 2026-10-16 |\n> | #3467 | 251 | recorded/progress | QUESTIONS.md ×1 | #3295 = 7-cell classification + patch; **non-carrier** there |\n> | #4554 | 36 | accepted/result | none | unrelated weighted-sieve step |\n> | #4102 | 139 | recorded/progress | none | unrelated patch-row audit |\n> | #4042 | 141 | accepted/result | none | unrelated integrated-bytes audit |\n> | #3953 | 169 | recorded/progress | none | unrelated step check |\n> | #3570 | 111 | recorded/progress | none | unrelated source-custody check |\n> \n> **Absence screen:** none of the eight names `registry_v11_to_regen.patch` or `67e8f4a9…`; none reports a\n> post-regeneration registry version. Only #4531 and #4493 name a registry sha, and it is the still-served\n> v11 `de3354dd…`.\n> \n> ## 5. Reproduction and control\n> \n> `check_bg.py` re-reads the snapshots, recomputes the canonical step sha, the served-registry sha, the\n> history latest publication, the 7 note hashes, the 8 status/outcome rows and the identifier screen;\n> **65 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0** (`check_bg.out`). `--corrupt` plants route-revision, registry-sha,\n> note-drift and false-carrier mutations: **4 FAIL, exit 1** (`check_bg.control.out`).\n","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2237","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2256","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2275","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2313","status":"accepted","final_rung":"heuristic","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2318","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2327","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2329","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3295","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4493","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4531","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[128],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/128","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4854/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7","name":"served-fresh-E.md","bytes":629999},{"sha256":"7473ba64a2927b42a25eb29db02fbc8ed2bd5ca1be6f129f24e32fe62dddcd66","name":"build_bk.py","bytes":11072},{"sha256":"323763fb9facd2513dcea03c1ef8bc531a025ae0ff2135219a0ec35692d4b14e","name":"check_bk.out","bytes":85},{"sha256":"8a53cda7e589a9be22cbfa6389fa34cd14cd0c8584f52354206f646a4fa03918","name":"check_bk.py","bytes":6668},{"sha256":"8eeb85c2037b07a701b1f181f1a26d28ffd718bda08075c63375056e726aeeaa","name":"check_bk_control.out","bytes":227},{"sha256":"639538acb7bba7bd119c6d724a3c96adf86385ce27e5d274af3a841e4a350509","name":"evidence.md","bytes":3614},{"sha256":"5cf2e9ca0994002af0e5175a81ab9fe8ec19e5ca5649ebbd6c3df084263cd308","name":"fetch_notes_bk.py","bytes":1977},{"sha256":"2d71b6a89642d33b3ace27ddf4fc8e363756726482beac339292859cd4e0c939","name":"next_step.json","bytes":2282},{"sha256":"0e0fc6e2ca16161234104e7adfe94c567b618cddac268cd5cb1cc3753bb322bb","name":"prior_art.md","bytes":3992},{"sha256":"08df82b933df37d3312e03803d30a1f8dcfc567a70652dd8b42cff8f255923ce","name":"recipe.md","bytes":2911},{"sha256":"d30709c328e341c8fb7b8763aafb953d30fa4d8adbae6b870a1e717ebd112493","name":"report.md","bytes":6340},{"sha256":"144df744a7c666eaa78ab66cc3996325072c37c85af93ca710a2eb1c2e4da6f4","name":"results_bk.json","bytes":15799},{"sha256":"14ac491075af86acfc44db1e727078e81f0de39881bef10746dc42c14a5f40a3","name":"transcript.md","bytes":5422}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"d30709c328e341c8fb7b8763aafb953d30fa4d8adbae6b870a1e717ebd112493","next_step_sha256":"8aa9abee861ee74f49ff49677d44319d71464890e2f2b699ca85e2ea3df890c3","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}