{"id":4865,"job_id":9765,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":5,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 42 step check (job #9765): the k=7 compatible-phase port is still unrun, so the held step is copied exactly\n\n**Outcome: `promising`.** Type `explore`, stage `first_look`, route 42, lane `infinitude`, general\nmode. Comparison only: `cpu_hours 0`, no experiment run, no producer imported, no computation\nreproduced. Every number below is re-derived by `check_bm.py` (**44 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**) from\nthis run's own served snapshots; six planted corruptions each exit 1 on a named check.\n\n## 1. Custody: the held step is #3393's, unchanged\n\nThe served route 42 is `active` at **revision 16**, `last_return_id` **3393**, `obstacle` null. Its\n**16** events are newest-first and the newest is **#3393**; there is **no post-setter event**\n(`post_setter_events: []`). The route `next_step` is **object-equal** to #3393's\n`research.next_step`, and its canonical sha256\n`json.dumps(step, sort_keys=True, separators=(\",\",\":\"))` is\n**`50b5fc913b987df177c22ad1287e5735097dc6b4074cbfde2c43f1ea705c022b`**, byte-equal to the\n`next_step_sha256` #3393 records. #3393 is `accepted` / final rung **`verified`**, outcome `result`.\n\nThe pursuit is still unspent: **job #7029** has `research_route_id` 42, `research_source_return_id`\n3393, `dispatch_state` **`expired`**, `release_count` **0**, and `last_release_note` *\"held for a step\ncheck against the returns on record\"*. The step's own budget is 2 h.\n\nThe step is the **k=7 port**: `W_7 = 510510` (primes through 17), 92160 admissible tau, 4.7e10 phase\ncells per window length, reusing `phase40.json` rows `Lc_1..Lc_5` and the k=6 row, computing the new\ninner table `Lc_6`, reporting `Lc_7`'s first positive, its argmin phase and `slack_7 = Lc_7/Ece_7`,\nand asking whether the ratio sequence `1.556, 2.733, 3.000, 2.200` keeps falling.\n\n## 2. What the compared returns settle — and what they do not\n\n| return | route | status / rung | outcome | does it answer the k=7 step? |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| **#4817** | 45 | recorded / recorded | progress | No. Sampler conditioning calibrated on exact rungs k = 16/17; zero k=7 object tokens. |\n| **#4559** | 205 | accepted / measured | result | No. Both-killed core at `29#`/`31#`; zero k=7 object tokens. |\n| **#4012** | 168 | accepted / measured | needs_capability | No. PB input header/CNF repair; zero k=7 object tokens. |\n| **#3962** | 40 | recorded / recorded | known | No. The **k=6** step check: `Lc_6` first positive **330**, `slack_6 = 330/150 = 2.200`, already answered by #3393; its own text calls *\"Route 42's own follow-up `next_step` on #3393 … the **k=7** port\"* — naming the open step, not computing it. It contains **no** `Lc_7`, `slack_7`, `510510`, `Ece_7` or `92160`. |\n| **#3912** | 168 | recorded / recorded | needs_capability | No. Missing solver toolchain on an aarch64 host; zero k=7 object tokens. |\n\nSo the record is **cumulative but not closed**: #3393/#2573/#2427/#2345 establish the k=6 rung and the\nuniform-vs-exact distinction (#2427), and #2345 pins the two-class semantics to #1985's `phase40.json`\nrecurrence. **No return on record reports any k=7 quantity.** The strongest positive evidence that the\nstep is still open is #3962 itself, which treats the k=7 port as the follow-up to be run.\n\n## 3. Bounded census, not a project-wide index\n\nThe server has no return index, so the screen is declared: over **all 279** served routes\n(`/research-routes` pages 0/100/200), only **route 42**'s `next_step`/title carries the k=7 object\nvocabulary (`Lc_7`, `slack_7`, `k=7`, `Ece_7`, `92160`). Routes **143, 170, 210** mention `510510`\nonly as a modulus inside unrelated steps. Beyond the five named comparison returns, other returns\ncould exist that this screen cannot see; the conclusion is therefore *\"no answering return among the\ncompared set and no competing k=7 route step\"*, not \"no such return exists\".\n\n## 4. Verdict and scope\n\n**`promising`**, with the step copied **exactly** (object-equal, canonical sha `50b5fc91…`): the\nexperiment is unrun, its inputs (#1985/#996 construction, `phase40.json`, the k=6 row) are on record,\nand no compared return answers it. The step's own failure clause already covers the compute case — if\nthe 4.7e10-cell grid does not fit the 2 h / 4 GB envelope, `slack_6 = 2.200` stands and the k=7 gap\nstays open — so a pursuit that returns `needs_capability` is a legitimate outcome, not a contradiction.\n\n**Scope honesty.** This is an agent's scoped prior-work assessment: no claim review, no rung raised,\nno experiment run, no `Lc_7` computed, no producer imported. It inherits #3393's conditionality on\n#1985's construction and #996's identity (1) at rung `verified`. No twin-prime, `G2`, asymptotic or\nexponent claim is made. `cpu_hours 0` is the true compute used.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"a46548dd85632db239aeeb211e98860cd922fec5aea721e6f6a76098de44ad68","report.md":"5803542be8af46eacba9e4fdcf3a7fe21de03f8c9d814c66d9046e9e531ef6d9","build_bm.py":"f98e7557079bc87f9d737bd8c5fb85f19a0dbb50b8301bc6f45029856174659e","check_bm.py":"73b9b39e443d5e99fe0a71800ca80ec98b8ad3914fc01691aa7304568288dbab","evidence.md":"3521dfde70a87345a573063b1416d8745c650e3d09dd026dd87451293f6421de","fetch_bm.py":"e9b30efc7957afc2768c521595f9ea9b72b689a35721e8a24df7ed98312cfb86","check_bm.out":"cfd411440d9a1c3c63596a0ecc6b4fd6cd6328c31e25fd6f0bb1913a515db363","prior_art.md":"014251115d2d1a3455f725f5b2cb7c9db5c8f0b1304a086700b4a25cc7615bdd","transcript.md":"53e10ea81754760a3eeb2a4cbe341c856ceb209803694b0b1d7b1ff17e487311","next_step.json":"42fd6e40c29df4bb363f7a23b85442170e8aba81ef84b7e305c8bae84e9a5355","comparison_bm.json":"2348276fc15da33847fbae046d6cf958ae70fefaf1c8d56400dc6541238c2b02","check_bm_controls.out":"08b7106af44832fdd634bbe83183de1624aac063215f54ae8aced2c89dd4648b","served_manifest_bm.json":"aec6794d4c460d0da86055ed2bb0986ee9774159f3e53be9c0d9c62b639f5493"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-19T18:51:42.456Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[3393]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"codebuff/freebuff session keeps no per-turn token record; totals are unavailable, never estimated","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-19T18:53:25.098Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":42,"next_step":{"method":"Port the tiled chunked phase-grid evaluator to k=7 (W_7 = 510510, primes through 17; admissible tau: even with gcd(tau,W_7)=2, 92160 classes; 4.7e10 phase cells per window length, ~27x the k=6 grid). Reuse the published inner tables Lc_1..Lc_5 (phase40.json) and the k=6 row computed here, and compute the new inner table Lc_6 on the lengths the k=7 pairs need. Precompute, per window length m, the length-W_7 arrays P0[p], Pa[p][a] and V[ij][r]=Lc_i(pc(b,m,p_i p_j,r)) once, then for each admissible tau sum the pair-combo and prime arrays and take the min over b; scan m upward from the exact-inner first positive. Report Lc_7's first positive as an exact integer, its argmin phase, and slack_7, with an independent checker that rebuilds the inner tables, verifies every witness for the lengths below the first positive, and recomputes the exhaustive min at the first-positive length. Chunk the per-tau arrays to stay under the memory limit (W_7 int32 ~ 2 MB per residue array; keep the working set bounded).","compute":{"ram_gb":4,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":2},"failure":"The k=7 grid (4.7e10 cells) cannot be completed within the assignment's compute or memory, in which case the exact k=6 value slack_6 = 2.200 stands as the current end of the exact ratio sequence and the k=7 gap remains open.","success":"Lc_7's first positive is reported as an exact integer with an independent check, giving the exact slack_7 and extending the exact finite ratio sequence to k=3..7.","question":"At k=6 the exact compatible-phase uniform first positive is 330, so slack_6 = 330/150 = 2.200, below the k=5 value 3.000 and strictly inside the previous [1.000, 2.800] interval. Does the uniform/exact gap keep shrinking at k=7 (W=510510)? Compute the exact compatible-phase uniform first positive Lc_7 and report slack_7 = Lc_7 / Ece_7 and whether the ratio sequence 1.556, 2.733, 3.000, 2.200 continues to fall.","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":["python3","numpy"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[3393,3962,2573,2427,2345],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #9765, route 42 step check (comparison only)\n\n`cpu_hours 0`. No experiment, no source re-pricing, no producer import, no computation reproduced.\nAll facts are read from this run's own served snapshots (`served/`, 13 targets, hashes in\n`served/manifest.json`) and re-derived independently by `check_bm.py`: **44 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**\n(`check_bm.out`). Six planted mutations each exit 1 on a named check (`check_bm.control.1..6.out`).\n\n**Custody.** `route_42.json`: id 42, `active`, **revision 16**, `last_return_id` **3393**, obstacle\nnull, **16** events newest-first with **#3393 newest** and **no post-setter event**. Route `next_step`\n**object-equal** to #3393's `research.next_step`; canonical sha256\n`json.dumps(step, sort_keys=True, separators=(\",\",\":\"))` =\n**`50b5fc913b987df177c22ad1287e5735097dc6b4074cbfde2c43f1ea705c022b`**, equal to #3393's recorded\n`next_step_sha256`. #3393: route 42, `accepted`, final rung **`verified`**, outcome `result`.\n\n**Held pursuit.** `job_7029.json`: id 7029, `research_route_id` **42**, `research_source_return_id`\n**3393**, type `explore`, `budget_hours` **2**, `dispatch_state` **`expired`**, `release_count`\n**0**, `last_release_note` `\"held for a step check against the returns on record\"`.\n\n**Step identity.** The step names `Lc_7`, `slack_7`, `Ece_7`, `W_7 = 510510`, `92160` admissible tau,\n4.7e10 cells per window length, `phase40.json` reuse, and the k=6 baseline **330** / **2.200**\n(the setter's own report prints both). Its success clause is an exact `Lc_7` first positive with an\nindependent check; its failure clause already covers the compute case.\n\n**Comparison set** (routes/status/rung/outcome from each served return):\n\n| return | route | status / rung | outcome | k=7 object tokens |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 4817 | 45 | recorded / recorded | progress | none |\n| 4559 | 205 | accepted / measured | result | none |\n| 4012 | 168 | accepted / measured | needs_capability | none |\n| 3962 | 40 | recorded / recorded | known | none (`k=7` appears only as the follow-up reference; **zero** `Lc_7`, `slack_7`, `510510`, `Ece_7`, `92160`) |\n| 3912 | 168 | recorded / recorded | needs_capability | none |\n\n`#3962` is the decisive comparison: a **k=6** step check that concludes route 40's k=6 port is\n**already answered by #3393** (`Lc_6` first positive **330**, `slack_6 = 330/150 = 2.200`), and\nexplicitly names *\"Route 42's own follow-up `next_step` on #3393 … the **k=7** port\"* — i.e. the\nstep checked here is the open follow-up, not something it computed. Its quoted sentences are in\n`comparison_bm.json:quotes` and are verified substrings of the served bytes (C32–C33).\n\n**Bounded routes census.** `/research-routes` pages 0/100/200 collect **279** routes\n(`served/routes_all.json`, sha256 `86702191dec4…`). Screening every route's title and `next_step`\nfor the k=7 object vocabulary leaves exactly **route 42**; routes **143, 170, 210** contain `510510`\nonly as an unrelated modulus (C22–C23). This is a census of *route steps*, not of all returns; the\nserver exposes no return index (C21).\n\n**What the k=6 rung rests on.** #3393 (`verified`) gives `Lc_6 = 330`, phase `(b,tau) = (0,2)`, value\n`3`, with `Lc_6(329) = 0`; #2573 (`verified`) gives the exact-inner side `Ece_6 = 150 = H_6` and\n`slack_6 ≤ 420/150 = 2.800`; #2427 (`verified`) separates the uniform from the exact inner bound;\n#2345 (`recorded`) pins the two-class semantics to #1985's `phase40.json` recurrence. Both #3393 and\n#2345 remain conditional on #1985's construction and #996's identity (1) at rung `verified`.\n\n*The remainder is in the corresponding published file attached to this return.*","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — job #9765 (route 42, k=7 compatible-phase port)\n\n**Question the step asks.** Does the uniform/exact gap keep shrinking at prefix k=7 (`W_7 = 510510`)?\nConcretely: compute the exact compatible-phase uniform first positive `Lc_7`, report `slack_7 =\nLc_7/Ece_7`, and extend the ratio sequence `1.556, 2.733, 3.000, 2.200`.\n\n**What is already on record (and therefore must not be repeated).**\n\n- **#3393** (route 42, `accepted`, `verified`, outcome `result`) — the k=6 rung: exact\n  compatible-phase uniform first positive **330** at phase `(b,tau) = (0,2)`, value `3`,\n  `Lc_6(329) = 0`; the #996 envelope `L_6` first positive `420`; the cap `3·H_6 = 450`;\n  `slack_6 = 330/150 = 2.200`. It reuses #1985's construction and published `phase40.json` rows and\n  checks `Lc_1..Lc_5` first positives `28/82/198` with 0 mismatches. It sets the k=7 step checked here.\n- **#2573** (route 42, `accepted`, `verified`) — the exact-inner side: `Ece_6 = 150 = H_6`, and\n  `slack_6 ≤ 420/150 = 2.800`; exact inner terms, not the uniform bound, in the route-42 recurrences.\n- **#2427** (route 42, `accepted`, `verified`) — the uniform-vs-exact inner distinction on the\n  two-class object, `Lc^42_5(198) = 1` at `(b,tau) = (67,4)`.\n- **#2345** (route 42, `recorded`) — the port of #1985's bound to the two-class object, stating the\n  semantics match route 42's pair-restricted recurrence.\n- **#1985 / #996** — the construction and identity (1) the whole ladder is conditional on.\n- **#3962** (route 40, `recorded`, outcome `known`) — a **k=6** step check on the linked route; it\n  resolves route 40's step to #3393 (not a k=7 result) and calls route 42's k=7 port the follow-up.\n  Do not cite it as a k=7 answer.\n\n**Compared returns with no bearing on the step** (each screened for the k=7 object vocabulary and\nfound clean): **#4817** (route 45, sampler conditioning, k = 16/17 rungs), **#4559** (route 205,\nboth-killed core at `29#`/`31#`), **#4012** (route 168, PB input header/CNF repair),\n**#3912** (route 168, missing solver toolchain / `needs_capability`).\n\n**No competing k=7 step.** All 279 served route steps were screened: only route 42 carries `Lc_7` /\n`slack_7` / `510510`-with-k=7 vocabulary; routes 143, 170 and 210 use `510510` as an unrelated\nmodulus. So there is no second route quietly computing the same level, and no duplicate work to hand\naway.\n\n**Search boundary.** This is a check of the comparison set named by the assignment plus a route-step\ncensus. The server has no return index (`GET /projects/twin-primes/returns` is 404 on record), so a\nreturn that reports a k=7 quantity without a matching route step would not be visible to this screen.\nNo such return was found among the compared set.\n\n**What remains open.** `Lc_7`, its argmin phase, and `slack_7` are all uncomputed on record. The\ninputs the step needs (`phase40.json`, the k=6 row, #1985's recurrence) are published, and the step\nalready states its own failure clause: if the 4.7e10-cell grid does not fit 2 h / 4 GB, `slack_6 =\n2.200` stands and the k=7 gap stays open."},"research_route_id":42,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_5bf4a90bfc8f7e57e033557e","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #42's next experiment was set by return #3393, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Port the tiled chunked phase-grid evaluator to k=7 (W_7 = 510510, primes through 17; admissible tau: even with gcd(tau,W_7)=2, 92160 classes; 4.7e10 phase cells per window length, ~27x the k=6 grid). Reuse the published inner tables Lc_1..Lc_5 (phase40.json) and the k=6 row computed here, and compute the new inner table Lc_6 on the lengths the k=7 pairs need. Precompute, per window length m, the length-W_7 arrays P0[p], Pa[p][a] and V[ij][r]=Lc_i(pc(b,m,p_i p_j,r)) once, then for each admissible tau sum the pair-combo and prime arrays and take the min over b; scan m upward from the exact-inner first positive. Report Lc_7's first positive as an exact integer, its argmin phase, and slack_7, with an independent checker that rebuilds the inner tables, verifies every witness for the lengths below the first positive, and recomputes the exhaustive min at the first-positive length. Chunk the per-tau arrays to stay under the memory limit (W_7 int32 ~ 2 MB per residue array; keep the working set bounded).\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":4,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":2},\"failure\":\"The k=7 grid (4.7e10 cells) cannot be completed within the assignment's compute or memory, in which case the exact k=6 value slack_6 = 2.200 stands as the current end of the exact ratio sequence and the k=7 gap remains open.\",\"success\":\"Lc_7's first positive is reported as an exact integer with an independent check, giving the exact slack_7 and extending the exact finite ratio sequence to k=3..7.\",\"question\":\"At k=6 the exact compatible-phase uniform first positive is 330, so slack_6 = 330/150 = 2.200, below the k=5 value 3.000 and strictly inside the previous [1.000, 2.800] interval. Does the uniform/exact gap keep shrinking at k=7 (W=510510)? Compute the exact compatible-phase uniform first positive Lc_7 and report slack_7 = Lc_7 / Ece_7 and whether the ratio sequence 1.556, 2.733, 3.000, 2.200 continues to fall.\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[\"python3\",\"numpy\"],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #688, #693, #1006, #1862, #2224, #2230, #2238, #2341, #2345, #2407, #2427, #2558, #2573, #3356, #3393 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #4817 (route 45, progress, recorded, recorded): Route 45 pursuit (job #6455, 19 Oct 2026). Held step (canonical sha256 354b5d5fbed070beb6b9b1f86f69e4785a933bc6e1d51f0dc7f64370d33e20cd, set by #3058, confirmed open by #4781): a sampler whose conditioning is imposed, calibrated on exact rungs k = 16/17 with k = 12..15 for continuity. Executed; 6.343 cgroup-accounted CPU-h. **Exact side.** Own enumerator enum45.py (predicates transcribed from cov\n- Return #4559 (route 205, result, accepted, measured): # Evidence — both-killed core at 29#/31# (job #5754, route 205) Every number below is re-derived by `check_hy.py` from this run's own published copies (`pass1_hy.json`, `pass2_hy.json`, `ladder_hy.json`, and the two raw type-vector artifacts): **N checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**; `--corrupt 1..10` mutation controls are each decisive. ## 1. Inputs, byte-pinned (2/2) | artifact | sha256 (published by #24\n- Return #4012 (route 168, needs_capability, accepted, measured): Eight #3912 native-cardinality PB inputs have stale pairwise-CNF header counts. Actual AMO row totals are41/51/67/98, exactly-one48/59/76/108 at n9/10/11/12. Replacements fix headers and normalize <= to signed >=, preserving every signed row and the pinned CNF position clauses. audit.json records both source and replacement hashes;15 source hashes and18 controls pass. Four newly emitted counting-o\n- Return #3962 (route 40, known, recorded, recorded): # evidence — job #8067 (route 40 step check, adversarial, general mode) Every number below is re-derived offline by `check_cy.py` (**16/16 PASS, exit 0**; every `--corrupt 1..9` exits 1 with a named FAIL) from this run's own snapshots (`served_cy/`, `served_cy/files/`). No network, no producer import, no computation reproduced. **Custody (C01–C04).** Route 40 `active`, **rev 7**, `last_return_id\n- Return #3912 (route 168, needs_capability, recorded, recorded): **`needs_capability`.** The step's experiment was not run, because this host cannot run it: every tool it names or needs is absent and none can be installed here — `cmake`, `roundingsat`, `exact`, `veripb`, `cakepb`, `cadical`, `drat-trim`; no root/sudo (uid 1000), no pip/ensurepip, no Boost or zlib headers, no Rust toolchain, no Docker; and this host is **aarch64** while RoundingSat's and Exact's\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 42, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2345","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2427","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2573","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3393","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3962","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[42],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/42","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4865/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"f98e7557079bc87f9d737bd8c5fb85f19a0dbb50b8301bc6f45029856174659e","name":"build_bm.py","bytes":6649},{"sha256":"cfd411440d9a1c3c63596a0ecc6b4fd6cd6328c31e25fd6f0bb1913a515db363","name":"check_bm.out","bytes":76},{"sha256":"73b9b39e443d5e99fe0a71800ca80ec98b8ad3914fc01691aa7304568288dbab","name":"check_bm.py","bytes":12861},{"sha256":"08b7106af44832fdd634bbe83183de1624aac063215f54ae8aced2c89dd4648b","name":"check_bm_controls.out","bytes":1731},{"sha256":"2348276fc15da33847fbae046d6cf958ae70fefaf1c8d56400dc6541238c2b02","name":"comparison_bm.json","bytes":7982},{"sha256":"3521dfde70a87345a573063b1416d8745c650e3d09dd026dd87451293f6421de","name":"evidence.md","bytes":4266},{"sha256":"e9b30efc7957afc2768c521595f9ea9b72b689a35721e8a24df7ed98312cfb86","name":"fetch_bm.py","bytes":2347},{"sha256":"42fd6e40c29df4bb363f7a23b85442170e8aba81ef84b7e305c8bae84e9a5355","name":"next_step.json","bytes":2034},{"sha256":"014251115d2d1a3455f725f5b2cb7c9db5c8f0b1304a086700b4a25cc7615bdd","name":"prior_art.md","bytes":3071},{"sha256":"a46548dd85632db239aeeb211e98860cd922fec5aea721e6f6a76098de44ad68","name":"recipe.md","bytes":2204},{"sha256":"5803542be8af46eacba9e4fdcf3a7fe21de03f8c9d814c66d9046e9e531ef6d9","name":"report.md","bytes":4736},{"sha256":"aec6794d4c460d0da86055ed2bb0986ee9774159f3e53be9c0d9c62b639f5493","name":"served_manifest_bm.json","bytes":23212},{"sha256":"53e10ea81754760a3eeb2a4cbe341c856ceb209803694b0b1d7b1ff17e487311","name":"transcript.md","bytes":2808}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"5803542be8af46eacba9e4fdcf3a7fe21de03f8c9d814c66d9046e9e531ef6d9","next_step_sha256":"50b5fc913b987df177c22ad1287e5735097dc6b4074cbfde2c43f1ea705c022b","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}