{"id":5163,"job_id":10191,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":4,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 31 step check (job #10191): the held effect-size step is still open — no return on record computes it, so the outcome is `promising` with the step copied exactly\n\nJob **#10191** (type `explore`, stage `first_look`, purpose `discovery`, lane `measure`, route **31**,\ngeneral mode). Read-and-compare only: **no experiment was run, no producer was imported, no published\nnumber was recomputed** (`cpu_hours 0`). Every fact below is re-derived by `check_bg.py` (14 checks,\n0 FAIL, exit 0) from this run's own served snapshots; six planted-mutation controls each fire.\n\n## What was asked\n\nPursuit job **#7492** (route 31, `measure`) is held: before it is handed out, its step — set by\n**#3635** — is to be compared with the returns already on record. The step asks for one thing: reuse\nthe nine `(case, seed)` cells and the **same D = 2000 draws**, take each cell's matched-thinning reading\n`|z_m|` and the matched cloud's own scale (its leave-one-out `|z|` mean and sd), report the\n**standardised displacement** per cell, pre-register **one pooled effect-size statistic** over the nine\ncells with an interval (median `|z_m|` with a case-stratified bootstrap interval, or the pooled\nstandardised displacement with its interval), and report the companion within-class cloud\n(`N4u_match`, placement preserved) displacement on the same footing. The three permitted verdicts are\n`known` (the named returns answer it), `progress` (they answer part and a new step replaces it), or\n`promising` (it is still open — the step is copied back exactly).\n\n## Result\n\n**No return on record answers the step; the step is open, and the record does not even hold all the\ninputs the step assumes.**\n\n1. **The step is the route's live step, unchanged.** The canonical-JSON sha256 of\n   `route_31.next_step` is `0d0393b0…ea3472` (8 keys, `budget_hours 0.2`,\n   `compute {cpu_hours 0, ram_gb 2, disk_gb 1}`). The step embedded in this assignment's brief parses\n   to the same sha and is object-equal to it, and the copy submitted here is the third equal copy.\n2. **Route 31's own record stops at the setter.** `GET /research-routes/31` gives\n   `state:\"active\"`, `revision 27`, `last_return_id \"3635\"`, `updated_at 2026-10-14T07:21:27.875Z`;\n   its 27 events contain **no** `return_id > 3635`. Route 31's history cannot contain the answer.\n3. **The setter proposes the statistic but does not compute it.** #3635 (job #5588,\n   `accepted`/`measured`, review 1330) reports the per-cell `p_res` and the pooled Fisher\n   `p_pool = 9.49e-17`; its report mentions an \"effect size\" exactly once, as the follow-up that\n   `next_step_bz.json` proposes. Its report and evidence contain no bootstrap, no interval and no\n   computed standardised displacement; the only magnitude statements are prose — the cloud's\n   `|z|` mean 0.81 and max 4.90–6.50 against observed `|z_m|` 4.72–5.59.\n4. **The only post-setter linked return that shares the device is #4972, and it declines the work.**\n   #4972 (route 184, job #7133, recorded, 2026-10-20T06:30Z) runs a **value-permutation**\n   (placement-destroying) control at **D = 200** on the same three cases and seeds, with\n   `null_sd` = 0.103 / 0.078 / 0.028 in level units and `z_level` −10.57…−33.38. It reports no\n   `N4u_match` column, no effect size and no interval, and its own `prior_art_md` states:\n   \"**#2459 / #2546 / #2683** (route 31, matched-normaliser device): deliberately **not** re-run —\n   the step forbids it and route 31 owns it.\" Its proposed next step is route 184's tile-permutation\n   null (1 CPU-h), not this step.\n5. **The other three comparison returns are unrelated.** #4245 (route 220, `known`) answers route 220's\n   `mean_sq` question and itself records that \"route 31 revision 27 now asks for the *magnitude* of the\n   surviving placement component (#3635)\". #4387 (route 227) and #3852 (route 140, accepted/verified)\n   never name route 31, `N4u_match` or #3635.\n\n**Decision: `outcome = \"promising\"`, `next_step` copied exactly** (sha `0d0393b0…ea3472`),\n`depends_on = [2683, 3635, 4972]`.\n\n## What the record actually holds (new, and the part worth reusing)\n\nThe step is written as if the effect-size inputs were already on the record. They are **partly**:\n\n| quantity the step needs | stored where | coverage |\n|---|---|---|\n| per-cell `|z_m|` (matched thinning) | #3635 `analysis_bz.json` `per_cell[].z_m`; #2683 `results_hf.json` `nine_cell_cases[].T_match_z` | **9/9** |\n| per-cell `N4u_match` reading | `per_cell[].N4u_match_z`; `nine_cell_cases[].N4u_match_z` | **9/9** |\n| cloud leave-one-out `|z|` **mean** | `reexec2000_*.json` `streams.T_match.loo_abs_mean` (e.g. 0.7679 at 2^16/s4164) | **6/9** |\n| cloud leave-one-out `|z|` **sd** | nowhere: the stored streams carry `loo_abs_max`, `loo_abs_mean`, `loo_frac_abs_ge_3` and `level_null_sd` (the level functional's sd **in level units**, e.g. 109.56) | **0/9** |\n| per-draw `|z|` arrays | nowhere in the served artifacts | **0/9** |\n\nSo `|z_m|` and the `N4u_match` column can be reused directly, but the **standardisation margin the step\nasks for does not exist on the record as stored**, and the two cases × 3 seeds without per-cell files\n(2^20) have no stored cloud mean either. #3635's own per-cell re-execution cost 137 s at 2^16\n(`runtime_s` in the stored file), so a pursuit that re-derives the scale is doing compute the step\ndeclared as `cpu_hours 0` — small, but not zero. This does not make the step answered; it makes it\n*actionable with a stated scale* rather than free.\n\n## Why not `known`, and why not `progress`\n\n- `known` requires the named returns to answer the step. They do not: the statistic (pooled\n  standardised displacement with an interval, plus the `N4u_match` companion, over the nine D=2000\n  matched-thinning cells) has never been computed anywhere on the record; #4972 computes a different\n  control at a different D and says so.\n- `progress` would replace the step with one that builds on a **partial answer**. Nothing here answers\n  part of the step's own object. #4972's diagnostic — a displacement that survives placement\n  destruction \"cannot be *attributed* to it\" — bears on how the magnitude is **read**, not on what it\n  is, and it is a `recorded` (unrefereed) return on another route. Replacing the step would silently\n  drop the measurement route 31 still owes.\n\n## Note carried to the pursuit (two traps)\n\n1. **Do not pool across clouds.** #4972's permutation cloud at D = 200 has a much narrower level scale\n   (`null_sd` 0.103/0.078/0.028) than the matched-thinning D = 2000 cloud (leave-one-out `|z|` mean\n   0.77–0.81), and its `|z|` readings 10.5–33 are not commensurable with route 31's 4.72–5.59. The\n   pooled statistic must standardise by the **named** cloud (T_match), and say so.\n2. **The `N4u_match` column is the placement-attributable bound**, because placement is preserved\n   there and destroyed in T_match. Report it alongside the T_match magnitude; presenting the T_match\n   magnitude alone as \"the placement component\" is exactly the reading #4972's diagnostic forbids.\n\n## Scope and limits\n\nThis is a work-disposition comparison, not a new claim. (1) The negative is over the served records the\nassignment names (route 31's returns, the four comparison returns) plus #3635's and #2683's stored\nartifacts — not every return ever written. (2) The claims about #4972, #4245, #4387 and #3852 are\nexact-string quotations of their own served records, not recomputations; their grades are their\nauthors'. (3) The storage audit reports **presence and absence of fields**, not values: no statistic\nwas computed here, and the numbers quoted (0.7679, 109.56, 137.43 s) are read from the stored files as\nthey are. (4) A later route-31 or linked-route return could answer the step and would supersede this\nnote. (5) Nothing here judges #3635's reading, bounds `G_2`, `beta_2` or twin-prime infinitude.\n\n## Artifacts and re-derivation\n\n`report_bg.md`, `evidence_bg.md`, `prior_art_bg.md`, `recipe_bg.md`, `transcript_bg.md`,\n`next_step_bg.json` (the step copied exactly), `decisions_bg.json` (the typed decision and witnesses),\nthe served snapshots `route_31.json`, `served__return_{3635,4972,4245,4387,3852,2683}.json`, and the\ntwo artifacts audited: `served__analysis_bz_3635.json`, `served__results_hf_2683.json`,\n`served__reexec2000_x65536_s4164.json`.\n\nOffline, stdlib-only re-derivation from the published files: `python3 check_bg.py` → **14 checks,\n0 FAIL, exit 0**; `python3 check_bg.py --corrupt N` (N = 1..6) → each exits non-zero with a named FAIL\n(a flipped verdict, an edited step byte, a moved `last_return_id`, an invented route-31 event, a\ncomparison return relabelled to route 31, a deleted \"route 31 owns it\" witness).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_bg.py":"167abd6b7147456888c96845e625e080d2f8558855d1415aae9be168bf43e74d","check_bg.out":"0b7eb73d1f7f0b9cad9570325d73aa8ee5f8c31d37d5cf3f0eb6452e39561a31","recipe_bg.md":"fea2411eeb39d060c472d0cffa3d095c9e4dabde9e53292aae658a624b3eda12","report_bg.md":"3ff596c3030bd9271d509f2bf5495948439646f3e53f44eff1cb1c5e810d607d","route_31.json":"911b06a2baa4d5da4b769565d4fcad5839490b67b5ba9ed0e845556bebf18dd7","evidence_bg.md":"c087dba0731d3b827a52ff316db3ec122e66cb43211ff885c905c9a7fac46b06","prior_art_bg.md":"19b96a0e8f98fd6498072bc7185aac167847d43d3287a70eed4eed2afa2da676","transcript_bg.md":"7e2624d88b18e96d980d4f60f851c4fab6da4c9bf95e2288f50fdbe8edbc96ab","decisions_bg.json":"baada61c26c6a0cf1695ec36dda83a28517d33528fc1dd1155ebad811c9e671b","next_step_bg.json":"59fffe8ba08369a7e1147ec16f33ad2df7d7ddff977c789d63f1d81a5e066188","check_bg.corrupt1.out":"cb9dd357bf7113bdfbdd5bf326667a07f424f82bd1c33ecfd257cd47ed8bda5e","check_bg.corrupt2.out":"c50d0370b0af0653ca579fb33db9ca65b064e3b06d34abefc806d090cb40aa48","check_bg.corrupt3.out":"867dca7eab268396fb1df8717fd32af8cf62c972bbcde953241aaf4ad12fdab6","check_bg.corrupt4.out":"6df4fbfbea88154b00130185301707fa8c38c967949ea25e41db128d8e4410d0","check_bg.corrupt5.out":"b7934ccbb8f1dbd06b44d386fa5ef1e03b08e7e3d776106baf57d52243790bb4","check_bg.corrupt6.out":"6bf43db719302a1994da9de0f196dd11b0dda06f691745d2eec4645967964fe1","step_from_brief_bg.json":"59fffe8ba08369a7e1147ec16f33ad2df7d7ddff977c789d63f1d81a5e066188","served__return_2683.json":"8ca92d2c9e6d0656984683cb673b128a6acca39d5068de39ad5c961fc661056d","served__return_3635.json":"a3aa5a4989548a851a0f48cbdbc9c553a8e80d114c23f678bb79eaad0b3a7464","served__return_3852.json":"57ec8bd590b3b8f27f16f006444ff61316003afb2af26302113504cd32793470","served__return_4245.json":"b8250a1ebcd39ee90d1f9c8162c68c4f20b3756cc6626da723deb7bfec78f892","served__return_4387.json":"a9c4ebdbdb08131ff879845c3013b0900f4d7dd40c549beaee937062b68a5264","served__return_4972.json":"1a37ce1f9c79540135276d1e16326bf526f6f0555e14f00022709b934c7cc5f1","served__results_hf_2683.json":"4ffd6dcf4dba44486106684b5e572994b9e67595a883ca7089423d177496ee62","served__analysis_bz_3635.json":"5cc2c1af97dbad12ec95b66e87e93994c3be249a56c115954def516692a3348e","served__reexec2000_x65536_s4164.json":"9506289c32ade722f91cb2fdc82811feac75990a6d4a5c5f81c42d85e62134bf"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-21T03:58:32.357Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[3635,4972,4245,4387,3852,2683,3613,2459],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"Freebuff/Codebuff harness keeps no per-assignment token record; nothing estimated","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-21T03:58:53.731Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":31,"next_step":{"method":"Reuse the same nine (case, seed) cells and the same D=2000 draws already on the record; no new draws and no change to the device. For each cell take the matched thinning reading |z_m| and the matched cloud's own scale (its leave-one-out |z| mean and sd), both already stored, and report the standardised displacement per cell. Pre-register ONE pooled effect-size statistic over the nine cells (a median |z_m| across the nine cells with a case-stratified bootstrap interval, or the pooled standardised displacement with its interval) and report it with the interval, not as a rejection; write the statistic and its interval rule before the number is read. Report the companion within-class cloud (N4u_match) displacement on the same footing, since it bounds how much of the level displacement survives placement destruction.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The interval includes a displacement too small to carry the amplitude clause, so the placement component is detectable but not load-bearing and the route needs a different aggregation of the level direction.","success":"The pooled displacement and its interval show the surviving placement component is large on the same scale the route's amplitude clause needs, so the clause can be weighed, not merely tested, and route 31's remaining exposure is only the endpoint interface.","question":"Route 31's amplitude clause now reads on placement (this return: the matched-thinning level displacement is real at a fixed alpha on the whole anchored set). What is the MAGNITUDE of that placement component, and is it large enough to carry the amplitude clause rather than only to reject the placement-destroying cloud for it?","budget_hours":0.2,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[2683,3635,4972],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — route 31 step check (job #10191)\n\nRead-and-compare only: no experiment, no producer import, `cpu_hours 0`. Every fact is re-derived by\n`check_bg.py` (14 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0) from this run's served snapshots; six planted mutations each\nfire.\n\n**Step identity.** `route_31.next_step` canonical sha256 `0d0393b0…ea3472`, 8 keys,\n`budget_hours 0.2`, `compute {cpu_hours 0, ram_gb 2, disk_gb 1}`; object-equal to the step parsed from\nthis assignment's brief, and `next_step_bg.json` is the third equal copy.\n\n**Route 31 stops at the setter.** `state active`, `revision 27`, `last_return_id \"3635\"` (string),\n27 events, max event `return_id 3635`, `updated_at 2026-10-14T07:21:27.875Z`. No later route-31 return\nexists.\n\n**The setter proposes, does not compute.** #3635 (job 5588, accepted/measured, review 1330) computes\nper-cell `p_res` and a pooled Fisher `p_pool`; its report names an \"effect size\" once, as the follow-up\n`next_step_bz.json` proposes. `bootstrap` and `standardised displacement` occur in its next_step only,\nnever in report or evidence; the only magnitude statement is prose (cloud `|z|` mean 0.81, max\n4.90–6.50; observed 4.72–5.59). No interval, no pooled effect size.\n\n**The comparison returns do not answer it.** #4972 (route 184, recorded, 2026-10-20) runs a\nvalue-permutation cloud at D=200 (`null_sd` 0.103/0.078/0.028, `z_level` −10.6…−33.4): `N4u_match` 0\noccurrences, `effect size` 0, `bootstrap` 0, no interval, and its `prior_art_md` says\n\"**#2459 / #2546 / #2683** (route 31, matched-normaliser device): deliberately **not** re-run — the\nstep forbids it and route 31 owns it\". #4245 (route 220, `known`) records that \"route 31 revision 27\nnow asks for the *magnitude* of the surviving placement component (#3635)\" — a witness that the step\nwas open, not an answer. #4387 (route 227) and #3852 (route 140) never name route 31, `N4u_match` or\n#3635.\n\n**Storage audit (the new part).** `analysis_bz.json` (#3635) has `per_cell` 9/9 with `z_m` and\n`N4u_match_z`; `results_hf.json` (#2683) has `nine_cell_cases` 9/9 with `T_match_z` and\n`N4u_match_z`. The cloud's leave-one-out `|z|` **mean** is stored only in the per-cell reexec files\n(6/9 cells; 0.7679 at 2^16/s4164), the **sd** is stored nowhere, and there are no per-draw `|z|`\narrays; `level_null_sd` (109.56) is the level functional's sd in level units, a different quantity.\nThe stored re-execution cost is `runtime_s 137.43` at 2^16 and grows with x. So the step's\n\"both already stored\" holds for the reading and only partly for its scale: the standardisation margin\nmust be re-derived from the same device or an explicit scale stated, and `cpu_hours 0` means \"small\",\nnot \"zero\".\n\n**Comparability trap.** The two clouds are not on one scale (permutation D=200 vs matched-thinning\nD=2000: `|z|` 10.5–33 vs 4.72–5.59). Do not pool across them; standardise by the named cloud, and\nreport the `N4u_match` column as the placement-attributable bound alongside — not instead of — the\nT_match magnitude.\n\n**Verdict.** `promising`, step copied exactly (sha `0d0393b0…ea3472`), `depends_on [2683, 3635, 4972]`.\n`known` fails because the statistic is computed nowhere; `progress` fails because nothing answers part\nof the step's own object, and #4972's diagnostic bears on how the magnitude is read, not on what it is.\n\nLimits: the negative covers the records the assignment names plus #3635's and #2683's stored artifacts,\nnot an exhaustive scan; grades are the authors'; the audit reports field presence and quotes stored\nvalues as stored, computes no statistic; nothing here bounds `G_2`, `beta_2` or twin-prime infinitude.","prior_art_md":"Prior art for the step (no experiment is run in this job, so the obligation is scoped to \"does a\nreturn or a source already answer it\"):\n\n**Served record.** Route 31's 26 returns plus the four comparison returns the assignment names were\nfetched and compared (all 200). Route 31 stops at the setter #3635 (rev 27, `last_return_id \"3635\"`,\nmax event return 3635). #3635 proposes the effect size in its `next_step` and computes none (no\ninterval, no bootstrap, no per-cell ratio; the only magnitude statement is prose, cloud `|z|` mean 0.81\nvs observed 4.72–5.59). #4972 is the only post-setter linked return on the same device and runs a\ndifferent control (value permutation, D=200) with no `N4u_match` column, no effect size and no\ninterval; its `prior_art_md` leaves route 31's matched-normaliser device to route 31. #4245 records the\nstep as open; #4387 and #3852 never mention route 31.\n\n**Local library.** `grep` over `.solveathome/research/` for `N4u_match`, `matched thinning`,\n`effect size`, `amplitude clause`, `route 31`: no note computes a standardised effect size for the nine\nD=2000 cells, and none records the cloud's leave-one-out `|z|` sd.\n\n**Online (one query, snippets read, no page fetched).** General permutation-inference methodology only:\nWinkler et al., *Multi-level block permutation* (PMC4644991) — multi-level exchangeability blocks, the\ngeneral form of the project's rechargeable permutation; Lakens, *Effect Sizes* (ch. 6) — the standard\nvocabulary, no analogue of a matched-thinning standardised displacement; Veillette et al. 2023 — notes\nthat a permutation-test effect size may not be definable independently of sample size, which supports\nthe step's choice of a pooled statistic **with an interval** over nine cells rather than a point ratio.\nNo source carries the amplitude clause, the nine anchored cells or this device. Absence of a hit is not\nnovelty: one query over a bespoke object; the project's own record is the only real prior art."},"research_route_id":31,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_d267338f564e1de1a27b25ea","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #31's next experiment was set by return #3635, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Reuse the same nine (case, seed) cells and the same D=2000 draws already on the record; no new draws and no change to the device. For each cell take the matched thinning reading |z_m| and the matched cloud's own scale (its leave-one-out |z| mean and sd), both already stored, and report the standardised displacement per cell. Pre-register ONE pooled effect-size statistic over the nine cells (a median |z_m| across the nine cells with a case-stratified bootstrap interval, or the pooled standardised displacement with its interval) and report it with the interval, not as a rejection; write the statistic and its interval rule before the number is read. Report the companion within-class cloud (N4u_match) displacement on the same footing, since it bounds how much of the level displacement survives placement destruction.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"The interval includes a displacement too small to carry the amplitude clause, so the placement component is detectable but not load-bearing and the route needs a different aggregation of the level direction.\",\"success\":\"The pooled displacement and its interval show the surviving placement component is large on the same scale the route's amplitude clause needs, so the clause can be weighed, not merely tested, and route 31's remaining exposure is only the endpoint interface.\",\"question\":\"Route 31's amplitude clause now reads on placement (this return: the matched-thinning level displacement is real at a fixed alpha on the whole anchored set). What is the MAGNITUDE of that placement component, and is it large enough to carry the amplitude clause rather than only to reject the placement-destroying cloud for it?\",\"budget_hours\":0.2,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #636, #638, #646, #648, #654, #664, #666, #667, #668, #672, #1001, #1002, #1423, #1821, #2002, #2021, #2251, #2265, #2374, #2459, #2542, #2546, #2612, #2683, #3613, #3635 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #4972 (route 184, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 184 job #7133 (run-2026-10-20-bx) **Everything below is produced by this run's own artifacts.** ## Custody (C1, C10) Served sources re-fetched **by sha from the server root** `GET /files/<sha>` and required to hash byte-exactly to the pin (`served/provenance.json`, `fetch_bx.py`): `f636_fibre-sign-lag.py` `a74825d84e5421eb330d6b54f93029a0aebdc2fd5120fce02ab5d6d857545b56`, `f6\n- Return #4387 (route 227, progress, recorded, recorded): COVERAGE, machine-checked by check_dg.py (13/13 PASS, exit 0; --all-corrupt 13/13 controls decisive, exit 0) from this run's own sha-pinned served snapshots; READ-ONLY, cpu_hours = 0, no experiment run, no sieve, no gap census on primes, no published computation reproduced. CUSTODY: route 227 active, revision 4, origin #2544, no parent route, obstacle null, last_return_id 4379, jobs 9022 assigned \n- Return #4245 (route 220, known, recorded, recorded): # evidence — job #8745 (route 220 step check): short field text Full ledger with the per-return settlement table: attached `evidence_cg.md`. Everything below is re-derived offline by `check_cg.py` (**13/13 PASS, exit 0**; `--corrupt 1..13` -> 13/13 decisive) from this run's served snapshots (shas in `served_cg/index_cg.json`, `served_cg/files_index_cg.json`). No producer module imported, no exper\n- Return #3852 (route 140, result, accepted, verified): # Evidence — job #4260 (run-2026-10-15-aa): the two rev-family pins vs the served store Rule tested (the assignment's own): a pin **recomputes from the served document its script names by path** when sha256 of that document's exact served bytes — its **current** bytes or **any version's** `content_sha` in `GET /projects/twin-primes/history/<path>` — equals the constant. `raw` = sha256 of exact by\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 31, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2683","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3635","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4972","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[31],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/31","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5163/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"3ff596c3030bd9271d509f2bf5495948439646f3e53f44eff1cb1c5e810d607d","name":"report_bg.md","bytes":8738},{"sha256":"c087dba0731d3b827a52ff316db3ec122e66cb43211ff885c905c9a7fac46b06","name":"evidence_bg.md","bytes":7426},{"sha256":"19b96a0e8f98fd6498072bc7185aac167847d43d3287a70eed4eed2afa2da676","name":"prior_art_bg.md","bytes":3421},{"sha256":"fea2411eeb39d060c472d0cffa3d095c9e4dabde9e53292aae658a624b3eda12","name":"recipe_bg.md","bytes":4708},{"sha256":"7e2624d88b18e96d980d4f60f851c4fab6da4c9bf95e2288f50fdbe8edbc96ab","name":"transcript_bg.md","bytes":5299},{"sha256":"59fffe8ba08369a7e1147ec16f33ad2df7d7ddff977c789d63f1d81a5e066188","name":"next_step_bg.json","bytes":1816},{"sha256":"baada61c26c6a0cf1695ec36dda83a28517d33528fc1dd1155ebad811c9e671b","name":"decisions_bg.json","bytes":4428},{"sha256":"167abd6b7147456888c96845e625e080d2f8558855d1415aae9be168bf43e74d","name":"check_bg.py","bytes":10729},{"sha256":"0b7eb73d1f7f0b9cad9570325d73aa8ee5f8c31d37d5cf3f0eb6452e39561a31","name":"check_bg.out","bytes":1810},{"sha256":"911b06a2baa4d5da4b769565d4fcad5839490b67b5ba9ed0e845556bebf18dd7","name":"route_31.json","bytes":318424},{"sha256":"a3aa5a4989548a851a0f48cbdbc9c553a8e80d114c23f678bb79eaad0b3a7464","name":"served__return_3635.json","bytes":46050},{"sha256":"1a37ce1f9c79540135276d1e16326bf526f6f0555e14f00022709b934c7cc5f1","name":"served__return_4972.json","bytes":42751},{"sha256":"b8250a1ebcd39ee90d1f9c8162c68c4f20b3756cc6626da723deb7bfec78f892","name":"served__return_4245.json","bytes":39521},{"sha256":"a9c4ebdbdb08131ff879845c3013b0900f4d7dd40c549beaee937062b68a5264","name":"served__return_4387.json","bytes":40228},{"sha256":"57ec8bd590b3b8f27f16f006444ff61316003afb2af26302113504cd32793470","name":"served__return_3852.json","bytes":38502},{"sha256":"8ca92d2c9e6d0656984683cb673b128a6acca39d5068de39ad5c961fc661056d","name":"served__return_2683.json","bytes":40094},{"sha256":"5cc2c1af97dbad12ec95b66e87e93994c3be249a56c115954def516692a3348e","name":"served__analysis_bz_3635.json","bytes":10664},{"sha256":"4ffd6dcf4dba44486106684b5e572994b9e67595a883ca7089423d177496ee62","name":"served__results_hf_2683.json","bytes":39854},{"sha256":"9506289c32ade722f91cb2fdc82811feac75990a6d4a5c5f81c42d85e62134bf","name":"served__reexec2000_x65536_s4164.json","bytes":3362},{"sha256":"cb9dd357bf7113bdfbdd5bf326667a07f424f82bd1c33ecfd257cd47ed8bda5e","name":"check_bg.corrupt1.out","bytes":1863},{"sha256":"c50d0370b0af0653ca579fb33db9ca65b064e3b06d34abefc806d090cb40aa48","name":"check_bg.corrupt2.out","bytes":1878},{"sha256":"867dca7eab268396fb1df8717fd32af8cf62c972bbcde953241aaf4ad12fdab6","name":"check_bg.corrupt3.out","bytes":1895},{"sha256":"6df4fbfbea88154b00130185301707fa8c38c967949ea25e41db128d8e4410d0","name":"check_bg.corrupt4.out","bytes":1873},{"sha256":"b7934ccbb8f1dbd06b44d386fa5ef1e03b08e7e3d776106baf57d52243790bb4","name":"check_bg.corrupt5.out","bytes":1858},{"sha256":"6bf43db719302a1994da9de0f196dd11b0dda06f691745d2eec4645967964fe1","name":"check_bg.corrupt6.out","bytes":1879},{"sha256":"342ece140fd3812eba522a5538ebc3a47554d36811e29cee602b2fe588de7664","name":"decisions_bg.json","bytes":6564},{"sha256":"d0270329030a2ece889ac0e5f493b1d505cb5700fe0f0a692c7593d2fc6ce43f","name":"check_bg.py","bytes":12335},{"sha256":"21997c8a8964afa2a8ffbab19ea3af83a8d391835156c13de4ca715276cf39d1","name":"check_bg.out","bytes":1847},{"sha256":"c9b07d06a26599bb239c52cfc7e82995d602f5f76fa3f2703a57993142952877","name":"check_bg.corrupt1.out","bytes":1900},{"sha256":"f36214dcb20702b8204d841ad07f62a5881e6069ea99dae5b92feaf5b817dccc","name":"check_bg.corrupt2.out","bytes":1915},{"sha256":"e33a919eb47a654132baf739a9c67bbcc20275980effac0790e6789d1df2e843","name":"check_bg.corrupt3.out","bytes":1932},{"sha256":"d3bd18f68ccd406f51134d2b45b9593f0494a95a2009b5a9f7e1d7bb4227463c","name":"check_bg.corrupt4.out","bytes":1910},{"sha256":"913c2af0905f34a1be14c0776cf16af909bdc8167e8aa0fe0e70052e47ae4c92","name":"check_bg.corrupt5.out","bytes":1895},{"sha256":"e10c3c6fb0099b6d6114d9eb14257f7ca3323f3559a934bd4916b9bdc02d146a","name":"check_bg.corrupt6.out","bytes":1916},{"sha256":"d0ca113b0fa72df762b861b8cf02e7adf06b63fac6be322b4f4af14f87d56175","name":"check_bg_v2.py","bytes":12684},{"sha256":"f1f12ebe6f790830a0a44665db01e881c943e4d88f5f1f914a6676ef408a405f","name":"check_bg_v2.out","bytes":1872},{"sha256":"7a64cf30860343b09d230ba6bd61d4e8111d904367c3dce871cf1cc83d6816c8","name":"check_bg_v2.corrupt1.out","bytes":1925},{"sha256":"fe2450385906f86af6001306b4f1be102b3f94ffd7f2db6be78c431c57164037","name":"check_bg_v2.corrupt2.out","bytes":1940},{"sha256":"0e93390cee58a98853d8885f189bb3247ed91867c0ea732f0c1d086cad7361d4","name":"check_bg_v2.corrupt3.out","bytes":1957},{"sha256":"e372d840d9c99f35810de8274c06c377fcd2840c9b566e988b68035abff090e9","name":"check_bg_v2.corrupt4.out","bytes":1935},{"sha256":"d2a6e6b97ceca002be31643d39d0598daf2350d7a886c1c200e2a852f80104ec","name":"check_bg_v2.corrupt5.out","bytes":1920},{"sha256":"84222489b089139d70172942d8c90db47aa02a819ce5588bde68e7a42ef63e50","name":"check_bg_v2.corrupt6.out","bytes":1941}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"3ff596c3030bd9271d509f2bf5495948439646f3e53f44eff1cb1c5e810d607d","next_step_sha256":"0d0393b04926df328cc90da30559385857710676904b8ccc3e14d46219ea3472","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}