{"id":5311,"job_id":10592,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Lane `formalize` state of the art -> version 9 (job #10592): entry 347 promoted, one rewrite\n\n**What changed.** One open unverified entry existed (entry 347, source return #5310) and the lane's\naccepted-return count is unchanged, so this upkeep is that entry plus one full rewrite of the Verified\nsummary. **Entry 347 is promoted**, and the summary is v9 with `through_return_id` left at **5134**\n(newest accepted return; `accepted_since` 0).\n\n**Why it was promoted: checked, not trusted.** I re-derived entry 347 on an independent path\n(`work/check_entry347_cg.py`): my own twin-admissibility sieve (prime slicing, not run-cf's slice\nassignment), my own cyclic gap extraction, my own pair accumulation by `np.add.at` over all seven\nrungs 5#, 7#, 11#, 13#, 17#, 19#, 23# (7.7 s total, 23# = 223,092,870-cell period). All of the\nentry's claims hold:\n\n- `A = A^T` at every rung; `sum_L A[L][L]` odd; `c_6` odd, every other `c_L` even;\n- **exactly one** odd diagonal cell, at `(g*,g*)`, with the `g*` the entry names\n  (12, 12, 18, 18, 30, 30, 30 at 5#,7#,11#,13#,17#,19#,23#), and `g*` is the span of the gap\n  starting at `v = P-1`, the unique mirror-fixed vertex (`P/2-1` is even and not admissible);\n- off-diagonal cells carry no parity;\n- `R_obs/R_null` = 1.000, 0.600, 0.636, 0.723, 0.647, 0.645, 0.636 against the census-matched\n  permutation null (seed 20261021), matching the source artifact cell for cell, including the census\n  itself at all seven rungs (`work/check_entry347_cg.json`, 0 failures).\n\n**One correction of wording, not of content.** The entry says `R` sits at \"0.636 +/- 0.04\" of the\nnull. My recomputation reproduces every ratio, but as a two-sided band that is generous: the values\nspan 0.600-0.723, so 13# lies outside 0.636 +/- 0.04. The summary therefore states `0.65`\n(0.600-0.723; 13# the outlier) and says so explicitly, and the measured sentence carries no drift\nclaim. The law itself (the provable part) is unaffected.\n\n**How the rewrite was constrained.** The served v8 summary was 11,989 of the 12,000-character cap, so\nfolding a new result is a compression job, not an append. Prose was tightened throughout; two\nmethod-only bullets were dropped (the ZMod/CRT technique note under #77/#135, and the filter-pricing\ntrick under #4085 — both returns remain cited in the summary) and a few names/figures already on their\nreturns were shortened. Every trimmed token is disclosed with a reason group in\n`work/trim_allow_cg.json`, and `work/check_cg.py` refuses a rewrite that drops an undisclosed token or\na stale disclosure: **14/14 checks pass, 50 trimmed tokens disclosed, 0 unexplained, 0 stale**\n(`work/check_cg.json`). Nothing settled was removed silently: the preamble says cuts stay on their\nreturn, and the load-bearing list (every return/entry id and headline number) is machine-checked.\n\n**Scope and limits.** An upkeep makes no mathematical claim of its own. The lane state, its spec and\nreturn #5310 were read from served bytes (sha256 in `work/served/manifest.json`); the seven-rung\nrecomputation is my own code but it is a *check* of a returned result, not new research. I did not\nre-derive entry 335's proof beyond its parity corollary, and I did not attempt any Lean artifact (no\ntoolchain on this host; #5310 records the same measured blocker). Compute 0.01 CPU-h (7.7 s, single\ncore).\n\n7 returns wait for a verdict.\n\n*Local artefacts:* `work/summary_v9_cg.md` (the shipped summary, 11,984 chars),\n`work/check_entry347_cg.py` -> `work/check_entry347_cg.json`, `work/check_cg.py` ->\n`work/check_cg.json`, `work/trim_allow_cg.json`, `work/summary_v8_cg.md` (served v8, unchanged).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-21T19:54:54.543Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[5310,5134],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"harness keeps no per-assignment token counts; no estimate made","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-21T19:56:03.569Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_e3fa032fa3b26bcf17ff075f","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 1 new unverified entry (1 open).","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5311/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"5100f7c1966606b62df23f537ecb5630a8d54ef840cc61eaee9b12b22de99f35","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}