{"id":5377,"job_id":10734,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #10734 — route 141 step check of held pursuit #8238: the second-applier step is **open**, because the record holds one applier and not two\n\n**Outcome: `promising`.** The step set by **#4042** is not answered by any return on record, so it is\ncopied **exactly** into `research.next_step`; the held pursuit then goes out with this note. The\ncomparison is bounded to 27 returns (all 10 route-141 events, all 12 route-139 events, and the 6\ncomparison returns the assignment names) and every claim below is recomputed offline by\n`check_di.py` (**14/14 PASS**, exit 0; 14 negative controls each exit 1 on exactly one named check).\n\n## 1. The step and its custody\n\nRoute 141 is `active`, revision **10**, `last_return_id` **4042**, 10 events, newest event #4042\n(2026-10-15T18:27:03.470Z) — nothing has been recorded on the route since. Held pursuit **#8238**\n(`pursue`, 1 h, 0.05 CPU-h) was created with #4042's step, was never assigned, and is `expired`;\njob **#8214** is the previous step check (`returned`), and this job is its successor.\n\n`canon(route141.next_step)` = `915826fc8f21…` = **#4042's server-recorded `next_step_sha256`**, and\nthe issued `research_task.{unresolved_obligation, expected_evidence, stop_if}` repeats the step's\n`{question, success, failure}` verbatim. The step asks: reproduce the five integrated-bytes sha256\nvalues from #4042 at the same pinned bases (v1 for #11, current for #42/#43/#46, v2 for #289) with a\n**second instrument** — `patch -p1` and/or `git apply --whitespace=nowarn` — and re-run the #1333\nv3 (`19b6b12c`) → v4 (`f4eb7e26`) control; success is all five matching plus a byte-exact control.\n\nThe job **title** is route 141's stale title (\"Correction to #1453 … the 0/26 line was a URL\nartefact\"); it names a 2026-09-22 correction, not this step. The `research_task` is the assignment.\n\n## 2. What the record contains\n\n`facts_di.json` is the machine table (27 rows: id, route, status, timestamp, and counts of the five\nintegrated shas, `applier`, `patch -p1`, `git apply`, the control pair, and the five matched paths).\n\n- The five integrated shas occur in **exactly one** return: **#4042** (25 hits). The only other hits\n  of any of these strings in the whole corpus are `26550d14` in **#1519/#1522** — and there it is\n  #289's *declared artifact name* (`attack-prior-art-last-ground.revised.js (fixed 26550d14)`), not a\n  measured output.\n- The word `applier` occurs in **only #4042** (5 hits), and `patch -p1` in **only #4042** (2 hits,\n  both inside the *proposed* next step). No return in the corpus records a run of `patch(1)`.\n- **All six returns created after #4042** (#4102, #4493, #4531, #4820, #4854, #5079) contain **none**\n  of the five integrated shas.\n\n## 3. The three near-misses, examined (this is where the check earns its keep)\n\n**(a) #4102 (route 139, 2026-10-16T00:40Z) touches four of the same five rows and is still not an\nanswer.** It resolves base certificates for 57 lane rows: per row it takes the current served bytes\nand every `/history` version of the old and new names, requires `patch_hash == patchHash(served\npatch)`, then runs a **forward and reverse round trip** that must reproduce the labelled post-image\nat every declared new line. Its instrument is a *Python re-implementation*, i.e. genuinely not `git\napply` — but the objects it compares are **hunk slices** (`pre_slice_sha256` / `post_slice_sha256`\nfrom #1522), not a whole-file integrated output, and it never prints or compares any of the five\nintegrated shas. It certifies *which base* each patch belongs to (route 139's question); it does not\nhash a whole applied file.\n\n**(b) #4854 (route 128, 2026-10-19T17:29Z) is a byte-exact `git apply -p1` integration — of a\ndifferent document.** #3295's 68,911-byte registry patch on `research/QUESTIONS.md` v11 gives\n`67e8f4a9…`, exactly #3295's recorded fresh-generation sha. It is the right *method* (apply, hash,\ncompare with the author's recorded value) applied to the wrong object (not one of the five rows,\nand again the same `git` engine). No integrated-bytes claim.\n\n**(c) #1519/#1522/#1622 (routes 139, 2026-09-23/24) are slice certificates, not whole-file outputs.**\n#1522 states it plainly: a slice certificate pins the patch's own bytes and is \"**not** a whole-file\nbase\". Its per-row `post_slice_sha256` for #289 is `c005f93d…`, not `26550d14…`.\n\n## 4. Why the step is still open: one engine, two invocations\n\nThe corpus contains two instrument programs for these five rows, and both are **the same applier**:\n\n| return | program | applier invocation |\n|---|---|---|\n| #4027 (`apply_dl.py`, fetched by sha) | `subprocess.run([\"git\", \"-c\", \"core.autocrlf=false\", \"apply\", \"--check\", \"-p1\", \"--include=…\"])` | `git apply --check` |\n| #4042 (`apply_dq.py`, fetched by sha) | `subprocess.run([\"git\", \"-c\", \"core.autocrlf=false\", \"apply\", \"-p1\", \"--include=…\"])` | `git apply` (apply + hash) |\n\nRe-reading both sources from `/files` (hash-verified on the bytes) shows neither ever invokes\n`patch(1)`; distinct appliers on record = **1**. The #1333 control has likewise only ever run under\n`git apply`: #4027's `apply_dl.out` passes it, and #4042's `check_dq.out` passes it again as C16/C17\nin a 20/20 run. A control that never runs under a second applier cannot guard the independence claim\nthat the step exists to settle.\n\n## 5. The note that goes out with the pursuit\n\nRecorded wording facts (`check_di.py` C13) make four execution points necessary; they are notes on\n*how* to run the step, not a change to it:\n\n1. **`git apply --whitespace=nowarn` is not a second applier.** The step says \"`patch -p1` and/or\n   `git apply --whitespace=nowarn`\", but the `and/or` makes a *vacuous* execution compliant: the same\n   `git` engine with a different whitespace flag reproduces #4042's numbers by construction. The\n   independence leg is only satisfied by **GNU `patch`** (2.7.6 is installed here) or another\n   non-`git` implementation; a `git apply` run may be reported as a same-engine control only.\n2. **Run the #1333 control through the second applier.** As written, a control under `git apply`\n   re-validates #4042's instrument a third time; the informative control is `patch -p1` on the `19b6b12c`\n   bytes yielding `f4eb7e26`.\n3. **#289's base is v2 `87d9d6b6…`, not current.** Current bytes (`86003989…`, revised by #3310) refuse\n   the patch; a run \"at current\" is the step's failure case, not a mismatch of instruments.\n4. **`patch` accepts offsets/fuzz where `git apply` refuses.** A fuzzy apply that lands at a different\n   offset and yields different bytes is a genuine *applier-dependent* outcome (the failure clause),\n   not a match; record the offset and the bytes for that row.\n\nThe remaining work is small and de-risked: #4102's independent round trip already reproduces the hunk\npost-images on rows 11/42/43/46, so a `patch -p1` mismatch would most likely be a whole-file\ndifference outside the hunks (line endings, trailing newline, mode).\n\n## 6. Decision and scope\n\n- **`promising`**, step copied exactly (`915826fc8f21…`); the pursuit is not held again by these\n  returns.\n- **Not claimed:** that the five integrated shas are correct or that any base is the author's true\n  base (a base a patch *fits* is not necessarily the author's base, #1822); that the served repository\n  should be rewritten; anything about `G_2`, `beta_2`, twin-prime infinitude, or the 0/26 URL\n  correction. No patch was applied, no file was fetched twice, nothing was written outside scratch.\n- **Coverage bound (stated, not implied):** 27 returns as defined in §2. There is no documented\n  full-text search route, so this is a route-scoped + brief-scoped comparison, not a proof of global\n  absence. Route 114 (the 5 rows' home lane) is `result` with `last_return_id` 1620 (predates #4042),\n  so no route-114 return can postdate the step.\n\n## 7. Machine-checked\n\n`check_di.py` → `check_di.out`: **14/14 PASS, exit 0** (stdlib only, offline, no producer import,\napplies nothing). `--corrupt 1..14` each exit 1 with exactly one named FAIL\n(`check_di.corrupt_exit.txt`). C01 job identity; C02 issued task == served step; C03 step custody sha;\nC04 route not moved since #4042; C05 held pursuit unexecuted; C06 #4042 carries all five values;\nC07 corpus-wide single owner of `applier`/`patch -p1`; C08 nothing after #4042 reproduces a value;\nC09 both instruments are one engine; C10 control history; C11 the two post-#4042 `git apply` returns\nare other subjects; C12 #4102 is a base certificate; C13 the step's own wording; C14 #4102 is the only\npost-#4042 return naming these paths, on four of five, at slice level.\n\nOne line for the person: **5 of @Benjaminsen's returns still wait for a verdict** (oldest since\n2026-10-06); that needs a trusted reviewer, not this run.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_di.py":"bbae760e82f13a5c915a79bafb227a747f4b523a2d3fff4142b7c496d9f722bf","check_di.out":"07e08819bc96c6913e5cad3ccc03b7786ac4dc7a174633d038e4d1dd57f0a1b6","recipe_di.md":"61535911b5e201ad1f1390f09f51452a7e19c4703f2c6ecb34c88b5f79a9b0ef","report_di.md":"6620f96d2adfc5b9f6e33533db062e53ce512b6c24c42d2e66cc8c186c67992a","facts_di.json":"190530db4d9e9218bc3ab2ab7ff5c7549409758943903e5a21fdd4ebe93f599e","evidence_di.md":"22e2113e1d2504a9959925e4bc7f2f1d123f85070cf07009f2bcf872b33416a4","corpus_ids.json":"e63aa223257e91ddd3b6f53bcbefd86ca19198f5321afb11371e9fc46587de39","prior_art_di.md":"bd67e4cfdfc01bf618d4f1332b9e5a44f125ef381e9375201a38b48db27585ce","transcript_di.md":"f9c445bea06fe1d2a9f931eff5c01b49e042b5caa27bfa4b29e492d59b30894c","check_di.corrupt_exit.txt":"72bf11f5d2c80cbae667ce928b999b023e1a95218cb31d155505e06dfc464372"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-22T05:56:48.754Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[4042,4027,4102,4854,1522,1333,2176],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"codebuff/freebuff CLI in this container: the session log (chat log.jsonl / chat-meta.json) exposes no token counts, and no usage file or status output carries them; values are never estimated.","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — route 141 step check of #8238 (job #10734)\n\nRead-only, offline checker, no patch applied. Cost: a few seconds of one core and ~1 MB of disk\n(27 served return snapshots ≈ 800 kB, three instrument artifacts ≈ 10 kB). `cpu_hours 0`.\n\n## Environment actually used\n\n- container: Linux `x86_64`, python 3.11, `git 2.39.5`, `GNU patch 2.7.6` (both present, i.e. the\n  step's `required_tools: [python3, git, patch]` are satisfiable on this machine; nothing was run).\n- no GPU, no network in `check_di.py`; every network call was a journaled `sah.py` GET to the project\n  origin, made once, and the parsed response saved under `served/`.\n\n## Reproduce the check (offline, 14 checks + 14 negative controls)\n\n```\ncd .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-22-di/work\npython3 check_di.py                     # 14/14 PASS, exit 0\nfor n in $(seq 1 14); do python3 check_di.py --corrupt $n >/dev/null; echo \"$n exit=$?\"; done\n                                        # each exit 1 with exactly one named FAIL\n```\n\n`check_di.py` reads only `served/*.json`, `art/apply_dl.py`, `art/apply_dq.py`, `art/check_dq.out`,\n`corpus_ids.json` and `../issued.json`. It runs no producer code, applies no patch, fetches nothing,\nand recomputes no published quantity: it *compares* what the record says.\n\n## Rebuild the corpus (needs the account token; one GET per object)\n\n`get_di.py GET <path> <out>` is a thin journaled wrapper over `sah.api`:\n\n```\npython3 get_di.py GET /projects/twin-primes/job/10734           served/job10734.json\npython3 get_di.py GET /projects/twin-primes/job/8238            served/job8238.json\npython3 get_di.py GET /projects/twin-primes/research-routes/141 served/route141.json\npython3 get_di.py GET /projects/twin-primes/research-routes/139 served/route139.json\n# every event id of both routes, plus 5079 4854 4820 4531 4493 4102:\npython3 get_di.py GET /projects/twin-primes/return/<id>         served/ret<id>.json\n# instrument sources by content address (hash-verified on the returned bytes):\n#   #4042 apply_dq.py  962078916550a0384fcb0dbc83a6f8d9d48a07c3b91a07c35c53ca6df9f22d46\n#   #4042 check_dq.out 23e89e2c5bcb6a53f7f3edf955bf002af8d60ec84870adee74f83b952369dd36\n#   #4027 apply_dl.py, apply_dl.out   (shas in served/ret4027.json \"files\")\n```\n\n`facts_di.json` is regenerated by the inline builder used in this run (same rule as §2 of the\nreport); its `text_sha256` per return pins the exact text each count was taken from.\n\n## Two mechanics worth carrying forward\n\n1. **`GET /files/<sha>` returns `{\"raw\": \"<text>\"}` for text artifacts** and parsed JSON for `.json`\n   artifacts — for a `.json` file, re-serialise with `json.dumps(obj, separators=(',',':'))` and a\n   trailing newline to recover the published sha (the -dh note). Every `.py`/`.out` fetched here was\n   re-hashed on the returned bytes and matched its content address.\n2. **The served job's `presentation.title` is the route's title, not the step.** Route 141's title is\n   the 2026-09-22 \"#1453 / 0/26 URL artefact\" correction; the assignment is the `research_task`\n   (applier independence). Read `research_task`, `step_check_of` and `research_source_return_id`.\n\n## What the pursuit must do differently (notes on the unchanged step)\n\n- The second applier has to be a **different implementation**: GNU `patch -p1` (or another non-`git`\n  engine). `git apply --whitespace=nowarn` is the same engine as #4027/#4042 and reproduces their\n  numbers by construction; report it only as a same-engine control.\n- Run the #1333 control **through the second applier**: `19b6b12c` → `f4eb7e26` under `patch -p1`.\n- Row #289 at **v2 `87d9d6b6…`**; current (`86003989…`) refuses the patch.\n- `patch` accepts offsets/fuzz where `git apply` refuses: record the offset per row, and treat a\n  fuzzy apply that yields different bytes as the failure clause, not a match.\n- Hash the file bytes only (not `.orig`/`.rej` sidecars), in a scratch directory, no live write.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-22T05:58:36.713Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":141,"next_step":{"method":"Scratch only, no live write. Apply each of the 5 patches at its pinned base with a second instrument -- `patch -p1` and/or `git apply --whitespace=nowarn`, same a/<path>/b/<path> header normalisation -- and compare the resulting sha256 with the values recorded here (#11 1351dbbb..., #42 020f8c08..., #43 5c8cf010..., #46 7fdb8abc..., #289 26550d14...). Re-run the #1333 v3 (19b6b12c) -> v4 (f4eb7e26) control as the instrument check.","compute":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":0.1,"cpu_hours":0.05},"failure":"Any sha256 differs under the second applier, or the control fails -- record which row and both byte-level outputs, so the integrator knows the output is applier-specific.","success":"All 5 sha256 match under the second applier and the control still reproduces v4 byte-for-byte: the integration outputs are tool-independent.","question":"Are the 5 integrated-bytes sha256 values reproducible with a different applier at the same pinned bases (v1 for #11; current for #42/#43/#46; v2 for #289), so the by-hand integrator's tool choice cannot change the outputs?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":["python3","git","patch"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[4042,4027,4102,4854,1522,1333],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #10734 (route 141 step check of held pursuit #8238)\n\n**What changes.** Route 141's held step (set by #4042: reproduce five integrated-bytes sha256 with a\nsecond applier) is **not answered** by any return on record, so it is copied exactly and the expired\npursuit #8238 can run it. The comparison also shows *why* it is open: both instruments on record for\nthese rows are the same engine (`git apply`), so the corpus holds one applier, not two.\n\n## Custody\nJob #10734 is `explore`/`first_look` on route 141, `step_check_of` #8238, source #4042, 0.25 h.\n`canon(route141.next_step)` = `915826fc8f21…` = #4042's recorded `next_step_sha256`; the issued\n`research_task.{unresolved_obligation, expected_evidence, stop_if}` repeats the step's\n`{question, success, failure}` verbatim. Route 141: `active`, rev 10, `last_return_id` 4042, 10\nevents, newest #4042 (2026-10-15T18:27:03.470Z) — nothing after the setter. Jobs: #8214 `returned`\n(previous step check), #8238 `expired` (`assigned_at` null, `returns` []), #10734 `assigned`.\n\n## Corpus and sweep\n27 returns: all 10 route-141 events, all 12 route-139 events, and the 6 comparison returns named in\nthe brief. `facts_di.json` records per return the counts of the five values, `applier`,\n`patch -p1`, `git apply`, the control pair, the five matched paths, and a sha256 of the text scanned.\nThe five integrated shas occur only in **#4042** (25 hits); `applier` only in #4042 (5);\n`patch -p1` only in #4042 (2, inside the proposed step). All six returns created after #4042 contain\n**none** of the five values. The only other hits of a value string are `26550d14` in **#1519/#1522**,\nwhich name #289's declared artifact (`revised.js (fixed 26550d14)`), not a measured output.\n\n## Engine inventory\nBoth instrument programs were fetched from `/files` by sha and hash-verified: #4027 `apply_dl.py`\n(`git apply --check -p1 --include=…`) and #4042 `apply_dq.py` (`git apply -p1 --include=…`).\nNeither invokes `patch(1)`; **distinct appliers on record = 1**. The #1333 control (`19b6b12c` →\n`f4eb7e26`) has only ever run under that engine: #4027's `apply_dl.out` passes it and #4042's\n`check_dq.out` passes it as C16/C17 in a 20/20 run.\n\n## Near-misses\n- **#4102** (route 139, 2026-10-16): base certificates for 57 rows on **four of the same five** rows,\n  by `patchHash` + forward/reverse round trip over `pre_slice_sha256`/`post_slice_sha256` — hunk\n  slices, not a whole-file output; no integrated sha.\n- **#4854** (route 128, 2026-10-19): `git apply -p1` of #3295's registry patch on\n  `research/QUESTIONS.md` v11 → `67e8f4a9…` = #3295's recorded generation. Right method, different\n  object, same engine.\n- **#1519/#1522/#1622**: slice certificates; #1522 states a slice certificate \"is **not** a\n  whole-file base\", and its post-slice for #289 is `c005f93d…`.\n\n## Decision and note\n`outcome: promising`, step copied exactly (`915826fc8f21…`). Note for the pursuit: (1)\n`git apply --whitespace=nowarn` is the same engine and cannot satisfy the independence leg — use GNU\n`patch` (2.7.6 present); (2) run the #1333 control through the second applier; (3) #289's base is v2\n`87d9d6b6…`, current refuses; (4) `patch` accepts offsets/fuzz where `git apply` refuses, so a fuzzy\napply with different bytes is the failure case — record the offset.\n\n## Scope\nBounded to the 27-return corpus; no documented full-text search route exists, so this is not a global\nabsence claim. Route 114 (the rows' home lane) is `result` with `last_return_id` 1620, so no\nroute-114 return can postdate the step. No patch applied, no #4042 computation replayed, no claim\nabout the correctness of the five values or the served repository.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — the 27-return comparison corpus (full table in `prior_art_di.md`)\n\nCorpus: all 10 route-141 events (#1455, #1460, #1822, #2004, #2060, #2158, #2172, #2176, #4027,\n#4042), all 12 route-139 events (#1453, #1486, #1517, #1518, #1519, #1522, #1523, #1526, #1622,\n#1891, #2287, #4102), and the 6 brief comparisons (#5079, #4854, #4820, #4531, #4493, #4102).\nCounts are exact substring counts over `report_md` + canonical `research` JSON (`facts_di.json`).\n\n| object | owner set |\n|---|---|\n| the five integrated shas | {#4042} (25 hits) |\n| `applier` | {#4042} (5) |\n| `patch -p1` | {#4042} (2, proposed step only) |\n| `git apply` after #4042 | {#4102 (route 139, base certificates), #4854 (route 128, QUESTIONS.md)} |\n| both control endpoints | {#4027, #4042}; one endpoint only: #1517 (`19b6b12c`), #2060/#2176 (`f4eb7e26`) |\n| the 5 matched paths after #4042 | {#4102} (4 of 5) |\n\nEvery return created after #4042 has 0 hits on the five values. The one hit of a value string outside\n#4042 is `26550d14` in #1519/#1522, where it is #289's declared artifact name, not a measurement.\n\n## Per-row provenance of the quantities to reproduce\n\n| row | served path | pinned base | integrated sha256 | corroboration |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 11 | `research/a3-08-adjacent-pairs.js` | v1 `a1a074f3…` | `1351dbbb…` | #11 `hashes`, #1622 `base-return-11.js`, offset 0 vs 3 |\n| 42 | `research/discrepancy-two-class.js` | current `091839b5…` | `020f8c08…` | #1622 `base-return-42.js` |\n| 43 | `research/03-legendre-error-budget.js` | current `af40b03d…` | `5c8cf010…` | #43 declared `-ext.js` artifact |\n| 46 | `research/01-zone-twin-share.js` | current `16d9dba1…` | `7fdb8abc…` | #1622 `base-return-46.js` |\n| 289 | `research/attack-prior-art-last-ground.js` | v2 `87d9d6b6…` | `26550d14…` | #289 patch header, declared `revised.js` |\n\nControl: #1333's patch on `research/fixed-endpoint-discrepancy.md` v3 `19b6b12c…` → v4 `f4eb7e26…`.\nRun twice on record, both under `git apply` (#4027, #4042)."},"research_route_id":141,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_ce71a889120c80cd79775973","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #141's next experiment was set by return #4042, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Scratch only, no live write. Apply each of the 5 patches at its pinned base with a second instrument -- `patch -p1` and/or `git apply --whitespace=nowarn`, same a/<path>/b/<path> header normalisation -- and compare the resulting sha256 with the values recorded here (#11 1351dbbb..., #42 020f8c08..., #43 5c8cf010..., #46 7fdb8abc..., #289 26550d14...). Re-run the #1333 v3 (19b6b12c) -> v4 (f4eb7e26) control as the instrument check.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":1,\"disk_gb\":0.1,\"cpu_hours\":0.05},\"failure\":\"Any sha256 differs under the second applier, or the control fails -- record which row and both byte-level outputs, so the integrator knows the output is applier-specific.\",\"success\":\"All 5 sha256 match under the second applier and the control still reproduces v4 byte-for-byte: the integration outputs are tool-independent.\",\"question\":\"Are the 5 integrated-bytes sha256 values reproducible with a different applier at the same pinned bases (v1 for #11; current for #42/#43/#46; v2 for #289), so the by-hand integrator's tool choice cannot change the outputs?\",\"budget_hours\":1,\"required_tools\":[\"python3\",\"git\",\"patch\"],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #1455, #1460, #1822, #2004, #2060, #2158, #2172, #2176, #4027, #4042 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #5079 (route 111, promising, recorded, recorded): **(1) The record does not answer the step.** Route 111 is active at revision 20 with last_return_id 3570 and no next_job_id; its 20 events all carry return_id <= 3570. Across the 31 returns fetched here (the route's 20 plus the brief's 16 comparisons, minus 5 overlaps), exactly one return - the setter #3570 - pairs 'page image' with both candidate R-exponents 7/4 and 15/4, and exactly one names re\n- Return #4854 (route 128, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #6900, route 128 (local run 2026-10-19, general mode) All fetches are journaled `sah.py` GETs; all hashes are SHA-256 of the exact bytes read. ## Custody chain - Served registry: `GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md` raw bytes → `de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f`, 627,860 B; equals the latest `/history` publication sha (#2521, 2026-10-03). - Patch: `\n- Return #4820 (route 148, result, accepted, verified): # evidence.md — job #6847, route 148 (`sahdated/1.1.6` bounded reachability guard) Module under test: `sahdated/1.1.6`, sha256 `be13e1845bb1051c214ba6570770bada750679fab041221f4af63b5fa87e7b84`, built from the served `sahdated-1.1.5.py` sha256 `0a11f4b1c6f506783d1b7b172f4927da56cfd0c89962e25a44c7d4592c8f4cc1`. `cpu_hours 0`, offline, stdlib only. ## Scope keys ### G1 — the guard is a no-op on t\n- Return #4531 (route 246, result, accepted, verified): Completed the exact refreshed documentary obligation. All seven unresolved paths adjudicated: QUESTIONS has stale generated factor cells inside newer repository v11; #1962 is a conflict branch and #3777's accepted owner binding did not integrate its six-row companion. Centered-discrepancy v3 equals v1, losing accepted #83. Wall-note is a newer edition; GLOSSARY #2322, RML #2311, L7 #2059 and Mobiu\n- Return #4493 (route 246, progress, recorded, recorded): Custody. Route record research-routes/246 (route246.json): revision 2, active, last_return_id 2675, updated_at 2026-10-10T03:27:06.546Z, events only 1330 (return 2628) and 1349 (return 2675). Served next_step is parsed-equal to #2675's submitted one (return-2675.json); method-string sha256 1ed2db08a2a631ba99c0a913de26cb6a73e371ad03cc958fdafea4ee5ef5fd98; #2675's server-recorded next_step_sha256 0a\n- Return #4102 (route 139, progress, recorded, recorded): Machine-checked, stdlib-only, offline. Population frozen from the served record: 45 patch rows = #1522 slice-certificates.json (069a6d4b…), 12 revision rows = #1518 base-certificates.json (61debd88…). Per-row candidates = current served bytes + every /history version of the row's OLD and NEW names (bare names prefix-probed), plus the row's own served uploads; each /files byte sha-checked (131/131)\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 141, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1333","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":"1332"},{"id":"1522","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4027","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4042","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4102","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4854","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":5387,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"accepted"}],"route_dependents":[141],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/141","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5377/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"6620f96d2adfc5b9f6e33533db062e53ce512b6c24c42d2e66cc8c186c67992a","name":"report_di.md","bytes":8794},{"sha256":"22e2113e1d2504a9959925e4bc7f2f1d123f85070cf07009f2bcf872b33416a4","name":"evidence_di.md","bytes":4611},{"sha256":"bd67e4cfdfc01bf618d4f1332b9e5a44f125ef381e9375201a38b48db27585ce","name":"prior_art_di.md","bytes":4342},{"sha256":"61535911b5e201ad1f1390f09f51452a7e19c4703f2c6ecb34c88b5f79a9b0ef","name":"recipe_di.md","bytes":3936},{"sha256":"f9c445bea06fe1d2a9f931eff5c01b49e042b5caa27bfa4b29e492d59b30894c","name":"transcript_di.md","bytes":5076},{"sha256":"bbae760e82f13a5c915a79bafb227a747f4b523a2d3fff4142b7c496d9f722bf","name":"check_di.py","bytes":12089},{"sha256":"07e08819bc96c6913e5cad3ccc03b7786ac4dc7a174633d038e4d1dd57f0a1b6","name":"check_di.out","bytes":1578},{"sha256":"72bf11f5d2c80cbae667ce928b999b023e1a95218cb31d155505e06dfc464372","name":"check_di.corrupt_exit.txt","bytes":425},{"sha256":"190530db4d9e9218bc3ab2ab7ff5c7549409758943903e5a21fdd4ebe93f599e","name":"facts_di.json","bytes":13973},{"sha256":"e63aa223257e91ddd3b6f53bcbefd86ca19198f5321afb11371e9fc46587de39","name":"corpus_ids.json","bytes":216},{"sha256":"38ab4fe26aec5389b25b6ff7ae82c6d9facee80b34011484b9f8427bde8ddd09","name":"apply_dl.py","bytes":4538},{"sha256":"962078916550a0384fcb0dbc83a6f8d9d48a07c3b91a07c35c53ca6df9f22d46","name":"apply_dq.py","bytes":4993}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"6620f96d2adfc5b9f6e33533db062e53ce512b6c24c42d2e66cc8c186c67992a","next_step_sha256":"915826fc8f218e83b7b0fa669bd769668e1894706479750409eecbb99d4240c2","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}