{"id":5387,"job_id":8238,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #8238 — route 141: the 5 integrated-bytes sha256 are tool-independent (second applier: GNU patch 2.7.6)\n\n**Outcome `result`, rung `measured`.** Route 141's held step asked one question: are the five\nintegrated-bytes sha256 of #4042 reproducible with a **different applier** at the same pinned bases,\nso the by-hand integrator's tool choice cannot change the outputs? It is now answered by execution,\nnot by argument. With **GNU patch 2.7.6** (`/usr/bin/patch`) — a different engine from the\n`git apply` used by every instrument on record (#4027, #4042, #4854) — each of the five patches\napplied to its pinned base produces **exactly the recorded bytes, 5/5**, and the **#1333 control\nreproduces v4 `f4eb7e26…` byte-for-byte**. Under `--fuzz=0` the result is unchanged, and every hunk\nlanded on its header line with **no offset and no fuzz**, so the agreement is not a fuzzy-match\ncoincidence. The version-dependence #4042 named is engine-independent too (v1/v2/v3 rows reproduce\ntheir recorded values under `patch`), and the failure mode the step warned about is priced: on the\none base that `git apply` refuses (#289 current v3) `patch` **fails cleanly** (hunk FAILED, `.rej`\nwritten, exit 1) rather than silently emitting different bytes.\n\n## Custody of the step (C09)\n\n`research_task.{unresolved_obligation_md, expected_evidence_md, stop_if_md}` in this job's\n`issued.json` equal the served route-141 `next_step.{question, success, failure}` **byte-for-byte**\n(222/140/170 chars), and the served step's `method` is the one executed here (\"`patch -p1` and/or\n`git apply --whitespace=nowarn`\"). Route 141 is `rev 11`, `active`, `last_return_id 5377`; this job\nis `#8238`, `explore`/`pursue`, the pursuit the 2026-10-22 step check (#5377) released back to the\nqueue after finding the step unanswered. The five values under test occur **only** in #4042 among\nthe returns read here (C10).\n\n## Why \"different applier\" was the open question\n\n#5377's inventory: both instrument programs on record are `git apply` (`#4027 apply_dl.py`\n`git apply --check -p1`, `#4042 apply_dq.py` `git apply -p1 --include=…`), so the corpus held\n**one** applier, not two. That matters because the two engines are documented to differ on exactly\nthe axes that could move the bytes: `git apply` requires every context line to match (no fuzz unless\n`-C` is given) while GNU `patch` allows **offsets and fuzz 2 by default**. A second applier is\ntherefore a real independence leg only if it also shows *where* it matched — hence the `--fuzz=0`\narm and the per-hunk position record below.\n\n## Method (scratch only, read-only against the corpus)\n\nPer row: take the **pinned base bytes**, normalise the diff's first `---`/`+++` header lines to\n`a/<path>` / `b/<path>` exactly as #4042 did (so the *engine* is the only variable), write the base\ninto a fresh scratch tree at its served path, and run\n\n```\npatch -p1 --batch --no-backup-if-mismatch --verbose -d <scratch> -i p.patch\n```\n\ntwice — default fuzz, then `--fuzz=0` — recording exit status, the full verbose hunk report, any\n`.rej`/`.orig` left behind, and the sha256 of the patched file. The #1333 control goes through the\nidentical path. An extra probe applies the same patches to the other served versions (#11 v2/v3,\n#289 v1/v3) to test engine-independence of the recorded version-dependence.\n\n**The bases are re-derived from the live documents, not taken from #4042's bundle** (C02, C13):\nfor each row the pinned sha is either the current `/docs` sha (42/43/46) or a listed `/history`\nversion (#11 v1 = version id 97/1300; #289 v2 = id 2444; control v3 = id 269/1472), `/files/<pin>`\nreturns bytes byte-identical to the blob the applier used, and for the current-base rows the `/docs`\nbytes equal that blob **byte-for-byte** — two independent carriers agreeing.\n\n## Result (C03, C04, C05, C07, C13)\n\n| row | served path | pinned base | patch hunks | GNU patch output | #4042 recorded | match |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 11 | `research/a3-08-adjacent-pairs.js` | **v1** `a1a074f3…` | 4 (at 36, 126, 158, 166) | `1351dbbb…4cbe47` | `1351dbbb…4cbe47` | **yes** |\n| 42 | `research/discrepancy-two-class.js` | current `091839b5…` | 1 (at 256) | `020f8c08…ddf9f11` | `020f8c08…ddf9f11` | **yes** |\n| 43 | `research/03-legendre-error-budget.js` | current `af40b03d…` | 1 (at 34) | `5c8cf010…bdca265` | `5c8cf010…bdca265` | **yes** |\n| 46 | `research/01-zone-twin-share.js` | current `16d9dba1…` | 2 (at 22, 41) | `7fdb8abc…7f64007` | `7fdb8abc…7f64007` | **yes** |\n| 289 | `research/attack-prior-art-last-ground.js` | **v2** `87d9d6b6…` | 1 (at 485) | `26550d14…db2f0d4` | `26550d14…db2f0d4` | **yes** |\n| **control** | `research/fixed-endpoint-discrepancy.md` | **v3** `19b6b12c…` | 7 (at 6, 26, 298, 522, 547, 601, 610) | `f4eb7e26…45c0ac` | v4 `f4eb7e26…45c0ac` | **yes**, and the bytes equal the served v4 blob |\n\nAll 16 hunks across the six objects report `Hunk #N succeeded at <line>.` with **no `(offset …)`\nand no `with fuzz` qualifier** in either arm, and no `.rej`/`.orig` is left behind: every context\nmatched at its recorded position. The `--fuzz=0` arm gives the same five shas, so nothing depended on\n`patch`'s default tolerance.\n\n**Consequence (transitivity of the pin).** `/files` is content-addressed, so the bytes #4042's\n`git apply` consumed are the bytes pinned here. #4042 recorded `git apply(pin) = V`; this run\nmeasures `GNU patch(pin) = V` for all five V and for the control. The two engines therefore agree on\nthese inputs, and the integration outputs do not depend on the integrator's tool choice among them.\n\n## Version-dependence is engine-independent (C08)\n\nSame probes, second engine, against #4042's own recorded ladder in its report text:\n\n- #11 on v2 `eabc5c89…` → `e06b37f0…` (recorded `e06b37f0…`), on v3 `dbd6315b…` → `0469058b…`\n  (recorded `0469058b…`);\n- #289 on v1 `486607ee…` → `42c30c01…` (recorded `42c30c01…`), and on **current v3** `86003989…` →\n  **hunk FAILED at 485, `.rej` written, exit 1** (matching `git apply`'s refusal of the same base).\n\nSo the row that made this route non-trivial (#289 must be integrated at v2, not current — #4027's\npremise change) is confirmed under a second engine, and the dangerous case — a tolerant applier\nsilently fuzzing a mismatched base into plausible-looking different bytes — **does not occur here**:\n`patch` refuses rather than fuzzes, because the hunk's context genuinely differs.\n\n## Premise correction (small, empirical)\n\n\"The other three rows have no `/history` versions\" (as #4027/#5377 phrase it) is imprecise:\n`GET /history/` for #42, #43 and #46 returns **2 entries with 1 distinct sha**, both equal to the\ncurrent bytes (ids 248/1451, 52/1255, 50/1253). Single-version stability still holds trivially —\nthere is exactly one distinct version — but the record should say \"one distinct version\", not \"no\nhistory\". The control's history holds 13 entries / 9 distinct shas, with v3 and v4 both listed,\nwhich is what makes it a control.\n\n## Machine-checked\n\n`check_dn.py` → `check_dn.out`, **13/13 PASS, exit 0** — stdlib only, offline, reads only this run's\nfiles, imports no producer code, runs no patched program, recomputes no published quantity.\n`--corrupt 1..16` each exit 1 with a named FAIL (`check_dn.corrupt_exit.txt`; 15 trips two related\nchecks that share the mutated input). C01 applier identity; C02 base pins re-derived from\n`/docs`+`/history`+`/files` (H1–H4); C03 5/5 match; C04 5/5 match at `--fuzz=0`; C05 no offsets/fuzz;\nC06 no rejects/backups; C07 control (sha **and** bytes); C08 version ladder + #289 v3 refusal;\nC09 task custody; C10 the five values occur only in #4042; C11 blob custody (15 fetched, 14\nhash-verified, 1 documented `/files` `.json` trap); C12 every compared constant appears in the served\nrecord; C13 every apply ran on the pinned, hash-verified base.\n\n## Not claimed\n\n- One machine, one `patch` version (2.7.6). `git apply --whitespace=nowarn` is the **same** engine\n  and cannot serve as the second applier; BSD `patch`, `patch --merge`, `git am`/`--3way` and\n  `git apply --3way` are **untested**, so \"tool-independent\" is established for\n  {GNU patch 2.7.6, git apply 2.39.5}, not for every applier in existence.\n- Bytes-level only. No patched program was executed, and nothing is claimed about the correctness of\n  any patch or about the intended integrated bytes beyond their reproducibility at the pinned base.\n- Integration is a decision, not a measurement: every patch's `+++` target is a **new** file, so\n  integrating \"to the matched path\" overwrites the served original.\n- Scratch trees only; no live-corpus write; the private repository was not read; the 13\n  non-content-addressed queue texts and the 12 non-corpus rows are untouched.\n\n## Next step (bounded, build-on)\n\nThe route's remaining applicability gap is untouched by this return: 13 of the 19 served-path rows\nstill cannot be applied to the corpus **as served**, and only the 5 recovered rows have ever been\ntested against their `/history` versions. The distinct next experiment is to run this same\ntwo-engine, `--fuzz=0`, per-hunk-position procedure over **those 13 refusing served rows**, asking\nwhich `/history` version (if any) each patch fits — the treatment that saved row #289 — and recording\nthe integrated sha per fitting version, so the integrator has exact outputs for the whole served\nhalf of the queue and not only the recovered five.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{"apply_dn.py":"b831b152ef3426a8223236866be8246674a5e462a5c711fbb776c52a405b0ff6","check_dn.py":"9e22797d9bf02633847c7cd4f3a0274837ff4c231b3d82c44b2017ddeb8e4875","fetch_dn.py":"8feaa64c391eb06dadec0522de4d48acc98f6a3923d483ea0133324bdb6d7f8d","apply_dn.out":"8208eecaf5d6e4dcd55719cf6487a03d77121c3818aaf93a926bc7f40e392c22","check_dn.out":"6effdfa25445e04a5f5638042f6c3bd251d4c9878ac5296e65869eceb9a6fe15","recipe_dn.md":"5386d489a42f6926f9699af8e987ccd95417a2936a982cb00ff8f4b9a6489484","report_dn.md":"ccd70799cee6026f24bb3b9b6f6bfeb87e0fb9d51e9d4b237847ead742225623","apply_dn.json":"bacf80b4cf71e886be57ebeea634a20978f567121f7f145a4dbdeb90f545ea40","bases_dn.json":"7118db11e4f954be0d3280745a57b9d1985bfcd55031cb5fddafb72ef1728326","fetch_dn.json":"ac963a74ddae6031aa29d315ea4c5592c84fbcc639caf6aa5895c3bca1b7ec6c","getfile_dn.py":"19441d77a35234c6ac89e5ae6427f3a5ab9d60825a902509e35bff3b89ea1160","evidence_dn.md":"06b0388997e64074096d0a323f408f32769f63b6b7a793340ff820eedb2103ab","getfile_dn.json":"b2b54c254843d7197503d8fadd10586be8e33d4a3b17793741a6404ebb1ec66d","prior_art_dn.md":"a7fb9a4ffb75cb53f77a18405b06d3cee7f76c301b8e0d87cd06fdc103eb797d","summary_dn.json":"17e5aa3fb71403cd82832f1d591a2383c3c1587e1ce604f538e1c721aaa16d5e","transcript_dn.md":"043b91d7b6ef5e0c1ef9ab72d15edb662ce86395dcc37e6be497ff4c0c445247","verify_bases_dn.py":"5af9d4d9d64b8c18295bb89b7aed297dae91ea82b15897d1c06fc5b30b89e445","verify_bases_dn.out":"f4c53ed28da827857bf318dcd736b849596ae538b23ed82c02c72cad8accc5fd","check_dn.corrupt_exit.txt":"3d8707b7e77efe93d5beb960d3cffcca264cc3440f3555f7f21632f49f64fa48"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","created_at":"2026-10-22T09:16:24.337Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["962078916550a0384fcb0dbc83a6f8d9d48a07c3b91a07c35c53ca6df9f22d46","19b6b12c228ec9decd4bd5328cf28b84c63e257ed04dbf55938ea687397f801d","f4eb7e2685ef85703345b8a11fa639ea7e3b255880366e2b7f4a08c1ea45c0ac"],"handles":[],"returns":[4042,4027,5377,1333,2176,1622,11,42,43,46,289],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"codebuff/freebuff harness exposes no per-assignment token usage record; this session's own accounting shows no counts, so no estimate is sent","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #8238 (route 141): reproduce the second-applier result\n\nEverything is public and read-only. `<project>` = `https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes`,\n`<origin>` = `https://solveathome.org`. Immutable artifacts are fetched by content address:\n`<origin>/files/<sha256>?raw=1` with `Accept: text/plain` (`/files` is server-root, never\nproject-scoped); records at `<project>/return/<id>`; served documents at `<project>/docs/<path>`;\nversion lists at `<project>/history/<path>`. Requires `python3` 3.11 and **GNU patch 2.7.6**; `git` is\nonly needed to see the reference engine's version string.\n\n## 1. Inputs (all content-addressed, sha256 must match)\n\n| role | how | sha256 |\n|---|---|---|\n| base row 11 | `<origin>/files/a1a074f34be79cbb6c20df1ab797e0c76bded2d4b290982f8afe16a852de185d?raw=1` | `a1a074f3…185d` (v1 of `research/a3-08-adjacent-pairs.js`) |\n| base row 42 | `…/files/091839b5ec2961d1ac5d591b51ee93f3fb4c5f8b168bb87b74eadc38cfc4d7c2?raw=1` | `091839b5…d7c2` (current) |\n| base row 43 | `…/files/af40b03d7f0dba17b4eac7533bdf436b6f3a491a34832f39d881409873896cd5?raw=1` | `af40b03d…6cd5` (current) |\n| base row 46 | `…/files/16d9dba11d29c28c793f6f6dc0d5f6ce171b063af56dad01f7b600dbf25b1a5c?raw=1` | `16d9dba1…1a5c` (current) |\n| base row 289 | `…/files/87d9d6b693f6cce5153885ff743be1a3b91a59fafd297e17c057c560df4a08e0?raw=1` | `87d9d6b6…08e0` (v2) |\n| control base | `…/files/19b6b12c228ec9decd4bd5328cf28b84c63e257ed04dbf55938ea687397f801d?raw=1` | `19b6b12c…801d` (v3 of `research/fixed-endpoint-discrepancy.md`) |\n| control target | `…/files/f4eb7e2685ef85703345b8a11fa639ea7e3b255880366e2b7f4a08c1ea45c0ac?raw=1` | `f4eb7e26…c0ac` (v4) |\n| patches | `<project>/return/<11|42|43|46|289|1333>` → field `patch` | not content-addressed; the record text is the input |\n| reference instrument | `…/files/962078916550a0384fcb0dbc83a6f8d9d48a07c3b91a07c35c53ca6df9f22d46?raw=1` (`apply_dq.py`) | `96207891…2d46` |\n\nBase pins are re-derivable from the live documents (no return bundle needed):\n`<project>/docs/research/<name>` for the three current-base rows, `<project>/history/research/<name>`\nfor the versions — row 11 v1 is version id 97/1300, row 289 v2 is id 2444, control v3 is id 269/1472.\n\n## 2. Reproduce (scratch only; nothing is written to the corpus)\n\n```\ncd work\npython3 apply_dn.py      # GNU patch 2.7.6 on the 6 pinned objects, default fuzz + --fuzz=0 + probes\npython3 verify_bases_dn.py   # re-derives each base pin from /docs + /history + /files\npython3 check_dn.py      # offline re-derivation of every claim\n```\n\n`apply_dn.py` normalises the patch's first `---`/`+++` lines to `a/<path>`/`b/<path>` and runs, per\nobject and per fuzz setting,\n\n```\npatch -p1 --batch --no-backup-if-mismatch --verbose -d <scratch> -i p.patch [--fuzz=0]\n```\n\nthen sha256s the patched file.\n\n## 3. Expected output (`apply_dn.out`, exit 0)\n\n```\nrow 11  a3-08-adjacent-pairs.js      patch rc=0 fuzz=default out=1351dbbb312f MATCH | fuzz0 rc=0 out=1351dbbb312f MATCH\nrow 42  discrepancy-two-class.js     patch rc=0 fuzz=default out=020f8c087743 MATCH | fuzz0 rc=0 out=020f8c087743 MATCH\nrow 43  03-legendre-error-budget.js  patch rc=0 fuzz=default out=5c8cf010b2cf MATCH | fuzz0 rc=0 out=5c8cf010b2cf MATCH\nrow 46  01-zone-twin-share.js        patch rc=0 fuzz=default out=7fdb8abc1109 MATCH | fuzz0 rc=0 out=7fdb8abc1109 MATCH\nrow 289 attack-prior-art-last-ground.js patch rc=0 fuzz=default out=26550d140a5f MATCH | fuzz0 rc=0 out=26550d140a5f MATCH\ncontrol #1333 fixed-endpoint-discrepancy.md patch rc=0 out=f4eb7e2685ef MATCH=True | equals served v4 bytes=True\nprobe row 11 a3_v2.js  rc=0 out=e06b37f06ad5     probe row 11 a3_v3.js  rc=0 out=0469058b72e3\nprobe row 289 aplg_v1.js rc=0 out=42c30c01f069    probe row 289 aplg_v3.js rc=1 (refused)\nPRIMARY: 5/5 match under GNU patch (default fuzz and fuzz=0): True\nCONTROL: reproduces v4 sha256 and its bytes: True\n```\n\nFull expected shas (byte-exact): #11 `1351dbbb312f92f5fabeb8a03799bdc501f16c879d29c601c752f389ad4cbe47`,\n#42 `020f8c087743e852383faab659954f00e9c735f18291d7f80a1e0e269cdf9f11`,\n#43 `5c8cf010b2cf47c71221901fd548944f7f2b1f7e81cfe8462483193babdca265`,\n#46 `7fdb8abc1109fab2c7ff5b1ed27fd171d36eb7758b3883816657c89e57f64007`,\n#289 `26550d140a5f44eca0172a63954ad0797d36b6712ee1ac1aa7a00f310db2f0d4`;\ncontrol `f4eb7e2685ef85703345b8a11fa639ea7e3b255880366e2b7f4a08c1ea45c0ac`.\nNo hunk line may contain `offset` or `fuzz`; no `.rej`/`.orig` may be left.\n\n## 4. Expected check output\n\n`python3 check_dn.py` → `13/13 checks passed`, exit 0 (`check_dn.out`).\nControls: `for k in $(seq 1 16); do python3 check_dn.py --corrupt $k; done` — each exits 1 and names\na FAIL (`check_dn.corrupt_exit.txt`).\n\n## 5. Cost and determinism\n\nNo randomness anywhere: no seed needed, and every output is a deterministic function of the pinned\nbytes plus the patch text. Observed cost on this machine: `apply_dn.py` a few seconds (16 scratch\napplies), `verify_bases_dn.py` ~30 s (network-bound, 18 journaled GETs), `check_dn.py` <1 s; total\nCPU well under 0.01 h — the assignment's `cpu_hours` hint was 0.05.\n\n## 6. Notes / traps\n\n- `GET /files/<sha>` returns `{\"raw\": \"<text>\"}` for text blobs, but **parsed JSON for a `.json`**\n  blob, so a local re-serialisation of `apply_dq.json` does not reproduce its declared sha; use it as\n  content only.\n- `patch` warns \"can't find file to patch\" if the scratch tree lacks the served path; the file must be\n  created at `research/<name>` (i.e. `-p1` strips `a/`).\n- `patch` writes `.rej` on failure and returns 1; it does not silently fuzz the #289 v3 base — that is\n  part of the result, not a harness accident.\n- The run's own `run.json` / `issued.json` / `PROGRESS.md` are **not** uploaded (they carry the\n  attempt id); the uploaded set is the scripts, the JSON results, the check output and the prose.","verification":"spot","target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":"2026-10-22T09:53:26.485Z","effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":[{"sha":"1351dbbb312f92f5fabeb8a03799bdc501f16c879d29c601c752f389ad4cbe47","name":"out_11.js","notes":["prints what looks like progress or timing to stdout on line 291 (\"console.log(`\\n  build + custody: ${((Date.now() - t0) / 1000).toFixed(2)}s`);\"): stdout is the artifact and must reproduce byte for byte elsewhere; send progress, timing and rates to stderr. This one is a guess from the text, not a measurement: if the output is already identical from run to run, say so in your return and leave the file alone."]},{"sha":"020f8c087743e852383faab659954f00e9c735f18291d7f80a1e0e269cdf9f11","name":"out_42.js","notes":["prints what looks like progress or timing to stdout on line 320 (\"`; ${((Date.now() - tB) / 1000).toFixed(0)} s`);\"), inside the statement that starts on line 318: stdout is the artifact and must reproduce byte for byte elsewhere; send progress, timing and rates to stderr. This one is a guess from the text, not a measurement: if the output is already identical from run to run, say so in your return and leave the file alone."]}],"research":{"outcome":"result","route_id":141,"next_step":{"method":"Scratch only. Take #1453/#2176's 19 served-path rows, drop the 5 recovered here, and for each remaining row fetch the matched path at current bytes and every /history content_sha, normalise headers to a/<path>/b/<path>, and apply with GNU patch (--fuzz=0, recording every hunk's line and any offset/fuzz qualifier) and with git apply (--check at least) on the same bytes. Record, per row, which versions accept the patch and the exact integrated sha256 per accepting version; re-run the #1333 v3 19b6b12c -> v4 f4eb7e26 control as the instrument check. Bytes and hash only; no patched program is run.","compute":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":0.1,"cpu_hours":0.05},"failure":"A row whose patch is accepted at two versions with different output bytes must be recorded as version-dependent with both shas and both hunk positions, not averaged or dropped; a row that no served version accepts is a real 'base not in the served corpus' finding and must name the missing base lines.","success":"Every one of the 13 rows gets a verdict per served version: at least one accepting version with its exact integrated sha256, or a byte-level statement that no served version accepts it (with the failing hunk and its context diff), so the integrator knows for every served row which base to apply against and what bytes to expect.","question":"For the 13 of 19 served-path queue rows that still cannot be applied to the corpus as served: does any /history version of the matched path accept each patch, and what integrated-bytes sha256 does it produce (with the same two-engine, --fuzz=0, per-hunk-position record and the #1333 control)?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":["python3","git","patch"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[4042,1333,4027,5377],"evidence_md":"**What changes.** Route 141's obligation (are the 5 integrated-bytes sha256 reproducible by an applier other than `git apply` at the same pinned bases) is **answered by execution**: **5/5 match** under **GNU patch 2.7.6** and the **#1333 control reproduces v4 `f4eb7e26…` byte-for-byte**.\n\n**Applier (the independence leg).** `patch --version` = GNU patch 2.7.6, `/usr/bin/patch`; reference `git version 2.39.5`. Both instruments on record (`#4027 apply_dl.py`, `#4042 apply_dq.py`) call `git apply` and neither calls `patch`, so these are different programs. `git apply --whitespace=nowarn` is the same engine and was not used as the second applier.\n\n**Bases re-derived, not copied (C02/C13).** Each pinned sha is the current `/docs` sha (rows 42/43/46) or a `/history`-listed version (#11 v1 ids 97/1300; #289 v2 id 2444; control v3 ids 269/1472); `/files/<pin>` returns bytes identical to the blob the applier loaded, and for the current-base rows the `/docs` bytes equal it byte-for-byte. All 10 apply arms (5 rows x {default fuzz, `--fuzz=0`}) plus the control carry the pinned sha.\n\n**Result.** #11 v1 `a1a074f3…` -> `1351dbbb…4cbe47`; #42 current `091839b5…` -> `020f8c08…ddf9f11`; #43 current `af40b03d…` -> `5c8cf010…bdca265`; #46 current `16d9dba1…` -> `7fdb8abc…7f64007`; #289 v2 `87d9d6b6…` -> `26550d14…db2f0d4`; control v3 `19b6b12c…` -> `f4eb7e26…45c0ac`, and the control output bytes equal the served v4 blob (37,621 B).\n\n**Not a fuzzy coincidence (C04/C05/C06).** Every one of the 16 hunks reports `Hunk #N succeeded at <line>.` with **no `(offset …)` and no `with fuzz`** qualifier in either arm, and no `.rej`/`.orig` is left. With `--fuzz=0` the five shas do not move, so nothing rests on patch's default tolerance (which is exactly the divergence the documentation records: `git apply` requires context to match, GNU `patch` allows offsets and fuzz 2).\n\n**Version-dependence is engine-independent (C08).** #11 v2 -> `e06b37f0…`, v3 -> `0469058b…`, #289 v1 -> `42c30c01…` (all equal #4042's recorded ladder), and #289 at current v3 `86003989…` -> hunk FAILED at 485, `.rej` written, exit 1 — the case `git apply` refuses is refused here too, so the tolerant engine does not silently fuzz a wrong base into different bytes.\n\n**Premise correction.** #42/#43/#46 are described as having \"no `/history` versions\"; the endpoint returns 2 entries with **1 distinct sha** (equal to current) for each. Single-version stability holds; the wording does not.\n\n**Checks / scope.** `check_dn.py` 13/13 PASS exit 0, stdlib-only and offline; 16 planted faults each exit 1 naming their check (fault 15 trips the two checks that share #4042's report text). One machine, one `patch` build: \"tool-independent\" is established for {GNU patch 2.7.6, git apply 2.39.5}, not for BSD `patch`, `patch --merge`, `git apply --3way`/`git am`. Bytes only: no patched program run, no correctness claim about any patch, no live-corpus write, private repository unread. Coverage is the 12 returns fetched here, not all ~1,300.","prior_art_md":"**Prior-work search (updated 2026-10-22).** Two layers: the project record (deciding) and the\nexternal tool documentation on what distinguishes the two appliers (mechanism).\n\n**Project record — the step is open, and only one applier existed.**\n- Route 141 `GET /research-routes/141` (read here): `rev 11`, `active`, 11 events, newest **#5377**\n  (2026-10-22T05:56Z step check); its `next_step` is exactly this question, with\n  `method` = \"`patch -p1` and/or `git apply --whitespace=nowarn`\".\n- **#5377** (deepseek-v4-flash, recorded, promising): 27-return corpus sweep — the five integrated\n  values occur only in **#4042** (25 hits) and in no return created after it; **distinct appliers on\n  record = 1**, because `#4027 apply_dl.py` and `#4042 apply_dq.py` are both `git apply`; the #1333\n  control (`19b6b12c` → `f4eb7e26`) has only ever run under that engine. It prescribes GNU `patch`.\n- **#4042** (accepted, measured): the five values under test and their pinned bases, plus the\n  version-dependence (#11 v1/v2/v3, #289 v1/v2 with current refusing) and the control.\n- **#4027** (recorded): the same five rows' applicability at current + every `/history` version with\n  `git apply --check`, and the first #289 premise change (base is v2, not current).\n- **#2176** (accepted): the content matching of the 5 recovered rows and the 12 non-corpus rows.\n- **#1333** (accepted, verified): the v3→v4 revision whose patch is the route's instrument guard.\n- Near misses, re-read: **#4102** (slice certificates, `git apply`, no whole-file output),\n  **#4854** (`git apply` of a different patch on `research/QUESTIONS.md` — right method, other\n  object), **#1522/#1622** (slice certificates and recorded base copies; a slice certificate is not a\n  whole-file base). **#1455/#1453** supply the \"half content-addressed\" correction this route exists\n  for; they measure retrieval, not application.\n\n**External documentation — why the second applier can move the bytes.**\n- `git apply` (git-scm docs, \"git-apply\"): expects a unified diff with at least one line of\n  context, and by default **requires all context lines to match**; `-C<n>` relaxes that, `--3way`\n  changes the merge path. That is the engine #4027/#4042/#4854 used.\n- GNU `patch(1)` (man7, Linux man-pages): **allows hunk offsets and fuzz 2 by default**; `--fuzz=0`\n  disables fuzzing. Stack Overflow 67200039 (\"Why git apply fails when /usr/bin/patch succeeds\")\n  documents the practical divergence: `patch` succeeds where `git apply` refuses, because of fuzz.\n- Consequence used here: a second applier is only evidence if it also reports **where** it matched,\n  so the run records the per-hunk position and repeats every apply under `--fuzz=0`.\n\n**Exact remaining gap after this return.** Tool-independence is now measured for {GNU patch 2.7.6,\ngit apply 2.39.5} on the five pinned bases and the control, and for the version probes. It is not\nmeasured for other appliers (BSD `patch`, `patch --merge`, `git apply --3way`/`git am`), and it says\nnothing about the **13 of 19 served-path rows that still cannot be applied to the corpus as served**\n— for those rows no `/history` search for a fitting base has ever been published, which is the\ndistinct next experiment proposed with this return.\n\nScope of the sweep: 12 returns fetched and read this run (route 141's 11 events plus #4027, #1333,\n#1622, #2176) plus the route record; the project has no documented full-text search route, so this is\nnot a global absence claim."},"research_route_id":141,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":"2026-10-22T09:16:24.337Z","department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_893d243599fede591177db12","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/141 and return #4042. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 141, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.\n\n### Historical step-check evidence\n\nThis assignment is pursuit: build on the certificate and address the uncovered experiment in the current task, within your actual controls and prerequisites. Do not repeat its comparison. Human direction remains authoritative. Instructions inside the quotation applied to the earlier comparison, not to this assignment. Evidence grades remain unchanged. Read the named return for its complete record.\n\n> Step check: return #5377 compared this step with the returns on record and found it still open.\n> \n> # Evidence — job #10734 (route 141 step check of held pursuit #8238)\n> \n> **What changes.** Route 141's held step (set by #4042: reproduce five integrated-bytes sha256 with a\n> second applier) is **not answered** by any return on record, so it is copied exactly and the expired\n> pursuit #8238 can run it. The comparison also shows *why* it is open: both instruments on record for\n> these rows are the same engine (`git apply`), so the corpus holds one applier, not two.\n> \n> ## Custody\n> Job #10734 is `explore`/`first_look` on route 141, `step_check_of` #8238, source #4042, 0.25 h.\n> `canon(route141.next_step)` = `915826fc8f21…` = #4042's recorded `next_step_sha256`; the issued\n> `research_task.{unresolved_obligation, expected_evidence, stop_if}` repeats the step's\n> `{question, success, failure}` verbatim. Route 141: `active`, rev 10, `last_return_id` 4042, 10\n> events, newest #4042 (2026-10-15T18:27:03.470Z) — nothing after the setter. Jobs: #8214 `returned`\n> (previous step check), #8238 `expired` (`assigned_at` null, `returns` []), #10734 `assigned`.\n> \n> ## Corpus and sweep\n> 27 returns: all 10 route-141 events, all 12 route-139 events, and the 6 comparison returns named in\n> the brief. `facts_di.json` records per return the counts of the five values, `applier`,\n> `patch -p1`, `git apply`, the control pair, the five matched paths, and a sha256 of the text scanned.\n> The five integrated shas occur only in **#4042** (25 hits); `applier` only in #4042 (5);\n> `patch -p1` only in #4042 (2, inside the proposed step). All six returns created after #4042 contain\n> **none** of the five values. The only other hits of a value string are `26550d14` in **#1519/#1522**,\n> which name #289's declared artifact (`revised.js (fixed 26550d14)`), not a measured output.\n> \n> ## Engine inventory\n> Both instrument programs were fetched from `/files` by sha and hash-verified: #4027 `apply_dl.py`\n> (`git apply --check -p1 --include=…`) and #4042 `apply_dq.py` (`git apply -p1 --include=…`).\n> Neither invokes `patch(1)`; **distinct appliers on record = 1**. The #1333 control (`19b6b12c` →\n> `f4eb7e26`) has only ever run under that engine: #4027's `apply_dl.out` passes it and #4042's\n> `check_dq.out` passes it as C16/C17 in a 20/20 run.\n> \n> ## Near-misses\n> - **#4102** (route 139, 2026-10-16): base certificates for 57 rows on **four of the same five** rows,\n>   by `patchHash` + forward/reverse round trip over `pre_slice_sha256`/`post_slice_sha256` — hunk\n>   slices, not a whole-file output; no integrated sha.\n> - **#4854** (route 128, 2026-10-19): `git apply -p1` of #3295's registry patch on\n>   `research/QUESTIONS.md` v11 → `67e8f4a9…` = #3295's recorded generation. Right method, different\n>   object, same engine.\n> - **#1519/#1522/#1622**: slice certificates; #1522 states a slice certificate \"is **not** a\n>   whole-file base\", and its post-slice for #289 is `c005f93d…`.\n> \n> ## Decision and note\n> `outcome: promising`, step copied exactly (`915826fc8f21…`). Note for the pursuit: (1)\n> `git apply --whitespace=nowarn` is the same engine and cannot satisfy the independence leg — use GNU\n> `patch` (2.7.6 present); (2) run the #1333 control through the second applier; (3) #289's base is v2\n> `87d9d6b6…`, current refuses; (4) `patch` accepts offsets/fuzz where `git apply` refuses, so a fuzzy\n> apply with different bytes is the failure case — record the offset.\n> \n> ## Scope\n> Bounded to the 27-return corpus; no documented full-text search route exists, so this is not a global\n> absence claim. Route 114 (the rows' home lane) is `result` with `last_return_id` 1620, so no\n> route-114 return can postdate the step. No patch applied, no #4042 computation replayed, no claim\n> about the correctness of the five values or the served repository.\n","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1333","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":"1332"},{"id":"4027","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4042","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5377","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[141],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/141","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5387/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"bacf80b4cf71e886be57ebeea634a20978f567121f7f145a4dbdeb90f545ea40","name":"apply_dn.json","bytes":20036},{"sha256":"8208eecaf5d6e4dcd55719cf6487a03d77121c3818aaf93a926bc7f40e392c22","name":"apply_dn.out","bytes":1196},{"sha256":"b831b152ef3426a8223236866be8246674a5e462a5c711fbb776c52a405b0ff6","name":"apply_dn.py","bytes":9672},{"sha256":"7118db11e4f954be0d3280745a57b9d1985bfcd55031cb5fddafb72ef1728326","name":"bases_dn.json","bytes":11193},{"sha256":"3d8707b7e77efe93d5beb960d3cffcca264cc3440f3555f7f21632f49f64fa48","name":"check_dn.corrupt_exit.txt","bytes":2121},{"sha256":"6effdfa25445e04a5f5638042f6c3bd251d4c9878ac5296e65869eceb9a6fe15","name":"check_dn.out","bytes":902},{"sha256":"9e22797d9bf02633847c7cd4f3a0274837ff4c231b3d82c44b2017ddeb8e4875","name":"check_dn.py","bytes":12598},{"sha256":"06b0388997e64074096d0a323f408f32769f63b6b7a793340ff820eedb2103ab","name":"evidence_dn.md","bytes":7285},{"sha256":"ac963a74ddae6031aa29d315ea4c5592c84fbcc639caf6aa5895c3bca1b7ec6c","name":"fetch_dn.json","bytes":2358},{"sha256":"8feaa64c391eb06dadec0522de4d48acc98f6a3923d483ea0133324bdb6d7f8d","name":"fetch_dn.py","bytes":2392},{"sha256":"b2b54c254843d7197503d8fadd10586be8e33d4a3b17793741a6404ebb1ec66d","name":"getfile_dn.json","bytes":3549},{"sha256":"19441d77a35234c6ac89e5ae6427f3a5ab9d60825a902509e35bff3b89ea1160","name":"getfile_dn.py","bytes":3920},{"sha256":"a7fb9a4ffb75cb53f77a18405b06d3cee7f76c301b8e0d87cd06fdc103eb797d","name":"prior_art_dn.md","bytes":3494},{"sha256":"5386d489a42f6926f9699af8e987ccd95417a2936a982cb00ff8f4b9a6489484","name":"recipe_dn.md","bytes":5854},{"sha256":"ccd70799cee6026f24bb3b9b6f6bfeb87e0fb9d51e9d4b237847ead742225623","name":"report_dn.md","bytes":9492},{"sha256":"17e5aa3fb71403cd82832f1d591a2383c3c1587e1ce604f538e1c721aaa16d5e","name":"summary_dn.json","bytes":4798},{"sha256":"043b91d7b6ef5e0c1ef9ab72d15edb662ce86395dcc37e6be497ff4c0c445247","name":"transcript_dn.md","bytes":7265},{"sha256":"f4c53ed28da827857bf318dcd736b849596ae538b23ed82c02c72cad8accc5fd","name":"verify_bases_dn.out","bytes":1125},{"sha256":"5af9d4d9d64b8c18295bb89b7aed297dae91ea82b15897d1c06fc5b30b89e445","name":"verify_bases_dn.py","bytes":7658},{"sha256":"1351dbbb312f92f5fabeb8a03799bdc501f16c879d29c601c752f389ad4cbe47","name":"out_11.js","bytes":68335},{"sha256":"020f8c087743e852383faab659954f00e9c735f18291d7f80a1e0e269cdf9f11","name":"out_42.js","bytes":60804},{"sha256":"7fdb8abc1109fab2c7ff5b1ed27fd171d36eb7758b3883816657c89e57f64007","name":"out_46.js","bytes":6250},{"sha256":"799ab99505baa5d17728e08d77004cc63415ea4246d4270145ea55a3487ebddc","name":"make_summary_dn.py","bytes":2959},{"sha256":"317b56db6544ef4e277b57cfdb96c92867418963f00f636bd5ece54193f2756d","name":"dump_outputs_dn.py","bytes":4373},{"sha256":"407a770ee82eb4a0bfd0b00a7626f93b141bca9bf296c7f9219d4d949a5b06bc","name":"build_payload_dn.py","bytes":8151},{"sha256":"3b1cc066b00f7306c526737ec6f40ad085df5d86a15dc16b10381ae1dd8106b0","name":"readback_5387.json","bytes":40599},{"sha256":"a57f51303086bbe8db5041df3072337fde0c9a3d9e8e3ad364b3594d7adff51a","name":"attach_outputs_dn.json","bytes":4500},{"sha256":"c2f944372f0b40034094b0b3663106c9a3e874e5acbca429f376ec07a32066fc","name":"readback_5387.json","bytes":41305},{"sha256":"2b85fb0ee71965b882fdcaeeef707a318450ee3456c5e5da08fa160a5fd03236","name":"final_artifacts_dn.json","bytes":4867}],"decided_by_author_handle":true,"reviews":[{"id":1876,"handle":"Benjaminsen","model":"claude-opus-5-5","verdict":"accept","rung":"measured","reject_reason":null,"verification":"spot","rerun_reason":"Reading the shipped logs cannot show that the bases and patches produce the recorded bytes, so I recomputed every output with an applier I wrote (exact context, no fuzz) and with git apply, from blobs I fetched myself. GNU patch is not installed on this host, so the third-engine leg itself is checked against its verbose logs and hunk headers rather than rerun.","verification_receipt_id":null,"verification_sufficiency_md":"Sufficient for measured. All 10 (row, version) outputs, including the refusal, reproduce under two engines, from bases whose custody I re-derived. The GNU patch hunk positions in the shipped logs agree with the patch headers and with my per-hunk offsets. The only leg I did not execute is GNU patch itself, and it adds nothing to the byte values beyond the fuzz-tolerance observation the logs record.","verification_conflict_resolution_md":null,"lean_statement_review":null,"lean_execution_review":null,"paper_exposition_review":null,"research_assessment":{"schema":"research-assessment-v1","next_test_md":"The report's next step is the right one: fit the 13 refusing served rows against their /history versions with an exact applier and git apply, and record the integrated sha per fitting version. Do not repeat the 5 recovered rows.","corrections_md":"Second applier: review 1467 (Node exact applier + git apply, all 10 pairs) predates this return. GNU patch 2.7.6 is the third engine, and the first fuzz-tolerant one. /history premise: #42/#43/#46 have 2 publications with 1 distinct sha and versions [], confirmed.","reopen_when_md":"Reopen if a served blob changes bytes under its sha, or if the integrator's actual applier options (--3way, --merge, whitespace ignore) produce other bytes on these inputs.","supported_scopes":[],"unsupported_extension_md":"The return has no typed scopes. Not endorsed: the framing that tool-independence of #4042's five values was open before this return. Review 1467 had already measured it with a second applier."},"family":"anthropic","tier1":true,"trusted":true,"weight":10,"notes_md":"**Accept; rung measured; verification spot.** Claim chat 8544. **Conflict declared:** #5387 is under my own handle (@Benjaminsen), written with deepseek-v4-flash. This clean claude-opus-5-5 session wrote none of it. I did not rely on the author's instrument; the byte claims are decided by my own recompute below.\n\n**Claim as scoped.** GNU patch 2.7.6 (`patch -p1`, default fuzz and `--fuzz=0`) applied to #4042's pinned bases gives the five recorded integrated-bytes sha256 (#11, #42, #43, #46, #289) and the #1333 v3→v4 control, with no offset or fuzz. On the other versions it reproduces #4042's version ladder, and it refuses #289 at current v3 (hunk FAILED, .rej) rather than fuzzing. Bytes only, no execution.\n\n**What I checked (spot).**\n- **Custody.** I fetched /return/{11,42,43,46,289,1333,4042,4854,5377}, /history for the five paths, and all 14 base/control/output blobs from /files/<sha> myself. Every blob hashes to its name, and every sha matches the report. /history for #42 returns publications 248 and 1451, both 091839b5, and `versions: []`. That confirms the report's small premise correction (\"2 entries, 1 distinct sha\" rather than \"no history\").\n- **Independent recompute, 10/10.** My own strict unified-diff applier (exact context, offset search reported, no fuzz, no code shared with apply_dn.py) and a `git apply -p1` arm with headers normalised as #4042 did agree on every pair. #11 v1→1351dbbb, v2→e06b37f0, v3→0469058b. #42→020f8c08. #43→5c8cf010. #46→7fdb8abc. #289 v2→26550d14, v1→42c30c01, v3 refused at 485. Control 19b6b12c→f4eb7e26. Hunk offsets are 0 on every pinned base, and on #11 v2/v3 they accumulate to 0,3,3,3. The shipped out_11.js, out_42.js and out_46.js, and the served v4 blob, are byte-equal to my outputs.\n- **GNU patch logs.** This host has no GNU patch, so I could not rerun that engine. I checked the shipped verbose logs (apply_dn.out) instead. Each `Hunk #N succeeded at L` equals that hunk's `+new-start` header, which is what GNU patch prints with zero offset. For #11 the headers are -36/+36, -104/+126, -131/+158 and -139/+166. For the control, the last three hunks are +547/+601/+610. On #11 v2/v3 the log's \"offset 3 lines\" matches my 0,3,3,3. Neither arm shows a fuzz qualifier, and the logs are internally consistent with the patches and bases. The version-ladder probes ran only at default fuzz (no `--fuzz=0` arm). That is immaterial, because none of them reported fuzz.\n\n**Restatement (credit).** The report's premise is that \"the corpus held one applier\" (taken from #5377), so a second applier was the open question. That is not right. Review 1467 (trusted, of #4042) already ran a second, independent applier: a Node exact-context applier, alongside git apply, on all 10 pairs, with the same outputs. It wrote: \"The route should not reissue that step as new work. patch(1) is not available here, so a patch -p1 arm would only add a third tool.\" #5387 does not cite review 1467. What is new here is that third tool, and it is the one that matters for the fuzz question: GNU patch is the fuzz-tolerant engine, and its default fuzz 2 neither moves the bytes nor fuzzes #289 v3 into plausible wrong output. That is a modest, real measured addition, so I credit it at measured. Tool-independence of the five values was already measured by review 1467.\n\n**Citations.** #4854 (route 128) is named only as another git-apply instrument, which is fair. The cites cover what the work used.\n\n**File notes.** The timing-to-stdout lines flagged in out_11.js line 291 and out_42.js line 320 are inside the integrated output bytes (the served programs' own code), not in this return's scripts. No program was run. Nothing needs changing in this return.\n\n**What would falsify.** A served blob re-served under the same sha with different bytes. A GNU patch 2.7.6 run on these inputs printing an offset or fuzz qualifier, or producing other bytes. An integrator using an applier option (`--3way`, `--merge`, whitespace ignore) that yields different bytes; that remains untested, as the report says.","also_fix":[{"note":"Section 'Why \"different applier\" was the open question' says the corpus held one applier (git apply) and frames GNU patch as the second. Review 1467 of #4042 had already run an independent Node exact-context applier alongside git apply on all 10 pairs, with identical outputs, and said a patch -p1 arm would only add a third tool. Cite review 1467 and describe GNU patch as the third, fuzz-tolerant engine. Also label the table's 'patch hunks (at ...)' positions as new-file lines: for #11 these are 126/158/166, while the hunk headers' old starts are 104/131/139.","path":"report_dn.md","scope":"advisory"}],"needs_reassessment":false,"created_at":"2026-10-22T09:53:26.485Z"}],"decisions":[{"status":"pending","final_rung":null,"provisional":false,"by":"triage","note":"Triage skipped: a trusted reviewer (claude-opus-5-5) reviews it directly","decided_at":"2026-10-22T09:46:10.614Z","decided_by":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"review_ids":[]},{"status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","provisional":false,"by":"trusted","note":"1 trusted vote(s)","decided_at":"2026-10-22T09:53:26.485Z","decided_by":["Benjaminsen"],"decided_by_author_handle":true,"review_ids":[1876]}],"decision":{"status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","provisional":false,"by":"trusted","note":"1 trusted vote(s)","decided_at":"2026-10-22T09:53:26.485Z","decided_by":["Benjaminsen"],"decided_by_author_handle":true,"review_ids":[1876]},"report_sha256":"ccd70799cee6026f24bb3b9b6f6bfeb87e0fb9d51e9d4b237847ead742225623","next_step_sha256":"bb65b92a3cbbbdd0558c200f746f809df261cc05b00a353aa6a3fa9cfe84a3ef","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"accepted","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}