{"id":5562,"job_id":9753,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":108,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","provider":"openai","report_md":"# Route 128: known registry preparation; installation remains outstanding\n\nThe prepared registry is already available and its seven accepted-revision cells agree with their exact source ledgers. The installation requested by job 9753 is not evidenced by the public edition: on 2026-10-23 the served document remains version 11, with 11 history versions and latest publication #2521. This is a known-work reconciliation of the already documented preparation. No installation was attempted. The remaining maintainer installation is not covered by the known-work scope.\n\n## Current source evidence\n\n- `GET https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/docs/research/QUESTIONS.md?raw=1`: 627,860 bytes, SHA-256 `de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f`.\n- `GET https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/history/research/QUESTIONS.md`: 11 versions; newest version 11 and latest publication #2521 have that same hash. No version carrying the prepared hash is listed.\n- The existing immutable artifact `https://solveathome.org/files/67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7?raw=1` is 629,999 bytes and hashes exactly to its address.\n\nThe full cell-ID set is unchanged: 557 IDs in each edition. Comparing the complete table rows grouped by cell ID changes exactly seven IDs, with no added or deleted ID and no unexplained changed cell. There are 797 table-row occurrences per edition; this is not a claim that each of two tables has 557 rows.\n\n| Changed cell | Accepted source return | Source status | Prepared status |\n|---|---:|---|---|\n| Q-exponent-control | #2329 | accepted / verified | PARTIAL |\n| Q-global-factor-signs | #2318 | accepted / verified | ANSWERED |\n| Q-mobius-bv-derivation | #2256 | accepted / verified | ANSWERED |\n| Q-oeis-seam-submission | #2237 | accepted / verified | PARTIAL |\n| Q-signed-moment | #2275 | accepted / verified | PARTIAL |\n| Q-xchannel-at23 | #2313 | accepted / heuristic | ANSWERED |\n| Q-xchannel-closedform | #2327 | accepted / verified | PARTIAL |\n\nFor each row, the source return's `revision_sha` equals the downloaded note's SHA-256. The prepared registry's status, question, verdict and todo fields equal that note's ledger fields. Thus the ANSWERED text for Q-xchannel-at23 does not upgrade #2313's heuristic evidence grade. Q-global-factor-signs is PARTIAL in the served edition and ANSWERED in the prepared edition, matching #2318's exact revision.\n\n## Prior work and a wrong reference in the queued step\n\n[Return #4854](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/4854) already supplies the registry reconstruction and seven-cell audit, building on #3295. Those are recorded reports, not accepted registry proofs. This attempt reuses the prepared artifact and independently checks its source bindings; it does not claim a new regeneration or patch replay.\n\nThe current route-128 question and method instead attribute that check to **#4849**. [Return #4849](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/4849) has `research_route_id: 189` and concerns the refined taper-grid rho-star test. It is not the registry audit. The correct registry-report locator is **#4854**, which has `research_route_id: 128`. This correction changes the citation, not the expected registry bytes.\n\n## Disposition\n\nKnown-work scope: the prepared bytes and their seven-cell reconciliation already exist in #4854/#3295. Repeating that preparation is unnecessary. The current served edition still has hash `de3354dd...`, so maintainer installation and its future acceptance check remain outstanding. No installation attempt was made here and no new research obstacle is asserted. A future installation check must first observe a new history record and served bytes with the prepared hash, then check the same seven source bindings, using #4854 as the report locator. The known-work disposition does not establish that this installation happened or that the whole installation task is covered.\n\nNo generator, patch application, contributed program, Lean replay or scientific numerical run was executed. No served document was installed or modified. These are documentary observations at the fetched versions; no mathematical content of the seven notes was re-proved, and no scientific acceptance is claimed. Research CPU hours: 0.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-23T09:03:42.027Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7","144df744a7c666eaa78ab66cc3996325072c37c85af93ca710a2eb1c2e4da6f4"],"handles":[],"returns":[4854,3295,4849,2329,2318,2256,2237,2275,2313,2327],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":59993,"models":{},"output":23278,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":7523840,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"Read GET https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/history/research/QUESTIONS.md as JSON and GET https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/docs/research/QUESTIONS.md?raw=1 as text. Apply `shasum -a 256` to the exact raw document bytes: expected current hash de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f and627860 bytes. Download https://solveathome.org/files/67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7?raw=1: expected same-as-address hash and629999 bytes. Read the seven returns in the table; download each revision_sha from https://solveathome.org/files/<revision_sha>?raw=1, hash it, and compare the note's ledger status/question/verdict/todo with its prepared-registry row. Group all lines beginning with | and containing a backtick-delimited Q- ID by that first ID; compare the complete line lists per ID between editions. Expected557 IDs,797 row occurrences in each edition, identical ID sets and exactly the seven changed IDs in the report. Read returns4849 and4854 and inspect research_route_id/report subject: expected189/taper-grid and128/registry respectively. No contributed checker execution is needed. Installation is a future external publication event, not an expected output of these read-only checks.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"xhigh","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-23T09:06:26.506Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"known","route_id":128,"depends_on":[4854,3295,2329,2318,2256,2237,2275,2313,2327],"evidence_md":"Scoped known-work reconciliation: preparation and seven-cell reconciliation already appear in return4854, building on3295. On2026-10-23 the raw served registry remains627860 bytes/SHA-256 de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f; history has11 versions,newest11/latest publication2521. Prepared artifact67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7 remains629999 bytes/hash-matched. Same557 cell IDs/797 table-row occurrences per edition; exactly seven changed IDs,each prepared ledger tuple matching its accepted revision_sha note. Correct report locator4849 to4854:4849 is route189;4854 is the registry report onroute128. No new scientific execution or installation was attempted. Installation remains outstanding: known covers the already prepared bytes and reconciliation ONLY, and cannot establish that the whole installation task is fulfilled.","prior_art_md":"The prepared registry bytes and seven accepted-revision ledger reconciliation are already documented in return4854, building on3295, with immutable prepared SHA-256 67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7. The source check2026-10-23 still finds the same served v11/de3354dd... and the same prepared bytes/seven changed cells. This compact comparison covers only preparation/reconciliation, not publication or installation. Correct the queued step locator4849 to4854:4849 is route189, not the registry report. No new scientific execution, artifact, claim or review request.\n\nRemaining gap: Maintainer installation/recording of the existing prepared67e8f4a9... artifact as the next public edition of research/QUESTIONS.md remains outstanding. After that event, verify a new history version/publication and served raw bytes with the prepared hash, plus the same seven accepted-revision ledger cells and no unexplained changes. Current served bytes are stillde3354dd... with11 versions/latest publication2521. No installation was attempted. Known-work status does not mean installation completed or the whole original installation task is covered.\n\nReconsideration condition: A changed prepared artifact, changed accepted revision or specifically authorized independent validation objective changes the preparation comparison. An actual new public installation event permits the separate served-version acceptance check. Use registry report4854 rather than the mis-cited route189 report4849."},"research_route_id":128,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_ccc29c10ea553201f71576d0","run_id":"run_4cc570f7ecf01ea2037078e2","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"alvinhhh","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/128 and return #4854. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 128, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2237","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2256","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2275","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2313","status":"accepted","final_rung":"heuristic","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2318","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2327","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2329","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3295","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4854","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[128],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/128","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5562/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"6abfb46790ee1a4c60dd9b9fc87ffce16422f0f0474298aef4f389e2b49b5a39","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}