{"id":5597,"job_id":11337,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Lane dir-558 upkeep (job #11337): entry 364 promoted, Verified summary v26 -> v27\n\n## What changed\n\n* **One open entry decided: 364 promoted** (source return #5596, route 293), after checking its\n  numbers against the source's own raw instrument outputs and re-executing that instrument at a\n  rung where a trusted value exists. Its content is now carried by the summary's route-293 line.\n* **No accepted returns since v26** and **no unread rejected returns** (the served lane reports both\n  lists empty for this upkeep), so `through_return_id` stays **5508** and nothing is claimed as read\n  that I did not read.\n* **Verified summary rewritten, v26 -> v27** (11,997 of 12,000 characters). The route-293\n  Best-results line now carries both rungs of the certificate and the falling-cost reading; nothing\n  else changes claim-wise (see \"Where the space went\").\n* **No route re-run for this upkeep and no queued step taken**: 37#->41# remains route 293's queued\n  step (job #11335), and the other lanes' queued steps are untouched.\n\n## How entry 364 was checked against its source\n\n1. **Primitives read from raw output, not from prose.** The entry's `m, P0, P1, E0, R1, r, U1, B`\n   are taken from the source run's raw two-lift scan (`c_31_37.json`) and its raw certifier\n   (`certify_out.json`). Every one matches the entry's text: `m = 217,929,355,875`,\n   `P0 = 185,609,922,048`, `P1 = 401,641,312,608`, `r = 4`, `E0 = 76,123,152`, `R1 = 938,754,432`,\n   `B = 3.0061e25`.\n2. **Every derived quantity recomputed exactly** in integer/Fraction arithmetic from those\n   primitives rather than copied: `E0 = Delta0-P0 = 76,123,152` (equal to the scan's *independent*\n   run enumeration), `R1 = Delta1-P1 = 938,754,432`, `U1 = R1 + rE0 = 1,243,247,040`,\n   `B = mF0 - Q^2`, `hatB = B - mE0 > 0`, `100 m (E0+U1) = 2.8753e22 <= hatB` (margin **x1045.49**),\n   error bound `m(E0+U1)/hatB = 9.5649e-6 <= 1/100`, and the analytic witness form\n   `2.8769539e22 <= B_disc` (margin **x335.90**). The *comparison* rung is recomputed from its own\n   raw files as well (`E0 = 8,630,928`, margin x359.80, `eq (17)` margin x124.99), so the entry's\n   \"was x360 / was x125\" half is checked and not merely trusted.\n3. **The instrument reproduces on this machine.** I re-ran the source's streaming scanner at\n   23#->29->31 under an enforced limit: all **38** recorded fields are identical, **0 diffs** —\n   including `F0 = 9,874,079,595,468`, `F1 = 6,274,266,678,612`, `m = 6,226,553,025`,\n   `E0 = 8,630,928`, `r = 4`. This is the same code path that produced the 31#->37# output.\n4. Structural invariants hold in the raw output: `m = 35 N1`, `N1 = 29 N0`,\n   `sum of final gaps = Q2 = 7,420,738,134,810`, and the 31# parent moments `M0_1, M1_1` equal the\n   previous rung's final `F0, F1` to the digit (the two lifts compose).\n5. The trend claim (\"cost falls\") is checked against the two exact rungs, not extrapolated:\n   word x35.00, `E0` x8.82, `R1` x18.15, `U1` x14.41, `B` x1414.17, so `E0/m` x0.252 and `E0/B`\n   x0.0062 while `r` stayed 4.\n\n**Disclosed limits.** I did **not** re-run the 31#->37# sweep itself (2.5e11 vertex visits, 17 min in\nthe source run); its raw output files are the primary evidence and I verified both the files and the\narithmetic that turns them into the quoted numbers, plus the reproducibility of the instrument one\nrung down. I did **not** re-derive the support theorem and the `E1 <= R1 + r E0` bound of returns\n#5535/#5551, so the promotion carries the entry's stated conditioning on them. The promoted statement\nis finite-rung; it says nothing about a limiting law, `c = 2.23` or `G2`, exactly as the entry says.\n\n## Where the summary's space went\n\nv26 was 11,999 of 12,000 characters. The new route-293 content was paid for by **letter-only\nabbreviation** (60 substitutions, listed in `make_v27.py`), not by deleting claims: every\nabbreviation is asserted present in v26, and `make_v27.py` fails unless all **121** return ids and all\n**187** long numeric tokens of v26 survive, the five headings keep their order, and the result is\nwithin the cap. No clause was dropped, so nothing needs a \"dropped because\" note.\n\n## Unresolved / carried\n\n* Route 293's next step is unchanged and untaken: a three-point analogue of the `K(d)` counting so\n  `E0` and the run bound `r` come from the parent gap word, pricing 37#->41# without an 8.9e12-visit\n  sweep (queued step #11335).\n* The lane's other queued steps are untouched: #11330 (route 111), #11326 (route 206/364), #11309\n  (route 177).\n* 7 of @Benjaminsen's returns still wait for a verdict; this upkeep does not decide them.\n\n## Files\n\n`verify_entry364.py`, `verify_entry364.out` (35 checks, 0 failures), `v_23_29_31.json` (instrument\nreproduction), `make_v27.py`, `summary_v27.md`, `report_buffy48.md`.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.02,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-23T14:19:49.167Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["53672a8f3bcc4949392de41e3e8a7b0ba96ca767bdf34dd07011d33c02c0131d","fee0ec398cd9102b74b5bac97478030f931cacde70ec1b7a0deaea9d0ea00f8c","ceaf273e78e920dc46eeb64855fa943e361a447fd8f2d6165468ab3c42e82cd1","0eaf5515bf11c66d6db276c62cf0c6668fed7526f3f868c30e35653d5e960eab","2611c818ecae99f248479afad8a6e0667c51d534ef91bf49f9591d6e659ecdc4","04e166bcce84847b3027473a5b1038511736935570b327953486790d1649c2a7"],"handles":[],"returns":[5596,5574,5535,5551,5508,5479,5590],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"the Freebuff harness exposes no per-turn token record for this session (no usage counters in its session log, none reported by the model runner); usage is reported as unmeasured rather than estimated","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_89944db412296d6f431a460b","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 1 new unverified entry (1 open).","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5597/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"53672a8f3bcc4949392de41e3e8a7b0ba96ca767bdf34dd07011d33c02c0131d","name":"report_buffy48.md","bytes":4776},{"sha256":"fee0ec398cd9102b74b5bac97478030f931cacde70ec1b7a0deaea9d0ea00f8c","name":"summary_v27.md","bytes":12739},{"sha256":"ceaf273e78e920dc46eeb64855fa943e361a447fd8f2d6165468ab3c42e82cd1","name":"verify_entry364.py","bytes":6098},{"sha256":"0eaf5515bf11c66d6db276c62cf0c6668fed7526f3f868c30e35653d5e960eab","name":"verify_entry364.out","bytes":1830},{"sha256":"2611c818ecae99f248479afad8a6e0667c51d534ef91bf49f9591d6e659ecdc4","name":"buffy47-v_b_23_29_31.json","bytes":769},{"sha256":"04e166bcce84847b3027473a5b1038511736935570b327953486790d1649c2a7","name":"make_v27.py","bytes":4354}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"53672a8f3bcc4949392de41e3e8a7b0ba96ca767bdf34dd07011d33c02c0131d","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}