{"id":5630,"job_id":11390,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Lane `formalize` upkeep (job #11390): entry 366 promoted, v14 -> v15, three accepted returns folded in\n\n## What changed\n\n* **One open entry decided: 366 promoted** (source return #5629, route 370, the binned order law),\n  after checking its numbers against that return's own text (`r5629.json`, fetched this run): its\n  content is now carried by the summary's binned-law line at 33 bins (Z_31 `rel2` -0.149 √2-edge /\n  -0.266 equal-mass with CMI 0.074/0.251 bits against the real word's -0.0115..+0.0001 and\n  0.0007-0.0135 bits inside the matched surrogate, transfer failing the ±0.01 bar by 15-26x).\n* **Three accepted returns since v14 folded in**, each read in full at this run:\n  * **#5439** (route 355, measured + Lean): the mod-5 lag-1 exclusion is now **Lean4 PROVEN**\n    (3 axioms, sorried control prints `sorryAx`, the false all-3-AP version fails to compile), and the\n    29# census shows the repeatable-lag-1 set is **not** the small-prime criterion (41 gap values\n    realized, 25 with an admissible 3-AP, 12 repeatable; 132/138/150 zero pairs against null\n    105.6/361.4/36.5; 108 four against 6,640). It also reproduces `rho(1) = 0.6389153` against\n    #5356's 0.63892 and the forced share 0.112012 at 29#.\n  * **#5476** (route 357, measured): the lag-resonance **sign** holds at a third rung (21/21 `rho>1`)\n    but the ordering clauses fail (`rho(N/23) = 1.22413 > rho(N/29) = 1.09702`, Spearman 0.75), and\n    the peak **spreads** rather than fades (half-width 4->6->16, area 1.53->2.09->2.91 while the\n    own-prime height falls 1.2841->1.0970) — so a cross-rung height is not a strength.\n  * **#5510** (route 59, PROVEN finite lemmas): any `W = sum b_k v_k` priced with the unchanged\n    Bettin-Chandee bracket and assembled by triangle costs at least `F(W)`, so 180/400 cannot reach\n    85/400 that way; Cauchy-Schwarz is not the obstruction (Lemma 1); the reciprocity swap forces\n    rank <= 1 for class closure. Scope is the separable strategy, not the route target.\n* `through_return_id` **5508 -> 5510** (newest accepted return listed; all three read). No rejected\n  return has been left unread (`rejected_since` 0), so no dead-ends line was due from a rejection.\n  Nothing is rejected this round: the one open entry was checked and promoted.\n* Summary **v14 -> v15**, 11,996 -> **11,993 characters** (cap 12,000).\n\n## What the compaction did and did not do (disclosed in full)\n\nv14 was at 11,996 of 12,000 characters, so folding in three accepted returns plus one entry needed\nroom. Two rules were applied and are checked mechanically:\n\n1. **No claim and no cited return was dropped.** Check C3 proves the new summary cites **every return\n   id** v14 cited (0 dropped), and check C2 proves the five required headings are present once each\n   in order.\n2. **Enumerated detail was compressed, not removed from the record.** 22 numeric tokens that v14\n   stated are no longer restated verbatim:\n\n   `0.078`, `0.12617`, `0.88188`, `0.88448`, `0.92339`, `0.95541`, `0.96726`, `1,253`, `1.7`, `106`,\n   `2,053`, `2.270295`, `2.361793`, `2.667489`, `240`, `279`, `437.3`, `6.5`, `60.9`, `66,606`,\n   `730`, `97.5`\n\n   Each is either (a) a middle member of a run whose endpoints the summary still gives (the six\n   `S_k/(N S0)` values, the three nonzero-cell counts, the `#5410` dimension ratios, the `#5421`\n   z-scores 97.5/437.3/60.9, the `#5399` `T(16)` bound 0.078 and the `T(16)=66,606` row), or (b) an\n   estimate the newer return overtook (`6.5 GB` was the pre-census 29# figure; #5439 ran it in\n   ~1.2 GB, which the summary now says), or (c) a range endpoint of a transfer that is being retired\n   (`k = 240..279`). **v14 itself is not lost**: it stays in the lane version history and is attached\n   here as `summary_v14_backup.md`, so any of these values can be recovered in one hop from its own\n   return id.\n   No value was cut to make space for a *claim*: the 22 tokens are evidence detail under claims whose\n   numbers the summary still states.\n\n## Checks (check_upkeep.py, 10/10 PASS exit 0; corrupt control fails, exit 1)\n\n* C1 length 11,993 <= 12,000 and >= 11,000 (a truncated file cannot pass);\n* C2 five headings, once each, in the required order;\n* C3 every v14 return id still cited (0 dropped);\n* C4 all four folded-in returns cited (#5439 #5476 #5510 #5629);\n* C5 `through_return_id` 5510 = the newest accepted return the server lists as unfolded;\n* C6 `promote == [366]`, the only open entry, and no `reject`;\n* C7 entry 366's numbers agree with **its source return #5629's own text** (rounding-tolerant: every\n  token in the entry body matches a number in the return within max(5e-4, 0.15 %)), and its\n  `source_return_id` is 5629;\n* C8 each new result is carried at its headline numbers (`0.6389153`/`0.1124`/`105.6`/`6,640`;\n  `1.22413`/`1.09702`/`4->6->16`/`25.6x`; `F(W)`/`180/400`/`85/400`/`95/400`/`rank<=1`;\n  `-0.266`/`0.251`/`15-26x`/`-21.6%`);\n* C9 no private execution identifier and no credential-shaped string (public pins — a 40-hex Mathlib\n  commit, the 64-char theorem names — are content, not leaks);\n* C10 the payload carries `state_update.summary_md` as a string with `promote` and\n  `through_return_id`, `transcript` as a pre-scrubbed string and `transcript_approved: true`.\n\nThe corrupt control plants a named fault and must fail: `--corrupt length` (summary over the cap),\n`--corrupt heading` (a heading renamed), `--corrupt dropid` (a cited id removed), `--corrupt promote`\n(an id that is not the open entry), `--corrupt through` (a stale marker). Each is reported in\n`check.corrupt.*.out`.\n\n## Scope and limits of this promotion\n\n1. **The promotion is a source check, not a re-measurement.** I compared entry 366 against #5629's\n   report text and its published numbers; I did **not** rerun the 33-bin census or the 29#/31# word\n   builds (the binned run itself cost ~0.15 CPU-h in #5629 and its artifacts are on the record).\n   Where the entry rounds (0.266 for 0.2664, 0.251 for 0.2513) the tolerance check accepts the\n   rounding, and the summary quotes the entry's rounded values.\n2. **The three folded returns were read, not re-derived.** #5439's Lean claims are taken at their\n   stated axioms/controls; #5510's Lemmas 1-2 are taken at their stated scope (finite W, common\n   bracket, triangle assembly); #5476's null is taken as its control-lag sample reports it (no\n   analytic z).\n3. The summary is a rewrite by judgement: claims that a newer return overtook were updated (the\n   route-355 next step, which #5439 discharges; the `6.5 GB` estimate), and the rest were compressed.\n\n## Unresolved obligations (not this assignment)\n\n* **9 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict** (4 on this session's model); one line for the\n  person, nothing for them to do.\n* Route 355's next step is now the distance-to-nearest-slot census of L=132/138/150 (#5439's own\n  next step); route 357's is the peak-shape prediction from the index discrepancy of `kP/p`;\n  route 370's is job **#11388** (per-value split of the fine lag-2 deficit); route 59 keeps three\n  obligations (#5510 §6) and no distinct experiment.\n* Job #3880 stays person-addressed and was not touched; #5544's open findings 152660/152661 remain\n  open on #5479's files; route 365's cheap Table-2 anchor repair from buffy50 still stands.\n\n## Accounting and boundaries\n\nUsage is **unmeasured** — this harness keeps no per-turn token counts, so no number is invented.\nOne assignment, one attempt (`6cd8e317574cfd91c0b5ef3dc5adbcf5`), session 1 of 1. The credential was\nread only inside tool processes, by name; it is not in this report, the transcript or the summary.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-23T22:28:30.310Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":null,"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"codebuff/freebuff keeps no per-turn token counts; no usage record exists for this session","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-23T22:30:28.140Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_6bf30e2be5761fe0dfceefaf","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 1 new unverified entry (1 open).","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5630/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"aaa9e8219f91e8cfe5913192f366284b6d69bce7d2303c293ed28fc33e0ae00c","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}