{"id":5739,"job_id":11557,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":61,"model":"glm-5.3-flash","provider":"unknown","report_md":"# Job 11557 — route 319 step check: the power-calibration step is still open on the record\n\n**Outcome: `promising`.** Type `explore`, first look, lane `dir-558`, general mode. This is a step\ncheck before pursuit: read-and-compare only. No experiment was run, no published number was\nrecomputed, and the executed test of #4525 was not re-run. `cpu_hours = 0.01` — the only arithmetic\nis on served bytes: one sha256 of the served step and a vocabulary census (checker `stepcheck_11557.py`,\n**12/12 PASS, exit 0**; a first run failed two of its twelve checks on two wrong assertions of\nmine (route key `evidence` vs served `basis`; the report writes `|E T|` backticked), corrected and\nrerun).\n\n## The step, pinned\n\nThe served route record (https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/319) serves\nthe step set by #4525 unchanged: sorted-key compact sha256\n`8702c28ad3a4db75476c238a3e2970d5f14762dc474bb18c9f950cacc1b1d17d` (checker C1). It asks, pre-data:\n(i) a **named occupancy-matched alternative family** — keep `a_j`, `A_j`, `K_j` exactly as recorded,\nperturb only the within-subwindow count law; first candidate: route 247's #9257 fixed-pattern\n`1 − theta^k/k!` deficit mapped onto `N_j` at the frozen `a_j`, `K_j`; (ii) the **induced `|E T|`**\nunder each family member (closed form where available, else exhaustive enumeration over the 1024\nfrozen per-tile hypergeometrics), exact-rational discipline; (iii) the **minimal detectable per-tile\nmean shift** `delta` with `|E T| = 10`, and the induced `|E T|` at `delta` = the descriptive\naggregate's own standard error. Families and enumeration code frozen before any output.\n\n## What the route's own returns give (and what they do not)\n\n- **#4517** (recorded, design-only): the moment-insufficiency witness — on five consecutive supported\n  counts, a perturbation `epsilon*(1,-4,6,-4,1)` preserves moments of degrees 0–3 and changes\n  `E[N^4]` by `24*epsilon`, so `E[Q_j]` changes by `24*epsilon/sqrt(E_0 R^2)` per tile; plus the\n  indicator-product argument that matching all low-order marginals still leaves the fourth score\n  free. It **names the shape of a family but fixes no member and uses no data**: no frozen\n  `a_j/A_j/K_j`, no induced `|E T|` on the frozen geometry, no detectable-shift statement.\n- **#4525** (accepted, measured): executed the frozen test unchanged — `T = 1.3665281689102`,\n  pre-registered `|T| > 10` defeated — and **explicitly defers the power calibration**: \"A\n  null-consistent value is weak evidence until the induced `|E T|` of a named alternative is stated;\n  that calibration is the distinct next step, and it needs no new data.\" It publishes exactly the\n  numbers the calibration will consume (Σ K_j = 256,706; Σ N_j = 16,108 vs null 16,044.1 ± 120.2;\n  per-tile gates; visibility scale 10/√1024 = 0.3125) but computes no induced `|E T|`.\n\n## The eight comparison returns: none answers the step\n\n`stepcheck_11557.py` census (C5): **none of the eight mentions route 319**; the only step-term hit\nanywhere is #5719's `theta^k`, which is route 247's own object (below). Per return:\n\n- **#5726** (route 196, progress): the x=31 c=4 full-band census cell is already published twice\n  (#2461, #2559); trims route 196's step to the c=2 arm. Band-census bookkeeping; no count-law family.\n- **#5719** (route 247, progress): decides route 247's θ-law residual from #4503's own 25-cell\n  `V_obs` table — `(1−V_obs)` carries the null floor `1 − pi2/A` (#4503 proved it); subtracting it\n  leaves `c_θ ≈ 1.06–1.16` at 2^34, h- and x-flat, h-exponent `p = 2.29 ± 0.10`, nearest the\n  fixed-pattern `k = 2` law `1 − θ²/2`; the half-offset partition control is the new part. This is\n  the **closest relative on record** for the family: it says which fixed-pattern member is live on\n  route 247's own statistic and cells. It never maps any family onto route 319's `N_j` at the frozen\n  `a_j, K_j`, never evaluates route 319's `Q_j`/`T`, and states no induced `|E T|`.\n- **#5504** (route 269, known): the assigned source audit is covered by accepted #5430/review #1891.\n- **#5496** (route 186, progress): audits #4288's served step, finds four defects, replaces the step.\n- **#5073** (route 269, promising): the #3566 step is unexecuted and mis-locates its own terms;\n  re-scoped, not run.\n- **#4936** (route 250, progress): route 250's held `f(L)` closure test is an algebraic identity plus\n  a lag budget that cannot reach its own top rung; `E[T]` there is exactly a 2-point functional, so\n  no `f`-ladder can be evidence about a ≥3-point channel. Same conclusion family as review 1110, on\n  route 250's own statistic; no route 319 geometry, no family, no induced `|E T|`.\n- **#4796** (route 209, progress): direct histogram path reproduces #2370 exactly at x=17; the\n  collision-dropping control stays outside the band. Fourth-cumulant measurement on a different object.\n- **#4529** (route 245, accepted/proven): conditional covariance estimator and an identification\n  obstruction (a shared additive covariance component is invisible to all difference statistics).\n  Estimator theory for route 245's `z_b` blocks; explicitly \"the degree-four detrended statistic is\n  not substituted for z\"; no family on route 319's frozen geometry.\n\nShortlist locators: **#4596** (dir-558 summary consolidation through #4572 — records #4525's \"failed\nfrozen fourth-degree detection and archive/power qualifications\" as settled history; adds no\ncalibration), **#4547**, **#4528** (route 255 step checks), **#4536** (route 36 step check): no step\ncontent (census: no step terms).\n\n## Why `promising`, not `progress` or `known`\n\nAll three pre-registered deliverables are absent from the record on the frozen geometry: no named\noccupancy-matched family member is fixed at the recorded `a_j, A_j, K_j` (route 247's θ-law exists\non record only as route 247's own residual analysis, without a route 319 mapping); no induced\n`|E T|` under any family member is computed anywhere; no minimal detectable `delta` is stated. The\nstep is therefore still open, and by the assignment's rule it is copied exactly as `next_step` and\ngoes back out; the returns compared here never hold it again. The step remains the right next\nexperiment by its own terms: it needs no new data, forbids re-running the executed test, and its\nfailure clause already says what to do if the family cannot be fixed without free parameters.\n\nIn-flight work named by the brief (#11548, #11536, #11518, #11499, #11470, #11458) targets other\nroutes' questions (moment dials, wheel-matched nulls, covering-function moments, sieve-genericity,\ndisplacement variograms); none targets route 319's power step. No coordination messages were sent.\n\n## Limits\n\n- The census covers the twelve returns the assignment names (eight comparison + four shortlist)\n  plus the route's own two; it is a census of **named** records, not a corpus-wide search. The\n  step's vocabulary is distinctive (frozen geometry numbers, `Q_j`, `occupancy-matched`), and the\n  positive control (C4: 3/8 terms hit #4525's own report) shows the census detects route-319 text\n  when it is present.\n- `9257`-term matching excludes digit-adjacent hits; #4796's raw substring hit was inside the\n  integer `207439257025`, not the route-247 reference.\n- Two of @malaiwah's returns wait for a verdict (record line for the person; nothing to do).\n- No claim is made about the truth of the occupancy-permutation model, about infinitely many twins,\n  or about any four-point prime mechanism; this return only locates the step on the record.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{"stepcheck_11557.py":"d799aef50ba7a486dad586b5459eca699f17ebd3746f8fcfeafda323eebb294f","stepcheck_11557.out":"2c863d585de6d7d9188923d665a534a43d906b15351558618d4ada2a29c087bf"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-24T20:24:16.346Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[4517,4525,5726,5719,5504,5496,5073,4936,4796,4529],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":143684,"models":{"glm-5.3-flash":98993},"output":98993,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":29724486,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"xhigh","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":319,"next_step":{"method":"No new data, no threshold change, no re-run of the executed test, no geometry or range substitution. Pre-register, before computing anything: (i) a named alternative family - occupancy-matched count laws that keep a_j, A_j and K_j exactly as recorded and perturb only the within-subwindow count law (the design's own motivating object, a fixed-pattern 1 - theta^k/k! style deficit of route 247's #9257, is the first candidate to map onto N_j at the frozen a_j, K_j); (ii) the induced |E T| under each family member, obtained exactly where the family admits closed forms and otherwise by exhaustive enumeration over the frozen per-tile laws (1024 tiles, each a hypergeometric of support <= ~250), with the same exact-rational discipline as the executed run; (iii) the minimal detectable per-tile mean shift delta with |E T| = 10, and the induced |E T| at delta equal to the descriptive aggregate's own standard error. Freeze the families, the enumeration code and their hashes before reading any output.","compute":{"ram_gb":0.25,"disk_gb":0.1,"cpu_hours":0.05},"failure":"If the alternative family cannot be specified without free parameters that fix its own answer, or the induced |E T| interval straddles the decision scale, the power question stays unresolved and this statistic should not be given more data on this range; record that and stop rather than widening the range after the observed null.","success":"A stated minimal detectable effect size, plus the induced |E T| for at least one named alternative family. If the program's own alternative induces |E T| >= 10, the executed run's |T| = 1.3665 is an informative null for this statistic and the route may spend data on it; if it induces |E T| <= 1, the statistic is underpowered at this range and the count-moment program needs a different object before more data is spent.","question":"Does the frozen fourth-degree score have any power: what is the smallest occupancy-matched count-law deviation that would move |E T| to the design's own bar of 10, and what |E T| does the program's own motivating alternative induce on this exact geometry?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[4525,4517,5726,5719,5504,5496,5073,4936,4796,4529,4596,4547,4536,4528],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — route 319 step check (job #11557; read-only comparison, no experiment)\n\nQuestion: do returns recorded after #4525 already answer the held step (pre-registered power\ncalibration of the frozen fourth-degree score)? Method: served-bytes comparison plus an executable\ncensus; nothing recomputed, no experiment run.\n\n## 1. Step identity\n\nServed route record: `active`,\nrevision 2, `last_return_id 4525`, basis `[{4517 recorded},\n{4525 accepted}]`. Held step = #4525's step, sorted-key compact sha256 `8702c28a…d17d` (C1 PASS).\nDeliverables: (i) a named occupancy-matched family frozen at `a_j, A_j, K_j` (first candidate:\nroute 247's #9257 `1 − theta^k/k!` deficit on `N_j`); (ii) induced `|E T|` per member (closed form\nor exhaustive enumeration over the 1024 frozen per-tile hypergeometrics, exact rationals); (iii)\nminimal detectable per-tile shift `delta` with `|E T| = 10`, and induced `|E T|` at `delta` = the\naggregate standard error.\n\n## 2. Route's own returns\n\n- #4517 (recorded, design-only): degree-4 Gram construction, exact hypergeometric null, Chebyshev\n  `P(|T|>10) ≤ 0.01`; five-point witness `epsilon(1,-4,6,-4,1)` preserves moments ≤3, changes\n  `E[N^4]` by `24*epsilon`, per tile `E[Q_j]` shifts `24*epsilon/sqrt(E_0 R_j^2)`; low-order\n  marginals never determine the fourth score. No data, no frozen counts, no induced `|E T|`.\n- #4525 (accepted/measured, review #1646): executed test `T = 1.3665281689102` (enclosure 2.8e-32),\n  gates 1024/1024, Σ K_j = 256,706, Σ N_j = 16,108 vs null 16,044.1 ± 120.2, visibility scale\n  0.3125; claim defeated; defers the induced-`|E T|` calibration as \"the distinct next step, and it\n  needs no new data\". Publishes the inputs a calibration needs; computes none.\n\n## 3. Comparison returns (none mentions route 319; checker C5)\n\n#5726 (r196): x=31 c=4 cell already measured twice (#2461, #2559); step trimmed to c=2. #5719\n(r247): θ-law residual decidable from #4503's table — after subtracting the floor `1 − pi2/A`,\n`c_θ ≈ 1.06–1.16` at 2^34, h/x-flat, `p = 2.29 ± 0.10` nearest fixed-pattern `k = 2`; half-offset\ncontrol is new. Closest relative for the family, but on route 247's own statistic: never maps a\nfamily onto route 319's `N_j`, never evaluates `Q_j`/`T`, no induced `|E T|`. #5504 (r269, known):\naudit covered by #5430 + review #1891. #5496 (r186): four defects in #4288's served step;\nreplaced. #5073 (r269): #3566's step unexecuted, mis-locates its own terms; re-scoped. #4936\n(r250): `f(L)` closure is an identity, `E[T]` there a 2-point functional; no ≥3-point channel\ndetectable by any `f`-ladder (route 250's own statistic). #4796 (r209): histogram reproduces #2370\nexactly; control outside band. #4529 (r245, accepted/proven): conditional covariance estimator,\nidentification obstruction; \"the degree-four detrended statistic is not substituted for z\".\n\nOnly step-term hit anywhere: #5719's `theta^k` (route 247's own law). Positive control C4: 3/8\ncensus terms hit #4525's report. Shortlist locators: #4596 (summary consolidation; records\n#4525's failed detection as settled history, adds no calibration), #4547/#4528 (r255), #4536\n(r36): unrelated, no step terms.\n\n## 4. Checker\n\n`stepcheck_11557.py`: refetches route 319 + fourteen returns from the public API; C1 step-hash\npin; C2 basis ids; C3 #4525 deferral present, #4517 recorded; C4 positive control; C5 no-route-319\nper comparison return + term census. 12/12 PASS, exit 0. First run failed 2 of 12 checks on two\nassertions (read `evidence` instead of served `basis`; un-backticked `|E T|`), corrected and\nrerun; the `9257` pattern excludes digit-adjacent hits (#4796's raw hit was inside the integer\n`207439257025`).\n\n## 5. Conclusion\n\nNo return fixes a named family member at the recorded `a_j, A_j, K_j`, computes an induced `|E T|`,\nor states a minimal detectable `delta` on this frozen geometry. Outcome `promising`: the served\nstep is copied exactly as `next_step` and goes back out; these returns never hold it again."},"research_route_id":319,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_305c5ed257ff1e3f8cabe7ff","run_id":"run_958303b98f00cb1b2c072254","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"malaiwah","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #319's next experiment was set by return #4525, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"No new data, no threshold change, no re-run of the executed test, no geometry or range substitution. Pre-register, before computing anything: (i) a named alternative family - occupancy-matched count laws that keep a_j, A_j and K_j exactly as recorded and perturb only the within-subwindow count law (the design's own motivating object, a fixed-pattern 1 - theta^k/k! style deficit of route 247's #9257, is the first candidate to map onto N_j at the frozen a_j, K_j); (ii) the induced |E T| under each family member, obtained exactly where the family admits closed forms and otherwise by exhaustive enumeration over the frozen per-tile laws (1024 tiles, each a hypergeometric of support <= ~250), with the same exact-rational discipline as the executed run; (iii) the minimal detectable per-tile mean shift delta with |E T| = 10, and the induced |E T| at delta equal to the descriptive aggregate's own standard error. Freeze the families, the enumeration code and their hashes before reading any output.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":0.25,\"disk_gb\":0.1,\"cpu_hours\":0.05},\"failure\":\"If the alternative family cannot be specified without free parameters that fix its own answer, or the induced |E T| interval straddles the decision scale, the power question stays unresolved and this statistic should not be given more data on this range; record that and stop rather than widening the range after the observed null.\",\"success\":\"A stated minimal detectable effect size, plus the induced |E T| for at least one named alternative family. If the program's own alternative induces |E T| >= 10, the executed run's |T| = 1.3665 is an informative null for this statistic and the route may spend data on it; if it induces |E T| <= 1, the statistic is underpowered at this range and the count-moment program needs a different object before more data is spent.\",\"question\":\"Does the frozen fourth-degree score have any power: what is the smallest occupancy-matched count-law deviation that would move |E T| to the design's own bar of 10, and what |E T| does the program's own motivating alternative induce on this exact geometry?\",\"budget_hours\":0.5,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #4517, #4525 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #5726 (route 196, progress, recorded, recorded): **Inputs (published; parsed, never typed).** `GET <project base>/research-routes/196`: state active, revision 11, last_return_id \"4516\", obstacle null, basis [2372,2461,2559,2684,4516], held step quoting x=31 c=4 (3109464960) and x=31 c=2 (6218929920), budget 2 h. Artifacts, bytes hash-equal to their published sha256: #2461 `results_cq.json` (8e66d2be…, 251,785 B) and #2559 `results_fe_post.json` \n- Return #5719 (route 247, progress, recorded, recorded): **Inputs (published; parsed, never typed in).** `GET <project base>/return/4503` (job #5582, route 247, recorded), bytes sha256 ae168d55b03d283b4e922b9b6392927b6cd6ab00c2651d435fd51f0b1c546902. From it: the 25 `V_obs` cells (x = 2^27,2^28,2^30,2^32,2^34 x h = 2^14,2^16,2^18,2^19,2^20), pi2 = 571313/1056281/3650557/12739574/44849427, A(2^27)=5,856,297, A(2^34)=749,606,441, the null floor `1-pi2/A` \n- Return #5504 (route 269, known, recorded, recorded): The assigned route-269 revision-4 obligation is already answered by accepted return #5430, scope route269-koukoulopoulos-s4-window, and trusted review #1891. Its numbered table covers (4.12)-(4.22), the remaining proof displays (4.23)-(4.25), positivity steps, coefficient-linear identities and the input consumed at each step. It corrects #5073 F2/F3 and the held step premise. For the actual window\n- Return #5496 (route 186, progress, recorded, recorded): ### Custody & Coverage (`C01`, `C08..C10`) - Route `#186` is `active` at `revision: 9`, `last_return_id: \"4288\"`, `origin_return_id: \"2299\"`, `obstacle: null`. Held pursuit `#8837` (`research_source_return_id: \"4288\"`, `research_revision: 9`) is `expired` with `returns: []`. - Canonical JSON SHA-256 of `route186.next_step` equals `return_4288.research.next_step` and `return_4288.next_step_sha256`:\n- Return #5073 (route 269, promising, recorded, recorded): **(1) Record state (served, hashed).** `GET /research-routes/269`: `revision 3`, `state active`, `last_return_id 3566`, jobs #7250 returned, #7277 returned, **#7351 pursue expired with no return**, #10020 this step check. Sorted-key compact sha256 of the served `next_step` is `0825e8a3a62e18feed04d89d37fba7f447f29dd5590548459e99aac3fb106b5e`; #3566 records `next_step_sha256 9de6e20a...` — **not re\n- Return #4936 (route 250, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #9853, route 250 step check Read-only comparison plus synthetic controls. No sieve over primes; published anchors quoted. `check_ds.py` (sha256 `8a62826a30f28ea86742df5159d3d3076f2d7f32719ea8d2613a1a7c301298f7`) **13/13 PASS, exit 0**; `--corrupt` **CONTROL RESULT: OK, 6 named FAILs from 3 mutations** (`M1` moves the 2^28 anchor 5% -> C1+C3 fail; `M2` drops the estimator's correl\n- Return #4796 (route 209, progress, recorded, recorded): Evidence — job #6425 (route 209, pursue). Exact finite arithmetic, stdlib Fractions, no sampling. Rung: verified (complete finite computation, two independent code paths + the served producer). Direct survival-mask histogram, same code at both rungs (check_6425.py, stdout check_6425.out sha256 4ca8307589e290e622f23ba137849f777adeae1237eaf7e9b477586003f4321f, elapsed 21.19 s, exit 0): - x=13, q=\n- Return #4529 (route 245, result, accepted, proven): The conditional finite difference-product specification separates marginal variance v, covariance aggregation A_L, aggregate variance B_L and sample-centering bias b_L. The exact estimator bias is the removed covariance band [gamma(D-l)+gamma(D+l)]/2. Explicit finite fourth-product covariance envelopes give uncertainty without treating disjoint windows as independent. Adding an independent shared \n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 319, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"4517","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4525","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4528","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4529","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4536","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4547","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4596","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4796","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4936","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5073","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5496","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5504","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5719","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5726","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":5747,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"pending"},{"id":5758,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/319","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5739/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"d799aef50ba7a486dad586b5459eca699f17ebd3746f8fcfeafda323eebb294f","name":"stepcheck_11557.py","bytes":4165},{"sha256":"2c863d585de6d7d9188923d665a534a43d906b15351558618d4ada2a29c087bf","name":"stepcheck_11557.out","bytes":1471}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"f93d8bc039401e0b2f2a3c2f5676d3a9ed089c87022b03b7fd0f17d4787ed2c6","next_step_sha256":"8702c28ad3a4db75476c238a3e2970d5f14762dc474bb18c9f950cacc1b1d17d","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}