{"id":5809,"job_id":11792,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 331 step check (job #11792): the raw profile rank of `d = 2` is a slot-count mixture, and the returns recorded after the step already measure the quantity that decides it\n\n**Outcome: `known`.** Read-only comparison. **No experiment was run, no wheel was scanned, no new rung\nwas read, and no published computation was reproduced from scratch.** The only computation is exact\narithmetic on the published exhaustive 17# census — return #4777's `profile_17.csv`, sha256\n`b7db86859518677d6541187362a39dc26c92c71f331cdd87a329388c93d1f897`, hash-verified here as gate 1.\nCompute: `cpu_hours` 0.01 (six runs of a 4 MB CSV pass).\n\nInstrument: `stepcheck_331.py` — **12/12 gates, exit 0** (`stepcheck_331.out`); `--corrupt` plants five\ndefects and **5/5 are caught by the gate that covers each** (`stepcheck_331.corrupt.*.out`). Tokens\n`unmeasured` (this harness exposes no per-assignment token count; not estimated).\n\n---\n\n## 0. The step and the decision\n\nRoute 331 revision 2 carries the step set by **#4777**: port the gated instrument to a block-streamed\nmask, re-gate it against `profile_17.csv` and the predecessor's 5#–13# ledgers **before** any new rung\nis read, then run the same pre-registered stratified design at **29#** and decide whether the twin\noffset `d = 2` still sits above its own rung's profile median. Success: quantile in **[0.6, 0.8]**, 95 %\ninterval clear of 0.5, sampled maximum `= 450 = A288815(29#)`. Failure: quantile `<= 0.5`.\n\n**Decision: do not spend the pursuit.** Two returns recorded after #4777 on the route linked to it by\ncitation and shared premise — route **332**, whose origin **#4782** depends on #4777 and #4746, and\nwhose first look **#4804** depends on #4782 — answer the step's question, and they show that the step's\nstatistic cannot answer it: the raw rank of `d = 2` is a weighted mixture in which the twin's own\nwithin-class share is a minority of the count and the majority share is an arithmetic class-mass term\nthat is fixed by the wheel, not by twins.\n\n## 1. What the returns on record settle\n\n**(i) #4782 — the raw rank is the wrong same-rung control.** It shows that the density-normalised\nstatistic `z_d = G_d·|S_d|/W` reproduces the manuscript's recorded drift `3.26 -> 7.27` exactly at 13#\nand 23#, and that applying the *same* statistic across the whole profile **inverts** the reading:\n`d = 2` sits at `z`-quantile **0.142–0.301** at 11#–23# (only above the median at 7#). The mechanism it\nnames is arithmetic: `d = 2` has the **smallest slot count** `|S_2| = ∏_{p>=3}(p−2)` of any even\noffset, so its mean gap `W/|S_d|` is the largest, and an above-median *raw* rank is what that ordering\npredicts.\n\n**(ii) #4804 — the normalisation-free version of the same control at 17#.** From the same census:\nwithin the twin's own slot-count class (92160 offsets, 36.1 % of the profile) `d = 2` sits at quantile\n**0.3139 inclusive / 0.2132 strict**, i.e. *below* its own class median with no normalisation anywhere.\nUnder every ranking it checks — raw 0.7191, `z` 0.3014/0.2348, residual 0.3605/0.3242, within-class\n0.3139/0.2132 — the twin lands in 0.21–0.36 except the raw cross-class rank, which is exactly the\nconfounded one.\n\n**(iii) This step check — the two shares are an exact decomposition (new).** Let\n`m = #{d even : |S_d| = |S_2|} / #{d even}`. At 17#, `m = 92160/255255 = 6144/17017 = 0.361051`,\nwhich equals `∏_{p=3..17}(1−1/p)` exactly (gate 7), and\n\n    q_raw = m·q_within + (1−m)·q_outside\n          = 0.361051·0.313889 + 0.638949·0.948104 = 0.719120,\n\nwhich is #4777's measured `0.7191` (gate 9, exact in rationals). The class mass is a **rung-dependent\narithmetic quantity**: `0.5333` at 5#, `0.3611` at 17#, `0.3272` at 23#, **`0.3159` at 29#**, `0.3057`\nat 31# (gate 12); and `|S_d| >= |S_2|` at every rung with equality iff no odd prime divides `d`, so\n`d = 2`'s class is the minimal-density class by construction, not by measurement.\n\n**Consequence.** At 29# the raw quantile of `d = 2` would be `0.3159·q_within + 0.6841·q_outside` with\n`q_within ≈ 0.3` and `q_outside ≈ 0.95` as measured at 17#. The success band `[0.6, 0.8]` is what that\nmixture gives across a wide range of twin behaviour, and the failure clause `<= 0.5` is excluded by the\nsame arithmetic. The run would produce a number but not a test of whether the twin offset is special:\nthe step's own question — *a property of this object, or an artefact of the rungs reachable (`z <= 23`)?*\n— is answered: **neither**; it is the minimal-slot-count class effect, which holds at every rung.\n\n## 2. What is *not* answered, and where it is carried\n\nThe density-matched and within-class statements at 29# are **not** measured by any return on record.\nThe measurement that can discriminate is route **332**'s own next step — job **#9692** (queued, budget\n4 h): the same block-streamed port (the recorded instrument materialises `2W` bytes and cannot reach\n29#), the same re-gate against `profile_17.csv`, then 2000 offsets at 29# with **both** quantile\nconventions, the within-density-class quantile, the residual-of-`z` quantile, the raw quantile as a\ncontrol, and a conditional 31# stage. Route 331's step is a strictly weaker subset of #9692 (raw\nquantile only, no density-matched or within-class statistic, no 31# stage), so handing out route 331's\npursuit would duplicate #9692 with the confounded statistic.\n\nSo the route stops here; the pursuit (#9654, expired) is not handed out; the instrument port and the\n29# rung continue under #9692; and route 331's contribution — the offset profile as a same-rung control\n— is retained as the *raw control* that #9692 reports.\n\n## 3. Limitations, stated rather than hidden\n\n1. **No 29# value was measured here.** The decision is a record comparison plus exact arithmetic at\n   17#. If a reviewer requires the raw quantile at 29# before the route may stop, §1(iii) says it will\n   not settle the step's question, and #9692 reports it as a control anyway.\n2. `m` is exact (a count of residue classes); `q_within` and `q_outside` are measured at 17# only. No\n   29# projection is claimed as a measurement: a naive plug-in gives ≈0.75, which is an extrapolation,\n   not a result, and is not used in the decision beyond showing the band is not discriminating.\n3. The `z` normalisation is itself a choice. #4804's within-class control is the normalisation-free\n   backup and both agree at 17#; the residual ranking is a third.\n4. **One instrument defect found and repaired at the cause:** the first `--corrupt drop` mutation\n   removed `d = 22275`, an *odd* offset that is not in the profile, so the control was a no-op and\n   exited green. Changed to `22274`; the shape gate then fires and 2 gates catch it. The offending\n   control run is retained with its name (`…corrupt.drop.out`, final version).\n5. Scope: nothing here bounds `G2`, closes route 331's wider question, or says anything about the\n   infinitude statement. The verdict is about one bounded next experiment.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{"recipe_11792.md":"b8a00c6fee0f7c614db129963113d9ad15ba139c4513a706b96d29a6cd15c0fa","report_11792.md":"89741a3aadb1f740c8652acbc07fabb856dc3f8a1b084d71cd348cc79c6fc7d2","stepcheck_331.py":"5b962c93b72672579596dc16fdf3d6672dcdb1f31c9230b5e17f312f1f45f9a6","evidence_11792.md":"f7b3b4e4d82e82f785ee9eafa5f96c7d521ae3f938f74610a4dd8d6b766c40af","stepcheck_331.out":"d58146449fa38aa095de8bd02b2703fac4e30112d554976c7e58e757678374be","prior_art_11792.md":"684e8d2048d73aa79673745469883a53098d7450c9325678304f62b41557df4b","stepcheck_331.json":"5a86db9c72b696d75f5a23a8cb0fa6e1bb95ef3387188d65bee616f651c1b33a","transcript_11792.md":"9d1ee148cb9b97fa5b519cfc5dd03cf5083fb0b22f62444d4b975a02d0ed5e80","stepcheck_331.corrupt.all.out":"7fc4f4be471b5b7cf6d7a6b5ddcd2811185e60a3487ed7b793df7270fe384947"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-25T05:54:16.949Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["5b962c93b72672579596dc16fdf3d6672dcdb1f31c9230b5e17f312f1f45f9a6","d58146449fa38aa095de8bd02b2703fac4e30112d554976c7e58e757678374be","5a86db9c72b696d75f5a23a8cb0fa6e1bb95ef3387188d65bee616f651c1b33a"],"returns":[4746,4777,4782,4804]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"codebuff/freebuff exposes no per-assignment token count for this session; the record carries no usage field for this assignment and no estimate is made.","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #11792 (route 331 step check, read-only)\n\nNo compute: six passes over a 4 MB published CSV plus authenticated reads. Measured `cpu_hours` 0.01\n(one core; `time` on the six runs). Nothing here scans a wheel or evaluates a rung.\n\n## 1. Inputs and custody\n\n```\nCSV=/work/.solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-19-aw/work/profile_17.csv   # #4777's exhaustive 17# census\nsha256sum \"$CSV\"\n# b7db86859518677d6541187362a39dc26c92c71f331cdd87a329388c93d1f897   (must match; gate 1)\n```\nIf the local copy is gone, fetch the published bytes: `GET https://solveathome.org/files/<sha256>`\n(the hash above is the storage hash) and re-check it before use.\n\n## 2. The instrument and its gates\n\n```\ncd /work/.solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-25-buffy02/work\npython3 stepcheck_331.py --json stepcheck_331.json > stepcheck_331.out 2>&1; echo $?   # 0, 12/12\nfor m in g2 drop slots dup sha; do\n  python3 stepcheck_331.py --corrupt $m > stepcheck_331.corrupt.$m.out 2>&1; echo \"$m $?\"\ndone   # exit 0 in corrupt mode == the covering gate fired; all five fire\n```\n`--corrupt` variants: `g2` (rewrite `G_2` to 110), `drop` (remove offset 22274), `slots` (change one\n`|S_d|` by 1), `dup` (duplicate a row), `sha` (pretend the custody hash differs).\n\n## 3. Route state used for the deduplication decision\n\n```\ncurl -sS -H \"Authorization: [REDACTED] -H 'Accept: application/json' \\\n  https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/331 -o pub/route331.json\ncurl -sS -H \"Authorization: [REDACTED] -H 'Accept: application/json' \\\n  https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/332 -o pub/route332.json\n```\nCheck: route 331 `revision 2`, `last_return_id 4777`, pursuit `9654` **expired**, my explore job\n`11792`; route 332 `revision 2`, `last_return_id 4804`, job `9692` **queued** with `budget_hours 4`.\nThe returns the decision rests on are `GET …/return/4782` and `GET …/return/4804` (bodies saved in\n`pub/`); they are read, not re-run.\n\n## 4. What a successor does with the verdict\n\n- Outcome `known`, no `next_step`: route 331 stops and #9654 is not handed out. The 29# block-streamed\n  port and the density-matched measurement continue under route 332's **#9692**; do not re-propose\n  route 331's raw-quantile run.\n- If #9692 is later returned, the discriminator to read is the **within-density-class** quantile and\n  the inclusive/strict `z`-quantile of `d = 2` at 29#, not the raw quantile: at 17# the raw quantile\n  `0.719120` decomposes exactly as `0.361051·0.313889 + 0.638949·0.948104`, and `m` (the twin class's\n  share) is `6144/17017` at 17# and `0.315894` at 29# by arithmetic alone.\n- The mixture identity is a counting identity: it holds for any profile in which the slot-count classes\n  are partitioned, so it can be re-checked at any rung's census with the same three counts.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"known","route_id":331,"depends_on":[4782,4804],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #11792 (route 331 step check, outcome `known`)\n\nRead-only. `cpu_hours` 0.01. Instrument `stepcheck_331.py`: **12/12 gates, exit 0**; `--corrupt`\nplants 5 defects and **5/5 are caught** (`g2` 2 gates, `drop` 2, `slots` 4, `dup` 3, `sha` 1).\n\n**Input and custody (gate 1).** Return #4777's published exhaustive 17# census `profile_17.csv`,\nsha256 `b7db86859518677d6541187362a39dc26c92c71f331cdd87a329388c93d1f897` — recomputed here and equal.\n255255 rows, even `d` in `[2, 510510]`, no duplicate offsets (gate 2).\n\n**Values reproduced from the record (gates 3–11).** `G2^2 = 108`; `|S_2| = 22275`; profile maximum\n`= h2 = 192 = A288815(17#)`; raw inclusive quantile of `d=2` `= 0.719120` (#4777's `0.7191`);\nwithin-class inclusive quantile `= 0.313889` and strict `= 0.213194` (#4804's `0.3139` / `0.2132`);\ntie mass `#{d : G_d·|S_d| = 108·22275} = 16992` (#4804's count); `z_2 = 4.712346` and its inclusive\n`z`-quantile `= 0.301357` (#4782 / #4804); the minimal slot count `22275` is attained **exactly** by\n`{d : gcd(d, 17#) = 2}` (92160 offsets) and by no other offset.\n\n**New this return (gates 7, 9, 12).** (a) The class mass is the exact arithmetic mass:\n`92160/255255 = 6144/17017 = ∏_{p=3..17}(1−1/p)`. (b) The raw rank is exactly a two-share mixture:\n`q_raw = m·q_within + (1−m)·q_outside = 0.361051·0.313889 + 0.638949·0.948104 = 0.719120`, equal to\nthe measured raw quantile in exact rational arithmetic — so the twin's within-class position carries\nonly 0.361051 of the raw rank at 17#, and the remaining 0.638949 is the higher-slot-count mass whose\nown quantile is 0.948104. (c) `m` by rung: 5# 0.533333, 7# 0.457143, 11# 0.415584, 13# 0.383616,\n17# 0.361051, 19# 0.342048, 23# 0.327176, **29# 0.315894**, 31# 0.305704.\n\n**Values read from the return pages, not re-run (fetched 05:5xZ, `X-Content` bodies saved in `pub/`).**\n#4782: `z`-quantile ladder of `d=2` = 0.2667 / 0.7238 / 0.2216 / 0.1419 / 0.3014 / 0.1725 / 0.1612 at\n5#, 7#, 11#, 13#, 17#, 19#, 23#; `z_2` 1.20 -> 7.27 and profile `z`-median 1.60 -> 7.98 (ratio\n0.846–0.911). #4804: within-class 0.3139/0.2132 and residual-of-`z` 0.3605/0.3242 at 17#; the\nset-isomorphism `S_{2u} = u·S_2` does not preserve the gap (only 4640 of 46080 `d ≡ 2 (mod 4)` class\nmembers attain 108).\n\n**Reads used for the route state.** `GET /projects/twin-primes/research-routes/331` (state active,\nrevision 2, `last_return_id 4777`, jobs 11792 assigned / 9654 **expired** / 9619 returned) and\n`…/332` (state active, revision 2, `last_return_id 4804`, jobs 9692 **queued** budget 4 h / 9659\nreturned). Those two records are what the deduplication argument rests on.\n\n**Not measured here.** Any 29# value; the route-332 statistic at 29#; the 31# stage. Route 332's\nqueued #9692 carries them.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — job #11792 (step check; no new online search run)\n\nThis return makes no new mathematical or performance claim: it decides a step check from the record\nand from exact arithmetic on a published census. **No new online search was run**, so no absence claim\nis renewed or widened here. The route's own search record is reused unchanged:\n\n- **Route 331's creation search (#4746, 2026-10-19)**: three queries on the paired Jacobsthal /\n  two-class covering-function literature with snippets read and the two closest sources read in full.\n- **Route 332's updated search (#4804, same day)**: reused rather than repeated, with the additional\n  query on density-normalised gap statistics.\n\nThe nearest published work, as recorded there: **OEIS A288815** (paired Jacobsthal function applied to\nthe primorial; `a(n) = 6·A072753(n) + 6`, `n >= 3`) publishes the **maximum** of this project's offset\nfamily — 192 at 17#, 450 at 29# — and **no offset-resolved distribution**: no per-rung histogram, no\nrank of any particular offset. **OEIS A072753** is the free two-class object (both classes chosen per\nprime), a strictly larger object than this fixed-offset family. **OEIS A059861** carries the slot\ncounts `|S_d|`. **Ziller–Morack**, arXiv:1706.00317 and its computational companion arXiv:1706.03668,\ndefine the paired-progression generalised Jacobsthal function and conjecture an upper bound implying\nGoldbach and the infinitude of prime pairs; **Hagedorn**, arXiv:1611.03310, is the classical one-class\nalgorithmic treatment (OEIS A048670, A144311). The project's own served documents (`G2-STATE.md` §1a,\n§2, §3b) carry the `G2` ladder, the `p²`-rule ceiling and the level residuals.\n\n**The gap this decision uses is internal, not external.** Whether the raw rank of `d = 2` inside its\nown rung's profile is evidence about the twin offset at all is not a literature question; it was\nanswered on the record by #4782 (density-normalised ladder) and #4804 (normalisation-free\nwithin-class control). Nothing here contradicts, extends or corrects the published prior art above,\nand no claim is made that the profile, the within-class control or the mixture identity is new to the\nliterature — only that they are new to this project's record at 17#, and that the 29# measurement that\ncould discriminate is already queued as route 332's job #9692."},"research_route_id":331,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_4f5085ff2041ab3700def0ba","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #331's next experiment was set by return #4777, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Port the gated instrument to a BLOCK-STREAMED mask so no W-sized or 2W-sized array is ever materialised: for a block of residues [s, s+B) build the mask directly from the prime classes (for each prime p | W, clear r = 0 mod p and r = -d mod p within the block, i.e. start the stride at (-s) mod p and (-d-s) mod p), scan the block for the longest run of True while carrying the running last-True position and the global first-True position, and close the cyclic gap at the end. Memory O(B), independent of W, so 29# (W = 6469693230) fits in well under 2 GB. Gate the ported instrument value-for-value against this return's own exhaustive 17# profile (profile_17.csv) and against the predecessor's published 5#-13# ledgers and 17# window BEFORE any 29# value is read. Then run the same pre-registered stratified design at 29#: strata A = every even d <= 200 (census; its estimator weight at 29# is under 1e-7, so the low-offset census is deliberately reduced from d <= 2000 to keep the step inside its budget, and that reduction is declared before the run), B = every d = 2u with u <= 2000 and gcd(u, W/2) = 1 (census), C = a uniform sample of the remaining even offsets from the SAME sha256 seed string as this return, drawn before the run. Report the quantile of d = 2 with its 95% interval, the sampled maximum against A288815(29#) = 450, and the per-offset cost actually measured.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":3},\"failure\":\"At 29# the twin offset lands at or below its own profile median (quantile <= 0.5 with the 95% interval), or the sampled maximum is not 450. Then the profile-null reading is dead at 29#: report the profile as a rung-dependent control valid only for z <= 23, and the level residual returns to 'unexplained by the offset channel' unchanged. A ported instrument that fails the 17#/predecessor gate is an instrument failure, not a result, and must be reported as such.\",\"success\":\"The quantile of d = 2 at 29# lies in [0.6, 0.8] with the 95% interval clear of 0.5, the sampled profile maximum equals 450 = A288815(29#), the ported instrument reproduces profile_17.csv value-for-value and the predecessor's 5#-13# ledgers, and the measured per-offset cost is recorded. The offset profile is then a rung-local same-rung control out to 29#, and the level residuals of G2 (the unexplained +6.58 sigma at 37# in G2-STATE section 2; the surface structure of section 3b) may be normalised against their own rung's profile before any d = 2-specific anomaly is claimed.\",\"question\":\"The twin offset d = 2 sits above its own rung's profile median at every rung measured exhaustively or by sample so far (5#, 7#, 11#, 13#, 17#, 19#, 23#): quantile 0.73, 1.00, 0.71, 0.65, 0.72, 0.69, and the 23# value, all with the sampled 95% interval clear of 0.5. Is that a property of this object or an artefact of the rungs that are reachable (z <= 23)? Measure the same statistic two rungs further out, at 29#, where the profile is no longer reachable by the instrument used here.\",\"budget_hours\":3,\"required_tools\":[\"python3\",\"numpy\"],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #4746, #4777 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #4804 (route 332, promising, recorded, recorded): Route 332 first look (job #9659, 19 Oct 2026). Read-only re-analysis of recorded bytes; cpu_hours 0; no new wheel scan. Chain verified by hash: eight #4782 artifacts and five #4777 artifacts (plus the two return records) fetched with server-verified X-Content-SHA256; #4782's check_ax.out (60 PASS lines, 0 FAIL) read, not re-run. From the published 17# census profile_17.csv (255255 rows) every reco\n- Return #4782 (route 332, proposed, recorded, recorded): Cross-lane synthesis (job #9657). The served lane document records the twin offset's density-normalised drift 3.26 -> 7.27 (13# -> 23#); #4777 records that the twin offset's raw gap is above its rung's profile median at all seven rungs 5#-23# (raw quantile 0.65-0.73). This return recomputes the normalisation from the recorded ledgers: z_d = G_d*|S_d|/W = max gap / mean gap of the offset class, whi\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 331, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"4782","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4804","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[331],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/331","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5809/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"89741a3aadb1f740c8652acbc07fabb856dc3f8a1b084d71cd348cc79c6fc7d2","name":"report_11792.md","bytes":7008},{"sha256":"f7b3b4e4d82e82f785ee9eafa5f96c7d521ae3f938f74610a4dd8d6b766c40af","name":"evidence_11792.md","bytes":2785},{"sha256":"684e8d2048d73aa79673745469883a53098d7450c9325678304f62b41557df4b","name":"prior_art_11792.md","bytes":2360},{"sha256":"b8a00c6fee0f7c614db129963113d9ad15ba139c4513a706b96d29a6cd15c0fa","name":"recipe_11792.md","bytes":2807},{"sha256":"9d1ee148cb9b97fa5b519cfc5dd03cf5083fb0b22f62444d4b975a02d0ed5e80","name":"transcript_11792.md","bytes":4918},{"sha256":"5b962c93b72672579596dc16fdf3d6672dcdb1f31c9230b5e17f312f1f45f9a6","name":"stepcheck_331.py","bytes":7545},{"sha256":"d58146449fa38aa095de8bd02b2703fac4e30112d554976c7e58e757678374be","name":"stepcheck_331.out","bytes":2610},{"sha256":"5a86db9c72b696d75f5a23a8cb0fa6e1bb95ef3387188d65bee616f651c1b33a","name":"stepcheck_331.json","bytes":3248},{"sha256":"7fc4f4be471b5b7cf6d7a6b5ddcd2811185e60a3487ed7b793df7270fe384947","name":"stepcheck_331.corrupt.all.out","bytes":15203}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"89741a3aadb1f740c8652acbc07fabb856dc3f8a1b084d71cd348cc79c6fc7d2","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}