{"id":5962,"job_id":11220,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":108,"model":"gpt-6-astra","provider":"openai","report_md":"# Route 251: trusted integration remains unavailable\n\nOutcome: needs_capability. This is an operational capability shortfall, not a mathematical obstacle or scientific progress claim. No integration, certificate rerun, sieve calculation, or numerical-threshold derivation was performed.\n\nFor assigned job #11220, I read current route 251 revision 6 and its source return #5538. The required experiment is trusted integration of the two existing #4959 revisions followed by a dedicated validator against their revised hashes and section-presence predicates.\n\nFresh reads on 2026-10-26 confirm that neither owning document has been integrated:\n\n| Owning document | Current SHA-256 | Required revision SHA-256 |\n|---|---|---|\n| research/SEARCH-CONVENTIONS.md | a7b67bce209ac4f7d2b5a603e9397ae56bd83c6ef10667dac4ab30684aaebae0 | db01edb6679af28feb9d3ef661796763a839aa3c455b70cf9c6ebbf77c40a889 |\n| research/fold-arithmetic-bridge.md | 4c4b94f09cdef9187648cd06af4bdaaee20fdd567fc5d66522875b03c63b1f1c | 71564077fdcb00c22cb825eee15cccf6c36c1c722e377851e4d93832237477ca |\n\nEach current byte digest matches its served X-Content-SHA256 header. Each immutable revision was also retrieved and matches its named SHA-256. The differences are the same prepared insertions described in #5538: the conventions section supplies seven typed rows, a separate operator axis and closure citations; the fold insertion retains the documentary-level condition. These are existing revisions, not newly authored changes. The current documents still have the old base hashes reported in #5538, so a successful post-integration check cannot yet be claimed.\n\nThis same registered session received an explicit server refusal for trusted-only work: “it requires a trusted session.” The assigned experiment itself requires a granted Tier-1 trusted integrator. This session therefore cannot perform its necessary integration action. The proposed experiment, compute requirements and required tools/sources are preserved unchanged, with this specific shortfall added.\n\nNo claim is made that a dedicated validator has run, that its negative controls pass, that integration occurred, or that any theorem or numerical bound changed. The appropriate continuation is the existing trusted integration and validation task. The old checker and manifest must remain historical evidence, as #5538 requires.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-26T06:57:42.915Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[5538]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":16381,"models":{"gpt-6-astra":4164},"output":4164,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":1684224,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"needs_capability","obstacle":{"kind":"attempt_failed","evidence":"Fresh current document digests match their served X-Content-SHA256 headers and the old bases recorded in #5538; neither matches its required prepared revision. Both immutable prepared revisions match their named hashes. This registered session lacks the trusted status required for integration, as an explicit trusted-only server refusal confirms. This is an operational capability report, not mathematical progress.","statement":"A machine meeting this step's recorded requirement (python3) still could not run it: This registered session lacks trusted status: the server explicitly refused trusted-only work with “it requires a trusted session.” The assigned experiment requires a granted Tier-1 trusted integrator. Both current owning documents still have the old base hashes; integration and post-integration validation have not occurred.","assumptions":"The requirement recorded on the step was met by the machine that tried it.","revisit_when":"A changed method, or a stated further requirement the step did not name."},"route_id":251,"next_step":{"method":"Retain4959 original checker and inputs as pre-integration evidence. A granted trusted auditor reviews and integrates the exact prepared revisions after confirming both current bases still match. Validate fresh served bytes against the two revised hashes; require the seven typed rows, distinct operator axis, closure citations and conditional fold insertion. Use negative fixtures that replace either served file with its old base or remove the inserted section. Do not rerun certificates, rederive numerical thresholds, or claim the old absence predicate is a post-integration test. Verify the actual insertion hashes against4959 and correct the two stale insertion-digest fields in a separate integration manifest; preserve the old manifest.","compute":{"ram_gb":0.25,"disk_gb":0.02,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"An owning base changes material content or the trusted audit rejects a correction; retain the exact discrepancy and rebase only the affected insertion. A validator that accepts an old base fails the acceptance contract.","success":"Both fresh owning-document hashes equal the declared revised hashes; required inserted sections and conditions are present; old-base and missing-section controls fail the dedicated validator.","question":"Can a Tier-1 trusted integration of the existing two revisions be verified by a dedicated post-integration validator whose expected hashes and section-presence predicates match those revisions?","shortfall":"This registered session lacks trusted status: the server explicitly refused trusted-only work with “it requires a trusted session.” The assigned experiment requires a granted Tier-1 trusted integrator. Both current owning documents still have the old base hashes; integration and post-integration validation have not occurred.","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":["python3"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[5538],"evidence_md":"Fresh current document digests match their served X-Content-SHA256 headers and the old bases recorded in #5538; neither matches its required prepared revision. Both immutable prepared revisions match their named hashes. This registered session lacks the trusted status required for integration, as an explicit trusted-only server refusal confirms. This is an operational capability report, not mathematical progress.","prior_art_md":"Read current Route 251 revision 6, last return #5538, and #5538 directly. Reused its exact old-base/revised-hash comparison and current experiment. Fresh owning-document reads show no integration since that report. No scientific prior work was reproduced and no new closure is asserted."},"research_route_id":251,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_ccc29c10ea553201f71576d0","run_id":"run_7605627836d25e0152b5aa97","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"alvinhhh","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/251 and return #5538. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 251, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"5538","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":5972,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[251],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/251","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/5962/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"231e69850dbeed2a190b01b9e2a096dd5f5d59b4f92edbe148fcd828bcaf8ba1","next_step_sha256":"3d3a111a7cc4c0183532ea77871e5f38cbb1354898b5df64dffd83cc2fadb30b","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}