{"id":6108,"job_id":12270,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","provider":"anthropic","report_md":"# Applicability screening of return #6056 (job 12270)\n\nSource: [#6056](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/6056) runs route 216's pre-registered test (from [#6047](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/6047)): does the fixed-L increment of the twin-admissible variance ratio R_A stay in [0.007, 0.011] over the primorials 67#..101#?\n- Method: exact fixed-L cells (L = 38, 42, 44, 46) from the 37# census, lifted exactly with #5832's Theorem 1. The c = 1 scale-matched values are interpolated.\n- Outcome: R_A rises at every fixed L over all 14 steps, but the increments decay monotonically. The band fails, and the 0.005 stop fires at 101# for L = 38, 44 and 46. The fixed-L drift is retired as a linear-in-rung transfer rate.\n- It was accepted at rung measured, verification spot. Review 2083 reproduced every R_A value with an independent exact pair-count closed form.\n\n| area | decision |\n|---|---|\n| g2-exponent | applicable (narrow, negative, provisional) |\n| adversarial | applicable (narrow, provisional) |\n| formalize | inapplicable |\n| measure | applicable (narrow, provisional) |\n| infinitude | inapplicable |\n| finiteness-structure | inapplicable |\n| kk-lower-bound | inapplicable |\n\nAll entries carry scope_keys [] because the source has no typed scopes.\n\n## Summary\n- **G2-exponent (narrow, negative).** Route 216 exists to feed a union-bound transfer to G2(x#). #6056 rules out one candidate input, a constant per-rung gain in fixed-L R_A. It gives no bound or exponent, and fixed L ≤ 54 is far below the G2 window scale.\n- **Adversarial.** The R_A values are reproduced by a closed form, so the open targets are:\n  - the dskew contraction claim (third moment, unchecked; the text says 26/26, the output says 41/41);\n  - the dependence of the c = 1 arm on the interpolation convention;\n  - the ungated \"faster than 1/log q\" reading.\n- **Measure.** Extending the fixed-L columns past 101# with the same exact lift is in the lane. It is a finite measurement only, and the review's closed form computes fixed-L R_A without a census, so it is the natural gate.\n\nThe other areas are inapplicable:\n- There is no accepted lemma, only measured finite values (formalize).\n- The route targets G2(x#), and A_q is a sieve model (infinitude).\n- There is no finiteness assumption or consequence.\n- For kk-lower-bound, there is no survivor-gap bound. The nearest misses are o5 (finite CRT pair data), o1/o4 (the review's θ(p)/p heuristic) and o6.\n\n## Known gaps\n- The dskew claim has no independent check, and its cell count is misstated in the text (26/26 vs 41/41). The return has revision_path null, so no finding was filed and the defect is recorded only in review 2083's notes.\n- The review's \"increment ≈ 2(1 − R_A)/p, so increment × log q → 0\" is a heuristic, not an accepted result.\n- The applicable entries are provisional because the source declares no typed scope.\n\n## Snapshot check\n- The report hash matches the snapshot (500390b0…53c0).\n- The return is still accepted (status accepted, final_rung measured, superseded_by null).\n- The material evidence covers return:6056 and its 26 artifacts. There are no findings to pin, because review 2083 recorded no also_fix.\n- No screening of #6056, #6047 or #6067 is in the live index.\n- Context outside the snapshot: #6056's only citer, [#6067](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/6067) (accepted, measured), has since run the stated next step to 199#. The outcome was inconclusive: increment × log q falls from 0.4262 to 0.3496 at L = 38 without settling. This does not change any decision above. It confirms that the measure extension is real and that no rate is established.\n\n## Conflict of interest\n- This screening runs under @Benjaminsen on claude-opus-5-5. @Benjaminsen is also the author handle of #6056, #6047 and #6067, which were written on deepseek-v4-flash.\n- I wrote #6056's only review (2083) and #6067's review (2084).\n- The decisions rest only on the accepted record, review 2083 and the area descriptions. Every transfer is marked narrow and provisional.\n\n## What this does not do\nIt runs no experiment or proof check and makes no new scientific claim, artifact, review request or route change.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-26T22:44:42.637Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"0":6056,"returns":[6056]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":126,"models":{"claude-opus-5-5":23544},"output":23544,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":2818466,"cache_write":137939,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_da55f23c995cabb5136f4e91","run_id":"run_b1feecadd95fa30cb0088743","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":{"schema":"research-applicability-v1","entries":[{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"g2-exponent","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Narrow, negative and provisional. Route 216's stated purpose is a second input for the union/Chebyshev transfer of R_A(L) < 1 to G2(x#). The transfer is blocked because it needs the tail of the window-count law. #6056 settles one candidate input at its own pre-registration: the fixed-L drift of R_A is not a rate that is linear in the rung count. Its increments halve over 61#..101# and fall below the 0.005 stop at 101#. This transfers as a measured negative record only: a G2(x#) union-bound argument must not assume a constant per-rung gain in R_A at fixed L. It does not transfer as a bound or an exponent. Fixed L <= 54 is far below the window scale relevant to G2(x#), the report claims nothing about G2, and R_A < 1 remains an exact finite statement at 15 primorials. Any G2 use still needs the tail input the route names as missing.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only. #6056 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_hashes []), so no entry is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: #6056 (by @Benjaminsen on deepseek-v4-flash, route 216, built on #6047's stored next step) measures the variance ratio R_A(L) of the twin-admissible window count (A_q = {a : gcd(a(a+2), q) = 1}, q = x#) at fixed L in {38, 42, 44, 46} and at the c = 1 scale-matched length L ~ q/|A_q|, at the 15 primorials 37#..101#. Every fixed-L cell is an exact integer histogram: the 37# census (inherited cells plus nine new cells L = 46..54) is lifted exactly with #5832's Theorem 1. The c = 1 values are interpolations. Measured outcome: R_A rises at every fixed L over all 14 steps, but the per-rung increments decay monotonically from about +0.0084..0.0089 (61#->67#) to +0.0048..0.0051 (97#->101#). That fails the pre-registered band [0.007, 0.011], and the 0.005 stop fires at 101# for L = 38, 44 and 46 (L = 42 is at +0.005057). The fixed-L drift is therefore retired as a linear-in-rung transferable rate. Nothing is asymptotic, and it claims no bound on G2(x#), beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude. Accepted at rung measured, verification spot. Review 2083 checks every R_A value with an independent exact closed form: R_A depends only on the CRT pair counts P(d) = prod_{odd p}(p - |{0,-2,-d,-d-2} mod p|), which reproduced all 60 fixed-L values and 15 c = 1 values. Not independently checked: the dskew (third-moment) contraction claim. Text defect from review 2083: the report says |dskew| contracts at 26/26 cells, but the captured output says 41/41. The review's 'increment ~ 2(1 - R_A)/p, so increment x log q -> 0' is a heuristic in the review, not an accepted result.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"adversarial","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Narrow and provisional. #6056 itself runs in the adversarial lane against #6047's reading ('converging to about 0.0100, not decaying'), which it corrects. The R_A values are not a productive counterexample target: review 2083's independent closed form reproduces all 60 fixed-L and 15 c = 1 values exactly. Claims still open to an adversarial check: - the dskew contraction claim ('|dskew| contracts at every step'), which is a third moment, is outside the closed-form check, and has a count mismatch in the text (26/26 vs the captured 41/41); - the c = 1 arm, whose linear, cubic and literal round(g(q)) readings give different increments (the literal reading's minimum is +0.003336), so any statement about 'the c = 1 increment' depends on the interpolation convention; - the descriptive 'somewhat faster than 1/log q' reading (increment x log q drifts 0.55 -> 0.42 at L = 38), which is not gated.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only. #6056 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_hashes []), so no entry is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: #6056 (by @Benjaminsen on deepseek-v4-flash, route 216, built on #6047's stored next step) measures the variance ratio R_A(L) of the twin-admissible window count (A_q = {a : gcd(a(a+2), q) = 1}, q = x#) at fixed L in {38, 42, 44, 46} and at the c = 1 scale-matched length L ~ q/|A_q|, at the 15 primorials 37#..101#. Every fixed-L cell is an exact integer histogram: the 37# census (inherited cells plus nine new cells L = 46..54) is lifted exactly with #5832's Theorem 1. The c = 1 values are interpolations. Measured outcome: R_A rises at every fixed L over all 14 steps, but the per-rung increments decay monotonically from about +0.0084..0.0089 (61#->67#) to +0.0048..0.0051 (97#->101#). That fails the pre-registered band [0.007, 0.011], and the 0.005 stop fires at 101# for L = 38, 44 and 46 (L = 42 is at +0.005057). The fixed-L drift is therefore retired as a linear-in-rung transferable rate. Nothing is asymptotic, and it claims no bound on G2(x#), beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude. Accepted at rung measured, verification spot. Review 2083 checks every R_A value with an independent exact closed form: R_A depends only on the CRT pair counts P(d) = prod_{odd p}(p - |{0,-2,-d,-d-2} mod p|), which reproduced all 60 fixed-L values and 15 c = 1 values. Not independently checked: the dskew (third-moment) contraction claim. Text defect from review 2083: the report says |dskew| contracts at 26/26 cells, but the captured output says 41/41. The review's 'increment ~ 2(1 - R_A)/p, so increment x log q -> 0' is a heuristic in the review, not an accepted result.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"formalize","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"No accepted lemma. #6056's accepted content is a table of exact finite R_A values and gate outcomes at rung measured. The two exact statements it relies on belong to other returns or to its review: #5832's Theorem 1 (the collision-free lift) and review 2083's pair-count identity for S2. A finite R_A value could in principle be checked by computation in Lean, but that would formalize a number, not a lemma of this source. A formalization target would come from #5832 or from an accepted statement of the pair-count identity, not from #6056.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only. #6056 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_hashes []), so no entry is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: #6056 (by @Benjaminsen on deepseek-v4-flash, route 216, built on #6047's stored next step) measures the variance ratio R_A(L) of the twin-admissible window count (A_q = {a : gcd(a(a+2), q) = 1}, q = x#) at fixed L in {38, 42, 44, 46} and at the c = 1 scale-matched length L ~ q/|A_q|, at the 15 primorials 37#..101#. Every fixed-L cell is an exact integer histogram: the 37# census (inherited cells plus nine new cells L = 46..54) is lifted exactly with #5832's Theorem 1. The c = 1 values are interpolations. Measured outcome: R_A rises at every fixed L over all 14 steps, but the per-rung increments decay monotonically from about +0.0084..0.0089 (61#->67#) to +0.0048..0.0051 (97#->101#). That fails the pre-registered band [0.007, 0.011], and the 0.005 stop fires at 101# for L = 38, 44 and 46 (L = 42 is at +0.005057). The fixed-L drift is therefore retired as a linear-in-rung transferable rate. Nothing is asymptotic, and it claims no bound on G2(x#), beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude. Accepted at rung measured, verification spot. Review 2083 checks every R_A value with an independent exact closed form: R_A depends only on the CRT pair counts P(d) = prod_{odd p}(p - |{0,-2,-d,-d-2} mod p|), which reproduced all 60 fixed-L values and 15 c = 1 values. Not independently checked: the dskew (third-moment) contraction claim. Text defect from review 2083: the report says |dskew| contracts at 26/26 cells, but the captured output says 41/41. The review's 'increment ~ 2(1 - R_A)/p, so increment x log q -> 0' is a heuristic in the review, not an accepted result.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"measure","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Narrow and provisional. The instrument chain is a deterministic exact census at 37# (shape_pigeonhole_9572.c), an exact lift (lift_w4.py, Theorem 1 of #5832) and a frozen analyser (analyse_9572.py), with gates 6/6 and controls 7/7. Extending the fixed-L columns to more primorials is in the lane, and the report's own next step (lifting the same 41-cell grid to 199#, exact because L <= 54 <= min(l_A(p), l_B(p))) is the natural extension. Limits that must be preserved: - the extension is a finite measurement only; it cannot establish an asymptotic rate or a limit of R_A; - by review 2083's closed form, fixed-L R_A at any rung is computable from P(d) without a census or lift, so an extension adds no measurement uncertainty to resolve and is best gated against that closed form; - the c = 1 arm is tied to the census grid (interpolation within L <= 82), unlike the fixed-L arm.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only. #6056 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_hashes []), so no entry is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: #6056 (by @Benjaminsen on deepseek-v4-flash, route 216, built on #6047's stored next step) measures the variance ratio R_A(L) of the twin-admissible window count (A_q = {a : gcd(a(a+2), q) = 1}, q = x#) at fixed L in {38, 42, 44, 46} and at the c = 1 scale-matched length L ~ q/|A_q|, at the 15 primorials 37#..101#. Every fixed-L cell is an exact integer histogram: the 37# census (inherited cells plus nine new cells L = 46..54) is lifted exactly with #5832's Theorem 1. The c = 1 values are interpolations. Measured outcome: R_A rises at every fixed L over all 14 steps, but the per-rung increments decay monotonically from about +0.0084..0.0089 (61#->67#) to +0.0048..0.0051 (97#->101#). That fails the pre-registered band [0.007, 0.011], and the 0.005 stop fires at 101# for L = 38, 44 and 46 (L = 42 is at +0.005057). The fixed-L drift is therefore retired as a linear-in-rung transferable rate. Nothing is asymptotic, and it claims no bound on G2(x#), beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude. Accepted at rung measured, verification spot. Review 2083 checks every R_A value with an independent exact closed form: R_A depends only on the CRT pair counts P(d) = prod_{odd p}(p - |{0,-2,-d,-d-2} mod p|), which reproduced all 60 fixed-L values and 15 c = 1 values. Not independently checked: the dskew (third-moment) contraction claim. Text defect from review 2083: the report says |dskew| contracts at 26/26 cells, but the captured output says 41/41. The review's 'increment ~ 2(1 - R_A)/p, so increment x log q -> 0' is a heuristic in the review, not an accepted result.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"infinitude","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Route 216 targets a transfer to G2(x#) (the twin-admissible gap function of the primorial), not twin-prime infinitude. #6056 measures a residue-class window statistic of A_q at 15 primorials and states that it bounds neither G2(x#) nor twin-prime infinitude. Nearest miss: A_q is the CRT model of twin-prime candidates, and R_A < 1 is an under-dispersion of that model. That is a sieve-model property, not a statement about primes, and nothing in it is a route toward infinitude.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only. #6056 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_hashes []), so no entry is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: #6056 (by @Benjaminsen on deepseek-v4-flash, route 216, built on #6047's stored next step) measures the variance ratio R_A(L) of the twin-admissible window count (A_q = {a : gcd(a(a+2), q) = 1}, q = x#) at fixed L in {38, 42, 44, 46} and at the c = 1 scale-matched length L ~ q/|A_q|, at the 15 primorials 37#..101#. Every fixed-L cell is an exact integer histogram: the 37# census (inherited cells plus nine new cells L = 46..54) is lifted exactly with #5832's Theorem 1. The c = 1 values are interpolations. Measured outcome: R_A rises at every fixed L over all 14 steps, but the per-rung increments decay monotonically from about +0.0084..0.0089 (61#->67#) to +0.0048..0.0051 (97#->101#). That fails the pre-registered band [0.007, 0.011], and the 0.005 stop fires at 101# for L = 38, 44 and 46 (L = 42 is at +0.005057). The fixed-L drift is therefore retired as a linear-in-rung transferable rate. Nothing is asymptotic, and it claims no bound on G2(x#), beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude. Accepted at rung measured, verification spot. Review 2083 checks every R_A value with an independent exact closed form: R_A depends only on the CRT pair counts P(d) = prod_{odd p}(p - |{0,-2,-d,-d-2} mod p|), which reproduced all 60 fixed-L values and 15 c = 1 values. Not independently checked: the dskew (third-moment) contraction claim. Text defect from review 2083: the report says |dskew| contracts at 26/26 cells, but the captured output says 41/41. The review's 'increment ~ 2(1 - R_A)/p, so increment x log q -> 0' is a heuristic in the review, not an accepted result.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"finiteness-structure","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"There is no finiteness assumption or consequence. #6056 is an exact computation about the residue set A_q modulo x# at 37#..101#. It is unconditional and says nothing about what a finite twin count would force.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only. #6056 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_hashes []), so no entry is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: #6056 (by @Benjaminsen on deepseek-v4-flash, route 216, built on #6047's stored next step) measures the variance ratio R_A(L) of the twin-admissible window count (A_q = {a : gcd(a(a+2), q) = 1}, q = x#) at fixed L in {38, 42, 44, 46} and at the c = 1 scale-matched length L ~ q/|A_q|, at the 15 primorials 37#..101#. Every fixed-L cell is an exact integer histogram: the 37# census (inherited cells plus nine new cells L = 46..54) is lifted exactly with #5832's Theorem 1. The c = 1 values are interpolations. Measured outcome: R_A rises at every fixed L over all 14 steps, but the per-rung increments decay monotonically from about +0.0084..0.0089 (61#->67#) to +0.0048..0.0051 (97#->101#). That fails the pre-registered band [0.007, 0.011], and the 0.005 stop fires at 101# for L = 38, 44 and 46 (L = 42 is at +0.005057). The fixed-L drift is therefore retired as a linear-in-rung transferable rate. Nothing is asymptotic, and it claims no bound on G2(x#), beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude. Accepted at rung measured, verification spot. Review 2083 checks every R_A value with an independent exact closed form: R_A depends only on the CRT pair counts P(d) = prod_{odd p}(p - |{0,-2,-d,-d-2} mod p|), which reproduced all 60 fixed-L values and 15 c = 1 values. Not independently checked: the dskew (third-moment) contraction claim. Text defect from review 2083: the report says |dskew| contracts at 26/26 cells, but the captured output says 41/41. The review's 'increment ~ 2(1 - R_A)/p, so increment x log q -> 0' is a heuristic in the review, not an accepted result.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"kk-lower-bound","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"No survivor-gap lower bound and no analytic input. A_q is a sieve survivor set, but #6056 measures second-moment window statistics at fixed short L <= 54, not maximal survivor gaps, and gives no lower bound. Nearest misses: - o5: the CRT pair counts behind R_A are finite exact CRT data of the kind o5 says to keep separate from the quoted general sieve input; - o1/o4: the review's 'theta(p)/p' heuristic for the decay is not a prime asymptotic with remainder; - o6: there is no density or Euler estimate, only exact finite products.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only. #6056 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_hashes []), so no entry is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: #6056 (by @Benjaminsen on deepseek-v4-flash, route 216, built on #6047's stored next step) measures the variance ratio R_A(L) of the twin-admissible window count (A_q = {a : gcd(a(a+2), q) = 1}, q = x#) at fixed L in {38, 42, 44, 46} and at the c = 1 scale-matched length L ~ q/|A_q|, at the 15 primorials 37#..101#. Every fixed-L cell is an exact integer histogram: the 37# census (inherited cells plus nine new cells L = 46..54) is lifted exactly with #5832's Theorem 1. The c = 1 values are interpolations. Measured outcome: R_A rises at every fixed L over all 14 steps, but the per-rung increments decay monotonically from about +0.0084..0.0089 (61#->67#) to +0.0048..0.0051 (97#->101#). That fails the pre-registered band [0.007, 0.011], and the 0.005 stop fires at 101# for L = 38, 44 and 46 (L = 42 is at +0.005057). The fixed-L drift is therefore retired as a linear-in-rung transferable rate. Nothing is asymptotic, and it claims no bound on G2(x#), beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude. Accepted at rung measured, verification spot. Review 2083 checks every R_A value with an independent exact closed form: R_A depends only on the CRT pair counts P(d) = prod_{odd p}(p - |{0,-2,-d,-d-2} mod p|), which reproduced all 60 fixed-L values and 15 c = 1 values. Not independently checked: the dskew (third-moment) contraction claim. Text defect from review 2083: the report says |dskew| contracts at 26/26 cells, but the captured output says 41/41. The review's 'increment ~ 2(1 - R_A)/p, so increment x log q -> 0' is a heuristic in the review, not an accepted result.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true}],"targets":[{"id":"g2-exponent","lane":"g2-exponent","title":"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2)","domain_md":"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"adversarial","lane":"adversarial","title":"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators","domain_md":"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"formalize","lane":"formalize","title":"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas","domain_md":"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"measure","lane":"measure","title":"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges","domain_md":"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"infinitude","lane":"infinitude","title":"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry","domain_md":"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"finiteness-structure","lane":"finiteness-structure","title":"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane)","domain_md":"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"kk-lower-bound","paper":"kk-lower-bound","title":"Mapped paper claims and separate obligations","domain_md":"kk-lower-bound.main: Survivor-gap lower bound, full cutoff, integers, crossing gaps, quantifiers and logarithms, sufficient A=12. This is not twin-prime infinitude. Only designated declarations and their exact assumptions are covered; O1–O7 remain separate.\nkk-lower-bound.o1: Prime harmonic asymptotic with constant and o(1) remainder; distinguish finite bounds and asymptotic equality.\nkk-lower-bound.o2: Two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic, including u <= Z^(1-epsilon); do not transfer a fixed-u theorem without a uniformity bridge.\nkk-lower-bound.o3: Every fixed A > 4; the accepted main proof uses sufficient A=12. The general-A extension remains separate.\nkk-lower-bound.o4: Dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2; an eventual y/(3 log y) lower bound does not prove equality.\nkk-lower-bound.o5: The quoted general sieve input and external one-class statement; distinguish accepted finite dimension-4, CRT and covering results.\nkk-lower-bound.o6: Two-sided density and Euler estimates; a finite one-sided bound does not close this obligation.\nkk-lower-bound.o7: The exact constant in equation (28), with its hypotheses and parameter ranges.","topic_ids":["kk-lower-bound.main","kk-lower-bound.o1","kk-lower-bound.o2","kk-lower-bound.o3","kk-lower-bound.o4","kk-lower-bound.o5","kk-lower-bound.o6","kk-lower-bound.o7"]}],"reviewer":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","effort":"high","handle":"Benjaminsen","trusted":true,"user_id":1,"authority_basis":"project_grant","same_contributor":true},"effective":true,"check_job_id":12270,"input_sha256":"208a8caaa2282c6716b32adc2d3db15ac9db7e81e1c7a50381dd069062a22dd1","source_snapshot":{"version":"research-applicability-v1","scope_hashes":[],"report_sha256":"500390b00402848fbf091a58158bb0c35c43d40bc8db2a428c059d4f612153c0","targets_sha256":"747ddcd43a71784abe2ccceb37c4a48cf8092821fa8346462db03f03b7f50a18","source_return_id":6056,"material_evidence":{"sha256":"83780e7f420a9f4f7796b1ff99f168aa69562e17d55203ae1d7ebb57b6a2d9f6","entries":{"return:6056":"b93781007186bdb5d74f78a1440df6cc55b801d91f6a523f7d774b05701adc84","artifact:6056:31afe0be01541a9d772e984cbf21f42f6f4c7647b04b2d6a566b1cc6d592d193":"31afe0be01541a9d772e984cbf21f42f6f4c7647b04b2d6a566b1cc6d592d193","artifact:6056:36e8e5845c323e5037cfec2846953602818dd1bef29d777e8326b3f980a832e2":"36e8e5845c323e5037cfec2846953602818dd1bef29d777e8326b3f980a832e2","artifact:6056:3946f639bfe3d2313b4ba575df9d78f131275ba9465849adcd09ee9ca919ce19":"3946f639bfe3d2313b4ba575df9d78f131275ba9465849adcd09ee9ca919ce19","artifact:6056:3aafd3bcec156be955a4261d50dc4c4bc43f36e335eed2e32f1307c94d3364bd":"3aafd3bcec156be955a4261d50dc4c4bc43f36e335eed2e32f1307c94d3364bd","artifact:6056:3ee4b6e271a3dd6ea2d8444e501c795dffe65e93e8d9a6e9ca798c9db1b84ed3":"3ee4b6e271a3dd6ea2d8444e501c795dffe65e93e8d9a6e9ca798c9db1b84ed3","artifact:6056:500390b00402848fbf091a58158bb0c35c43d40bc8db2a428c059d4f612153c0":"500390b00402848fbf091a58158bb0c35c43d40bc8db2a428c059d4f612153c0","artifact:6056:53fb5808f01dc8f2d0bb3b82a21c664a7e20cc207d9b7fdaaf0644cbdf8f16d6":"53fb5808f01dc8f2d0bb3b82a21c664a7e20cc207d9b7fdaaf0644cbdf8f16d6","artifact:6056:554a71226233b51c1c7526976f74f49d0d748371e17cf5b17f083c3ee2f186b0":"554a71226233b51c1c7526976f74f49d0d748371e17cf5b17f083c3ee2f186b0","artifact:6056:558ed8db7bfa4f3a0698ccd79038a6eaa95a91d84094d9707f4a49e8dc25ffda":"558ed8db7bfa4f3a0698ccd79038a6eaa95a91d84094d9707f4a49e8dc25ffda","artifact:6056:5827c78e5f36d1e5ef93ac5f990753329f7abea0e2af3e8b17408cea41f3adde":"5827c78e5f36d1e5ef93ac5f990753329f7abea0e2af3e8b17408cea41f3adde","artifact:6056:586df4a64ee459df1f5a9157af8db733b43bf7f2c8c272b02b2c2503d6aa9ea8":"586df4a64ee459df1f5a9157af8db733b43bf7f2c8c272b02b2c2503d6aa9ea8","artifact:6056:8985d1a3b2548f0e057c36448d23211ac31790935624f472592c02def4f3e14e":"8985d1a3b2548f0e057c36448d23211ac31790935624f472592c02def4f3e14e","artifact:6056:8fda7a7fbfb1fd9842c2a4c0f207794ee17223cc1b88c866ddb7a61d18d379ef":"8fda7a7fbfb1fd9842c2a4c0f207794ee17223cc1b88c866ddb7a61d18d379ef","artifact:6056:91ed3f1eeede264f1684db2114c8c10eaad5619745e4cdef8f14bd140711ab4e":"91ed3f1eeede264f1684db2114c8c10eaad5619745e4cdef8f14bd140711ab4e","artifact:6056:933da970934e08ecb5d60fdaadc6d9f169f571963ceb559b5bf24c37df2ac4ab":"933da970934e08ecb5d60fdaadc6d9f169f571963ceb559b5bf24c37df2ac4ab","artifact:6056:93f7ba40f1052725c7c2247e7ff15192563c4b8ea626730fd42dbe15b32361da":"93f7ba40f1052725c7c2247e7ff15192563c4b8ea626730fd42dbe15b32361da","artifact:6056:b168814608f00c0af5c3218c64cb676cbf7277742281f9750cfb64b9e8a3b84d":"b168814608f00c0af5c3218c64cb676cbf7277742281f9750cfb64b9e8a3b84d","artifact:6056:b7edeb08dbbfc6e28f2adfd216c7ccf36db5018014078f5d083dc34944a57344":"b7edeb08dbbfc6e28f2adfd216c7ccf36db5018014078f5d083dc34944a57344","artifact:6056:b9e638aeef1a29cb15f04fb1cd5036c7805a362626350203376918b1f3f2140f":"b9e638aeef1a29cb15f04fb1cd5036c7805a362626350203376918b1f3f2140f","artifact:6056:ba5e8a43ee6a695f38bd1efdbfe9a8390d5a2065bbf3f62b42cb4cfe31498e13":"ba5e8a43ee6a695f38bd1efdbfe9a8390d5a2065bbf3f62b42cb4cfe31498e13","artifact:6056:bfde1fd85969e93acef5dbdf60f703c7fc7cd8c53d712b56c5275adfe72ecaf3":"bfde1fd85969e93acef5dbdf60f703c7fc7cd8c53d712b56c5275adfe72ecaf3","artifact:6056:c00968d2d7bba306c1a66fa77e5fb2dbbfe5fab35954e0b51375ef43ecfdbf91":"c00968d2d7bba306c1a66fa77e5fb2dbbfe5fab35954e0b51375ef43ecfdbf91","artifact:6056:c7c45ceb20f5b394b96f6a43c618f9adad333e378802b983488348db79cc58b0":"c7c45ceb20f5b394b96f6a43c618f9adad333e378802b983488348db79cc58b0","artifact:6056:c86ea93c3d94812273ee343d897779bfd2bbef5b3ae4d605456d1a478b94c37e":"c86ea93c3d94812273ee343d897779bfd2bbef5b3ae4d605456d1a478b94c37e","artifact:6056:e1e6f5e73f8a78d24b999e9bcc94c73fa4b9cf1768d9312879c63676e606cd7d":"e1e6f5e73f8a78d24b999e9bcc94c73fa4b9cf1768d9312879c63676e606cd7d","artifact:6056:fe29f03b4f2aca6e24bc7d911725df255de1b94b8e6c75801459af596e78d985":"fe29f03b4f2aca6e24bc7d911725df255de1b94b8e6c75801459af596e78d985"},"version":"material-evidence-v1"},"consideration_only":true},"source_return_id":6056,"consideration_only":true,"scientific_authority":false,"provisional_relevance":true,"base_assessment_return_id":null},"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Bounded applicability screening of accepted scientific return #6056: provisional consideration before validated transfer. This is relevance judgment, not another acceptance of the source or endorsement of unvalidated scopes. Do not run experiments, reproduce a computation or re-prove the source. No prior screening. Read the source and its current scope assessments once.\n\nSource snapshot: {\"version\":\"research-applicability-v1\",\"consideration_only\":true,\"source_return_id\":6056,\"report_sha256\":\"500390b00402848fbf091a58158bb0c35c43d40bc8db2a428c059d4f612153c0\",\"scope_hashes\":[],\"material_evidence\":{\"version\":\"material-evidence-v1\",\"entries\":{\"return:6056\":\"b93781007186bdb5d74f78a1440df6cc55b801d91f6a523f7d774b05701adc84\",\"artifact:6056:31afe0be01541a9d772e984cbf21f42f6f4c7647b04b2d6a566b1cc6d592d193\":\"31afe0be01541a9d772e984cbf21f42f6f4c7647b04b2d6a566b1cc6d592d193\",\"artifact:6056:36e8e5845c323e5037cfec2846953602818dd1bef29d777e8326b3f980a832e2\":\"36e8e5845c323e5037cfec2846953602818dd1bef29d777e8326b3f980a832e2\",\"artifact:6056:3946f639bfe3d2313b4ba575df9d78f131275ba9465849adcd09ee9ca919ce19\":\"3946f639bfe3d2313b4ba575df9d78f131275ba9465849adcd09ee9ca919ce19\",\"artifact:6056:3aafd3bcec156be955a4261d50dc4c4bc43f36e335eed2e32f1307c94d3364bd\":\"3aafd3bcec156be955a4261d50dc4c4bc43f36e335eed2e32f1307c94d3364bd\",\"artifact:6056:3ee4b6e271a3dd6ea2d8444e501c795dffe65e93e8d9a6e9ca798c9db1b84ed3\":\"3ee4b6e271a3dd6ea2d8444e501c795dffe65e93e8d9a6e9ca798c9db1b84ed3\",\"artifact:6056:500390b00402848fbf091a58158bb0c35c43d40bc8db2a428c059d4f612153c0\":\"500390b00402848fbf091a58158bb0c35c43d40bc8db2a428c059d4f612153c0\",\"artifact:6056:53fb5808f01dc8f2d0bb3b82a21c664a7e20cc207d9b7fdaaf0644cbdf8f16d6\":\"53fb5808f01dc8f2d0bb3b82a21c664a7e20cc207d9b7fdaaf0644cbdf8f16d6\",\"artifact:6056:554a71226233b51c1c7526976f74f49d0d748371e17cf5b17f083c3ee2f186b0\":\"554a71226233b51c1c7526976f74f49d0d748371e17cf5b17f083c3ee2f186b0\",\"artifact:6056:558ed8db7bfa4f3a0698ccd79038a6eaa95a91d84094d9707f4a49e8dc25ffda\":\"558ed8db7bfa4f3a0698ccd79038a6eaa95a91d84094d9707f4a49e8dc25ffda\",\"artifact:6056:5827c78e5f36d1e5ef93ac5f990753329f7abea0e2af3e8b17408cea41f3adde\":\"5827c78e5f36d1e5ef93ac5f990753329f7abea0e2af3e8b17408cea41f3adde\",\"artifact:6056:586df4a64ee459df1f5a9157af8db733b43bf7f2c8c272b02b2c2503d6aa9ea8\":\"586df4a64ee459df1f5a9157af8db733b43bf7f2c8c272b02b2c2503d6aa9ea8\",\"artifact:6056:8985d1a3b2548f0e057c36448d23211ac31790935624f472592c02def4f3e14e\":\"8985d1a3b2548f0e057c36448d23211ac31790935624f472592c02def4f3e14e\",\"artifact:6056:8fda7a7fbfb1fd9842c2a4c0f207794ee17223cc1b88c866ddb7a61d18d379ef\":\"8fda7a7fbfb1fd9842c2a4c0f207794ee17223cc1b88c866ddb7a61d18d379ef\",\"artifact:6056:91ed3f1eeede264f1684db2114c8c10eaad5619745e4cdef8f14bd140711ab4e\":\"91ed3f1eeede264f1684db2114c8c10eaad5619745e4cdef8f14bd140711ab4e\",\"artifact:6056:933da970934e08ecb5d60fdaadc6d9f169f571963ceb559b5bf24c37df2ac4ab\":\"933da970934e08ecb5d60fdaadc6d9f169f571963ceb559b5bf24c37df2ac4ab\",\"artifact:6056:93f7ba40f1052725c7c2247e7ff15192563c4b8ea626730fd42dbe15b32361da\":\"93f7ba40f1052725c7c2247e7ff15192563c4b8ea626730fd42dbe15b32361da\",\"artifact:6056:b168814608f00c0af5c3218c64cb676cbf7277742281f9750cfb64b9e8a3b84d\":\"b168814608f00c0af5c3218c64cb676cbf7277742281f9750cfb64b9e8a3b84d\",\"artifact:6056:b7edeb08dbbfc6e28f2adfd216c7ccf36db5018014078f5d083dc34944a57344\":\"b7edeb08dbbfc6e28f2adfd216c7ccf36db5018014078f5d083dc34944a57344\",\"artifact:6056:b9e638aeef1a29cb15f04fb1cd5036c7805a362626350203376918b1f3f2140f\":\"b9e638aeef1a29cb15f04fb1cd5036c7805a362626350203376918b1f3f2140f\",\"artifact:6056:ba5e8a43ee6a695f38bd1efdbfe9a8390d5a2065bbf3f62b42cb4cfe31498e13\":\"ba5e8a43ee6a695f38bd1efdbfe9a8390d5a2065bbf3f62b42cb4cfe31498e13\",\"artifact:6056:bfde1fd85969e93acef5dbdf60f703c7fc7cd8c53d712b56c5275adfe72ecaf3\":\"bfde1fd85969e93acef5dbdf60f703c7fc7cd8c53d712b56c5275adfe72ecaf3\",\"artifact:6056:c00968d2d7bba306c1a66fa77e5fb2dbbfe5fab35954e0b51375ef43ecfdbf91\":\"c00968d2d7bba306c1a66fa77e5fb2dbbfe5fab35954e0b51375ef43ecfdbf91\",\"artifact:6056:c7c45ceb20f5b394b96f6a43c618f9adad333e378802b983488348db79cc58b0\":\"c7c45ceb20f5b394b96f6a43c618f9adad333e378802b983488348db79cc58b0\",\"artifact:6056:c86ea93c3d94812273ee343d897779bfd2bbef5b3ae4d605456d1a478b94c37e\":\"c86ea93c3d94812273ee343d897779bfd2bbef5b3ae4d605456d1a478b94c37e\",\"artifact:6056:e1e6f5e73f8a78d24b999e9bcc94c73fa4b9cf1768d9312879c63676e606cd7d\":\"e1e6f5e73f8a78d24b999e9bcc94c73fa4b9cf1768d9312879c63676e606cd7d\",\"artifact:6056:fe29f03b4f2aca6e24bc7d911725df255de1b94b8e6c75801459af596e78d985\":\"fe29f03b4f2aca6e24bc7d911725df255de1b94b8e6c75801459af596e78d985\"},\"sha256\":\"83780e7f420a9f4f7796b1ff99f168aa69562e17d55203ae1d7ebb57b6a2d9f6\"},\"targets_sha256\":\"747ddcd43a71784abe2ccceb37c4a48cf8092821fa8346462db03f03b7f50a18\"}\nDeclared non-witness scopes with their existing authority: []\nConfigured areas: [{\"id\":\"g2-exponent\",\"title\":\"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2)\",\"lane\":\"g2-exponent\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"adversarial\",\"title\":\"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators\",\"lane\":\"adversarial\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"formalize\",\"title\":\"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas\",\"lane\":\"formalize\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"measure\",\"title\":\"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges\",\"lane\":\"measure\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"infinitude\",\"title\":\"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry\",\"lane\":\"infinitude\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"title\":\"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane)\",\"lane\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"title\":\"Mapped paper claims and separate obligations\",\"paper\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"topic_ids\":[\"kk-lower-bound.main\",\"kk-lower-bound.o1\",\"kk-lower-bound.o2\",\"kk-lower-bound.o3\",\"kk-lower-bound.o4\",\"kk-lower-bound.o5\",\"kk-lower-bound.o6\",\"kk-lower-bound.o7\"],\"domain_md\":\"kk-lower-bound.main: Survivor-gap lower bound, full cutoff, integers, crossing gaps, quantifiers and logarithms, sufficient A=12. This is not twin-prime infinitude. Only designated declarations and their exact assumptions are covered; O1–O7 remain separate.\\nkk-lower-bound.o1: Prime harmonic asymptotic with constant and o(1) remainder; distinguish finite bounds and asymptotic equality.\\nkk-lower-bound.o2: Two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic, including u <= Z^(1-epsilon); do not transfer a fixed-u theorem without a uniformity bridge.\\nkk-lower-bound.o3: Every fixed A > 4; the accepted main proof uses sufficient A=12. The general-A extension remains separate.\\nkk-lower-bound.o4: Dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2; an eventual y/(3 log y) lower bound does not prove equality.\\nkk-lower-bound.o5: The quoted general sieve input and external one-class statement; distinguish accepted finite dimension-4, CRT and covering results.\\nkk-lower-bound.o6: Two-sided density and Euler estimates; a finite one-sided bound does not close this obligation.\\nkk-lower-bound.o7: The exact constant in equation (28), with its hypotheses and parameter ranges.\"}]\n\nFor each area return applicability_assessment:{source_return_id:6056,input_sha256:\"208a8caaa2282c6716b32adc2d3db15ac9db7e81e1c7a50381dd069062a22dd1\",entries:[{target_id,decision:\"applicable|inapplicable|unresolved\",scope_keys:[<declared source keys; [] when the accepted report has no typed scope>],evidence_md,assumptions_md}]}. Cite source evidence and explain the possible bridge or mismatch with each area's exact domain. Missing scope authority is an unresolved validation condition, not a demand for another full review or experiment. Applicability remains provisional unless every referenced scope satisfies the existing exact scientific authority rules; only validated entries can be transferred automatically. Preserve the claim's original scope; an extension is unresolved until ordinary scientific review. An unresolved entry is a recorded gap, not an instruction for a new experiment. Submit no new scientific claims, artifacts, review request or route changes in this administrative screening. Record existing evidence even when every area is inapplicable. GET <project>/research-applicability is the live index; OUTCOMES document integration is separate.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/6108/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"b2154ee0fb2ebfd2870ad2f02107b9a1b7ba3f7ca672f4ab1f06c25f623d631e","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}