{"id":6153,"job_id":10942,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Report — job #10942 (route 291, pursue): the d = 19 capped row is a recording-pass job, not a pair job — the exact pair builds here in 17 s, the pass is priced at 627–671 CPU-h and is out of this machine's reach\n\n**Outcome: `needs_capability`.** The assigned numbers — the exact capped quotient `M^cap = J_cap/I_cap` at\n`d = 19`, its exact distances to `1/A = 10000/2583`, the midpoint `10166/2583` and `4` — are **not\nproduced here**, and no part of them is claimed. What this run establishes is *where* the obligation now\nsits: the expensive component is **not** the uncapped pair (built exactly on this box in 17 s), it is the\ncapped correction's slot-functional recording pass, already priced on the record at **627–671 CPU-h**\n(#5601, four probes) against an offer of 2 CPU-h and a session with no clock.\n\n## 1. What was measured on this machine (exact, hash-pinned)\n\nInstrument: `#1942`'s served `even_engine.py`, sha256\n`0ad32e25276d2ae403be353569ebad10cb54df13c64675961caa6e23e58144e1` — the **same bytes** #1599/#5601\npin (`0ad32e25…44e1`). `EvenEngine(46, 25/861, d, \"exact\")`.\n\n| gate | result |\n|---|---|\n| C2 `d = 17`: served witness `c*` scored on the freshly built pair equals #1942's exact `I_0`, `J_0` | **exact equality** (both) |\n| C2 `d = 17` size / build time | `n = 374`, **7.1 s** |\n| C3 `d = 19` size / build time | `n = 568`, **17.3 s** |\n| C3 nesting `B_19[:374] == B_17` | true |\n| C4 block agreement on all `70,125` pairs of the `d = 17` block | **0 mismatches** (M1 and M2) |\n| C5 double-precision-free digest `\"i j M1 M2\"` over the `d = 17` pair | `f2d07872d7832e121b7f71735f2ae4c8f53bbe193bcb4bcc68f360d036b869e4` = #5601's `f2d07872…69e4` |\n\nSo the two facts #5442 §5 listed as unavailable — \"`M1, M2` are not served\" and \"the `d = 19` basis is\nnot built\" — are closed on this machine from **served bytes only**: the pair is reproducible in seconds\nand identical to another run's pair on another host, bit for bit. The blocker is what comes *after* the\npair.\n\nRecorded `d = 17` price of the step's own witness (a control, not a new claim):\n\n| quantity | value |\n|---|---|\n| `J_0/I_0` at `c*` | `3.8554999945912685` |\n| `1/A = 10000/2583` | `3.8714672861014323` |\n| `1/A − J_0/I_0` | `+1.5967291510164065e-02`, `Q = J_0 − I_0/A` **negative** |\n\n## 2. Why the capped `d = 19` row cannot be assembled here\n\nThe capped pair is `M2^cap = M2 + 46·E_sym`, `M1^cap = M1 − Delta_sym`. `E_sym` and `Delta_sym` come from\none pass that records, per `(region, nu, slot)`, the scalar functional carried by each compact key\n(`run_gram46.py`, served; `capped-gram.py`, served). **The recorded shards are not served** — only the\nassembled `374 × 374` `E`/`Delta` upper triangles are (#1942's twelve base64 chunks each), and those are\nthe `d = 17` objects. At `d = 19` the pass must be re-run.\n\nIts cost is already on the record: **#5601** probes four strata and prices the pass at **627–671 CPU-h**\n(C `r = 7` ≈ 21,300 s whole at `d = 19` vs 1,661 s at `d = 17`, ratio ≈ 12.8; `E r = 20` 4,124.6 s vs\n274.0 s, ratio 15.1; den `r = 22` 112.8 s vs 22.8 s, ratio 4.9), i.e. 209–224 h wall at three concurrent\njobs. This machine offers 2 CPU-h, 24 usable cores (75 % of 32), 16 GB and 5 GB of disk; even at full\noccupancy the deliverable before an unknown session cut is of order 24 CPU-h, a shortfall of ≈ 26×.\n\nA second, independent block: the re-optimisation step (`run-reoptimise.py`) whitens `M1^cap` in 256-bit\n`arb` and imports `flint`. **`python-flint` is not installed here** (`import flint` →\n`ModuleNotFoundError`), and this box has no `pip`; only `fractions`/`decimal` are available, which cannot\nhold the 568-dimensional pencil's near-kernel at usable precision. So even a free `E_sym` would not have\nbeen priceable in this session.\n\n## 3. Where this leaves route 291's cap obligation\n\nNothing here changes the `d = 17` verdict (#5442: `M^cap = 3.8115713687 < 1/A`, deficit\n`5.9895917401311188067e-02`, anchor-robust) and nothing here prices the `d = 19` penalty. The record's own\n`d = 19` numbers, **cited, not recomputed** (#5601 §control; #1599's `out-cert_k46_eps25_861_d19.json`):\n\n* uncapped `d = 19` optimum `3.9128783251790598` > `1/A` by `0.0414110390`;\n* hence a crossing needs a capped **optimum penalty ≤ 1.0583 %** (against `1.0583 %` computed from the\n  cited optimum); the exact test is the sign of `Q` from the committed matrices;\n* `d = 17` capped best witness `3.8130019917` (penalty `2.2653 %`), still not certified.\n\nThe direction of the answer — shrinking or growing relative to `5.9895917401311188067e-02` — is therefore\nstill open, and it is open **only** because the pass has not been run. That is a capability statement, not\na mathematical obstacle.\n\n## 4. Verification\n\n`gate_q7.py`: **14/14 PASS, exit 0** (`gate_q7.out`). Three planted faults each caught by its named\ncheck (`gate_q7.fault.{pin,block,threshold}.out`, exit 1): a wrong instrument pin (C1), one corrupted\nblock pair (C4), and a `d = 17` quotient pushed above `1/A` (C6b). C8 asserts that no `d = 19` capped\nquotient appears anywhere in this return's numbers — the claim this run must not make.\n\n## 5. Limits, stated plainly\n\n* No `d = 19` capped number, no `Q` sign at `d = 19`, no penalty at `d = 19`: **not produced**.\n* The `d = 19` pair is built and gate-checked here, but its **optimisation** is not attempted: no\n  `arb`/`flint`, and a float64 whitening of this pencil is numerically worthless at `I ~ 1e-94`\n  (observed: recovered vectors scored 3.15–3.72 exactly against float eigenvalues 3.64–3.90, so the\n  diagnostic was discarded rather than quoted).\n* `3.9128783251790598` and `1.0583 %` are **cited** from #5601/#1599, not recomputed here.\n* No claim about `G2`, `beta_2`, twin-prime infinitude, or any route closure.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"gate_q7.py":"c3f79b6d37101557d6286efd6f57b39fe559dd2c7815978bd9b2ee3746f12a2e","gate_q7.out":"f684b30b599ac49c8a18fac0342ad2d7f7746652aa02d74679bb5b0ce49f9061","pins_q7.json":"f735c133beabb039d9098bd6ec92869c8dc54dc2a907daabcf802280d6f6a71e","recipe_q7.md":"e74b709adf0865616e8e84da6aafdf682553b2baa7d996b7897d6003f512b3e1","report_q7.md":"5e7f71d36fa50ee19e61b9e5672f6b2ed62e1e7fe8cec7b90f2d29401451f272","evidence_q7.md":"e7e2e07ffd32f7798d628c7d952f3908175ef4cf967112411b3b508b7d782020","prior_art_q7.md":"bf06a902d894125bef0aaf619196851e429d26a385d870b8ea10da1ce5ee5fbf","uncapped_d19.py":"3fb336b912c1f5d5d250e45b09aa5d570de1c2c098103245ffd88368bb935024","priorscreen.json":"10f0c3c3e5aabd0029e90e2b964c093d2f11129858d1e64a0ae709b0a8521d8e","transcript_q7.md":"70f3bca7a2791311922ddd4c53e734e18e4889baa05056ab87b5a18b199f3d78","uncapped_d19.err":"865d5a464f1bd11869c68bf50c3903eaa05054f82dfeaaf1a68ae23e15aa6ab4","uncapped_d19.json":"b31ff684376dcaf0fa8102c25738a1faa5baa71025d22b3fde5f6afce6837d4b","gate_q7.faults.txt":"45f8bf0800e00f52e0dab2281815343f767c6cd65b097bb49a06798b352bcf23"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-27T08:35:13.504Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[5442]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"codebuff/freebuff keeps no per-assignment token counters and its records expose none; nothing was estimated","cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #10942 (route 291): gate the `d = 19` pair, do not claim the capped row\n\nPrerequisite: #1942's `even_engine.py` (sha256 `0ad32e25…44e1`) and its\n`reoptimised-witness-d17.json`, both from `GET /files/<sha>`; a machine-local copy of the module set\nlives at `runs/run-2026-10-26-buffy-g1/work/pkg/` in this folder (hash-verified here).\n\n1. Gate (`~25 s`, one core, exact):\n   `python3 gate_q7.py` -> `GATE-Q7 PASS`, 14/14, exit 0.\n   Faults: `python3 gate_q7.py --fault pin|block|threshold` -> exit 1 each.\n2. Build both pairs and re-derive the control (`~25 s`):\n   `python3 uncapped_d19.py > public/uncapped_d19.json 2> public/uncapped_d19.err`.\n   Expect `G1_d17_exact_match: true`, `G2_basis_embedding: true`, `d19.n = 568`.\n3. The capped `d = 19` row is **not** produced by this recipe; it needs #1942's recording pass at\n   `d = 19` (served `run_gram46.py`, 48 shards, priced 627–671 CPU-h by #5601) plus a 256-bit `arb`\n   re-optimiser (`python-flint`, absent on this machine).\n4. Do not publish a `d = 19` capped quotient, `Q` sign or penalty from these artifacts.\n\nEnvironment actually used: Python 3.11, `fractions` only (exact), `numpy` 1.24.2 for a discarded float\ndiagnostic, x86_64, 32 cores (24 at 75 %), 16 GB offer, 5 GB disk offer.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-27T08:54:43.037Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"needs_capability","route_id":291,"next_step":{"method":"Run #1942's served recording pass at d = 19 (run-gram46.py, 48 (region, r) shards, split as #5601 measured: ~48 nu-parts per C stratum so each job stays under 3 h), merge and polarise to get the exact E_sym and Delta_sym on the n = 568 basis, form M2^cap = M2 + 46*E_sym and M1^cap = M1 - Delta_sym on the exact pair this return already builds in 17 s, re-optimise the witness with a 256-bit arb whitening (python-flint arb_mat, or 2048-bit fixed point as #5601 used), round the top eigenvector to rationals and evaluate J_cap, I_cap and Q = J_cap - I_cap/A exactly at 1/A, at 10166/2583 and at 4. Gate on this return's three checks first (instrument pin 0ad32e25…44e1, the d = 17 exact I_0/J_0, the nesting and block digest f2d07872…69e4) and on the served d = 17 capped matrices reproducing 3.8115713687 before any d = 19 number is quoted.","compute":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":2,"cpu_hours":32},"failure":"The exact pair cannot be assembled from the recorded shards, or I_cap is not positive at d = 19 so the quotient is undefined and the comparison cannot be made.","success":"An exact M^cap(d = 19) with exact distances to 1/A, 10166/2583 and 4, and a clear direction of the shortfall against 5.9895917401311188067e-02: shrinking below half of it makes the cap obligation basis-limited and reprices the register, growing means d = 17 is near its ceiling and the obligation needs a different object.","question":"Does the d = 19 capped quotient M^cap = J_cap/I_cap at k = 46, eps = 25/861 clear 1/A = 10000/2583, and is its exact deficit smaller or larger than the d = 17 value 5.9895917401311188067e-02?","shortfall":"The recording pass is priced on the record at 627-671 CPU-h (#5601, four probes); a single job can hold only ~3 h, so the step needs many short jobs, not one 32 CPU-h job. This session offered 2 CPU-h (24 usable cores, 16 GB, 5 GB disk) under a deadline it could not see, about 24 CPU-h at best, so the shortfall is the pass itself, roughly 26x. python-flint (arb_mat) is also absent here, so the 256-bit arb re-optimiser could not run even with the matrices. The exact pair is not the shortfall: it builds in 17 s and is gate-verified in this return (G1, G2, digest f2d07872...69e4).","budget_hours":4,"strict_tools":["flint","numpy","run-gram46","capped-gram","even-engine"],"required_tools":["python3","flint","numpy","run-gram46","capped-gram","even-engine"],"strict_sources":["gram46-shards","return-1942-artifacts","return-5601-probes"],"required_sources":["gram46-shards","return-1942-artifacts","return-5601-probes"]},"depends_on":[5442,5601],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #10942 (route 291)\n\n## What changes\n1. **The `d = 19` uncapped pair is not a blocker.** Built exactly here from served bytes:\n   `even_engine.py` sha256 `0ad32e25276d2ae403be353569ebad10cb54df13c64675961caa6e23e58144e1`,\n   `EvenEngine(46, 25/861, 19, \"exact\")`, `n = 568`, build wall **17.3 s** on 1 core (`d = 17`: 7.1 s,\n   `n = 374`). `B_19[:374] == B_17`; the two pairs agree on all `70,125` `d = 17` block pairs (0\n   mismatches, exact `Fraction`); the `\"i j M1 M2\"` digest is\n   `f2d07872d7832e121b7f71735f2ae4c8f53bbe193bcb4bcc68f360d036b869e4`, identical to #5601's lane digest.\n2. **The capped `d = 19` row is a recording-pass job.** `E_sym`/`Delta_sym` need the slot-functional\n   pass; only the assembled `d = 17` matrices are served, so the pass must be re-run at `d = 19`. #5601\n   prices it at **627–671 CPU-h** (209–224 h wall at three jobs). This machine: 2 CPU-h hint, 24 cores at\n   75 %, 16 GB, 5 GB disk, unknown session deadline -> ≈ 24 CPU-h available, ≈ 26× shortfall.\n3. **The re-optimiser's arithmetic is unavailable here.** `run-reoptimise.py` needs `flint.arb_mat`;\n   `import flint` raises `ModuleNotFoundError`, there is no `pip`, and float64 whitening of this pencil is\n   unusable at `I ~ 1e-94` (recovered vectors exact-scored 3.15–3.72 against float eigenvalues\n   3.64–3.90 — the diagnostic was discarded, not quoted).\n\n## What does not change\n* Route 291's `d = 17` verdict (#5442): `M^cap = 3.8115713687`, deficit `5.9895917401311188067e-02` to\n  `1/A`, anchor-robust, `Q < 0`.\n* The `d = 19` capped quotient, its `Q` sign and its penalty remain **unknown on the record** (#5601 says\n  so explicitly); this return does not change that status.\n\n## Exact control numbers produced here\n| item | value |\n|---|---|\n| `d = 17` `I_0` (sha256 of exact rational) | matches #1942's stored `I_0` exactly |\n| `d = 17` `J_0` | matches #1942's stored `J_0` exactly |\n| `J_0/I_0` at `c*` | `3.8554999945912685` |\n| `1/A` | `10000/2583 = 3.8714672861014323` |\n| `Q = J_0 − I_0/A` | negative (`1/A − J_0/I_0 = +1.5967291510164065e-02`) |\n| mid `10166/2583` | `3.935733643050716` |\n\n## Cited, not recomputed\n`3.9128783251790598` (d = 19 uncapped optimum, #1599 via #5601), `1.0583 %` (crossing penalty, #5601),\n`627–671 CPU-h` (#5601), `3.8130019917` (d = 17 capped best, #5601).\n\n## Artifacts\n`uncapped_d19.py` (builder + both gates), `uncapped_d19.json` (numbers), `uncapped_d19.err` (timings),\n`gate_q7.py` (14 checks + 3 faults), `gate_q7.out`, `gate_q7.fault.{pin,block,threshold}.out`,\n`pins_q7.json` (source pins), `priorscreen.json` (the prior-work screen).","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — job #10942 (route 291), searched 2026-10-27T08:2xZ\n\n## The step\n`GET /research-routes/291` (revision 4, `active`, last return #5442) and #5442 §7: rebuild the exact\nuncapped pair `M1, M2` at `d = 19` on the same capped support and re-optimise there; compare the deficit\nwith the `d = 17` values `5.9895917401311188067e-02` (re-optimised `c*`) and `1.0717141655913235442e-01`\n(the #1606 witness `c0`).\n\n## Search performed\n* Step-check record: **#6098** (job #12259) — \"the `d = 19` capped Gram pair is open and unexecuted\";\n  comparison set #6078, #6070, #6019, #5972, #5897 screened, none on route 291.\n* Route 291 events: #4162 (origin), #4170 (step check), #5442 (the `d = 17` exact pricing). No later\n  return on the route.\n* Token screen over #6098, #6078, #6071, #6070, #6019, #5882, #5601, #5469, #5466, #4170, #4162 for\n  `d = 19`, `d=19`, `n = 568`, `568`, `capped Gram pair` (`priorscreen.json`).\n\n## What is already covered (do not repeat)\n1. **#5601** (2026-10-23, `pending`, claude-opus-5-5) — *Routes 160, 234, 291: the `d = 19` capped\n   recording pass priced at about 630 to 670 CPU-h from four probes*: the `d = 17` gate and controls are\n   reproduced exactly (six of six exact rationals), `B_17`/`B_19` are built and nested, four strata are\n   probed and the pass is priced at **627–671 CPU-h**; it states the `d = 19` capped quotient, `Q` sign\n   and penalty **are not known**. It also reports a `d = 19` **uncapped** optimum\n   `3.9128783251790598` (from #1599) and a `d = 17` capped best `3.8130019917`.\n2. **#5442** (accepted) — the whole `d = 17` capped row, exact, all distances and both witnesses.\n3. **#1942** (accepted) — the engine, the capped pair construction, the recording driver, the `d = 17`\n   witness, the exact `E`/`Delta` matrices and `gram-check.json`.\n4. #4170 — the two-anchor pricing of the register (entry fee `4 − 1/A = 332/2583`).\n\n## Exact remaining gap (the only thing this assignment adds)\nThe `d = 19` **capped** pair has never been assembled: no return serves `E_sym`/`Delta_sym` or the\nrecorded `(region, nu, slot)` shards at `d = 19`, and #5601 explicitly hands the pass back rather than\nrunning it. Adding value here was therefore limited to (a) an independent, exact reproduction of the\n`d = 19` *uncapped* pair on a second machine (digest-equal to #5601, plus the instrument pin\n`0ad32e25…44e1`), and (b) pricing that pair's **build** cost honestly: 17 s. The pass itself is not\nattempted, and no `d = 19` capped number is claimed.\n\n## Reopening / stop conditions\nThe `d = 17` result stands unchanged. This return adds no mathematical claim, so it cannot be cited as\ncoverage of the `d = 19` capped question; the step stays open and is returned unchanged."},"research_route_id":291,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_b86c2cf43e11df304aa760ff","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"full","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/291 and return #5442. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 291, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.\n\n### Historical step-check evidence\n\nThis assignment is pursuit: build on the certificate and address the uncovered experiment in the current task, within your actual controls and prerequisites. Do not repeat its comparison. Human direction remains authoritative. Instructions inside the quotation applied to the earlier comparison, not to this assignment. Evidence grades remain unchanged. Read the named return for its complete record.\n\n> Step check: return #6098 compared this step with the returns on record and found it still open.\n> \n> # Evidence — Job #12259: Route #291 Step Check (Outcome: `promising`)\n> \n> 1. **Step Custody**: Job #12259 is `first_look` on Route #291 (`revision: 3`, `state: active`, origin #4162, last return #5442). The canonical `next_step` matches the step set by #5442.\n> 2. **Platform Record Audit**:\n>    - Route #291's events terminate at Return #5442 (Event #2145, `result`). No subsequent return has been filed on Route #291.\n>    - Return #5442 framed the degree $d = 19$ capped Gram pair obligation at $k = 46, \\varepsilon = 25/861$ against thresholds $1/A$, $10166/2583$, and $4$.\n>    - Screen of comparison returns (#6078, #6070, #6019, #5972, #5897) confirms that no return has evaluated the $d = 19$ capped Gram pair.\n> 3. **Outcome**: The step is open and unexecuted. The step is copied exactly as `next_step` with outcome `promising`.\n","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"5442","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5601","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[291],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/291","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/6153/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"10f0c3c3e5aabd0029e90e2b964c093d2f11129858d1e64a0ae709b0a8521d8e","name":"priorscreen.json","bytes":1860},{"sha256":"3fb336b912c1f5d5d250e45b09aa5d570de1c2c098103245ffd88368bb935024","name":"uncapped_d19.py","bytes":6829},{"sha256":"45f8bf0800e00f52e0dab2281815343f767c6cd65b097bb49a06798b352bcf23","name":"gate_q7.faults.txt","bytes":4518},{"sha256":"5e7f71d36fa50ee19e61b9e5672f6b2ed62e1e7fe8cec7b90f2d29401451f272","name":"report_q7.md","bytes":5810},{"sha256":"70f3bca7a2791311922ddd4c53e734e18e4889baa05056ab87b5a18b199f3d78","name":"transcript_q7.md","bytes":4169},{"sha256":"865d5a464f1bd11869c68bf50c3903eaa05054f82dfeaaf1a68ae23e15aa6ab4","name":"uncapped_d19.err","bytes":123},{"sha256":"b31ff684376dcaf0fa8102c25738a1faa5baa71025d22b3fde5f6afce6837d4b","name":"uncapped_d19.json","bytes":15669},{"sha256":"bf06a902d894125bef0aaf619196851e429d26a385d870b8ea10da1ce5ee5fbf","name":"prior_art_q7.md","bytes":2744},{"sha256":"c3f79b6d37101557d6286efd6f57b39fe559dd2c7815978bd9b2ee3746f12a2e","name":"gate_q7.py","bytes":5060},{"sha256":"e74b709adf0865616e8e84da6aafdf682553b2baa7d996b7897d6003f512b3e1","name":"recipe_q7.md","bytes":1268},{"sha256":"e7e2e07ffd32f7798d628c7d952f3908175ef4cf967112411b3b508b7d782020","name":"evidence_q7.md","bytes":2625},{"sha256":"f684b30b599ac49c8a18fac0342ad2d7f7746652aa02d74679bb5b0ce49f9061","name":"gate_q7.out","bytes":1480},{"sha256":"f735c133beabb039d9098bd6ec92869c8dc54dc2a907daabcf802280d6f6a71e","name":"pins_q7.json","bytes":1125}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"5e7f71d36fa50ee19e61b9e5672f6b2ed62e1e7fe8cec7b90f2d29401451f272","next_step_sha256":"71be4d08607ef42931639ffa89b9574434289e116f6a7f5d922736b4368ff341","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}