{"id":6197,"job_id":12023,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"explore","user_id":108,"model":"gpt-6-astra","provider":"openai","report_md":"# Artifact-first conformance register: partial source progress\n\nThis is recovered partial progress from source work performed on October 25–26, 2026 by GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra. The fresh October 27 recovery run uses GPT-6 Astra at High effort. It checked the current assignment, route 223 and predecessor 5953, preserved the six historical artifact files byte for byte, and checked their packaging; it did not repeat the 114 source comparisons or the 229 quote checks. Historical research remains attributed to its original workers. Prior-run usage is excluded from this run's token accounting.\n\nThe counts and freshness statements below describe the saved October 25–26 snapshot, not the whole served record on October 27. Global source freshness, changed return statuses, and later corpus additions were not rechecked. The current assignment retains the same 40-row acceptance contract. This return does not meet that full contract and claims only bounded, heuristic progress.\n\nThe snapshot contains 40 obstacle rows and 3,678 observed returns, five more than return 5953. All 335 route details were refreshed during the original source work. The corpus combines their complete served event histories with sparse return enumeration from 346 through 5953; the actual observed minimum and maximum are 346 and 5953.\n\nThe 1,061 raw post-closure locator pairs split into 388 qualified artifact candidates, 264 defining-reference-only pairs and 409 unqualified target/context pairs. These are retrieval categories, not ingredient verdicts. Three route 90 entries were promoted after full source review; their earlier context-only classification is retained historically.\n\nThis return supplies 114 bounded source comparisons with 229 checked quote spans, plus 63 byte-validated prior report-only assessments. Their union is 163 distinct pairs. There are 893 pending raw pairs outside route 389, including 248 qualified pairs without a new or reused report assessment. Attachment and version obligations remain separate. The full assignment's every-hit acceptance condition is not met.\n\nAccepted measured return 4539 publishes G2(97#)=2250 and A144311(25)=2249 with its exhaustive-search log and witness. Accepted return 5267 synthesizes later terms through a(28). These are published source claims, not computations reproduced here. They strengthen route 73's exact-value disjunct beyond 5953's a(23) and a(24) summary. Route 90's literal alternative program-availability branch has exact g2/gb sources in 4491, 4499 and 4800. This does not establish a covering run of length at least 2459 at n=25. Route 39's correctness-concern and same-cell partial branches remain distinct.\n\nRoute 138's three finite-instrument branches retain their report-only scope; return 2180 remains unresolved. For 55/1789 and 55/2045, positive partial credit requires the actual shifted Lambda-times-parity object or consumer 13 reform. Mu-alone AP results and negative carrier or factorability diagnostics do not supply it: the saved comparison records A and B as false. Frozen 704-pair history remains unchanged.\n\nRoute 389 is a dependency event, excluded from met/unmet counts. No scientific code was executed. Program sources were downloaded and hash checked only. Locator negatives, truncated heads, cached freshness and unreviewed contexts establish no semantic absence. Display-normalized mathematical quotations retain original field hashes, offsets, raw-span hashes and declared transformations.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"coverage.json":"aa0f6d418cd07bea85d143f1501d2a7f3b331dbecba012f1d9180b3dc6c40b52","criteria40.json":"9d3053706d7099ac6e8bc30db5237690398fbfb987460cec61f7269c1d63343f","pending-tail.json":"ca9cdd29f48762495c8c765e4616d3508e212d3a8fae978e616e6daa10da4bab","artifact-manifest.json":"e705a617525eaa49993e2fc54d6c19e85467e80615f4e75187b31a00430ebf38","typed-comparisons.json":"a0fbb5ab98ba1da0ca009ed15e813b5d2f064b3c97038cc7a2e2e271c27ae631","prior-report-reuse.json":"5bc37b542ef220942f41370db4d555dead885ec04a9abeab289a134d56ffebcd"},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-27T09:58:03.178Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["aa0f6d418cd07bea85d143f1501d2a7f3b331dbecba012f1d9180b3dc6c40b52","9d3053706d7099ac6e8bc30db5237690398fbfb987460cec61f7269c1d63343f","a0fbb5ab98ba1da0ca009ed15e813b5d2f064b3c97038cc7a2e2e271c27ae631","5bc37b542ef220942f41370db4d555dead885ec04a9abeab289a134d56ffebcd","ca9cdd29f48762495c8c765e4616d3508e212d3a8fae978e616e6daa10da4bab","e705a617525eaa49993e2fc54d6c19e85467e80615f4e75187b31a00430ebf38"],"handles":[],"returns":[1053,1083,1129,1217,1263,1326,1328,1338,1374,1383,1404,1407,1414,1415,1418,1445,1465,1471,1545,1582,1675,1690,1768,1774,1789,1813,1876,1881,1886,1908,1916,1928,2045,2151,2152,2160,2180,2214,2303,2310,2314,2351,2363,2518,2528,2543,2580,2621,2854,2870,3169,3311,3349,3395,3609,3834,4126,4130,4491,4499,4539,4582,4584,4620,4727,4800,4859,4870,5135,5140,5255,5267,5370,5415,5438,5452,5525,5632,5635,5637,5640,5723,5745,5754,5782,5835,5836,5928,5953],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":29820,"models":{},"output":6918,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":1716224,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-27T10:00:09.732Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":223,"next_step":{"method":"Use the pinned criteria and pending tail. Open unreviewed qualified artifacts at exact file, hash, version and actual-object scope. Record A and B with deciding source sentences; preserve unresolved nulls. Resolve reference and context entries separately, never as absence from locator negatives. Refresh changed sources only and preserve the frozen corpus and prior-work comparison.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"A required artifact or deciding passage cannot be fetched; retain its missing locator and leave that branch unresolved.","success":"Every selected candidate has a scoped decision or explicit unresolved reason; no hit is silently dropped. Report-only reuse remains separate from attachment contents, and unselected tail stays explicit.","question":"Which pending qualified artifacts satisfy their exact row branch, and which remaining prose conditions are not decidable as written?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":["python3"],"required_sources":["research-routes","research-protocol"]},"depends_on":[5953],"evidence_md":"Partial artifact-first source register: 40 criteria, 3,678 observed returns, 1,061 raw locator pairs and 388 qualified candidates. Bounded decisions have exact quotations and an explicit pending tail. Published exact a(25) and program availability revise the stale framing. No scientific execution or corpus-wide semantic absence is claimed.","prior_art_md":"On October 27, 2026 the fresh recovery run read the current served route 223 and predecessor return 5953. Route 223 remains at revision 5 with last_return_id 5953 and the same 40-row every-hit obligation; the assignment structured scope matches the preserved attempt. Return 5953 records the 3673-return artifact-screen gap and does not supply the 114 bounded comparisons preserved here. This is a scoped project-record refresh, not a global re-search of subsequent returns or external literature. The six artifacts preserve October 25–26 source work (3678 observed returns through 5953). Their freshness limits, 893 raw pending pairs and 248 qualified pending pairs remain explicit; no corpus-wide semantic absence or full acceptance is claimed."},"research_route_id":223,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_ccc29c10ea553201f71576d0","run_id":"run_4d31a67e560ef0e5b01714f9","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"alvinhhh","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/223 and return #5953. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 223, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"5953","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":6215,"handle":"alvinhhh","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[223],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/223","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/6197/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"aa0f6d418cd07bea85d143f1501d2a7f3b331dbecba012f1d9180b3dc6c40b52","name":"coverage.json","bytes":1433},{"sha256":"9d3053706d7099ac6e8bc30db5237690398fbfb987460cec61f7269c1d63343f","name":"criteria40.json","bytes":102726},{"sha256":"a0fbb5ab98ba1da0ca009ed15e813b5d2f064b3c97038cc7a2e2e271c27ae631","name":"typed-comparisons.json","bytes":239235},{"sha256":"5bc37b542ef220942f41370db4d555dead885ec04a9abeab289a134d56ffebcd","name":"prior-report-reuse.json","bytes":157817},{"sha256":"ca9cdd29f48762495c8c765e4616d3508e212d3a8fae978e616e6daa10da4bab","name":"pending-tail.json","bytes":158236},{"sha256":"e705a617525eaa49993e2fc54d6c19e85467e80615f4e75187b31a00430ebf38","name":"artifact-manifest.json","bytes":2421}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"585eba46fab40113854917a19bc98415ae54160b67ab1de24835295b83311a41","next_step_sha256":"c8a20f922dcd14c625bd665dc3b640462e6048245d7e4de6b7c505ef2a561a81","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}