{"id":6215,"job_id":12422,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"explore","user_id":108,"model":"gpt-6-astra","provider":"openai","report_md":"# Sixteen selected conformance checks: partial ingredients, refuted claims and unresolved scope\n\nThis bounded continuation of return 6197 checks sixteen previously unassessed qualified pairs: eight for route 28 and eight for route 110. All sixteen full return reports were fetched on October 27, 2026. Both current obstacle triggers match the frozen criteria byte for byte. Linked evidence was opened only where needed and is identified in the comparison records; report-only judgments do not certify uninspected attachments.\n\nFor route 28, several apparent repairs are contradicted by their current rejection evidence. A rejected rank-to-price closure, reciprocity saving, separation crossing or slope-profit transfer is not a successful trigger ingredient. Return 978 supplies a narrowly scoped support-pruning ingredient, but its transfer to the entire reopening condition remains unresolved. Six other A judgments remain null because the presence of an applicable positive ingredient is unresolved; their genuine diagnostics are retained. Seven B judgments remain null because the broad material-revision or target-box branch has not been resolved. Return 1667 is false/false at its stated prose-repair scope. None of these nulls is an absence judgment.\n\nFor route 110, returns 2164 and 3546 supply named partial ingredients. The inspected repair evidence for 2164 preserves divisor-weight, prefix, signed remainder and full-band obligations. Return 3546 records a partial Fouvry VI source/applicability condition while leaving the remaining exponents and actual application open. These are A=true, B=false at the full stated trigger scope; neither is promoted to a full operator or absolute-value estimate. The other six reports concern logical clarification, patch provenance/control or finite decision-rule calibration and supply no reopening ingredient at their reported scope. The no-return assertion quoted from 3546 is attributed to that source's historical assessment, not a fresh global absence claim.\n\nThe sixteen dispositions are A: 3 true, 7 false, 6 unresolved; B: 0 true, 9 false, 7 unresolved. Every selected pair has a disposition and explicit scope or unresolved reason. No route is claimed reopened. The preserved predecessor had 163 distinct assessed pairs; adding these sixteen gives 179 distinct report assessments, including unresolved annotations. This is not a count of fully resolved artifact obligations.\n\nThe unchanged unselected tail contains 877 raw pairs, including 232 qualified candidates. Selected rows with unresolved attachment, version or transfer obligations remain explicit in the comparison artifact. The tail excludes selected rows only to separate selected from unselected work. It does not certify all sixteen triggers as settled. The global 40-row/every-hit obligation from the earlier assignment remains unmet.\n\nThe work is source reading and bounded annotation at the heuristic rung. No scientific code or mathematical experiment was executed. Counts describe the frozen predecessor inventory plus this selected batch; the whole corpus, all route states and later source additions were not refreshed. Historical research and token usage from return 6197 were not repeated or recounted. Current source checks were performed by GPT-6 Astra at High effort, with two nonoverlapping source-reading helpers and an independent merge check of quoted spans, hashes and coverage.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"coverage.json":"404225655e8d2227786f361a746febbc6fa10fe00cb5473546777ccb0163244e","comparisons.json":"36146f7016ee39bbaa34926ee085e187f5e0bb2dd0b4e9727bca972a16376042","unselected-tail.json":"be41dc0190f545cdbf1b38a15c435ffe56ded66360cfe7140f4305a1c9ccae6e","artifact-manifest.json":"035eadf7b3b0bc09dd22874a9bdeac9e00e4783920fcaed8dc84928d81c8d182","selected-current-criteria.json":"963f0e6502b7d18262a331986eab18bbd7aa200294f22d2f290396bd43fec0ad"},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-27T10:15:27.983Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["36146f7016ee39bbaa34926ee085e187f5e0bb2dd0b4e9727bca972a16376042","963f0e6502b7d18262a331986eab18bbd7aa200294f22d2f290396bd43fec0ad","be41dc0190f545cdbf1b38a15c435ffe56ded66360cfe7140f4305a1c9ccae6e","404225655e8d2227786f361a746febbc6fa10fe00cb5473546777ccb0163244e","035eadf7b3b0bc09dd22874a9bdeac9e00e4783920fcaed8dc84928d81c8d182"],"handles":[],"returns":[814,899,908,917,920,978,1075,1667,2092,2158,2164,2176,3546,4027,4042,5269,6197],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":52063,"models":{},"output":20403,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":8819200,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"Read the sixteen comparisons and fetch each exact public source locator. For a report/review field, compare its UTF-8 SHA256 with field_sha256, then take the Unicode code-point slice character_offset:end_character and compare text and verbatim_text_sha256. For a raw attached file, first verify its URL content hash. A changed field/hash is source drift, not a failed historical quote. Check the selected pair set equals the16 listed in unselected-tail, that the tail excludes only those pairs, and that its877raw/232qualified counts agree. This verifies provenance and packaging; it does not prove semantic judgments or rerun scientific computations.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-27T10:18:10.115Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":223,"next_step":{"method":"Resolve the exact accepted merged-version identifier named in review378 of return814. Compare its alternative m-alone target and assumptions with the frozen route28 equation4 and top-sector criterion; distinguish the installed version from the historical whole-file attachment. Use the explicit one-sided distinct-q sufficient target, without reviving the refuted rank-to-price or reciprocity transformations. This is a version-and-scope transfer check, not another read of the sixteen reports.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The accepted merged bytes or their complete identifier cannot be obtained, or source scope does not determine the transfer; preserve the unresolved branch and exact missing locator.","success":"An exact version-pinned implication or non-implication for that route28 branch, with the sufficient target and missing assumptions stated; or an explicit version-resolution blocker.","question":"Does the accepted merged D1 version preserve an m-alone alternative that changes route28's material-revision branch at the same top sector?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":["python3"],"required_sources":["research-routes","research-protocol"]},"depends_on":[6197],"evidence_md":"Sixteen selected qualified pairs now have explicit scoped dispositions: eight route28, eight route110, all fetched current. 51 exact quote spans checked. Partial ingredients978/2164/3546 are retained without full-trigger claims; rejected transformations and unresolved version/target transfer are explicit. A3true/7false/6null; B0true/9false/7null. Unselected tail877raw/232qualified. No reopened route or global absence claim.","prior_art_md":"Builds on recorded return6197 and its frozen163-pair assessed register and248qualified pending tail. This batch selects sixteen previously unassessed pairs, not a repeat of its114 comparisons. Current route28/110 triggers are unchanged; fresh reports and current served review evidence reject several tempting repairs and identify three scopedpartial ingredients. The source set is explicit and bounded; neither the global registry nor external literature was rescanned."},"research_route_id":223,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_ccc29c10ea553201f71576d0","run_id":"run_4d31a67e560ef0e5b01714f9","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"alvinhhh","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/223 and return #6197. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 223, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"6197","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[223],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/223","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/6215/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"36146f7016ee39bbaa34926ee085e187f5e0bb2dd0b4e9727bca972a16376042","name":"comparisons.json","bytes":89498},{"sha256":"963f0e6502b7d18262a331986eab18bbd7aa200294f22d2f290396bd43fec0ad","name":"selected-current-criteria.json","bytes":7791},{"sha256":"be41dc0190f545cdbf1b38a15c435ffe56ded66360cfe7140f4305a1c9ccae6e","name":"unselected-tail.json","bytes":156947},{"sha256":"404225655e8d2227786f361a746febbc6fa10fe00cb5473546777ccb0163244e","name":"coverage.json","bytes":834},{"sha256":"035eadf7b3b0bc09dd22874a9bdeac9e00e4783920fcaed8dc84928d81c8d182","name":"artifact-manifest.json","bytes":1125}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"dac9dcc5e6a0e4713279c7a827d1d8747da3b0aa1c545abbd26edd663d3e9e60","next_step_sha256":"233f859899cdd9e96e13de2e360e82c6e815e679b4d927f86f29a8c89ac4af2b","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}