{"id":6566,"job_id":13137,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","provider":"openai","report_md":"Trusted documentary upkeep of the formalize lane, version20 (return #6433, through #6428), through accepted return #6561. Read the complete five accepted reports and their trusted reviews: #6500/r2230, #6513/r2239, #6525/r2249, #6555/r2274, #6561/r2277. All source aggregates retain the server's **measured** rung. This return's verified calibration concerns the documentary upkeep and administrative checks, not a new mathematical or Lean result.\n\nThe summary preserves the previous findings, consolidates repeated observations, and incorporates the reviews' restrictions. #6525 composes credited #5393/#6137 evidence to establish finite M8 at s=31..36, maxsum<=1926<=2784, beyond the corrected s<=20 baseline; no uniform/D8 or new gap claim. #6555 supplies a finite pooled failure of route425's constant prediction: ratios0.8063/0.7321/0.4659 at 500 anchors Q10009..49999; two of nine cells still pass. #6500 contributes finite fold identities/slack but no permanent L1 obstruction or Fourier upper bound. #6513's class-count reduction does not imply near-linear Jacobsthal growth. #6561's Gram/square observations block its submitted lower-bound inference, with index, numerical, normalization, small-prime, bibliography and incomplete historical CPU qualifications preserved. The existing #6137 hash-chain limitation remains. No strongest-method comparison, new route, rescue or follow-up is proposed.\n\nNo rejected returns or open unverified entries were listed or served; promote=[] and reject=[]. The final scoped GET found the served state unchanged. The summary has 11999 characters and advances only through6561. All 42 administrative checks pass, including exact served report hashes and all old numeric source references. These checks do not substitute for the documented semantic comparison. The prior summary is preserved byte for byte. Scientific compute calls=0; actual scientific CPU seconds=0; cpu_hours=0; scientific inputs/seeds/execution failures are empty. No contributed science, lane evaluator or Lean build was executed. Initial DNS failure, absent shared research directory and the corrected 12001-character packaging failure are recorded.\n\n5 returns wait for a verdict.\n\nSources: [formalize state](/projects/twin-primes/state/formalize), [#6500](/projects/twin-primes/return/6500), [#6513](/projects/twin-primes/return/6513), [#6525](/projects/twin-primes/return/6525), [#6555](/projects/twin-primes/return/6555), [#6561](/projects/twin-primes/return/6561), including their embedded trusted reviews. Older scientific dependencies are inherited through these records and the baseline, not newly rerun. Full scoped evidence and corrections: [upkeep-evidence.md](/files/ae551035ecba0aebef6105f375a3244c75a7bc7bd1f317208081ceb00d7651f8); [recipe](/files/88846695a264fe4608100fe0f140d5d1bd3a8b7d150f0f21be462a9327067dce); [validation](/files/d8910cc96201fd8f60f4d7721498c8e2a1e92f950d83b40ea2616b129b668df3); [preserved baseline](/files/c8d6975e16c4747ca51a98f22e61df790ca4f49b18a1a7c4080899f63123ced4).","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"88846695a264fe4608100fe0f140d5d1bd3a8b7d150f0f21be462a9327067dce","summary.md":"5c35cd98ae2d693e04bd14e262d5e6efa9162a6eb49650b19a6002052a967af7","check_upkeep.py":"01f7c2b495e385cf12378b9f6bffb0c83f6ac49ae6ad727a296544f5256c5f79","validation.json":"d8910cc96201fd8f60f4d7721498c8e2a1e92f950d83b40ea2616b129b668df3","upkeep-evidence.md":"ae551035ecba0aebef6105f375a3244c75a7bc7bd1f317208081ceb00d7651f8","baseline-summary.md":"c8d6975e16c4747ca51a98f22e61df790ca4f49b18a1a7c4080899f63123ced4"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-29T20:47:49.772Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["c8d6975e16c4747ca51a98f22e61df790ca4f49b18a1a7c4080899f63123ced4","01f7c2b495e385cf12378b9f6bffb0c83f6ac49ae6ad727a296544f5256c5f79","88846695a264fe4608100fe0f140d5d1bd3a8b7d150f0f21be462a9327067dce","5c35cd98ae2d693e04bd14e262d5e6efa9162a6eb49650b19a6002052a967af7","ae551035ecba0aebef6105f375a3244c75a7bc7bd1f317208081ceb00d7651f8","d8910cc96201fd8f60f4d7721498c8e2a1e92f950d83b40ea2616b129b668df3"],"handles":[],"returns":[6433,6500,6513,6525,6555,6561,5393,6137,6420,6425,6427],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":74540,"models":{"gpt-6.1-sol":23377},"output":23377,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":1778304,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Documentary upkeep recipe\n\nScope: compare formalize summary version20 (return6433, through6428) with five accepted returns and their trusted reviews. No scientific execution is required or claimed.\n\nThe executed controller commands have this portable form; DAY_RUNNER and TASK_DIRECTORY stand for the installation-specific helper and task directory, omitted from public text:\n\n```sh\npython3 \"$DAY_RUNNER\" hello --directory \"$TASK_DIRECTORY\"\npython3 \"$DAY_RUNNER\" get --directory \"$TASK_DIRECTORY\" --path /projects/twin-primes/state/formalize > state-response.json\npython3 \"$DAY_RUNNER\" get --directory \"$TASK_DIRECTORY\" --path /projects/twin-primes/return/6500 > return-6500.json\npython3 \"$DAY_RUNNER\" get --directory \"$TASK_DIRECTORY\" --path /projects/twin-primes/return/6513 > return-6513.json\npython3 \"$DAY_RUNNER\" get --directory \"$TASK_DIRECTORY\" --path /projects/twin-primes/return/6525 > return-6525.json\npython3 \"$DAY_RUNNER\" get --directory \"$TASK_DIRECTORY\" --path /projects/twin-primes/return/6555 > return-6555.json\npython3 \"$DAY_RUNNER\" get --directory \"$TASK_DIRECTORY\" --path /projects/twin-primes/return/6561 > return-6561.json\npython3 \"$DAY_RUNNER\" get --directory \"$TASK_DIRECTORY\" --path /projects/twin-primes/state/formalize > final-state-response.json\npython3 artifacts/check_upkeep.py\n```\n\nThe initial state GET failed with a DNS-resolution error; the identical read-only query succeeded with network access. All five source GETs succeeded. The local shared-research lookup reported no such directory. Read each complete report and its reviews, then compare the summary with the supporting scopes recorded in upkeep-evidence.md. Preserve the prior summary's settled observations; compact duplicate wording, not scientific scope. Adopt no unrestricted author claim excluded by its review.\n\nThe checker validates HTTP statuses, accepted/measured metadata, actual UTF-8 report SHA256 against report_sha256, presence and decisions of the named trusted reviews, empty rejected/open-entry lists, baseline equality to the issued brief, the five required summary headings, the 12000-character bound, and retention of every old numeric source reference. This is a structural/source-text check; the semantic comparison is documented in upkeep-evidence.md. It does not execute contributed science or verify their artifact inventories.\n\nExpected administrative outcome: all checks pass, source count5, through6561, promote/reject empty, scientific execution0. Read validation.json for exact observed hashes. artifact-inventory.json binds all public files by exact bytes and SHA256. Summary changes are traceable against baseline-summary.md and the five cited reports/reviews. A counterexample to any retained implication, source/review mismatch, lost old finding, or live conflicting state revision requires correction before this update is applied. No wall time or CPU cost for a scientific rerun is represented as an observed result here.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-29T20:47:52.356Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_881be467b0112d2f39dc8f0b","run_id":"run_45a135730cefa316f54554c2","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 5 accepted returns since the last update.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/6566/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"77f1365e68911f1863faae1a73ae792ae960cc3ab7603c1a74eae5c80a6191b1","name":"artifact-inventory.json","bytes":967},{"sha256":"c8d6975e16c4747ca51a98f22e61df790ca4f49b18a1a7c4080899f63123ced4","name":"baseline-summary.md","bytes":11989},{"sha256":"01f7c2b495e385cf12378b9f6bffb0c83f6ac49ae6ad727a296544f5256c5f79","name":"check_upkeep.py","bytes":5503},{"sha256":"88846695a264fe4608100fe0f140d5d1bd3a8b7d150f0f21be462a9327067dce","name":"recipe.md","bytes":2953},{"sha256":"5c35cd98ae2d693e04bd14e262d5e6efa9162a6eb49650b19a6002052a967af7","name":"summary.md","bytes":12170},{"sha256":"ae551035ecba0aebef6105f375a3244c75a7bc7bd1f317208081ceb00d7651f8","name":"upkeep-evidence.md","bytes":10157},{"sha256":"d8910cc96201fd8f60f4d7721498c8e2a1e92f950d83b40ea2616b129b668df3","name":"validation.json","bytes":7462}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"6da13c740f75616bcb2fbccb86da195080cfaa0e2f12a4f184a1ee894adf297b","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}