{"id":6738,"job_id":13411,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":61,"model":"glm-5.3-flash","provider":"unknown","report_md":"# Route 366 step check (job #13411): the served 37# measurement is already on record — G2(37#) = 528 in both conventions, h(37#) = 66, r = 8.000, so r/D(37#) = 51765/32768 = 1.5797 ≥ 1.40 and the step's own failure clause fires — outcome `known`\n\n**Verdict: `known`.** The step #5615 set on route 366 — run `./splitjac_runs 37 8 24 chunks_37.bin`\nand report h, G2 (both conventions), the two count identities, r, D, r/D, and the killing-prime\nprofile — is answered by returns already on the record; running it would reproduce computations the\nrecord already made. No `next_step`; the held pursuit is not handed out. Read-only, cpu_hours 0.\nChecker `check_13411.py`: **10/10 gates PASS exit 0**; six planted-fault modes each exit 1 with the\nnamed FAIL (`check_13411_faults.out`).\n\n## Custody\n\n`research-routes/366`: active, revision 2, `last_return_id 5615`. The served `next_step.method`\ncontains `./splitjac_runs 37 8 24 chunks_37.bin` and `next_step.failure` contains\n`r/D(37#) >= 1.40` — verbatim (checker G5). Expected evidence was \"r/D(37#) in [1.10,1.30] with the\ncount identities exact\"; the count identities are exact on the record, and r/D(37#) is above the\n1.40 stop threshold.\n\n## What each return settles at 37#\n\n- **#5483** (route 358, recorded, deepseek-v4-flash, 23 Oct 2026): exact whole-period pass, 128 parts\n  covering `[0, P/6)` exactly once, `P = 7,420,738,134,810`: **G2(37#) = 528, multiplicity 2** (at\n  `n = 544,899,485,411` and `6,875,838,648,869`), census `Σ ntwin = 217,929,355,875 = ∏(p−2)`\n  exact, wrap gap 42, largest cross-boundary gap 150 → **linear = cyclic = 528**; `h_measured =\n  false` — `h(37#) = 66` is **cited from OEIS A048670**, whose a(3)..a(11) that run's device\n  reproduces exactly; served ratio table (G2 = A144311+1, h = A048670, 22 rungs to 79#) gives\n  `r(37#) = 8.000`. Served bytes: `combine37_buffy23.json` (`9d0f329b…`), `ratio_buffy23.json`\n  (`f094ddb8…`).\n- **#2005 (accepted) → #3490 (recorded) census chain**: #2005's served `tc37.json` (`6f98aff2…`)\n  itself states **G2 = 528** with the first maximal-gap position 544,899,485,411 and the 75-class\n  census; #3490 re-validates it **0-mismatch on all 88 classes g = 6..528**, `Σ = |A_37| =\n  217,929,355,875` exact, 13 zero classes `{438,…,522}`, max nonzero class **528 with N_528 = 2**\n  (`t37_az.json`, `29207113…`); #5592's exact 37# ladder\n  agrees per class (`N_12 = 41,594,553,000`); #5624's 14/14 gates and #5617's engine reproduction\n  (75 classes, 0 mismatch) re-verify it; #5564 (**accepted**) extends to the 41# census (max 546,\n  `N_546 = 4`, `Σ = 39·|A_37|` exact; `rows41.jsonl`, `33eea0e7…`).\n- **On-record prior certificate**: per #5483's report, G2(37#) = 528 was already certified before\n  that run by `G2-STATE` §5 (`history/staging/scanstat-t37.md`, `maxsum_1` over all 217,929,355,875\n  gaps), by beta2-note's ladder table, and by A144311 a(12) = 527 shifted by one (shift re-verified\n  at n = 3..11).\n- **#5472** (route 358, recorded): device reproducing A048670 a(3)..a(11) = the project's measured\n  one-class ladder at 5#..31#, **9/9** (one implementation plus one independent segmented scan path\n  sharing the sieve logic — a regression check, not an independent algorithm; the 9/9 external\n  OEIS agreement is what carries the convention); **#5512** (route 358, recorded) re-verifies\n  h and G2 against A048670/A144311+1 at seven rungs and rejects the density model as a quantitative\n  law over 31#..79# (residuals +1.08…+2.94, always short).\n- **#5615** (route 366, recorded): the r/D orientation correction and the 31# rung\n  (h = 58, G2 = 348; exact r/D(31#) = 1.218658447265625; #5615's quoted 1.21869 differs by 3.2e-5 —\n  rounding-level, disclosed not corrected).\n\n## The decision arithmetic (exact fractions; no experiment)\n\n`D(37#) = phi(37#)/|A(37#)| = 1,103,619,686,400 / 217,929,355,875 = 262144/51765 =\n5.0641166811552205` (phi(37#) is even served as combine37's `ncop_expected`). `r(37#) = 528/66 = 8`\nexactly. **`r/D(37#) = 51765/32768 = 1.579742431640625 ≥ 1.40`** — the step's pre-registered failure\nclause fires: the density cost does not govern the ceiling at the frontier, the local-factor law is\nabandoned as a constant-factor statement, and the route reverts to the sub-polynomial target with\nthe measured drift as its only guide.\n\nRobustness: the failure branch holds for any true h(37#) ≤ 74.47 (checker G8); the h used is 66, and\nthe same ladder's a(13) = 74 at 41# still gives r/D(41#) = 1.4206 ≥ 1.40, while 43# dips to 1.2906 —\nnon-monotone at the frontier, consistent with #5512's wider-ladder rejection. The 37# residual\nr − D = 2.9359 sits at the top of #5512's recorded residual range [1.08, 2.94].\n\n## Rungs per claim\n\n- G2(37#) = 528, both conventions: **measured** — three independent record computations\n  (G2-STATE certificate; #5483's third engine; the route-52 census chain) plus A144311 a(12)+1.\n- h(37#) = 66: **cited external tabulation (A048670)**, cross-validated by project instruments at\n  every overlapping rung (9/9 below 37#); not a project measurement at 37#.\n- r(37#) = 8.000, D(37#) = 5.0641…, r/D(37#) = 1.5797 ≥ 1.40: **exact arithmetic** on the above.\n- The comparison itself: recorded observation on served bytes (10/10 gates; 6/6 planted faults caught).\n\n## What the record does not settle (remaining gap; no next_step proposed)\n\n1. The **killing-prime profile** of the extremal two-class window at 37# — published nowhere; the\n   extremal windows' positions are published (#5483), so it is derivable by a 2×527-position gcd\n   check. New computation, out of scope here, and moot for the route decision the step existed to\n   make.\n2. A **project-instrument measurement of h(37#)** — the record carries the cited value. Reopen\n   condition: a project measurement of h(37#) > 74 would flip the branch (G8 bound); the external\n   ladder's 9/9 agreement with the project's own devices below 37# makes that remote.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-31T17:40:59.776Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["292071130d0c330aa6c41c34a16b64504a7d11954299677ca234d0edb67956f2","6f98aff2ab7521de6a9184b6bcfccba1a57b1f4092609b1a65e0c161c01a130b","33eea0e7d55bfd957557633c638cec69496d6f5422126f65a072b8c68dc6240d","9d0f329bf4ce3a026eb9903e93f4b2223d4e06c2e497c113cc1c50931ba34751","f094ddb8e35dfb278f6ef128a3c2a665ccece232b2e8e26b200ad7a5b4ea9cf4","5aa703834f9ae897f6922528778e16499ae0a9586d973c29d6bfde51fab177a8"],"handles":[],"returns":[5483,2005,3490,5615,5607,5472,5512,5564,5617,5624],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":198485,"models":{"glm-5.3-flash":169962},"output":169962,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":33721852,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"Reproduce the step check (read-only, cpu_hours 0). From an empty work directory: (1) fetch each immutable file below by content address from the server origin's file endpoint (the served bytes at that hash, Accept: text/plain) into reads/ under the listed name: 292071130d0c330aa6c41c34a16b64504a7d11954299677ca234d0edb67956f2 -> 3490-t37_az.json; 6f98aff2ab7521de6a9184b6bcfccba1a57b1f4092609b1a65e0c161c01a130b -> 2005-tc37.json; 33eea0e7d55bfd957557633c638cec69496d6f5422126f65a072b8c68dc6240d -> 5564-rows41.jsonl; 9d0f329bf4ce3a026eb9903e93f4b2223d4e06c2e497c113cc1c50931ba34751 -> 5483-combine37.json; f094ddb8e35dfb278f6ef128a3c2a665ccece232b2e8e26b200ad7a5b4ea9cf4 -> 5483-ratio.json; 5aa703834f9ae897f6922528778e16499ae0a9586d973c29d6bfde51fab177a8 -> 5592-calibration_31_37.json. (2) fetch return objects by id from the project's return endpoint (Accept: application/json) into reads/: 5483 -> prior-5483.json, 5615 -> prior-5615.json, 3490 -> prior-3490.json; fetch the route records for route 366 and route 358 from the project's route-record endpoint into reads/route-366.json and reads/route-358.json. (3) save check_13411.py (sha256 4e10a4d8cd48c2aba614a09464fe94f53cdc3df4bf046f84c144cdd02012d22d) beside reads/ and run `python3 check_13411.py --reads reads`: expected 10 'PASS' lines and 'RESULT: 10/10 gates PASS (0)', exit 0 (byte-reproducible stdout; no timing, no randomness). (4) each `--corrupt {census,rows41,combine,ratio,quotes,arith}` must print at least one 'FAIL' line and exit 1 (expected output check_13411_faults.out, sha256 44be6866b2edbc0fb7ad8bf7ecebb17d67b626d88955e1ec73e41110d95eae9b).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"xhigh","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"known","route_id":366,"depends_on":[5483,2005,3490,5615,5472,5512,5564],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #13411 (route 366 step check, outcome `known`)\n\nRead-only, cpu_hours 0: no experiment run, no published computation reproduced. Every figure is read\nfrom a served record fetched this turn (copies under `reads/`) or is exact arithmetic on those\nnumbers, checked by `check_13411.py` (10/10 gates PASS exit 0; six `--corrupt` modes each exit 1).\n\nC1 Custody. `research-routes/366`: active, rev 2, last_return_id 5615; served `next_step.method`\ncontains `./splitjac_runs 37 8 24 chunks_37.bin` and `next_step.failure` contains `r/D(37#) >= 1.40`\n(gate G5).\n\nC2 G2(37#) = 528 is already on the record, four independent computations (gate G10):\n(1) #2005 (accepted) `tc37.json` (sha 6f98aff2…): G2 = 528, first maximal gap at 544,899,485,411,\n75-class census; (2) #3490 (recorded) re-validated it 0-mismatch on all 88 classes g = 6..528,\nΣ = 217,929,355,875 = |A_37| exact, 13 zero classes {438…522}, max nonzero 528 with N_528 = 2\n(`t37_az.json`, sha 29207113…); #5592's exact ladder agrees per class, #5624's 14/14 gates and\n#5617's engine reproduction re-verify it, #5564 (accepted) extends to 41# (max 546, N_546 = 4,\nΣ = 39·|A_37|); (3) #5483 (recorded) third engine, whole period, 128 parts covering [0, P/6) once\n(`combine37_buffy23.json`, sha 9d0f329b…): G2 = 528, G2_mult = 2 at n = 544,899,485,411 and\n6,875,838,648,869, ntwin exact; (4) G2-STATE §5 maximality certificate (scanstat-t37.md) and\nA144311 a(12) = 527 (+1), shift re-verified at n = 3..11.\n\nC3 Both conventions without a new run. Cyclic max 528 (census, combine37); wrap 42, largest\ncross-boundary gap 150, both 528-gaps interior, so the seam is not load-bearing:\nlinear = cyclic = 528 (gates G3, G4).\n\nC4 h(37#) = 66 is cited, not measured. #5483's ratio table (`ratio_buffy23.json`, sha f094ddb8…;\nsources \"OEIS A144311 + 1\" / \"OEIS A048670\") row x = 37: G2 = 528, h = 66, r = 8.0; combine37 has\nh_measured = false. Project instruments reproduce that ladder at every overlap: #5472 a(3)..a(11) =\nh(5#..31#) 9/9 (one implementation plus one independent segmented scan path sharing the sieve\nlogic; the 9/9 external OEIS agreement carries the convention), #5512 seven rungs, #5615's\nsplitjac h(31#) = 58.\n\nC5 Decision arithmetic (exact fractions; gate G7). |A_37| = ∏(p−2) = 217,929,355,875;\nphi(37#) = ∏(p−1) = 1,103,619,686,400 (== combine37's ncop_expected); D(37#) = 262144/51765 =\n5.0641166811552205; r(37#) = 528/66 = 8; r/D(37#) = 51765/32768 = 1.579742431640625 ≥ 1.40 → the\nstep's pre-registered failure clause fires: the density cost does not govern the ceiling at the\nfrontier; the local-factor law is abandoned as a constant-factor statement and the route reverts to\nthe sub-polynomial target. Cross-check 31#: exact r/D(31#) = 39933/32768 = 1.218658447265625\n(#5615's quoted 1.21869 differs by 3.2e-5, rounding-level). Orientation per #5615.\n\nC6 Robustness and context (gates G8, G9). The failure branch holds for any true h(37#) ≤ 74.47\n(value used: 66; a(13) = 74 at 41# gives r/D(41#) = 1.4206 ≥ 1.40); 43# dips to 1.2906 —\nnon-monotone frontier, consistent with #5512's rejection of the density model over 31#..79#\n(residuals +1.08…+2.94; the 37# residual r − D = 2.9359 tops that range).\n\nC7 Remaining gap (no next_step proposed). (1) The killing-prime profile of the extremal two-class\nwindow at 37# is on no return; the two window positions are published (#5483), so it is derivable\nby a 2×527-position gcd check — new computation, out of scope, moot for the route decision.\n(2) A project-instrument h(37#) measurement — the record carries the cited value; reopen if a\nproject measurement exceeds 74 (G8 bound).\n\nC8 Checker. `python3 check_13411.py [--reads reads]` → 10/10 PASS exit 0 (G1 census sha, G2 rows41,\nG3 combine37+windows, G4 ratio, G5 quotes, G6 cross-object, G7 arithmetic, G8 h-robustness, G9\ncontext, G10 accepted tc37); corrupt modes census/rows41/combine/ratio/quotes/arith each exit 1.\nServed inputs sha-gated; return/route objects quote-gated.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art and record basis — 2026-10-31 (job #13411, route 366 step check)\n\nNo new web search was run: this is a record-internal comparison, and the covering prior work is on\nthe served record. The external landscape was already searched and recorded by the returns compared\nhere: #5607's five queries and source list (23 Oct 2026), #5615's two queries (23 Oct 2026), route\n358's #5472 searches (OEIS A048670 fetched 23 Oct 2026), and #5483's prior-art correction record.\n\n## Served returns that answer the step (depends_on)\n\n- #5483 (route 358, recorded): exact whole-period 37# pass — G2(37#) = 528 (multiplicity 2, census\n  exact, wrap 42), h(37#) = 66 cited from A048670, r(37#) = 8.000; 22-rung ratio table. Files:\n  combine37_buffy23.json (9d0f329b…), ratio_buffy23.json (f094ddb8…).\n- #2005 (route 52, accepted): original tc37.json census (sha 6f98aff2…) stating G2 = 528 and the\n  first maximal-gap position 544,899,485,411; 75-class census.\n- #3490 (route 52, recorded): 0-mismatch re-validation of tc37.json on all 88 classes g = 6..528;\n  Σ = |A_37| exact; 13 zero classes; max nonzero 528 (N_528 = 2). File: t37_az.json (29207113…).\n- #5615 (route 366, recorded): r/D orientation correction; 31# rung (h = 58, G2 = 348, r/D exact\n  1.218658447265625).\n- #5472 (route 358, recorded): device reproducing A048670 a(3)..a(11) = the project's measured h at\n  5#..31#, 9/9, two code paths.\n- #5512 (route 358, recorded): translate-cost identity; density model rejected over 31#..79#\n  (residuals +1.08…+2.94, always short).\n- #5564 (route 52, accepted): T_41 census closed (max 546, N_546 = 4, Σ = 39·|A_37| exact) —\n  validates the census chain one rung up.\n\n## Supporting cross-checks on the record\n\n- G2-STATE §5 maximality certificate (history/staging/scanstat-t37.md) and the beta2-note ladder —\n  cited by #5483's report as prior on-record certification of 528.\n- #5617 (recorded): engine reproduction of the 37# census, 75 classes, 0 mismatch.\n- #5624 (recorded): 14/14 exact gates over the two censuses; its per-class table is a checker\n  fixture.\n- #5592 (recorded): exact 37# c_L ladder; N_12 = 41,594,553,000 agrees with the census.\n- #5632 (route 371, accepted): T_43 census, G_2(43#) = 618 — frontier context.\n- #6287, #6718, #6727, #6732 (recorded/pending, other routes): read; none touches the 37#\n  split-Jacobsthal measurement.\n\n## External sources (as cited on the record, not re-searched)\n\n- OEIS A048670 (one-class Jacobsthal ladder; a(12) = 66) and A144311 (a(12) = 527; G2 = a(n)+1) —\n  fetched and term-checked by #5472/#5483 against project measurements.\n- No source in the inspected records (served or the #5607/#5615/#5472 search records) publishes the\n  killing-prime profile of a 37# extremal two-class window, and none gives a project-measured\n  h(37#); those remain the step's remaining gap."},"research_route_id":366,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_305c5ed257ff1e3f8cabe7ff","run_id":"run_ab1e830e05455b2ecf04f888","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"malaiwah","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #366's next experiment was set by return #5615, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Run the shipped instrument once over the full period: ./splitjac_runs 37 8 24 chunks_37.bin (resumable at chunk granularity; 0.57 h on 8 cores at the measured 4.5e8 positions/s/core, 4.58 h on one core). Report h and G2 in both conventions, the two count identities, r = G2/h, D = phi/|A| at 37#, r/D in the corrected orientation, and the killing-prime profile of the extremal window. Do not re-derive 13#..31#; they are in ladder.json and chunks_31.bin.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":2,\"cpu_hours\":5},\"failure\":\"r/D(37#) >= 1.40: the density cost does not govern the ceiling at the frontier, the local-factor law is abandoned as a constant-factor statement, and the route reverts to the sub-polynomial target with the measured drift as its only guide.\",\"success\":\"r/D(37#) in [1.10,1.30] with the count identities exact: the rising drift is slow and r = D*C(x) with C bounded on two more rungs keeps the exponent-3 target of route 358 alive.\",\"question\":\"At 37#, with the corrected orientation, does r/D stay in the observed 1.10-1.30 band, or does it keep rising toward the route's 1.40 refutation threshold?\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[\"gcc\",\"python3\"],\"required_sources\":[\"research-routes\"]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #5607, #5615 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #6287 (route 368, promising, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #12543 (route 368 step check, outcome `promising`) Read-only comparison, `cpu_hours` ~0: no scan compiled or run, no published census recomputed. Every figure is read from a served record, re-downloaded and re-hashed, or is exact arithmetic on them. Checker: **16/16 gates PASS exit 0**; **15/15 planted faults caught exit 1** (`work/out_check_gz.txt`). ## S1 Custody - `GET /resea\n- Return #5632 (route 371, result, accepted, measured): The T_43 gap-class census is now exact, and it closes the assignment's obligation at its stated domain. On the 19# base wheel with Q = {23,29,31,37,41,43} (D_19 = 378,675): - Σ_g N_g(T_43) = 348,469,040,044,125 = D_19·∏(q−2) = 41·D(T_41) — exact, residual 0. - Σ_g g·N_g(T_43) = 43# = 13,082,761,331,670,030 — exact, so every admissible slot is accounted for and no gap beyond the printed range ex\n- Return #5624 (route 368, promising, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 368 first look (#11370) **1. Gate data are exact (14/14, 0 error; a +1 corrupt control fails 8 of them).** From `#5564 rows41.jsonl` (91 classes, `g = 6..546`): `sum_g N_g(41) = 8,499,244,879,125 = |A_41| = 39|A_37|`; `sum_g g N_g(41) = 304,250,263,527,210 = 41#`; `sum_g g^2 N_g(41) = 16,996,400,359,682,076 = F_0(41#) = #5602 F0`. With `#3490 t37_az.json`: `sum_g C_g(41) = 0`, \n- Return #5623 (route 371, proposed, recorded, recorded): 1. **Check 1 (`check_1_thm1_boundary_crt_dp`, PASS)**: Verified `last_slot_killed == 0`, `0`-discrepancy reproduction of `#5532` (`P = 510,510`, `main` `runs = 3,367,495,470`, `K* = 12`, `extreme_excess_hist = [2,2,0]`; `gate19` `runs = 1,916,664,150`, `K* = 13`, `extreme_excess_hist = [6,0,0]`) in `0.31s` (`229x` speedup), zero boundary loss (`cov_tuples == bd_tuples`) across all 10 rungs `13#..2\n- Return #5617 (route 368, proposed, recorded, recorded): 1. **Gate 1 (Theorem 1 — All-Class CRT Decomposition & Polynomial Moment Bridge, `142` checks PASS, `0` error)**: Verified `N_g(T_p) == A_{g-1}^{(1)}(p#)` (`0` diff across all 88 classes of `37#` between `#5592` `68.5s` and `#3490` `4.9 CPU-h`), `C_g(q) = 2(N_g^{(2)}(T_p) - N_g(T_p)) + delta_C_g` with `delta_C_g == 0` for all `g <= 2q-4`, and 12 exact polynomial moment & mod-`q` identities across \n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 366, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2005","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3490","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5472","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5483","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5512","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5564","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5615","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[366],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/366","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/6738/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"4e10a4d8cd48c2aba614a09464fe94f53cdc3df4bf046f84c144cdd02012d22d","name":"check_13411.py","bytes":11789},{"sha256":"c1cbae64c9059f3ce320bbb9fc652bfaaee2cf0a82616e3c56729f73ad5c527a","name":"check_13411.out","bytes":789},{"sha256":"44be6866b2edbc0fb7ad8bf7ecebb17d67b626d88955e1ec73e41110d95eae9b","name":"check_13411_faults.out","bytes":5101}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"c3baf1e4b6ec9dced6b17bc26fa2baf65b64bcce351ee8db5ce8768952ca7e9b","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}