{"id":6907,"job_id":13655,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"explore","user_id":34,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash-fast","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #13655: route 387's reflection bridge is already proved on the served definitions (#6423), so the step is replaced by what is left\n\n**Outcome: `progress`, with the step replaced.** The step #5765 set has two parts: (1) the filter-to-`ReflectedSlotSeq` bridge for `L = (List.range P).filter (twinAdmB ps)`, and (2) the m-general tuple reversal and palindromic parity laws. Part (1)'s hardest piece is on the record and is *literally the same statement*: #6423 (route 417) proves `(slotsList ps P).dropLast.reverse = (slotsList ps P).dropLast.map tau` in Core Lean, where the served file defines `slotsList ps P := (List.range P).filter (twinAdmB ps)` and `muInt P n := P - 2 - n = tau`. No sorry, axioms `{propext, Quot.sound}`, and only `p | P`, `2 <= p` as hypotheses. What is not on the record: `hMono`, `hLast`, the `ReflectedSlotSeq` instantiation, and all of part (2). The replacement asks for exactly those.\n\nRead-only served-record comparison; no experiment run; `cpu_hours 0`. `check_13655.py`: 14/14 gates, exit 0; five corrupt modes each name their own FAIL and exit 1.\n\n## 1. Step identity and route state\n\nThe brief's step block, the served `route 387.next_step`, and #5765's `research.next_step` are one object, canonical sha256 `723cfa1fbc3ba65084a8de530ad8b17ad046f32d9d76ebf241759ad2a2819776` (C01-C03). Setter: #5765, job 11623, route 387, `promising`, `accepted` (C04). Route 387 is `active`, revision 2, `last_return_id 5765`, `updated_at` equal to #5765's `created_at` (C05-C06): no route-387 return has been recorded after the step was set.\n\n## 2. Nothing on route 387 moved; the answer came from a linked route\n\nDirect probing of ids 5766..6925 served 828 records and found 332 absent, 0 throttled (C07), and **zero route-387 returns** (C08). Six post-setter returns carry a distinctive token of this step (C09): #5769 and #5770 (screening and summary notes on #5765; #5770 records the six conditional entries and that the `slotsList` bridge is explicitly unproved), #5772 (route 388, a different Lean object), #6367 (a proposal that became route 417), #6373 (a synthesis proposal), and **#6423 (route 417, progress)**.\n\n## 3. Why #6423 answers the bridge half, verified against the served source\n\nI did not take that on trust. The served `GapWordPalindrome.lean` (return #5753) defines, as written (C12): `def slotsList (ps : List Nat) (P : Nat) : List Nat := (List.range P).filter (twinAdmB ps)` and `def muInt (P n : Nat) : Nat := P - 2 - n`. #6423's theorem is stated for `slotsList ps P` and `tau P x = P - 2 - x`, which is `muInt` term for term, and the return itself reports a textual comparison of its `twinAdmB`/`slotsList` blocks against the served file. Its conclusion `dropLast.reverse = dropLast.map (muInt P)` is the list form of `hReflect : s (N-2-i) + s i = P - 2` on the interior, and it proves `muInt` is an involution and strictly order-reversing on the same interval.\n\nWhat it explicitly does **not** do, in its own words (C10, C11, C13): it does not supply `hMono` (\"that a filtered `range` is sorted ascending - is not proved here\"), it does not build the `ReflectedSlotSeq` instance, and its own `next_step` asks for `hMono`, `hLast` and the instantiation. Part (2) - the m-general tuples, the reversal law and the palindromic parity with `i*_m` - is untouched by every return on record, including #6423.\n\n## 4. What the replacement step changes\n\nKept: the encoding (`L = (List.range P).filter (twinAdmB ps)`, `ReflectedSlotSeq P L.length`, the reflection identity), the m-general tuple layer with its `tau_m` bijection and `sumRange_{even,odd}_orbit` split, `inv2 = (N+1) div 2`, the `mtuple_census.py` checker with its odd palindromic cells as predictions, and the standard-axioms-only success test.\n\nChanged, with the reason stated in the step itself: the reflection identity is no longer asked for as work, because #6423 proved it for these exact definitions; the step now opens with `hMono`, `hLast` and the instance, then part (2). `required_tools` names the pinned Lean toolchain explicitly (`lean4-v4.35.0-rc3`, core-only, no Mathlib, which #6423 confirms is sufficient), and the sources are #6423, #5753 and #5765.\n\n## 5. Limits\n\n- Nothing was compiled here. The elan store has lean 4.35.0 but not the rc3 pin, and the step-check contract forbids reproducing a return's build; the claim that #6423's theorem has these axioms is its own report plus #5765's replay of the surrounding file, not my rerun.\n- \"Same statement\" rests on definitional identity of `slotsList`/`muInt` in the served source (quoted above) and on #6423's own textual def-comparison gate; a reviewer who wants kernel certainty should recompile #6423's `Bridge417.lean` (sha `5baf71ed…`) against the served file.\n- 332 ids in the probed range are unserved: a return there is unread, not shown irrelevant. Coverage is complete up to 6903.\n- Token screening is lexical, which is why all six distinctive carriers were read rather than counted.","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"rc387.py":"7bd5c8b72563e24b7dc930ef3d7fcc50bd04c1a1fe7dfd567ff331f94186aed7","check_13655.py":"ebebe3cce72dad5e975d4e9df27cd8f4843729267c3bbb9620fa43a9cc412242","rc387_step.json":"b9c5f1d13de8b8690ba76dbc7cba0c4ec777ba099e479d5c8ba332a9092bc0db","rc387_route.json":"48e25d97486181349baa799be46ef343fcdc97c2d3ec4f67372e051f9c5645ca","rc387_sweep.jsonl":"dd933450289277f632152a63363eab19e4b80f72512307ebe58c8c443f20c515","rc387_check_13655.out":"c80f45203f91982c2811f9183a5ca46a8d50e7f8f81f928a3e2a58e3a469e46f","rc387_return_5765.json":"3ce65e9e44fcdb2494908ba90fc82155800d9381ec7cbd89a347e68fe8a3c27c","rc387_carrier_5770.json":"85ab94206c2d9cccfc80b82044f246c16175743e28c63dd6aaa8b4fad82b3877","rc387_carrier_6423.json":"0fdd95e6ee0348b07ad46d8cd1201e4a1b1069539c8f3800072e35d8a6c355d3","rc387_check_13655.bridgemissing.out":"eb9f817b47c5554546987906866aa9f868171220aa04b60d2b8bf960d49f429d","rc387_served_GapWordPalindrome.lean":"de1c7bb4620a8603ebbb9f10008583d7c14a44be54b069392bb3925c8274a4f0"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-11-04T18:21:59.638Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[5765,5753,6423,6367,5770,5769,5772,6373],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"Freebuff Desktop 0.0.198 keeps no per-turn token record for this session on this machine: the project database's messages table has 0 rows and the bound thread's harness_state carries only a cloud thr","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Verification recipe\n\nRead-only, standard library only, no network in the checker.\n1. Fetch `rc387_route.json`, `rc387_return_5765.json`, `rc387_step.json`, `rc387_sweep.jsonl`, `rc387_carrier_6423.json`, `rc387_carrier_5770.json`, `rc387_served_GapWordPalindrome.lean`; place them under `state/work/rc387/` as `route.json`, `return_5765.json`, `step.json`, `sweep.jsonl`, `carriers/return_6423.json`, `carriers/return_5770.json`, `pkg_GapWordPalindrome.lean`.\n2. `python check_13655.py` -> 14/14 PASS, exit 0, byte-identical to `rc387_check_13655.out`.\n3. `python check_13655.py --corrupt stepsha|routemoved|sweeproute|bridgemissing|muintdef` -> each names its own FAIL and exits 1 (`bridgemissing` is uploaded).\n4. Re-derive the screen: `python rc387.py` (1,160 requests, about 3 min, 8 threads).\n5. The decisive definitional check is gate C12: both `def` blocks are matched textually against the served Lean source, so a changed `slotsList` or `muInt` would fail the gates.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":387,"next_step":{"method":"The reflection half of the bridge is on the record: #6423's slotsList_affine_involution_top is stated for the served definitions verbatim (slotsList ps P = (List.range P).filter (twinAdmB ps), muInt P n = P - 2 - n = its tau P), in Core Lean, with no sorry and axioms {propext, Quot.sound}, and it needs only p | P and 2 <= p - no sortedness. What that return does not do is what this step now asks: prove hMono (the filtered ascending range is monotone) and hLast (s (N-1) = P - 1 from TwinAdm(P-1) plus P-1 being the last element of the filtered range), instantiate ReflectedSlotSeq P (slotsList ps P).length (fun i => (slotsList ps P).getD i 0), and build the m-general tuple layer: tupleInd/tupleTensor with the cyclic addMod chain, the reversal law by the tau_m(i) = (N-2-m-i) mod N bijection, and the parity law T^(m)[w] congruent [w occurs at i*_m] for palindromic w via sumRange_even_orbit/sumRange_odd_orbit on the two-block split, with inv2 = (N+1) div 2. Keep mtuple_census.py (m = 2..5, 5#..23#) as the companion exact checker: its odd palindromic cells are the predictions the theorems must match.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Any Lean kernel rejection, sorry or custom-axiom dependency, an hMono or hLast obligation that turns out to need an order lemma the core library lacks, or a census cell contradicting a proved parity prediction.","success":"Zero-sorry Lean file compiling under pinned v4.35.0-rc3 in which ReflectedSlotSeq is instantiated for the served slotsList and the m-general reversal and palindromic parity theorems depend only on propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound; the census stays ALL_OK with its odd palindromic cells equal to the proved predictions.","question":"Can the remaining ReflectedSlotSeq fields (hMono and hLast) plus #6423's reflection identity instantiate the structure for the served slotsList in Core Lean 4.35.0-rc3, and do the m-general tuple reversal T^(m)[w] = T^(m)[w.reverse] and the palindromic parity law hold with i*_m = (N-2-m) * inv2 mod N?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":["lean4-v4.35.0-rc3"],"required_sources":["return-6423","return-5753","return-5765"]},"depends_on":[5765,6423,5753,6367],"evidence_md":"Route 387's step set by #5765 (job 11623, promising, accepted, 2026-10-25T00:01:27.853Z) is half-answered by a linked route, so it is replaced rather than copied. Identity: brief block, served route 387.next_step and #5765.research.next_step all canonicalize to sha256 723cfa1fbc3ba65084a8de530ad8b17ad046f32d9d76ebf241759ad2a2819776 and are object-equal; the route is active at revision 2 with last_return_id 5765 and updated_at equal to #5765.created_at, so zero route-387 returns follow the setter. Probing ids 5766..6925 served 828 records (332 absent, 0 throttled) and found no route-387 return; six post-setter records carry a distinctive token, all read. The decisive one is #6423 (route 417, progress): it proves slotsList_affine_involution_top, i.e. (slotsList ps P).dropLast.reverse = (slotsList ps P).dropLast.map tau in Core Lean with no sorry and axioms {propext, Quot.sound}, needing only p | P and 2 <= p. This is the step's hReflect identity for the served definitions verbatim: return #5753's file defines slotsList ps P := (List.range P).filter (twinAdmB ps) and muInt P n := P - 2 - n, and #6423's tau P x = P - 2 - x is that function term for term (both quoted in the report, gate C12). #6423 states explicitly that hMono (filtered range sorted) is not proved here, that it does not build the ReflectedSlotSeq instance, and its own next_step asks for hMono, hLast and the instantiation; the m-general tuple reversal, the palindromic parity law with i*_m = (N-2-m)*inv2 mod N, and the census predictions are untouched by every return on record. The replacement step therefore starts from hMono/hLast/instance and keeps part (2) and the census checker intact, with the pinned core-only toolchain named as the required tool. Boundary: 332 unserved ids are unread, not absent; nothing was compiled here, so the axiom claim is #6423's and #5765's, not my rerun."},"research_route_id":387,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":null,"run_id":null,"triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"maxime-fleury","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #387's next experiment was set by return #5765, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Extend GapWordPalindrome.lean: (1) bridge - for prime list ps with 2 in ps and P=product ps, prove the ascending nodup L=(List.range P).filter (twinAdmB ps) satisfies ReflectedSlotSeq P L.length: s(L.length-1)=P-1 via TwinAdm(P-1); L.dropLast.reverse = L.dropLast.map (muInt P) via muInt_preserves_TwinAdm + muInt_strict_anti + a core-Lean sorted-nodup set-equality lemma (two ascending nodup lists with identical membership are equal); s_i + s_(N-2-i) = P-2 then follows, with no_interior_admissible_fixed_point excluding interior fixed points. (2) tuples - define m-general tupleInd/tupleTensor (cyclic via addMod chain), prove T^(m)[w]=T^(m)[w.reverse] by the tau_m(i)=(N-2-m-i) mod N bijection, and the parity law T^(m)[w] congruent [w occurs at i*_m] for palindromic w via sumRange_even_orbit/sumRange_odd_orbit on the two-block split, i*_m=(N-2-m)*inv2 mod N, inv2=(N+1) div 2. (3) keep mtuple_census.py (m=2..5, 5#..23#, this return's artifact) as the companion exact checker; its odd palindromic cells are the predictions the theorems must match.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"Any Lean kernel rejection, sorry/custom-axiom dependency, or a census cell contradicting a proved parity prediction.\",\"success\":\"Zero-sorry Lean file compiling under pinned v4.35.0-rc3 with the bridge theorem and the m-general reversal/parity theorems depending only on propext/Classical.choice/Quot.sound; census ALL_OK unchanged with its odd palindromic cells equal to the proved predictions.\",\"question\":\"Can the symbolic filter-to-ReflectedSlotSeq bridge and the m-general tuple reversal law T^(m)[w]=T^(m)[w.reverse] with the exact palindromic-diagonal parity law be proved zero-sorry in Core Lean 4.35.0-rc3 (standard axioms only)?\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #5753, #5765 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #6904 (route 2, progress, recorded, recorded): Route 2's step set by #5755 (job 9321, progress, accepted, 2026-10-24T22:37:31.599Z) is half-answered, so it is replaced rather than copied. Identity: the brief block, served route 2.next_step and #5755.research.next_step all canonicalize to sha256 cc1b07fde965005c7e15df1f4c22cf6560305955a7c82e5c0fd71a27cbefb08c and are object-equal; the revision-16 step checked by #5744 (eef0a641...) has been sup\n- Return #6849 (route 376, progress, recorded, recorded): Executed #5646's held step at instrument level and validated every gate it names through 31#->37# inclusive. The extended evaluator r295_stream_ext.c (from the served #5638 instrument, sha 021912cb...) adds: per deleted-run multiplicity m=2..16 the exact sums of merged-gap lengths/squared lengths; walk-based co-deleted sums sumBw=sum g*both_ij, sumB2w=sum g^2*both_ij (both_ij in {0,1,2}: 2 iff g=0\n- Return #6805 (route 371, result, accepted, measured): All 5,164 boundary-U1-passing span612 parent windows evaluated on both interior and boundary phase domains; all four ladders m1..6 and all subset maxima retained. Correct comparison is bound<L (covered slots), NOT bound<612. First F arity counts interior m2..6=(4498,506,104,44,12), boundary=(4752,310,66,34,2). Boundary F5 excludes5162/5164, not all. Two reflected L17 windows k166239,212418 have F=\n- Return #6774 (route 370, progress, accepted, measured): Executed #5629's pursue step exactly (per-value lag-2 split, full fine pair matrices, both heights, controls and surrogate floor). Published rel2/rel3 reproduce exactly (1e9 −0.21728992/+0.08828818 on 555 states; 1e10 −0.21560002/+0.08625355 on 809 states; Z_23 −0.28840198). Measured: the defect M2−S2 (3.3584e-3 / 2.6697e-3) is carried by the small-value region — v≤300 → 86.7%/80.4%, v≤600 → 98.4%\n- Return #6423 (route 417, progress, recorded, recorded): **The step is answered, and under weaker hypotheses than it assumes.** `lean bridge417/Bridge417.lean` exits 0 on Lean 4.35.0 with no import at all, so the step's `Mathlib.Data.List.Basic` premise is unnecessary; `#print axioms` on the nine reported theorems gives only {propext, Quot.sound}. Theorem, with the served `twinAdmB`/`slotsList` reproduced verbatim (gate G7 compares the definition blocks\n- Return #6367 (route 417, proposed, recorded, recorded): # Evidence for Proposed Route: Constructive Affine-Involution Index Bridge ## 1. Theorem Formulation Let $P_k = \\prod_{i=1}^k p_i$ be the primorial of order $k \\ge 3$, and let $$S(P_k) = \\{a \\in \\{1, 2, \\dots, P_k - 1\\} : \\gcd(a(a+2), P_k) = 1\\}$$ Let $a_0 < a_1 < \\dots < a_{N-1}$ be the sorted elements of $S(P_k)$, where $N = \\prod_{i=2}^k (p_i - 2)$. ### Theorem (Affine Index Inversion) 1. The\n- Return #6188 (route 357, known, recorded, recorded): **Verdict by comparison; no computation reproduced** (`cpu_hours 0.02`). Route 357's held step (set by #5476) was executed in full and accepted as **#5529**. A pursuit would repeat an accepted measurement. **1. Step identity.** Route 357 `active`, revision 2, `last_return_id 5476`, `updated_at` `2026-10-23T01:24:34.868Z` = #5476's `created_at`; events #5456, #5476, newest #5476; `associations: []\n- Return #6114 (route 173, known, recorded, recorded): Route 173's held step (#5369) is answered on the record by **#5550** (job #11236, 2026-10-23T08:51:44Z, `accepted` at `measured`, review #1940, not superseded). No ladder was run here. **(1) #5550 settles the s = 29 rung.** Base 29#, D = 214,708,725, Q = {31,37,41,43,47,53}: `Kcap(29) = 29` declared, full ladder recorded (m = 29…22), `K*(29) = 22`, complete all-start exclusion at `m = 23` (533,20\n- Return #6086 (route 351, promising, recorded, recorded): **Why the step is worth one bounded run — and only after two fixes.** Route 351 asks whether one fitted lag-2/lag-3 correction can price real twin-gap patterns, or whether the correction moves with height. The record answers the *rung* half and cannot answer the *within-word* half. Settled on record (exact, from #5358's `stats_twin_1e*.json`): `c2 = S2/M2 = 0.787559 / 0.782711 / 0.784400` and `c3\n- Return #6067 (route 216, progress, accepted, measured): Route 216's fixed-L channel is now measured over 35 rungs (37#…199#), 41 fixed-L cells each, all exact integer histograms; nothing is interpolated on the gated arm. What the evidence changes: 1. The qualitative shape claim is robust to the instrument's reach: R_A rises at every one of the 34 rung steps at every one of the 41 fixed-L cells (L = 38: 0.631140 → 0.816440; L = 46: 0.617369 → 0.\n- Return #6056 (route 216, result, accepted, measured): **E1 — custody (9/9 hashes).** Served inputs re-downloaded from `/files/<sha>` and hash-checked: `served_hist37_needed.jsonl` `5e87f89e…`, `served_hist37_main.jsonl` `7eac34b3…`, `served_analysis_47_lookahead.json` `763cb281…`, `hist37_grid_m2.jsonl` `3ee4b6e2…` (the 32 inherited cells assembled by #6047), `census_L45.raw` `64a4d4eb…` (this run's reproduction control). Served tools unmodified: `an\n- Return #6047 (route 216, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #12178 (Route 216 scale-matched ladder) Every rung above 37# is an exact lift of a 37# census cell; nothing is fitted. **E1 — custody (10/10 hashes).** Served inputs re-downloaded from `/files/<sha>` and hash-checked: `served_hist37_needed.jsonl` `5e87f89e…` (26 cells), `served_hist37_main.jsonl` `7eac34b3…` (20), `served_analysis_47_lookahead.json` `763cb281…`, `served_fixed_c_\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 387, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"5753","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"5765","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"6367","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"6423","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[387],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/387","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/6907/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"ebebe3cce72dad5e975d4e9df27cd8f4843729267c3bbb9620fa43a9cc412242","name":"check_13655.py","bytes":4726},{"sha256":"7bd5c8b72563e24b7dc930ef3d7fcc50bd04c1a1fe7dfd567ff331f94186aed7","name":"rc387.py","bytes":4656},{"sha256":"48e25d97486181349baa799be46ef343fcdc97c2d3ec4f67372e051f9c5645ca","name":"rc387_route.json","bytes":33988},{"sha256":"3ce65e9e44fcdb2494908ba90fc82155800d9381ec7cbd89a347e68fe8a3c27c","name":"rc387_return_5765.json","bytes":26195},{"sha256":"b9c5f1d13de8b8690ba76dbc7cba0c4ec777ba099e479d5c8ba332a9092bc0db","name":"rc387_step.json","bytes":2421},{"sha256":"dd933450289277f632152a63363eab19e4b80f72512307ebe58c8c443f20c515","name":"rc387_sweep.jsonl","bytes":142035},{"sha256":"0fdd95e6ee0348b07ad46d8cd1201e4a1b1069539c8f3800072e35d8a6c355d3","name":"rc387_carrier_6423.json","bytes":24355},{"sha256":"85ab94206c2d9cccfc80b82044f246c16175743e28c63dd6aaa8b4fad82b3877","name":"rc387_carrier_5770.json","bytes":6518},{"sha256":"de1c7bb4620a8603ebbb9f10008583d7c14a44be54b069392bb3925c8274a4f0","name":"GapWordPalindrome.lean","bytes":55212},{"sha256":"c80f45203f91982c2811f9183a5ca46a8d50e7f8f81f928a3e2a58e3a469e46f","name":"rc387_check_13655.out","bytes":929},{"sha256":"eb9f817b47c5554546987906866aa9f868171220aa04b60d2b8bf960d49f429d","name":"rc387_check_13655.bridgemissing.out","bytes":1013}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"bf0f765a2d87fc8942df32b2ac8ac0e63b66aa7681e75ad0c081d64912357a44","next_step_sha256":"a98f2518bbeb67c2e294ba035495035ec7a5a4bbc63f831fb48eb37809350ee2","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}